Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm a little confused again.
Setting up a 1624 tube for cathode biasing and also need to create a center tap for keying to ground. The book says 610 ohms at my voltage. So would I use a pair of 1200 ohm resistors in this case? My logic is since there is not a separate cathode then the two R in parallel would raise the filament 'cathode' 600 ohms above B-minus. TIA and Merry Christmas, Bill |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill M wrote:
I'm a little confused again. Setting up a 1624 tube for cathode biasing and also need to create a center tap for keying to ground. The book says 610 ohms at my voltage. So would I use a pair of 1200 ohm resistors in this case? My logic is since there is not a separate cathode then the two R in parallel would raise the filament 'cathode' 600 ohms above B-minus. TIA and Merry Christmas, Bill (Disclaimer -- I haven't done this. It's just knowledge gotten from lots of books, and lots of solid-state circuit design experience). No, because all the filament voltage will go to mildly heating up the resistors, and none will go to wildly heating up the filament. Use a center-tapped filament transformer, and put the 600 ohm resistor between its center tap and ground. If necessary, use a separate transformer just for the 1624s. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Do you need to implement control loops in software? "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" gives you just what it says. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill M wrote:
I'm a little confused again. Setting up a 1624 tube for cathode biasing and also need to create a center tap for keying to ground. The book says 610 ohms at my voltage. So would I use a pair of 1200 ohm resistors in this case? My logic is since there is not a separate cathode then the two R in parallel would raise the filament 'cathode' 600 ohms above B-minus. TIA and Merry Christmas, Bill If the tube filament is running on AC then a resistor from the transformer winding center tap to ground would do the job. If the filament winding isn't center tapped, then two resistors form the center tap. Usually two low ohm resistors (say 22 ohms) are used with a third resistor to ground for the cathode bias from the junction of the two resistors. You could just use two larger resistors as you suggest, but in the case of an audio amplifier how would you bypass it with a capacitor? (use TWO capacitors). If the tube filament is running on AC then the problem is compounded since you might not be able to isolate the filament supply from ground. Guess battery operated radios used C batteries. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Wescott wrote:
Bill M wrote: I'm a little confused again. Setting up a 1624 tube for cathode biasing and also need to create a center tap for keying to ground. The book says 610 ohms at my voltage. So would I use a pair of 1200 ohm resistors in this case? My logic is since there is not a separate cathode then the two R in parallel would raise the filament 'cathode' 600 ohms above B-minus. TIA and Merry Christmas, Bill (Disclaimer -- I haven't done this. It's just knowledge gotten from lots of books, and lots of solid-state circuit design experience). No, because all the filament voltage will go to mildly heating up the resistors, and none will go to wildly heating up the filament. Use a center-tapped filament transformer, and put the 600 ohm resistor between its center tap and ground. If necessary, use a separate transformer just for the 1624s. If his un-centertapped filament winding is ONLY supplying that one tube and he has each leg going to ground through a 1200 ohm resistor that would result in a 600 ohm connection to ground. So it should work. Remember that's 2400 ohms across the filament, it won't suck up much heater current at all. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill M" wrote in message ... I'm a little confused again. Setting up a 1624 tube for cathode biasing and also need to create a center tap for keying to ground. The book says 610 ohms at my voltage. So would I use a pair of 1200 ohm resistors in this case? Correct, both resistors would essentially be in parallel, and from the hot cathode to ground. Using two resistors would help balance out the 60 cycle hum as an added benefit, which is what I assume you're trying to accomplish. Pete |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 24, 8:58 pm, Bill M wrote:
I'm a little confused again. Setting up a 1624 tube for cathode biasing and also need to create a center tap for keying to ground. The book says 610 ohms at my voltage. So would I use a pair of 1200 ohm resistors in this case? My logic is since there is not a separate cathode then the two R in parallel would raise the filament 'cathode' 600 ohms above B-minus. TIA and Merry Christmas, Bill hey OM: Exactly and you will need at least 10 watts of resistors to be safe. Because they also will have to handle plate, grid1, grid2, and the current they draw across the filament. I suppose if they where wire wound like 25 watt you could stick a ferrite rod in their hole and make them your filament chokes also. But if you use carbon comp resistors then part of your drive will go heating those resistors, so not much gain going on there. 73 OM n8zu |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 25, 12:46 pm, raypsi wrote:
