Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all who responded thus far (and sorry to be such a wellspring of
newbie questons). Yes, I must confess that there is no lightning arrestor installed as of yet! I was aware that one should install such a device at the time I put up the antenna, but I didn't have one handy, nor did I feel the need to invest in one. I was thinking that in the late fall/winter we really don't get any lightning here (north-east PA) and therefore I wouldn't really need a lightning arrestor until the Spring. I'm sure I'm probably wrong on this, though, as it was mainly a product of my Scots heritage getting the best of me. I guess it would be helpful to include some more specifics about what radios Im trying to feed with this antenna. Thus far, I have accumulated an A****er Kent "big box" Model 20, an A****er Kent 55-C (chassis only), an RCA Radiola 18, and a homebrew regen. This is my latest project. It uses a '36 screen grid tube as detector and a 6F8G as dual-stage audio driving a loudspeaker through an overly large Hammond OPT. So far I've only wound a coil for BC band and this thing works amazingly well. I plan on making some smaller coils for short wave (hopefully the solar storm stuff wont be long in staying). I also have future plans for a Grigsby-Grunow that was given to me to fix up, but it's on the distant horizon as of yet. So far nobody has complained about the large pile of radio-related crap in the sun porch, but Im sure it's a matter of time. I will probably have to route the antenna lead-in through a wall or two and around some bends and twists to get it into the workshop in the basement. I guess I was assuming I should use coax for this, but apparently not, from what everyone here is saying. I'm not as concerned about noise as I am about possible signal loss. Is this something to even be concerned about with a plain old insulated stranded wire lead-in routed through walls and such? I'm still new at this RF stuff (being a relatively recent convert from the realm of "AF"), so please bear with me, and thanks for all the helpful tips and suggestions! Dave |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob, is this something I could possibly be able to use in this application?
Where does one find such high-impedance coax? As an alternative, would it be possible to put an active device up near the antenna that would act as a buffer to feed a low-impedance line? Dave "Bob Lewis (AA4PB)" wrote in message ... If the antenna is the typical end-fed wire then the impedance will be very high. Most AM radios have a high impedance input designed to match a random wire like that. If you use coax, the capacitance of the coax (center conductor to shield) will essentially short most of the signal to ground and little will get to the receiver. If you've ever opened up the coax used on car radios you'll find that it is a special high impedance coax. A small wire fits loosly thru an insulated tube with the shield around the outside. This keeps a relatively large spacing between the center conductor and the shield in order to minimize capacitance. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob, is this something I could possibly be able to use in this application?
Where does one find such high-impedance coax? As an alternative, would it be possible to put an active device up near the antenna that would act as a buffer to feed a low-impedance line? Dave "Bob Lewis (AA4PB)" wrote in message ... If the antenna is the typical end-fed wire then the impedance will be very high. Most AM radios have a high impedance input designed to match a random wire like that. If you use coax, the capacitance of the coax (center conductor to shield) will essentially short most of the signal to ground and little will get to the receiver. If you've ever opened up the coax used on car radios you'll find that it is a special high impedance coax. A small wire fits loosly thru an insulated tube with the shield around the outside. This keeps a relatively large spacing between the center conductor and the shield in order to minimize capacitance. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
David wrote: Yes, I must confess that there is no lightning arrestor installed as of yet! it was mainly a product of my Scots heritage getting the best of me. Sounds familiar. Actually a lighting arrestor isn't worth much, and I'd suggest a large knife switch directly between the lead-in and ground. Your present antenna is ideal for broadcast reception since, as has been mentioned, most antique radios were designed with this sort of antenna in mind. Extending the lead-in to the basement will simply make it work better. The vertical part of the lead-in catches most of the signal. Keep it as far from power lines and noise sources as possible. If your ground is now farther away, you may lose some efficiency; my ground is a driven well in the basement. On short wave, things are different. I've used my inverted-L for short wave too, but never compared it directly against another antenna. Cheers, Alan |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
David wrote: Yes, I must confess that there is no lightning arrestor installed as of yet! it was mainly a product of my Scots heritage getting the best of me. Sounds familiar. Actually a lighting arrestor isn't worth much, and I'd suggest a large knife switch directly between the lead-in and ground. Your present antenna is ideal for broadcast reception since, as has been mentioned, most antique radios were designed with this sort of antenna in mind. Extending the lead-in to the basement will simply make it work better. The vertical part of the lead-in catches most of the signal. Keep it as far from power lines and noise sources as possible. If your ground is now farther away, you may lose some efficiency; my ground is a driven well in the basement. On short wave, things are different. I've used my inverted-L for short wave too, but never compared it directly against another antenna. Cheers, Alan |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Forsyth wrote:
Bob, is this something I could possibly be able to use in this application? Where does one find such high-impedance coax? As an alternative, would it be possible to put an active device up near the antenna that would act as a buffer to feed a low-impedance line? Dave The trick in this recommendation is that the car radio feedline is a specific length (a few feet)and its capacitance is taken into account. -Bill "Bob Lewis (AA4PB)" wrote in message ... If the antenna is the typical end-fed wire then the impedance will be very high. Most AM radios have a high impedance input designed to match a random wire like that. If you use coax, the capacitance of the coax (center conductor to shield) will essentially short most of the signal to ground and little will get to the receiver. If you've ever opened up the coax used on car radios you'll find that it is a special high impedance coax. A small wire fits loosly thru an insulated tube with the shield around the outside. This keeps a relatively large spacing between the center conductor and the shield in order to minimize capacitance. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Forsyth wrote:
Bob, is this something I could possibly be able to use in this application? Where does one find such high-impedance coax? As an alternative, would it be possible to put an active device up near the antenna that would act as a buffer to feed a low-impedance line? Dave The trick in this recommendation is that the car radio feedline is a specific length (a few feet)and its capacitance is taken into account. -Bill "Bob Lewis (AA4PB)" wrote in message ... If the antenna is the typical end-fed wire then the impedance will be very high. Most AM radios have a high impedance input designed to match a random wire like that. If you use coax, the capacitance of the coax (center conductor to shield) will essentially short most of the signal to ground and little will get to the receiver. If you've ever opened up the coax used on car radios you'll find that it is a special high impedance coax. A small wire fits loosly thru an insulated tube with the shield around the outside. This keeps a relatively large spacing between the center conductor and the shield in order to minimize capacitance. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Forsyth wrote: Thanks for all who responded thus far (and sorry to be such a wellspring of newbie questons). Yes, I must confess that there is no lightning arrestor installed as of yet! I was aware that one should install such a device at the time I put up the antenna, but I didn't have one handy, nor did I feel the need to invest in one. I was thinking that in the late fall/winter we really don't get any lightning here (north-east PA) and therefore I wouldn't really need a lightning arrestor until the Spring. I'm sure I'm probably wrong on this, though, as it was mainly a product of my Scots heritage getting the best of me. Do yourself a favor: at the end of your antenna (inside the house) install a neon bulb and a 100K resistor in series, connected between the antenna and ground. Then, on a windy day, go watch the bulb. You can make your own static discharge unit: -----------\ /-------------- Copper \ / Copper Strip / \ Strip -----+-----/ \-----+-------- | | +---/\/\/\/-----+ 100K The points on the copper strips need to be sharp, not blunt, at the gap. Wire one strip to ground with #10 or larger copper wire, and the other strip to the antenna. Set the gap between the copper strips as narrow as you can. Solder a 100K resistor across the copper strips. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Forsyth wrote: Thanks for all who responded thus far (and sorry to be such a wellspring of newbie questons). Yes, I must confess that there is no lightning arrestor installed as of yet! I was aware that one should install such a device at the time I put up the antenna, but I didn't have one handy, nor did I feel the need to invest in one. I was thinking that in the late fall/winter we really don't get any lightning here (north-east PA) and therefore I wouldn't really need a lightning arrestor until the Spring. I'm sure I'm probably wrong on this, though, as it was mainly a product of my Scots heritage getting the best of me. Do yourself a favor: at the end of your antenna (inside the house) install a neon bulb and a 100K resistor in series, connected between the antenna and ground. Then, on a windy day, go watch the bulb. You can make your own static discharge unit: -----------\ /-------------- Copper \ / Copper Strip / \ Strip -----+-----/ \-----+-------- | | +---/\/\/\/-----+ 100K The points on the copper strips need to be sharp, not blunt, at the gap. Wire one strip to ground with #10 or larger copper wire, and the other strip to the antenna. Set the gap between the copper strips as narrow as you can. Solder a 100K resistor across the copper strips. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
There is no simple answer to your problem as the impedances and frequency range involved are too great. However, as you are not intending to use the antenna to transmit with, take a look at this site and do a search on "LONG WIRE BALUN". http://www.maplin.co.uk/ If you are in the U.S. I am sure that there will be an equivalent item around somewhere. It is even possible that there is a design for one of these out on the net. The device is mis-named really and should be called something like an UNUN. Of course it is a kludge but what the hell as it should be better than a single wire or coax feed from your basement. Cheers - Joe, G3LLV |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew |