Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently the FCC has been writing to the CEOs of electric utilities about
intereference experienced by individual amateurs and I believe last week I saw a letter to some people about a baby monitor. The letters are at http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement_logs/ FWIW, Tom, N3IJ "Bob McConnell" wrote in message ... On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 03:47:34 +0000 (UTC), "-=jd=-" wrote: Dateline "rec.radio.amateur.homebrew", Sat, 06 Sep 2003 18:55:22 GMT: As it appeared in message-ID# , "Bob Lewis \(AA4PB\)" appears to have written the following... Now, he actually has fun frustrating the offending CB'er. That's great. So now your friend has become a part of the problem instead of part of the solution. That makes him no better than the guy he's compaining about. Actually, quite the opposite. None of the neighbors could get any response from the FCC. The offending CB'er was coming over the TV's and radios in the neighborhood. Commercial TV and radio receivers are notoriously susceptible to strong signals well outside of their frequency range. The manufacturers have taken too many shortcuts to provide decent selectivity. So the FCC doesn't pay much attention to those complaints. But as soon as the hams in the area had a problem, they should have been notifying the FCC. At that point, your neighbor was interfering with a licensed service and they do pay attention to that. Admitedly, their attention has been sporadic in the past, but in the last few years they have gotten much more serious about tracking down operators that are causing harmful interference, even if they are licensed. If the event you described happened recently, there may have been a better way. Keep that in mind if he gets back on the air. Bob McConnell N2SPP |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently the FCC has been writing to the CEOs of electric utilities about
intereference experienced by individual amateurs and I believe last week I saw a letter to some people about a baby monitor. The letters are at http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement_logs/ FWIW, Tom, N3IJ "Bob McConnell" wrote in message ... On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 03:47:34 +0000 (UTC), "-=jd=-" wrote: Dateline "rec.radio.amateur.homebrew", Sat, 06 Sep 2003 18:55:22 GMT: As it appeared in message-ID# , "Bob Lewis \(AA4PB\)" appears to have written the following... Now, he actually has fun frustrating the offending CB'er. That's great. So now your friend has become a part of the problem instead of part of the solution. That makes him no better than the guy he's compaining about. Actually, quite the opposite. None of the neighbors could get any response from the FCC. The offending CB'er was coming over the TV's and radios in the neighborhood. Commercial TV and radio receivers are notoriously susceptible to strong signals well outside of their frequency range. The manufacturers have taken too many shortcuts to provide decent selectivity. So the FCC doesn't pay much attention to those complaints. But as soon as the hams in the area had a problem, they should have been notifying the FCC. At that point, your neighbor was interfering with a licensed service and they do pay attention to that. Admitedly, their attention has been sporadic in the past, but in the last few years they have gotten much more serious about tracking down operators that are causing harmful interference, even if they are licensed. If the event you described happened recently, there may have been a better way. Keep that in mind if he gets back on the air. Bob McConnell N2SPP |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Limitedselection wrote: To "Caveat Lector": Thanks for your 'help'! Apparently you are a lawyer (or play one on usenet)? You don't need to be a lawyer to know the law, nor a weatherman to know which way the wind blows. You will be interfering with an authorized radio service. That's illegal. You will be transmitting (outside Part 15 limits) without a license. That's illegal. You will be putting on the air transmitting equipment that is neither inspected-and-accepted nor type-accepted. That's illegal. You do not own nor control the airwaves on your property. I could try to list the things that are illegal even though you own the property they're done on, except that I have a 10-Meg limit on my temporary file size. I agree you probably won't get caught, but don't kid yourself about what you're doing... -- R F Wieland Newark, DE 19711-5323 USA 39.68N 75.74W Icom R75 Heathkit GR-81 Inverted-L in the attic Reply to wieland at me dot udel dot edu |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Limitedselection wrote: To "Caveat Lector": Thanks for your 'help'! Apparently you are a lawyer (or play one on usenet)? You don't need to be a lawyer to know the law, nor a weatherman to know which way the wind blows. You will be interfering with an authorized radio service. That's illegal. You will be transmitting (outside Part 15 limits) without a license. That's illegal. You will be putting on the air transmitting equipment that is neither inspected-and-accepted nor type-accepted. That's illegal. You do not own nor control the airwaves on your property. I could try to list the things that are illegal even though you own the property they're done on, except that I have a 10-Meg limit on my temporary file size. I agree you probably won't get caught, but don't kid yourself about what you're doing... -- R F Wieland Newark, DE 19711-5323 USA 39.68N 75.74W Icom R75 Heathkit GR-81 Inverted-L in the attic Reply to wieland at me dot udel dot edu |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This one is tried and proven to be a winner. Start with some kind of mild
spark generator (large buzzer or mechanical bell). Isolate the device from it's power source with a pair of chokes (and place in soundproof box). Feed from the device(one lead to each side of spark gap or points) VIA 450Ohm open ladder line to a dipole cut to the 11 Meter band and orient it in the direction of the CB'ers antenna. This setup TRASHES AM and SSB RCVRS!!! I'ts possible your neighbors might see some sparklies in their picture on the low VHF channels. Want to make it REAL efficiant? take the CB radio you have and put a COR on it's RCVR. Set it up without an antenna to his favorite channel.When the COR closes it starts a time relay and transmits for about 10 minutes. Each time it hears the jerk it pops up and jams his RCVR. This scheme will NOT work over 500 feet. If this guy lives next door or behind you he IS game. He can not talk with someone ifhe can HEAR them to begin with. Even the dumbest of animals will soon learn....Eddie "Limitedselection" wrote in message ... Help! I want to effectively "jam" CB reception on my property. The "jammer" would need to be low power and cover an area about as large as a 'small' city block. I have searched google, but I have only found references to schematics that were either posted to usenet as a picture (thus not saved in google archives), or located on web servers in domains that no longer exist. Any information would be appreciated! |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This one is tried and proven to be a winner. Start with some kind of mild
spark generator (large buzzer or mechanical bell). Isolate the device from it's power source with a pair of chokes (and place in soundproof box). Feed from the device(one lead to each side of spark gap or points) VIA 450Ohm open ladder line to a dipole cut to the 11 Meter band and orient it in the direction of the CB'ers antenna. This setup TRASHES AM and SSB RCVRS!!! I'ts possible your neighbors might see some sparklies in their picture on the low VHF channels. Want to make it REAL efficiant? take the CB radio you have and put a COR on it's RCVR. Set it up without an antenna to his favorite channel.When the COR closes it starts a time relay and transmits for about 10 minutes. Each time it hears the jerk it pops up and jams his RCVR. This scheme will NOT work over 500 feet. If this guy lives next door or behind you he IS game. He can not talk with someone ifhe can HEAR them to begin with. Even the dumbest of animals will soon learn....Eddie "Limitedselection" wrote in message ... Help! I want to effectively "jam" CB reception on my property. The "jammer" would need to be low power and cover an area about as large as a 'small' city block. I have searched google, but I have only found references to schematics that were either posted to usenet as a picture (thus not saved in google archives), or located on web servers in domains that no longer exist. Any information would be appreciated! |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: want circuit/schematic for CB "jammer"
From: (Robert F Wieland) Date: 9/13/2003 12:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: In article , Limitedselection wrote: To "Caveat Lector": Thanks for your 'help'! Apparently you are a lawyer (or play one on usenet)? You don't need to be a lawyer to know the law, nor a weatherman to know which way the wind blows. You will be interfering with an authorized radio service. That's illegal. You will be transmitting (outside Part 15 limits) without a license. That's illegal. You will be putting on the air transmitting equipment that is neither inspected-and-accepted nor type-accepted. That's illegal. You do not own nor control the airwaves on your property. I could try to list the things that are illegal even though you own the property they're done on, except that I have a 10-Meg limit on my temporary file size. I agree you probably won't get caught, but don't kid yourself about what you're doing... -- R F Wieland Newark, DE 19711-5323 USA 39.68N 75.74W Icom R75 Heathkit GR-81 Inverted-L in the attic Reply to wieland at me dot udel dot edu Wieland, I am not kidding myself. I never stated, asserted, proposed or implied that jamming was legal. I am very sorry that you completely misinterpreted my post. I know that it jamming is illegal, okay Wieland? Thanks for your help! |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Sep 2003 07:39:17 GMT,
(Limitedselection) wrote: Subject: want circuit/schematic for CB "jammer" From: (Robert F Wieland) Date: 9/13/2003 12:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: In article , Limitedselection wrote: To "Caveat Lector": Thanks for your 'help'! Apparently you are a lawyer (or play one on usenet)? You don't need to be a lawyer to know the law, nor a weatherman to know which way the wind blows. You will be interfering with an authorized radio service. That's illegal. You will be transmitting (outside Part 15 limits) without a license. That's illegal. You will be putting on the air transmitting equipment that is neither inspected-and-accepted nor type-accepted. That's illegal. You do not own nor control the airwaves on your property. I could try to list the things that are illegal even though you own the property they're done on, except that I have a 10-Meg limit on my temporary file size. I agree you probably won't get caught, but don't kid yourself about what you're doing... -- R F Wieland Newark, DE 19711-5323 USA 39.68N 75.74W Icom R75 Heathkit GR-81 Inverted-L in the attic Reply to wieland at me dot udel dot edu Wieland, I am not kidding myself. I never stated, asserted, proposed or implied that jamming was legal. I am very sorry that you completely misinterpreted my post. I know that it jamming is illegal, okay Wieland? Thanks for your help! a friend made a jammer for a difficult person who caused a lot of problems for the surrounding world. The jammer had photodiode, and would only operate when dark, it transmitted only after a CB transmission - for the next 20 minutes causing reception impossible for this guy, and it was hidden in a nearby trea So this bloke couldn't make 2-way communication and after some time resigned to find a new house somewhere far away from this place He had caused very much problems running high power and blocking TV-and broadcast-reception, so it was a good idea to keep him from activitating the CB or what ever band It happened many years ago, but still it is told to amuse the friends -jm -- remove ,xnd to reply (Spam precaution!) |
#70
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Sep 2003 07:39:17 GMT,
(Limitedselection) wrote: Subject: want circuit/schematic for CB "jammer" From: (Robert F Wieland) Date: 9/13/2003 12:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: In article , Limitedselection wrote: To "Caveat Lector": Thanks for your 'help'! Apparently you are a lawyer (or play one on usenet)? You don't need to be a lawyer to know the law, nor a weatherman to know which way the wind blows. You will be interfering with an authorized radio service. That's illegal. You will be transmitting (outside Part 15 limits) without a license. That's illegal. You will be putting on the air transmitting equipment that is neither inspected-and-accepted nor type-accepted. That's illegal. You do not own nor control the airwaves on your property. I could try to list the things that are illegal even though you own the property they're done on, except that I have a 10-Meg limit on my temporary file size. I agree you probably won't get caught, but don't kid yourself about what you're doing... -- R F Wieland Newark, DE 19711-5323 USA 39.68N 75.74W Icom R75 Heathkit GR-81 Inverted-L in the attic Reply to wieland at me dot udel dot edu Wieland, I am not kidding myself. I never stated, asserted, proposed or implied that jamming was legal. I am very sorry that you completely misinterpreted my post. I know that it jamming is illegal, okay Wieland? Thanks for your help! a friend made a jammer for a difficult person who caused a lot of problems for the surrounding world. The jammer had photodiode, and would only operate when dark, it transmitted only after a CB transmission - for the next 20 minutes causing reception impossible for this guy, and it was hidden in a nearby trea So this bloke couldn't make 2-way communication and after some time resigned to find a new house somewhere far away from this place He had caused very much problems running high power and blocking TV-and broadcast-reception, so it was a good idea to keep him from activitating the CB or what ever band It happened many years ago, but still it is told to amuse the friends -jm -- remove ,xnd to reply (Spam precaution!) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|