Wasn't this the basis of the TNS?

If so, it worked on impulse noise above the slow AGC level.

The ANC-4 doesn't even let the noise into the first RF stage!!

DD, W1MCE

Crazy George wrote:

Jason:

Very similar to what you are describing is popularly known as a "Noise
Blanker" Motorola introduced their design for mobile radios in 1959 as an
"Extender" In the same time frame, Collins offered a model for the S-Line
and KWM-2. I designed a tube model for GE's Progress Line radios, and I
forget who designed the solid state version. The concept has been described
in numerous places, so do a bibliographic search of Engineering Index, or
Scientific Abstracts, or whatever that school has access to. You also need
to familiarize yourself with the concepts involved in noise balanced
squelch, which was patented by Motorola back in the late 30s or early 40s.
It will tell you how to do the audio noise level measurement meaningfully
and apply it usefully.

--
Crazy George
Remove NO and SPAM from return address
"Jason Hsu" wrote in message
om...

THE BIG QUESTION: How do you measure the audio noise level in a
receiver? Does anyone here know of any circuits that show the overall
audio noise level?

Let me tell you what this is all about.

SIDE NOTE: Thanks again to those of you who helped me with the
SWR/wattmeter project I worked on last semester. This project taught
me more about ferrite cores, op amps, and diodes than ANY class
possibly could. I learned about stray capacitance and what rails
mean. I also learned that not all 1N34A diodes are alike.

In this coming semester, I will be working on an even more ambitious
project - an automatic noise canceller for 160m to 10m. It will
definitely be a control system, and it may even use DSP. The device
will also require a motor for automatically adjusting the controls.
The idea is to design and build an automatic version of the Timewave
ANC-4 or the MFJ-1025/1026 RF noise cancellers.

The ANC-4 and MFJ-1025/1026 are manual devices. There are automatic
noise cancellation devices, but their adjustments are at the audio
level rather than the RF level.

The back panel of my device will contain:
1. Connector for the signal antenna
2. Connector for the transceiver
3. Connector for the noise antenna
4. DC power connector

The front panel of my device will contain:
1. Power switch and the obligatory idiot light to show that the power
is on
2. 2 audio connectors: one connects to the transceiver, and the other
connects to an external speaker
3. Frequency range control for choosing the inductance values, as the
proper inductance values in the RF noise cancelling circuit varies
with frequency
4. Phase range knob so that the phase shifter can cover all 360
degrees
5. Manual noise phase knob
6. Manual noise gain knob
7. LED display to show the noise level
8. Noise phase adjustment push-button: Pressing this button activates
the control system to adjust the phase shift of the noise.
9. Noise gain adjustment button: Pressing this button activates the
control system to adjust the gain of the noise.

Other features:
1. I need to design my automatic noise canceller so that parts won't
blow up if I transmit 100W through it. This probably requires some
type of automatic bypass circuitry.
2. Transmitted power must not reach the noise antenna (at least not
without a great deal of attenuation)
3. It also needs a low insertion loss.
4. A preamplifier would be desirable.

How it would work:
1. You manually turn the phase and gain controls to the minimum
settings. (Or I could put in a reset button to do that. No, that
would add too much complexity to the circuit.)
2. You select the band using the band inductance switch.
3. You move the phase polarity switch to the negative setting. If
the noise cancellation procedure does not work, it probably means the
opposite setting is required.
4. Press the noise gain adjustment button. The device adjusts the
noise gain until a change in the signal level (or the S meter) is just
noted. (Some type of derivative function would come into play.)
5. Press the noise phase adjustment button. The device adjusts the
noise phase shift so as to produce a null in the signal level (or the
S meter).
6. Steps 4 and 5 could be repeated to make further adjustments.
There might be away to activate the control system with just one
button.

Does anyone know of circuits that measure audio noise? Making the RF
noise canceller automatic requires an audio circuit to monitor the
noise level. This noise level needs to be converted into a large DC
voltage, which feeds the motors that turn the variable capacitor and
potentiometer.

Jason Hsu, AG4DG

Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement
 

Wasn't this the basis of the TNS?

If so, it worked on impulse noise above the slow AGC level.

The ANC-4 doesn't even let the noise into the first RF stage!!

DD, W1MCE

Crazy George wrote:

Jason:

Very similar to what you are describing is popularly known as a "Noise
Blanker" Motorola introduced their design for mobile radios in 1959 as an
"Extender" In the same time frame, Collins offered a model for the S-Line
and KWM-2. I designed a tube model for GE's Progress Line radios, and I
forget who designed the solid state version. The concept has been described
in numerous places, so do a bibliographic search of Engineering Index, or
Scientific Abstracts, or whatever that school has access to. You also need
to familiarize yourself with the concepts involved in noise balanced
squelch, which was patented by Motorola back in the late 30s or early 40s.
It will tell you how to do the audio noise level measurement meaningfully
and apply it usefully.

--
Crazy George
Remove NO and SPAM from return address
"Jason Hsu" wrote in message
om...

THE BIG QUESTION: How do you measure the audio noise level in a
receiver? Does anyone here know of any circuits that show the overall
audio noise level?

Let me tell you what this is all about.

SIDE NOTE: Thanks again to those of you who helped me with the
SWR/wattmeter project I worked on last semester. This project taught
me more about ferrite cores, op amps, and diodes than ANY class
possibly could. I learned about stray capacitance and what rails
mean. I also learned that not all 1N34A diodes are alike.

In this coming semester, I will be working on an even more ambitious
project - an automatic noise canceller for 160m to 10m. It will
definitely be a control system, and it may even use DSP. The device
will also require a motor for automatically adjusting the controls.
The idea is to design and build an automatic version of the Timewave
ANC-4 or the MFJ-1025/1026 RF noise cancellers.

The ANC-4 and MFJ-1025/1026 are manual devices. There are automatic
noise cancellation devices, but their adjustments are at the audio
level rather than the RF level.

The back panel of my device will contain:
1. Connector for the signal antenna
2. Connector for the transceiver
3. Connector for the noise antenna
4. DC power connector

The front panel of my device will contain:
1. Power switch and the obligatory idiot light to show that the power
is on
2. 2 audio connectors: one connects to the transceiver, and the other
connects to an external speaker
3. Frequency range control for choosing the inductance values, as the
proper inductance values in the RF noise cancelling circuit varies
with frequency
4. Phase range knob so that the phase shifter can cover all 360
degrees
5. Manual noise phase knob
6. Manual noise gain knob
7. LED display to show the noise level
8. Noise phase adjustment push-button: Pressing this button activates
the control system to adjust the phase shift of the noise.
9. Noise gain adjustment button: Pressing this button activates the
control system to adjust the gain of the noise.

Other features:
1. I need to design my automatic noise canceller so that parts won't
blow up if I transmit 100W through it. This probably requires some
type of automatic bypass circuitry.
2. Transmitted power must not reach the noise antenna (at least not
without a great deal of attenuation)
3. It also needs a low insertion loss.
4. A preamplifier would be desirable.

How it would work:
1. You manually turn the phase and gain controls to the minimum
settings. (Or I could put in a reset button to do that. No, that
would add too much complexity to the circuit.)
2. You select the band using the band inductance switch.
3. You move the phase polarity switch to the negative setting. If
the noise cancellation procedure does not work, it probably means the
opposite setting is required.
4. Press the noise gain adjustment button. The device adjusts the
noise gain until a change in the signal level (or the S meter) is just
noted. (Some type of derivative function would come into play.)
5. Press the noise phase adjustment button. The device adjusts the
noise phase shift so as to produce a null in the signal level (or the
S meter).
6. Steps 4 and 5 could be repeated to make further adjustments.
There might be away to activate the control system with just one
button.

Does anyone know of circuits that measure audio noise? Making the RF
noise canceller automatic requires an audio circuit to monitor the
noise level. This noise level needs to be converted into a large DC
voltage, which feeds the motors that turn the variable capacitor and
potentiometer.

Jason Hsu, AG4DG

In article , Jerry Avins wrote:
Tweetldee wrote:

...

Now, as to your concern to keep 100W of RF from blowing up your noise
canceller. That's what antenna changeover relays are for. They normally
connect the antenna to the receiver, but when the transmitter is keyed up,
the relay connects the antenna to the transmitter output, and disconnects it
from the receiver. Simple, but effective, and has been used for many many
years in amateur as well as commercial radio equipment.

The line from the change-over relay to the receiver should be shorted
when the receiver is disconnected and either short or a half wave, or
else open when the receiver is disconnected and a quarter wave long.

Jerry


It's important to protect the both the noise antenna input and the main
antenna inputs on the noise canceller from RF - but trying to figure out if
you should short or open the receiver input based on the wavelength is a
little difficult when the frequency range covers a continuum of multiple
octaves. Not to mention the problem with putting a quarter or half wave chunk
of feedline between the changeover relay and the receiver input when the
wavelength is 160 meters. That technique works well for any single frequency
(or very narrow frequency band as a percentage of the center frequency) and is
commonly used at VHF frequencies and above with diode and relay switching
circuits for the additional isolation it affords.

An important consideration is the voltage on the changeover relay and the
components connected to it. The obvious part is the 100 W and 50 Ohm
situation, but consider what happens to the voltage when you have a high (SWR
for the hams / VSWR for the engineers). Jason, since this is your project,
I'll leave you with the research to figure out the potential range of reactive
loads with various antennas as well as the calculation of the resultant
voltages. Remember a good simulation models the real world, not just a
convenient part of it. I will tell you the result if you don' t give this
part of your design its due. Think about PCB traces vaporized, capacitors
shorted, transistor "fuses", relay housings melted and what we used to call
"essence of Allen Bradley" from the burned resistors. It's about the same as a
lightning hit or running 1000 watts through a 100 watt unit! This can be a
safety issue as well as causing unncessary delay and cost.

One of the other people noted that it was important to do a lot of reading,
research and analysis of your own - I'll second that!

If you haven't run across it yet, start with the term "Null Steering".

'nuff said for now,

Randy Gawtry
Timewave Technology Inc.

In article , Jerry Avins wrote:
Tweetldee wrote:

...

Now, as to your concern to keep 100W of RF from blowing up your noise
canceller. That's what antenna changeover relays are for. They normally
connect the antenna to the receiver, but when the transmitter is keyed up,
the relay connects the antenna to the transmitter output, and disconnects it
from the receiver. Simple, but effective, and has been used for many many
years in amateur as well as commercial radio equipment.

The line from the change-over relay to the receiver should be shorted
when the receiver is disconnected and either short or a half wave, or
else open when the receiver is disconnected and a quarter wave long.

Jerry


It's important to protect the both the noise antenna input and the main
antenna inputs on the noise canceller from RF - but trying to figure out if
you should short or open the receiver input based on the wavelength is a
little difficult when the frequency range covers a continuum of multiple
octaves. Not to mention the problem with putting a quarter or half wave chunk
of feedline between the changeover relay and the receiver input when the
wavelength is 160 meters. That technique works well for any single frequency
(or very narrow frequency band as a percentage of the center frequency) and is
commonly used at VHF frequencies and above with diode and relay switching
circuits for the additional isolation it affords.

An important consideration is the voltage on the changeover relay and the
components connected to it. The obvious part is the 100 W and 50 Ohm
situation, but consider what happens to the voltage when you have a high (SWR
for the hams / VSWR for the engineers). Jason, since this is your project,
I'll leave you with the research to figure out the potential range of reactive
loads with various antennas as well as the calculation of the resultant
voltages. Remember a good simulation models the real world, not just a
convenient part of it. I will tell you the result if you don' t give this
part of your design its due. Think about PCB traces vaporized, capacitors
shorted, transistor "fuses", relay housings melted and what we used to call
"essence of Allen Bradley" from the burned resistors. It's about the same as a
lightning hit or running 1000 watts through a 100 watt unit! This can be a
safety issue as well as causing unncessary delay and cost.

One of the other people noted that it was important to do a lot of reading,
research and analysis of your own - I'll second that!

If you haven't run across it yet, start with the term "Null Steering".

'nuff said for now,

Randy Gawtry
Timewave Technology Inc.

Randy,

Speaking of the horse's mouth! I am concerned that Jason might have too high
an expectation of what the noise canceler can do. See if the below is right.

1. It can cancel out the noise from a single stationary noise source that is
received via groundwave, and will in general do nothing for atmospheric
noise as you would have on 75m.

2. For an automated adjustment method to work, and keep it within his means
and time frame, he will have to tune to a frequency where there is no signal
present. He should then be able to retune to a differenr frequency within a
few KHz, and still have the nulling.

3. Consistent with 2, the receiver's AGC voltage is as good an indication of
noise amplitude as any. In fact, it can't be measured AFTER the AGC, as for
instance the audio output.

Tam/WB2TT
***********************************************
"Randall R. Gawtry" wrote in message
...
One of the other people noted that it was important to do a lot of
reading,
research and analysis of your own - I'll second that!

If you haven't run across it yet, start with the term "Null Steering".

'nuff said for now,

Randy Gawtry
Timewave Technology Inc.

Randy,

Speaking of the horse's mouth! I am concerned that Jason might have too high
an expectation of what the noise canceler can do. See if the below is right.

1. It can cancel out the noise from a single stationary noise source that is
received via groundwave, and will in general do nothing for atmospheric
noise as you would have on 75m.

2. For an automated adjustment method to work, and keep it within his means
and time frame, he will have to tune to a frequency where there is no signal
present. He should then be able to retune to a differenr frequency within a
few KHz, and still have the nulling.

3. Consistent with 2, the receiver's AGC voltage is as good an indication of
noise amplitude as any. In fact, it can't be measured AFTER the AGC, as for
instance the audio output.

Tam/WB2TT
***********************************************
"Randall R. Gawtry" wrote in message
...
One of the other people noted that it was important to do a lot of
reading,
research and analysis of your own - I'll second that!

If you haven't run across it yet, start with the term "Null Steering".

'nuff said for now,

Randy Gawtry
Timewave Technology Inc.

Tarmo Tammaru wrote:

Randy,

Speaking of the horse's mouth! I am concerned that Jason might have too high
an expectation of what the noise canceler can do. See if the below is right.

1. It can cancel out the noise from a single stationary noise source that is
received via groundwave, and will in general do nothing for atmospheric
noise as you would have on 75m.

Correct!


2. For an automated adjustment method to work, and keep it within his means
and time frame, he will have to tune to a frequency where there is no signal
present. He should then be able to retune to a differenr frequency within a
few KHz, and still have the nulling.

Correct!


3. Consistent with 2, the receiver's AGC voltage is as good an indication of
noise amplitude as any. In fact, it can't be measured AFTER the AGC, as for
instance the audio output.

Correct!


Tam/WB2TT
***********************************************
"Randall R. Gawtry" wrote in message
...

One of the other people noted that it was important to do a lot of

reading,

research and analysis of your own - I'll second that!

If you haven't run across it yet, start with the term "Null Steering".

'nuff said for now,

Randy Gawtry
Timewave Technology Inc.

Tarmo Tammaru wrote:

Randy,

Speaking of the horse's mouth! I am concerned that Jason might have too high
an expectation of what the noise canceler can do. See if the below is right.

1. It can cancel out the noise from a single stationary noise source that is
received via groundwave, and will in general do nothing for atmospheric
noise as you would have on 75m.

Correct!


2. For an automated adjustment method to work, and keep it within his means
and time frame, he will have to tune to a frequency where there is no signal
present. He should then be able to retune to a differenr frequency within a
few KHz, and still have the nulling.

Correct!


3. Consistent with 2, the receiver's AGC voltage is as good an indication of
noise amplitude as any. In fact, it can't be measured AFTER the AGC, as for
instance the audio output.

Correct!


Tam/WB2TT
***********************************************
"Randall R. Gawtry" wrote in message
...

One of the other people noted that it was important to do a lot of

reading,

research and analysis of your own - I'll second that!

If you haven't run across it yet, start with the term "Null Steering".

'nuff said for now,

Randy Gawtry
Timewave Technology Inc.

Randy,

Thanks for your response. The obvious thing you would like to do is to have
the software be smart enough to distinguish between signal and noise. But
then the hardware becomes moot, and you have invented a better DSP noise
reduction circuit.

BTW, I am considering getting an ANC4 to get rid of power line noise on 6
meters. Fortunately, the noise is coming from the North, a very seldom used
beam heading.

Tam/WB2TT

Randy,

Thanks for your response. The obvious thing you would like to do is to have
the software be smart enough to distinguish between signal and noise. But
then the hardware becomes moot, and you have invented a better DSP noise
reduction circuit.

BTW, I am considering getting an ANC4 to get rid of power line noise on 6
meters. Fortunately, the noise is coming from the North, a very seldom used
beam heading.

Tam/WB2TT

Dave,

Thanks for the info. In my case, the source seems to be a bank of 4
transformers on a pole about 300 feet away. Weirdest thing I had was S9
white noise from about 40 to 55 MHz with about 50% amplitude modulation at
around 50 KHz. Turned out to be a 60 amp cartridge fuse in my fuse box about
to go bad. I think the 50 KHz was a mechanical resonance in the fuse.

I don't know about the 746, but my 756 has dual watch capability, which lets
you listen to two frequencies at the same time. It would be interesting if
they would let you vary the phase of the secondary channel..

Tam/WB2TT
"Dave Shrader" wrote in message
et...
My ANC-4 is sitting on top of the ICOM 746. I have a short piece of
coax, 7 to 8 feet, to a doublet with a total length of 8 feet on the
floor against an outside wall.

Works Great!

I've used the ANC-4 for almost two years. While in Massachusetts the QTH
was 100 meters from the New England Power Grid with three sets of high
tension [ 67,000 volts] three phase power lines [nine wires total].
The power lines were generally quite quiet but during summer humidity
and/or thunderstorms they would get 'noisy'. The ANC-4 reduced the noise
to S1 typical levels.

Here in New Hampshire, my local noise source is the local LAN where the
router is four feet from my receiver. Similar results with the ANC-4.

BTW, it was given to me as a gift by W1KSZ who picked it up on e-bay for
about $60.00. Thanks many times over, Dick.

DD, W1MCE

Dave,

Thanks for the info. In my case, the source seems to be a bank of 4
transformers on a pole about 300 feet away. Weirdest thing I had was S9
white noise from about 40 to 55 MHz with about 50% amplitude modulation at
around 50 KHz. Turned out to be a 60 amp cartridge fuse in my fuse box about
to go bad. I think the 50 KHz was a mechanical resonance in the fuse.

I don't know about the 746, but my 756 has dual watch capability, which lets
you listen to two frequencies at the same time. It would be interesting if
they would let you vary the phase of the secondary channel..

Tam/WB2TT
"Dave Shrader" wrote in message
et...
My ANC-4 is sitting on top of the ICOM 746. I have a short piece of
coax, 7 to 8 feet, to a doublet with a total length of 8 feet on the
floor against an outside wall.

Works Great!

I've used the ANC-4 for almost two years. While in Massachusetts the QTH
was 100 meters from the New England Power Grid with three sets of high
tension [ 67,000 volts] three phase power lines [nine wires total].
The power lines were generally quite quiet but during summer humidity
and/or thunderstorms they would get 'noisy'. The ANC-4 reduced the noise
to S1 typical levels.

Here in New Hampshire, my local noise source is the local LAN where the
router is four feet from my receiver. Similar results with the ANC-4.

BTW, it was given to me as a gift by W1KSZ who picked it up on e-bay for
about $60.00. Thanks many times over, Dick.

DD, W1MCE

Tarmo Tammaru wrote:

Dave,

Thanks for the info. In my case, the source seems to be a bank of 4
transformers on a pole about 300 feet away. Weirdest thing I had was S9
white noise from about 40 to 55 MHz with about 50% amplitude modulation at
around 50 KHz. Turned out to be a 60 amp cartridge fuse in my fuse box about
to go bad. I think the 50 KHz was a mechanical resonance in the fuse.

...

There are lots of weird noise sources. As a kid in the 40s, I was part
of a family visit to an old farm west of Bethlehem Pa., in what was
definitely "fringe area" TV reception. The man of the house was telling
my father about the strong zig-zag pattern that sometimes showed up on
the screen, blanking out the video and often lousing up vertical synch.
He wanted to know if the FCC would track down the interference; he
thought it was a ham about half a mile away. Just then, the interference
started, and right after, his son came downstairs to join us. A little
while later, his daughter went upstairs, and the interference cleared
when she got to the top. Without saying anything, I went over to the
stairway switch and turned it on and off a few times. "On" caused the
interference. When we swapped the bulb with one in a floor lamp, the
floor lamp caused the same interference. It has been one of my enduring
regrets that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Tarmo Tammaru wrote:

Dave,

Thanks for the info. In my case, the source seems to be a bank of 4
transformers on a pole about 300 feet away. Weirdest thing I had was S9
white noise from about 40 to 55 MHz with about 50% amplitude modulation at
around 50 KHz. Turned out to be a 60 amp cartridge fuse in my fuse box about
to go bad. I think the 50 KHz was a mechanical resonance in the fuse.

...

There are lots of weird noise sources. As a kid in the 40s, I was part
of a family visit to an old farm west of Bethlehem Pa., in what was
definitely "fringe area" TV reception. The man of the house was telling
my father about the strong zig-zag pattern that sometimes showed up on
the screen, blanking out the video and often lousing up vertical synch.
He wanted to know if the FCC would track down the interference; he
thought it was a ham about half a mile away. Just then, the interference
started, and right after, his son came downstairs to join us. A little
while later, his daughter went upstairs, and the interference cleared
when she got to the top. Without saying anything, I went over to the
stairway switch and turned it on and off a few times. "On" caused the
interference. When we swapped the bulb with one in a floor lamp, the
floor lamp caused the same interference. It has been one of my enduring
regrets that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Tam- never had much luck with one got (also 6 meter op), but , also, BEWARE
if into weak signal stuff - has 6 dB LOSS on recieve (DC bands, who cared,
background noise worse than that, but at VHF ???) If you want one, make
you good deal! Jim NN7K



Tam wrote:
Randy,

Thanks for your response. The obvious thing you would like to do is to
have
the software be smart enough to distinguish between signal and noise. But
then the hardware becomes moot, and you have invented a better DSP noise
reduction circuit.

BTW, I am considering getting an ANC4 to get rid of power line noise on 6
meters. Fortunately, the noise is coming from the North, a very seldom
used
beam heading.

Tam/WB2TT

Tam- never had much luck with one got (also 6 meter op), but , also, BEWARE
if into weak signal stuff - has 6 dB LOSS on recieve (DC bands, who cared,
background noise worse than that, but at VHF ???) If you want one, make
you good deal! Jim NN7K



Tam wrote:
Randy,

Thanks for your response. The obvious thing you would like to do is to
have
the software be smart enough to distinguish between signal and noise. But
then the hardware becomes moot, and you have invented a better DSP noise
reduction circuit.

BTW, I am considering getting an ANC4 to get rid of power line noise on 6
meters. Fortunately, the noise is coming from the North, a very seldom
used
beam heading.

Tam/WB2TT

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 13:31:25 -0400, Jerry Avins wrote:

Tarmo Tammaru wrote:

Dave,

Thanks for the info. In my case, the source seems to be a bank of 4
transformers on a pole about 300 feet away. Weirdest thing I had was S9
white noise from about 40 to 55 MHz with about 50% amplitude modulation at
around 50 KHz. Turned out to be a 60 amp cartridge fuse in my fuse box about
to go bad. I think the 50 KHz was a mechanical resonance in the fuse.

...

There are lots of weird noise sources. As a kid in the 40s, I was part
of a family visit to an old farm west of Bethlehem Pa., in what was
definitely "fringe area" TV reception. The man of the house was telling
my father about the strong zig-zag pattern that sometimes showed up on
the screen, blanking out the video and often lousing up vertical synch.
He wanted to know if the FCC would track down the interference; he
thought it was a ham about half a mile away. Just then, the interference
started, and right after, his son came downstairs to join us. A little
while later, his daughter went upstairs, and the interference cleared
when she got to the top. Without saying anything, I went over to the
stairway switch and turned it on and off a few times. "On" caused the
interference. When we swapped the bulb with one in a floor lamp, the
floor lamp caused the same interference. It has been one of my enduring
regrets that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.

Jerry

I think that one may have been intended for an embassy somewhere...


Eric Jacobsen
Minister of Algorithms, Intel Corp.
My opinions may not be Intel's opinions.
http://www.ericjacobsen.org

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 13:31:25 -0400, Jerry Avins wrote:

Tarmo Tammaru wrote:

Dave,

Thanks for the info. In my case, the source seems to be a bank of 4
transformers on a pole about 300 feet away. Weirdest thing I had was S9
white noise from about 40 to 55 MHz with about 50% amplitude modulation at
around 50 KHz. Turned out to be a 60 amp cartridge fuse in my fuse box about
to go bad. I think the 50 KHz was a mechanical resonance in the fuse.

...

There are lots of weird noise sources. As a kid in the 40s, I was part
of a family visit to an old farm west of Bethlehem Pa., in what was
definitely "fringe area" TV reception. The man of the house was telling
my father about the strong zig-zag pattern that sometimes showed up on
the screen, blanking out the video and often lousing up vertical synch.
He wanted to know if the FCC would track down the interference; he
thought it was a ham about half a mile away. Just then, the interference
started, and right after, his son came downstairs to join us. A little
while later, his daughter went upstairs, and the interference cleared
when she got to the top. Without saying anything, I went over to the
stairway switch and turned it on and off a few times. "On" caused the
interference. When we swapped the bulb with one in a floor lamp, the
floor lamp caused the same interference. It has been one of my enduring
regrets that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.

Jerry

I think that one may have been intended for an embassy somewhere...


Eric Jacobsen
Minister of Algorithms, Intel Corp.
My opinions may not be Intel's opinions.
http://www.ericjacobsen.org

Without saying anything, I went over to the
stairway switch and turned it on and off a few times. "On" caused the
interference. When we swapped the bulb with one in a floor lamp, the
floor lamp caused the same interference. It has been one of my enduring
regrets that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.
================
That bulb was probably an old coiled 'Edison' type . They were /are known to
form a tuned circuit resonating in the old TV band 1 ( about 48 - 62 MHz)
acting as a TX when power is applied.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

Without saying anything, I went over to the
stairway switch and turned it on and off a few times. "On" caused the
interference. When we swapped the bulb with one in a floor lamp, the
floor lamp caused the same interference. It has been one of my enduring
regrets that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.
================
That bulb was probably an old coiled 'Edison' type . They were /are known to
form a tuned circuit resonating in the old TV band 1 ( about 48 - 62 MHz)
acting as a TX when power is applied.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

Eric Jacobsen wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 13:31:25 -0400, Jerry Avins wrote:

... It has been one of my enduring regrets
that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.

Jerry

I think that one may have been intended for an embassy somewhere...

About a year later, I read about such a bulb in QST. The author believed
that Edison-effect electrons excited a self broad-band resonance in the
doubly coiled filament, sustaining oscillation by a mechanism I forget,
but that seemed reasonable at the time. Incandescent lamps are filled
with low-pressure nitrogen to avoid damage from the Edison effect, and
interaction with the gas figured in his explanation. It was that
explanation that led me to build an open-air triode. I was surprised as
anyone when that worked, and I took it as a confirming instance for the
now-forgotten explanation.

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Eric Jacobsen wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 13:31:25 -0400, Jerry Avins wrote:

... It has been one of my enduring regrets
that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.

Jerry

I think that one may have been intended for an embassy somewhere...

About a year later, I read about such a bulb in QST. The author believed
that Edison-effect electrons excited a self broad-band resonance in the
doubly coiled filament, sustaining oscillation by a mechanism I forget,
but that seemed reasonable at the time. Incandescent lamps are filled
with low-pressure nitrogen to avoid damage from the Edison effect, and
interaction with the gas figured in his explanation. It was that
explanation that led me to build an open-air triode. I was surprised as
anyone when that worked, and I took it as a confirming instance for the
now-forgotten explanation.

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Frank Dinger wrote:

Without saying anything, I went over to the
stairway switch and turned it on and off a few times. "On" caused the
interference. When we swapped the bulb with one in a floor lamp, the
floor lamp caused the same interference. It has been one of my enduring
regrets that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.
================
That bulb was probably an old coiled 'Edison' type . They were /are known to
form a tuned circuit resonating in the old TV band 1 ( about 48 - 62 MHz)
acting as a TX when power is applied.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

Thank you thankyouthankyou! I've been called a crazy liar more than once
over that bulb. There was no channel 1 when that incident happened, but
I suppose that a small change of geometry could raise the frequency. The
explanation in QST had it that the frequency was swept over a fairly
large range as the voltage varied during a cycle.

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Frank Dinger wrote:

Without saying anything, I went over to the
stairway switch and turned it on and off a few times. "On" caused the
interference. When we swapped the bulb with one in a floor lamp, the
floor lamp caused the same interference. It has been one of my enduring
regrets that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.
================
That bulb was probably an old coiled 'Edison' type . They were /are known to
form a tuned circuit resonating in the old TV band 1 ( about 48 - 62 MHz)
acting as a TX when power is applied.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

Thank you thankyouthankyou! I've been called a crazy liar more than once
over that bulb. There was no channel 1 when that incident happened, but
I suppose that a small change of geometry could raise the frequency. The
explanation in QST had it that the frequency was swept over a fairly
large range as the voltage varied during a cycle.

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 17:35:45 -0400, Jerry Avins wrote:

Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.

Love that byline.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

For proper E-mail replies SWAP "-" and "_"

Why is it that Democrats can't debate politely?
And are only rude and interruptive.
Lack of mental capacity?

On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 17:35:45 -0400, Jerry Avins wrote:

Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.

Love that byline.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

For proper E-mail replies SWAP "-" and "_"

Why is it that Democrats can't debate politely?
And are only rude and interruptive.
Lack of mental capacity?

Jerry Avins wrote:

Eric Jacobsen wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 13:31:25 -0400, Jerry Avins wrote:

... It has been one of my enduring regrets
that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.

Jerry

I think that one may have been intended for an embassy somewhere...

About a year later, I read about such a bulb in QST. The author believed
that Edison-effect electrons excited a self broad-band resonance in the
doubly coiled filament, sustaining oscillation by a mechanism I forget,
but that seemed reasonable at the time. Incandescent lamps are filled
with low-pressure nitrogen to avoid damage from the Edison effect, and
interaction with the gas figured in his explanation. It was that
explanation that led me to build an open-air triode. I was surprised as
anyone when that worked, and I took it as a confirming instance for the
now-forgotten explanation.

Open-air triode?? Do tell, you have me fascinated...

Rob

Jerry Avins wrote:

Eric Jacobsen wrote:

On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 13:31:25 -0400, Jerry Avins wrote:

... It has been one of my enduring regrets
that I didn't ask to keep the bulb. It was probably thrown out.

Jerry

I think that one may have been intended for an embassy somewhere...

About a year later, I read about such a bulb in QST. The author believed
that Edison-effect electrons excited a self broad-band resonance in the
doubly coiled filament, sustaining oscillation by a mechanism I forget,
but that seemed reasonable at the time. Incandescent lamps are filled
with low-pressure nitrogen to avoid damage from the Edison effect, and
interaction with the gas figured in his explanation. It was that
explanation that led me to build an open-air triode. I was surprised as
anyone when that worked, and I took it as a confirming instance for the
now-forgotten explanation.

Open-air triode?? Do tell, you have me fascinated...

Rob

"Rob Judd" wrote in message
...

Open-air triode?? Do tell, you have me fascinated...

IIRC, field effect triodes {FETs} were made about the same time as the first
vacuum tubes, but they didn't work well enough, given materials technology
of the day.

"Rob Judd" wrote in message
...

Open-air triode?? Do tell, you have me fascinated...

IIRC, field effect triodes {FETs} were made about the same time as the first
vacuum tubes, but they didn't work well enough, given materials technology
of the day.

R J Carpenter wrote:

"Rob Judd" wrote in message
...

Open-air triode?? Do tell, you have me fascinated...

IIRC, field effect triodes {FETs} were made about the same time as the first
vacuum tubes, but they didn't work well enough, given materials technology
of the day.

I thought that FETs dated to the early 30s. De Forest's "audion" was
invented in 1903 and made long-distance telephony practical by 1913.

Jerry

P.S. to Rick: That was before my time.
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

R J Carpenter wrote:

"Rob Judd" wrote in message
...

Open-air triode?? Do tell, you have me fascinated...

IIRC, field effect triodes {FETs} were made about the same time as the first
vacuum tubes, but they didn't work well enough, given materials technology
of the day.

I thought that FETs dated to the early 30s. De Forest's "audion" was
invented in 1903 and made long-distance telephony practical by 1913.

Jerry

P.S. to Rick: That was before my time.
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Jerry Avins wrote:

Rob Judd wrote:

...

Open-air triode?? Do tell, you have me fascinated...

Rob

I wrote of it before, so I'll be brief and hope I'm not boring. An
open-coil hot plate with a ceramic holder to support and contain the
nichrome element as filament*. Topped with galvanized window screening,
the zinc removed with muriatic acid so as not to noxiously sublime,
resting on the ceramic as (literally!) grid. Small glass beads -- around
1/16" -- scattered on it to create a gap and hold the screening flat.
Atop that, a pie tin weighted with cooling water to serve as
(literally!) plate. With 700 volts on the plate, I got measurable
current on my 1000 ohm/volt meter. At -90 volts on the grid, the current
was too small to read. The gain was enough to sustain oscillation.

Très bizarre!

Rob

Jerry Avins wrote:

Rob Judd wrote:

...

Open-air triode?? Do tell, you have me fascinated...

Rob

I wrote of it before, so I'll be brief and hope I'm not boring. An
open-coil hot plate with a ceramic holder to support and contain the
nichrome element as filament*. Topped with galvanized window screening,
the zinc removed with muriatic acid so as not to noxiously sublime,
resting on the ceramic as (literally!) grid. Small glass beads -- around
1/16" -- scattered on it to create a gap and hold the screening flat.
Atop that, a pie tin weighted with cooling water to serve as
(literally!) plate. With 700 volts on the plate, I got measurable
current on my 1000 ohm/volt meter. At -90 volts on the grid, the current
was too small to read. The gain was enough to sustain oscillation.

Très bizarre!

Rob

That bulb was probably an old coiled 'Edison' type . They were /are
known to
form a tuned circuit resonating in the old TV band 1 ( about 48 - 62
MHz)
acting as a TX when power is applied.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

Thank you thankyouthankyou! I've been called a crazy liar more than once
over that bulb. There was no channel 1 when that incident happened, but
I suppose that a small change of geometry could raise the frequency. The
explanation in QST had it that the frequency was swept over a fairly
large range as the voltage varied during a cycle.

I found such a bulb in the loft of the garage of a house we were
renting in the mid-1950s. I had read an article about them somewhere,
so I took it inside, screwed it into a lamp near the TV, and, voila,
instant Channel 3 TVI (that was the main channel in Milwaukee,
WI, then). I put it in a box in my shack, and didn't think about it for
some time.

I put up a tower and 20 meter beam. Before the coax was in the house,
a neighbor sent his kid over to complain about TVI. I invited him to
come over and see that the TV in my shack was not showing any
interference, but he declined, and continued to complain over the next
few months.

While preparing to leave for two weeks vacation, I had a flash of
inspiration. I put the bulb in a lamp, connected a timer to the lamp,
and put it in a closet (so the light couldn't be seen in an otherwise
dark house). The timer turned the bulb on during evening TV
hours.

I left it on for several days after our return. The neighbor never
complained of TVI again.

73, John - K6QQ, glad for the statute of limitations.

That bulb was probably an old coiled 'Edison' type . They were /are
known to
form a tuned circuit resonating in the old TV band 1 ( about 48 - 62
MHz)
acting as a TX when power is applied.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

Thank you thankyouthankyou! I've been called a crazy liar more than once
over that bulb. There was no channel 1 when that incident happened, but
I suppose that a small change of geometry could raise the frequency. The
explanation in QST had it that the frequency was swept over a fairly
large range as the voltage varied during a cycle.

I found such a bulb in the loft of the garage of a house we were
renting in the mid-1950s. I had read an article about them somewhere,
so I took it inside, screwed it into a lamp near the TV, and, voila,
instant Channel 3 TVI (that was the main channel in Milwaukee,
WI, then). I put it in a box in my shack, and didn't think about it for
some time.

I put up a tower and 20 meter beam. Before the coax was in the house,
a neighbor sent his kid over to complain about TVI. I invited him to
come over and see that the TV in my shack was not showing any
interference, but he declined, and continued to complain over the next
few months.

While preparing to leave for two weeks vacation, I had a flash of
inspiration. I put the bulb in a lamp, connected a timer to the lamp,
and put it in a closet (so the light couldn't be seen in an otherwise
dark house). The timer turned the bulb on during evening TV
hours.

I left it on for several days after our return. The neighbor never
complained of TVI again.

73, John - K6QQ, glad for the statute of limitations.