On Dec 24, 8:58 pm, Bill M wrote: I'm a little confused again. Setting up a 1624 tube for cathode biasing and also need to create a center tap for keying to ground. The book says 610 ohms at my voltage. So would I use a pair of 1200 ohm resistors in this case? My logic is since there is not a separate cathode then the two R in parallel would raise the filament 'cathode' 600 ohms above B-minus. TIA and Merry Christmas, Bill hey OM: Exactly and you will need at least 10 watts of resistors to be safe. Because they also will have to handle plate, grid1, grid2, and the current they draw across the filament. I suppose if they where wire wound like 25 watt you could stick a ferrite rod in their hole and make them your filament chokes also. But if you use carbon comp resistors then part of your drive will go heating those resistors, so not much gain going on there. 73 OM n8zu Well they ain't filament chokes, but in the drive circuit the drive signal won't go to heating them up if they are chokes. So they will only be taking about 1 mil of current from the filament circuit. 73 n8zu |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
raypsi wrote:
On Dec 25, 12:46 pm, raypsi wrote: On Dec 24, 8:58 pm, Bill M wrote: I'm a little confused again. Setting up a 1624 tube for cathode biasing and also need to create a center tap for keying to ground. The book says 610 ohms at my voltage. So would I use a pair of 1200 ohm resistors in this case? My logic is since there is not a separate cathode then the two R in parallel would raise the filament 'cathode' 600 ohms above B-minus. TIA and Merry Christmas, Bill hey OM: Exactly and you will need at least 10 watts of resistors to be safe. Because they also will have to handle plate, grid1, grid2, and the current they draw across the filament. I suppose if they where wire wound like 25 watt you could stick a ferrite rod in their hole and make them your filament chokes also. But if you use carbon comp resistors then part of your drive will go heating those resistors, so not much gain going on there. 73 OM n8zu Well they ain't filament chokes, but in the drive circuit the drive signal won't go to heating them up if they are chokes. So they will only be taking about 1 mil of current from the filament circuit. 73 n8zu One possible problem. If this is an RF amplifier circuit you probably want to use NON-INDUCTIVE resistors in the circuit or they WILL act as chokes! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 11:03:48 -0500, ken scharf wrote:
Tim Wescott wrote: Bill M wrote: I'm a little confused again. Setting up a 1624 tube for cathode biasing and also need to create a center tap for keying to ground. The book says 610 ohms at my voltage. So would I use a pair of 1200 ohm resistors in this case? My logic is since there is not a separate cathode then the two R in parallel would raise the filament 'cathode' 600 ohms above B-minus. TIA and Merry Christmas, Bill (Disclaimer -- I haven't done this. It's just knowledge gotten from lots of books, and lots of solid-state circuit design experience). No, because all the filament voltage will go to mildly heating up the resistors, and none will go to wildly heating up the filament. Use a center-tapped filament transformer, and put the 600 ohm resistor between its center tap and ground. If necessary, use a separate transformer just for the 1624s. If his un-centertapped filament winding is ONLY supplying that one tube and he has each leg going to ground through a 1200 ohm resistor that would result in a 600 ohm connection to ground. So it should work. Remember that's 2400 ohms across the filament, it won't suck up much heater current at all. Sorry. I was visualizing the 1200 ohms each in series with the transformer, whose center tap is grounded. Of course the alternate way makes perfect sense. And here it is too late to ask Santa for more brains for Christmas. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Do you need to implement control loops in software? "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" gives you just what it says. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "ken scharf" wrote in message .. . raypsi wrote: On Dec 25, 12:46 pm, raypsi wrote: On Dec 24, 8:58 pm, Bill M wrote: I'm a little confused again. Setting up a 1624 tube for cathode biasing and also need to create a center tap for keying to ground. The book says 610 ohms at my voltage. So would I use a pair of 1200 ohm resistors in this case? My logic is since there is not a separate cathode then the two R in parallel would raise the filament 'cathode' 600 ohms above B-minus. TIA and Merry Christmas, Bill hey OM: Exactly and you will need at least 10 watts of resistors to be safe. Because they also will have to handle plate, grid1, grid2, and the current they draw across the filament. I suppose if they where wire wound like 25 watt you could stick a ferrite rod in their hole and make them your filament chokes also. But if you use carbon comp resistors then part of your drive will go heating those resistors, so not much gain going on there. 73 OM n8zu Well they ain't filament chokes, but in the drive circuit the drive signal won't go to heating them up if they are chokes. So they will only be taking about 1 mil of current from the filament circuit. 73 n8zu One possible problem. If this is an RF amplifier circuit you probably want to use NON-INDUCTIVE resistors in the circuit or they WILL act as chokes! Would that make a difference? I'd also assume there's two RF cathode bypass caps in there; otherwise the circuit would be extremely degenerative. Pete |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Old B&K model 440 Cathode Rejuvenator Tester (CRT) | Boatanchors | |||
Cathode Ray Tubes | Homebrew | |||
recording spots directly on cd? | Broadcasting | |||
443a cold cathode tube | Homebrew | |||
443a cold cathode tube | Homebrew |