Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Apart from the new pcb, the main electrical difference between the Radio
Shack DX-394B and its immediate predecessor, the DX-394A, is the addition of an emitter follower buffer amp between the output of the 2nd local Oscillator (the emitter of the one transistor 44.5MHz VCXO) and the 2nd mixer. The latter is a 2SK210-Y/YY VHF N-channel JFET; 1st IF is injected at the gate and the 2nd LO at the drain. Why would the designers add the buffer? What performance comparison should I make between the A and the B model to assess whether it would be worthwhile to retrofit a similar buffer to the A model? I can say that I have not noticed any dramatic difference with my usual listening habits. Tom |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Ameritron ARB-702K Linear Amp Buffer | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Ameritron ARB-702K Linear Amp Buffer | Boatanchors | |||
RS DX-394B: why 2nd LO buffer added? | Equipment | |||
RS DX-394B: why 2nd LO buffer added? | Homebrew | |||
RS DX-394B: why 2nd LO buffer added? | Equipment |