Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , SpamLover
writes Is there any place on the web whence I can download some high-definition graph for a 0-100 or 0-180 scale? I'd print it out in large format and then reduce it to the size I need by means of an ANALOG photocopier. http://www.qsl.net/wb6bld/meter.html Duncan -- Support bacteria. They are the only culture some people have. Duncan Clark |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you everyone!
I haven't tried "Meter", but "Dial" already made me the proud owner of a nicely printed 0-100 linear scale. Question: I had to do a screen capture and print via IrfanView, as the Radius setting had no effect on the printed size. Did I do something wrong? (However, using the screen capture, the result is excellent!) Re. log scale: don't you get any serious problems with fine rendering / printing? My PC/Video/printer work very well with Meter + IrfanView, but I can't get anything decent out of Excel/Open Office, as both approximate fine divisions too roughly for any practical use, even when doing HUGE pie charts. Thanks again, sooner or later I'll post pics of the new rig. It will (should) be a broad tuning-range HF regen with a highly repositionable, crystal referenced bandspread (either one generic 0-100 linear scale with tuning graph book, or perhaps a series of slide-in tuning cards, both so cutely retro!) plus switchable wide/phone/CW audio bandpass filtering, and a few other tricks. Also, by the way, do you know of anyone using a film scale + lamp + lens to PROJECT the tuning scale in a homemade device? This would be sooo cooool! I'd even be tempted to print in the names of a selection of broadcasters, coastal stations, nets, QPR windows, USN fax, GCSS, whatever.... Spammy |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you everyone!
I haven't tried "Meter", but "Dial" already made me the proud owner of a nicely printed 0-100 linear scale. Question: I had to do a screen capture and print via IrfanView, as the Radius setting had no effect on the printed size. Did I do something wrong? (However, using the screen capture, the result is excellent!) Re. log scale: don't you get any serious problems with fine rendering / printing? My PC/Video/printer work very well with Meter + IrfanView, but I can't get anything decent out of Excel/Open Office, as both approximate fine divisions too roughly for any practical use, even when doing HUGE pie charts. Thanks again, sooner or later I'll post pics of the new rig. It will (should) be a broad tuning-range HF regen with a highly repositionable, crystal referenced bandspread (either one generic 0-100 linear scale with tuning graph book, or perhaps a series of slide-in tuning cards, both so cutely retro!) plus switchable wide/phone/CW audio bandpass filtering, and a few other tricks. Also, by the way, do you know of anyone using a film scale + lamp + lens to PROJECT the tuning scale in a homemade device? This would be sooo cooool! I'd even be tempted to print in the names of a selection of broadcasters, coastal stations, nets, QPR windows, USN fax, GCSS, whatever.... Spammy |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The radius should affect the printed result. *HOWEVER* - the radius in the
Windows version is in pixels. On your printer, pixels are usually pretty small these days, so you need to make the dial absolutely huge on the screen to print reasonably. Most commonly printers are 300 dpi (although some newer ones are a lot higher) so a radius setting of 150 would give you a 1 inch diameter dial. ... "SpamLover" wrote in message om... Thank you everyone! I haven't tried "Meter", but "Dial" already made me the proud owner of a nicely printed 0-100 linear scale. Question: I had to do a screen capture and print via IrfanView, as the Radius setting had no effect on the printed size. Did I do something wrong? (However, using the screen capture, the result is excellent!) Re. log scale: don't you get any serious problems with fine rendering / printing? My PC/Video/printer work very well with Meter + IrfanView, but I can't get anything decent out of Excel/Open Office, as both approximate fine divisions too roughly for any practical use, even when doing HUGE pie charts. Thanks again, sooner or later I'll post pics of the new rig. It will (should) be a broad tuning-range HF regen with a highly repositionable, crystal referenced bandspread (either one generic 0-100 linear scale with tuning graph book, or perhaps a series of slide-in tuning cards, both so cutely retro!) plus switchable wide/phone/CW audio bandpass filtering, and a few other tricks. Also, by the way, do you know of anyone using a film scale + lamp + lens to PROJECT the tuning scale in a homemade device? This would be sooo cooool! I'd even be tempted to print in the names of a selection of broadcasters, coastal stations, nets, QPR windows, USN fax, GCSS, whatever.... Spammy |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The radius should affect the printed result. *HOWEVER* - the radius in the
Windows version is in pixels. On your printer, pixels are usually pretty small these days, so you need to make the dial absolutely huge on the screen to print reasonably. Most commonly printers are 300 dpi (although some newer ones are a lot higher) so a radius setting of 150 would give you a 1 inch diameter dial. ... "SpamLover" wrote in message om... Thank you everyone! I haven't tried "Meter", but "Dial" already made me the proud owner of a nicely printed 0-100 linear scale. Question: I had to do a screen capture and print via IrfanView, as the Radius setting had no effect on the printed size. Did I do something wrong? (However, using the screen capture, the result is excellent!) Re. log scale: don't you get any serious problems with fine rendering / printing? My PC/Video/printer work very well with Meter + IrfanView, but I can't get anything decent out of Excel/Open Office, as both approximate fine divisions too roughly for any practical use, even when doing HUGE pie charts. Thanks again, sooner or later I'll post pics of the new rig. It will (should) be a broad tuning-range HF regen with a highly repositionable, crystal referenced bandspread (either one generic 0-100 linear scale with tuning graph book, or perhaps a series of slide-in tuning cards, both so cutely retro!) plus switchable wide/phone/CW audio bandpass filtering, and a few other tricks. Also, by the way, do you know of anyone using a film scale + lamp + lens to PROJECT the tuning scale in a homemade device? This would be sooo cooool! I'd even be tempted to print in the names of a selection of broadcasters, coastal stations, nets, QPR windows, USN fax, GCSS, whatever.... Spammy |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
the radius in the Windows version is in pixels
Perfect! Now I can get excellent results. Thank you! |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
the radius in the Windows version is in pixels
Perfect! Now I can get excellent results. Thank you! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |