Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was startled when I hooked up a DX-394 radio (RX2) to the output of the
2nd mixer of another DX-394 (RX1) to find that the strong MW station RX1 was tuned to showed up not only at the 2nd IF of 455 kHz but at every 5kHz from around 200kHz to 30MHz! The strength varied with frequency, probably in part with the gain vs frequency curve of RX2. There were stronger signals at the 2nd and 3rd harmonics of 455kHz. Had to reduce the RX1's RF gain to the point where its AGC was inactive and the receiver was operating just above its threshold of detection to diminish the forest to just a few trees. The 2nd mixer is preceded by a crystal filter at the 1st IF of 45MHz +/-2.5kHz so I expected to see spectrum of about 15-20kHz width across 455kHz and some 3rd and higher order products like 910 and 1365kHz. The 5kHz interval is suspiciously the same as the steps in the 1st LO VCO frequency (45.150 to 74.995 MHz), controlled by a digital PLL. The 2nd LO at 44.545MHz +/-2.5khz is a varactor tuned VCO. To generate products every 5kHz, surely we need a 5kHz signal or two very strong signals that are 5kHz apart going into the mixer or some non-linear stage after the 1st IF filter. Am I seeing something unusual or is this what I should see? If it's an anomaly, can anyone suggest what the cause might be? I'm thinking this is a fault or a design weakness that with more complex signals gives rise to a lot of interference to good reception. Could it be possible that this is the result of the method of observation and is not really occurring in normal practise? 73 Tom |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oy, RS receivers :
![]() I had similar probs on a DX-200, solved by turning down the RF gain. Ended up pulling the RF section out all together and running the first RF tranny straight to the mixer. Best dang radio I ever had :-) -- Gregg *It's probably useful, even if it can't be SPICE'd* http://geek.scorpiorising.ca |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oy, RS receivers :
![]() I had similar probs on a DX-200, solved by turning down the RF gain. Ended up pulling the RF section out all together and running the first RF tranny straight to the mixer. Best dang radio I ever had :-) -- Gregg *It's probably useful, even if it can't be SPICE'd* http://geek.scorpiorising.ca |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom
What is the spectrum going into the mixer at the output of the crystal filter? If this is OK, then it must be the second mixer that is at fault. Look at the spectrum of the LO into the first mixer - does it have 5KHz reference sidebands, and at what level? What is the 1st mixer and post mixer amp? Are they able to cope with the strong broadcast signal? If they are not something substantial like a ring diode mixer and a strong post mix amp, then the IM might be happening there. A typical bipolar mixer might only be able to cope with -20dBm without overload. If the RF gain doesnt help, then maybe it is the RF amp that is at fault, though I wouldnt expect all this to get through the crystal filter. (though even crystal filters can be nonlinear if driven hard enough...) Richard Tom Holden wrote in message .. . I was startled when I hooked up a DX-394 radio (RX2) to the output of the 2nd mixer of another DX-394 (RX1) to find that the strong MW station RX1 was tuned to showed up not only at the 2nd IF of 455 kHz but at every 5kHz from around 200kHz to 30MHz! The strength varied with frequency, probably in part with the gain vs frequency curve of RX2. There were stronger signals at the 2nd and 3rd harmonics of 455kHz. Had to reduce the RX1's RF gain to the point where its AGC was inactive and the receiver was operating just above its threshold of detection to diminish the forest to just a few trees. The 2nd mixer is preceded by a crystal filter at the 1st IF of 45MHz +/-2.5kHz so I expected to see spectrum of about 15-20kHz width across 455kHz and some 3rd and higher order products like 910 and 1365kHz. The 5kHz interval is suspiciously the same as the steps in the 1st LO VCO frequency (45.150 to 74.995 MHz), controlled by a digital PLL. The 2nd LO at 44.545MHz +/-2.5khz is a varactor tuned VCO. To generate products every 5kHz, surely we need a 5kHz signal or two very strong signals that are 5kHz apart going into the mixer or some non-linear stage after the 1st IF filter. Am I seeing something unusual or is this what I should see? If it's an anomaly, can anyone suggest what the cause might be? I'm thinking this is a fault or a design weakness that with more complex signals gives rise to a lot of interference to good reception. Could it be possible that this is the result of the method of observation and is not really occurring in normal practise? 73 Tom |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom
What is the spectrum going into the mixer at the output of the crystal filter? If this is OK, then it must be the second mixer that is at fault. Look at the spectrum of the LO into the first mixer - does it have 5KHz reference sidebands, and at what level? What is the 1st mixer and post mixer amp? Are they able to cope with the strong broadcast signal? If they are not something substantial like a ring diode mixer and a strong post mix amp, then the IM might be happening there. A typical bipolar mixer might only be able to cope with -20dBm without overload. If the RF gain doesnt help, then maybe it is the RF amp that is at fault, though I wouldnt expect all this to get through the crystal filter. (though even crystal filters can be nonlinear if driven hard enough...) Richard Tom Holden wrote in message .. . I was startled when I hooked up a DX-394 radio (RX2) to the output of the 2nd mixer of another DX-394 (RX1) to find that the strong MW station RX1 was tuned to showed up not only at the 2nd IF of 455 kHz but at every 5kHz from around 200kHz to 30MHz! The strength varied with frequency, probably in part with the gain vs frequency curve of RX2. There were stronger signals at the 2nd and 3rd harmonics of 455kHz. Had to reduce the RX1's RF gain to the point where its AGC was inactive and the receiver was operating just above its threshold of detection to diminish the forest to just a few trees. The 2nd mixer is preceded by a crystal filter at the 1st IF of 45MHz +/-2.5kHz so I expected to see spectrum of about 15-20kHz width across 455kHz and some 3rd and higher order products like 910 and 1365kHz. The 5kHz interval is suspiciously the same as the steps in the 1st LO VCO frequency (45.150 to 74.995 MHz), controlled by a digital PLL. The 2nd LO at 44.545MHz +/-2.5khz is a varactor tuned VCO. To generate products every 5kHz, surely we need a 5kHz signal or two very strong signals that are 5kHz apart going into the mixer or some non-linear stage after the 1st IF filter. Am I seeing something unusual or is this what I should see? If it's an anomaly, can anyone suggest what the cause might be? I'm thinking this is a fault or a design weakness that with more complex signals gives rise to a lot of interference to good reception. Could it be possible that this is the result of the method of observation and is not really occurring in normal practise? 73 Tom |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would have to agree, that it is the reference sidebands of the LO that you
are seeing................it sounds like they are using a relatively wide loop filter in the synthesizer, in order to achieve a fast settling time. Pete Richard Hosking wrote in message . au... Tom What is the spectrum going into the mixer at the output of the crystal filter? If this is OK, then it must be the second mixer that is at fault. Look at the spectrum of the LO into the first mixer - does it have 5KHz reference sidebands, and at what level? What is the 1st mixer and post mixer amp? Are they able to cope with the strong broadcast signal? If they are not something substantial like a ring diode mixer and a strong post mix amp, then the IM might be happening there. A typical bipolar mixer might only be able to cope with -20dBm without overload. If the RF gain doesnt help, then maybe it is the RF amp that is at fault, though I wouldnt expect all this to get through the crystal filter. (though even crystal filters can be nonlinear if driven hard enough...) Richard Tom Holden wrote in message .. . I was startled when I hooked up a DX-394 radio (RX2) to the output of the 2nd mixer of another DX-394 (RX1) to find that the strong MW station RX1 was tuned to showed up not only at the 2nd IF of 455 kHz but at every 5kHz from around 200kHz to 30MHz! The strength varied with frequency, probably in part with the gain vs frequency curve of RX2. There were stronger signals at the 2nd and 3rd harmonics of 455kHz. Had to reduce the RX1's RF gain to the point where its AGC was inactive and the receiver was operating just above its threshold of detection to diminish the forest to just a few trees. The 2nd mixer is preceded by a crystal filter at the 1st IF of 45MHz +/-2.5kHz so I expected to see spectrum of about 15-20kHz width across 455kHz and some 3rd and higher order products like 910 and 1365kHz. The 5kHz interval is suspiciously the same as the steps in the 1st LO VCO frequency (45.150 to 74.995 MHz), controlled by a digital PLL. The 2nd LO at 44.545MHz +/-2.5khz is a varactor tuned VCO. To generate products every 5kHz, surely we need a 5kHz signal or two very strong signals that are 5kHz apart going into the mixer or some non-linear stage after the 1st IF filter. Am I seeing something unusual or is this what I should see? If it's an anomaly, can anyone suggest what the cause might be? I'm thinking this is a fault or a design weakness that with more complex signals gives rise to a lot of interference to good reception. Could it be possible that this is the result of the method of observation and is not really occurring in normal practise? 73 Tom |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would have to agree, that it is the reference sidebands of the LO that you
are seeing................it sounds like they are using a relatively wide loop filter in the synthesizer, in order to achieve a fast settling time. Pete Richard Hosking wrote in message . au... Tom What is the spectrum going into the mixer at the output of the crystal filter? If this is OK, then it must be the second mixer that is at fault. Look at the spectrum of the LO into the first mixer - does it have 5KHz reference sidebands, and at what level? What is the 1st mixer and post mixer amp? Are they able to cope with the strong broadcast signal? If they are not something substantial like a ring diode mixer and a strong post mix amp, then the IM might be happening there. A typical bipolar mixer might only be able to cope with -20dBm without overload. If the RF gain doesnt help, then maybe it is the RF amp that is at fault, though I wouldnt expect all this to get through the crystal filter. (though even crystal filters can be nonlinear if driven hard enough...) Richard Tom Holden wrote in message .. . I was startled when I hooked up a DX-394 radio (RX2) to the output of the 2nd mixer of another DX-394 (RX1) to find that the strong MW station RX1 was tuned to showed up not only at the 2nd IF of 455 kHz but at every 5kHz from around 200kHz to 30MHz! The strength varied with frequency, probably in part with the gain vs frequency curve of RX2. There were stronger signals at the 2nd and 3rd harmonics of 455kHz. Had to reduce the RX1's RF gain to the point where its AGC was inactive and the receiver was operating just above its threshold of detection to diminish the forest to just a few trees. The 2nd mixer is preceded by a crystal filter at the 1st IF of 45MHz +/-2.5kHz so I expected to see spectrum of about 15-20kHz width across 455kHz and some 3rd and higher order products like 910 and 1365kHz. The 5kHz interval is suspiciously the same as the steps in the 1st LO VCO frequency (45.150 to 74.995 MHz), controlled by a digital PLL. The 2nd LO at 44.545MHz +/-2.5khz is a varactor tuned VCO. To generate products every 5kHz, surely we need a 5kHz signal or two very strong signals that are 5kHz apart going into the mixer or some non-linear stage after the 1st IF filter. Am I seeing something unusual or is this what I should see? If it's an anomaly, can anyone suggest what the cause might be? I'm thinking this is a fault or a design weakness that with more complex signals gives rise to a lot of interference to good reception. Could it be possible that this is the result of the method of observation and is not really occurring in normal practise? 73 Tom |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because both radios are the same design, I suppose it's possible that what I
am observing is as much the fault of RX2 as it is of RX1 except that the output of RX1 at 455kHz only drives RX2 to about S9 while the test signal into RX1 drives it much higher. I wish I had a spectrum analyser. I might be able to confirm that the effect is or is not the influence of the second RX2 by checking the output of RX1 with my boat anchor analog R4B - it cannot receive 455kHz but I was observing the effect with RX2 tuned to the 10m ham band, too. The DX-394 comprises a 3SK195 RF amp, double 3SK195's for the 1st mixer differentially driven by the r.f. amp and in common mode by the 1st LO, 45MHz crystal filter, 2SC27140 1st IF amp, 2SK210Y 2nd mixer, diode switches for choice of two filters. The 1st LO PLL is a Fujitsu MB87014APF-G-BND referenced to a 33MHz crystal all under a soldered shield. From the schematic, (I'm no expert at reading these) pin 12 (designated as the output for an active type low pass filter) feeds what looks to be a control for voltage applied to a varactor diode with a feedback path consisting of a 33k in parallel with a 0.01 (M - mylar?) cap both in series with a 0.033 (M) cap. That would be the low pass filter and would control settling time, right? 73, Tom Pete KE9OA wrote: I would have to agree, that it is the reference sidebands of the LO that you are seeing................it sounds like they are using a relatively wide loop filter in the synthesizer, in order to achieve a fast settling time. Pete Richard Hosking wrote in message . au... Tom What is the spectrum going into the mixer at the output of the crystal filter? If this is OK, then it must be the second mixer that is at fault. Look at the spectrum of the LO into the first mixer - does it have 5KHz reference sidebands, and at what level? What is the 1st mixer and post mixer amp? Are they able to cope with the strong broadcast signal? If they are not something substantial like a ring diode mixer and a strong post mix amp, then the IM might be happening there. A typical bipolar mixer might only be able to cope with -20dBm without overload. If the RF gain doesnt help, then maybe it is the RF amp that is at fault, though I wouldnt expect all this to get through the crystal filter. (though even crystal filters can be nonlinear if driven hard enough...) Richard Tom Holden wrote in message .. . I was startled when I hooked up a DX-394 radio (RX2) to the output of the 2nd mixer of another DX-394 (RX1) to find that the strong MW station RX1 was tuned to showed up not only at the 2nd IF of 455 kHz but at every 5kHz from around 200kHz to 30MHz! The strength varied with frequency, probably in part with the gain vs frequency curve of RX2. There were stronger signals at the 2nd and 3rd harmonics of 455kHz. Had to reduce the RX1's RF gain to the point where its AGC was inactive and the receiver was operating just above its threshold of detection to diminish the forest to just a few trees. The 2nd mixer is preceded by a crystal filter at the 1st IF of 45MHz +/-2.5kHz so I expected to see spectrum of about 15-20kHz width across 455kHz and some 3rd and higher order products like 910 and 1365kHz. The 5kHz interval is suspiciously the same as the steps in the 1st LO VCO frequency (45.150 to 74.995 MHz), controlled by a digital PLL. The 2nd LO at 44.545MHz +/-2.5khz is a varactor tuned VCO. To generate products every 5kHz, surely we need a 5kHz signal or two very strong signals that are 5kHz apart going into the mixer or some non-linear stage after the 1st IF filter. Am I seeing something unusual or is this what I should see? If it's an anomaly, can anyone suggest what the cause might be? I'm thinking this is a fault or a design weakness that with more complex signals gives rise to a lot of interference to good reception. Could it be possible that this is the result of the method of observation and is not really occurring in normal practise? 73 Tom |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because both radios are the same design, I suppose it's possible that what I
am observing is as much the fault of RX2 as it is of RX1 except that the output of RX1 at 455kHz only drives RX2 to about S9 while the test signal into RX1 drives it much higher. I wish I had a spectrum analyser. I might be able to confirm that the effect is or is not the influence of the second RX2 by checking the output of RX1 with my boat anchor analog R4B - it cannot receive 455kHz but I was observing the effect with RX2 tuned to the 10m ham band, too. The DX-394 comprises a 3SK195 RF amp, double 3SK195's for the 1st mixer differentially driven by the r.f. amp and in common mode by the 1st LO, 45MHz crystal filter, 2SC27140 1st IF amp, 2SK210Y 2nd mixer, diode switches for choice of two filters. The 1st LO PLL is a Fujitsu MB87014APF-G-BND referenced to a 33MHz crystal all under a soldered shield. From the schematic, (I'm no expert at reading these) pin 12 (designated as the output for an active type low pass filter) feeds what looks to be a control for voltage applied to a varactor diode with a feedback path consisting of a 33k in parallel with a 0.01 (M - mylar?) cap both in series with a 0.033 (M) cap. That would be the low pass filter and would control settling time, right? 73, Tom Pete KE9OA wrote: I would have to agree, that it is the reference sidebands of the LO that you are seeing................it sounds like they are using a relatively wide loop filter in the synthesizer, in order to achieve a fast settling time. Pete Richard Hosking wrote in message . au... Tom What is the spectrum going into the mixer at the output of the crystal filter? If this is OK, then it must be the second mixer that is at fault. Look at the spectrum of the LO into the first mixer - does it have 5KHz reference sidebands, and at what level? What is the 1st mixer and post mixer amp? Are they able to cope with the strong broadcast signal? If they are not something substantial like a ring diode mixer and a strong post mix amp, then the IM might be happening there. A typical bipolar mixer might only be able to cope with -20dBm without overload. If the RF gain doesnt help, then maybe it is the RF amp that is at fault, though I wouldnt expect all this to get through the crystal filter. (though even crystal filters can be nonlinear if driven hard enough...) Richard Tom Holden wrote in message .. . I was startled when I hooked up a DX-394 radio (RX2) to the output of the 2nd mixer of another DX-394 (RX1) to find that the strong MW station RX1 was tuned to showed up not only at the 2nd IF of 455 kHz but at every 5kHz from around 200kHz to 30MHz! The strength varied with frequency, probably in part with the gain vs frequency curve of RX2. There were stronger signals at the 2nd and 3rd harmonics of 455kHz. Had to reduce the RX1's RF gain to the point where its AGC was inactive and the receiver was operating just above its threshold of detection to diminish the forest to just a few trees. The 2nd mixer is preceded by a crystal filter at the 1st IF of 45MHz +/-2.5kHz so I expected to see spectrum of about 15-20kHz width across 455kHz and some 3rd and higher order products like 910 and 1365kHz. The 5kHz interval is suspiciously the same as the steps in the 1st LO VCO frequency (45.150 to 74.995 MHz), controlled by a digital PLL. The 2nd LO at 44.545MHz +/-2.5khz is a varactor tuned VCO. To generate products every 5kHz, surely we need a 5kHz signal or two very strong signals that are 5kHz apart going into the mixer or some non-linear stage after the 1st IF filter. Am I seeing something unusual or is this what I should see? If it's an anomaly, can anyone suggest what the cause might be? I'm thinking this is a fault or a design weakness that with more complex signals gives rise to a lot of interference to good reception. Could it be possible that this is the result of the method of observation and is not really occurring in normal practise? 73 Tom |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It sounds like there is a single pole (second order) filter/PLL system. The
whole system would have to have a loop cutoff of 1/20th to 1/50th of the reference freq (100-250Hz) to get reasonable sideband suppression. You could try looking at the waveform on the VCO control line - if the 5KHz signal is more than few mV then there is probably something wrong. Try also putting an attenuator in front of the RF amp - if the problem suddenly disappears with increasing attenuation, then the problem is overload Richard The DX-394 comprises a 3SK195 RF amp, double 3SK195's for the 1st mixer differentially driven by the r.f. amp and in common mode by the 1st LO, 45MHz crystal filter, 2SC27140 1st IF amp, 2SK210Y 2nd mixer, diode switches for choice of two filters. The 1st LO PLL is a Fujitsu MB87014APF-G-BND referenced to a 33MHz crystal all under a soldered shield. From the schematic, (I'm no expert at reading these) pin 12 (designated as the output for an active type low pass filter) feeds what looks to be a control for voltage applied to a varactor diode with a feedback path consisting of a 33k in parallel with a 0.01 (M - mylar?) cap both in series with a 0.033 (M) cap. That would be the low pass filter and would control settling time, right? 73, Tom |