Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a few slow-motion drives with pointers that I'd like to equip
with simple log scales. I have tried to split a half-circle scale by means of a compass, and found it to be quite doable, but 1) time-consuming, 2) messy, 2) leading to power-of-two end-of scale values (obviously) that are anything but intuitive. I am not an binary / octal / hex / kind of guy, and have no affinity for scales that end at 64 or 128 or G_d forbid 256. I also tried making a 0-100 scale by means of Excel / PowerPoint / Openoffice, but their rendering hits very soon an unsightly rough degree of approximation. Is there any place on the web whence I can download some high-definition graph for a 0-100 or 0-180 scale? I'd print it out in large format and then reduce it to the size I need by means of an ANALOG photocopier. TIA Spammy |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
go to:
http://hfradio.org/wb8rcr On the lower left is a link to "Panel (not QSLmaker)" ... "SpamLover" wrote in message om... I have a few slow-motion drives with pointers that I'd like to equip with simple log scales. I have tried to split a half-circle scale by means of a compass, and found it to be quite doable, but 1) time-consuming, 2) messy, 2) leading to power-of-two end-of scale values (obviously) that are anything but intuitive. I am not an binary / octal / hex / kind of guy, and have no affinity for scales that end at 64 or 128 or G_d forbid 256. I also tried making a 0-100 scale by means of Excel / PowerPoint / Openoffice, but their rendering hits very soon an unsightly rough degree of approximation. Is there any place on the web whence I can download some high-definition graph for a 0-100 or 0-180 scale? I'd print it out in large format and then reduce it to the size I need by means of an ANALOG photocopier. TIA Spammy |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice and very useful, but appears to not do log scales as I believe
the OP wants. I hacked a simple Excel spreadsheet that would do fine, except for the fact that Excel plots INCORRECT size segments sometimes! Grrrr. Otherwise seems like it would be fine; it prints just fine, to whatever your printer resolution is. If the OP wants to try it in Excel perhaps a different way than he first tried, here's what I did... o One cell for degrees span, referenced in next-to-last step. o Make a column with the values where you want tics (e.g., 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100). There can be any number of them, at any values (in sequence, of course). o Next column over, take the log of the tic values o Next column over, take the differences between adjacent values in previous (log) column. There will be n-1 of them. o Just below last cell of differences column, create a cell with sum(column_above)*(360-degrees_span)/degrees_span in it. o Create a "donut" plot of the n values in the last column. Adjust the colors to be all the same (or not, as you please) and the inner circle to be the radius you want. This doesn't label the tics, but you should be able to do that in other progs if you want. And the tics are all the same length, which is suboptimal. Should be easy to do in Scilab, too, and use Ghostscript to print (like Panel and Dial do). That gives the ability to make different size tics and to label them. Cheers, Tom "xpyttl" wrote in message ... go to: http://hfradio.org/wb8rcr On the lower left is a link to "Panel (not QSLmaker)" .. "SpamLover" wrote in message om... I have a few slow-motion drives with pointers that I'd like to equip with simple log scales. I have tried to split a half-circle scale by means of a compass, and found it to be quite doable, but 1) time-consuming, 2) messy, 2) leading to power-of-two end-of scale values (obviously) that are anything but intuitive. I am not an binary / octal / hex / kind of guy, and have no affinity for scales that end at 64 or 128 or G_d forbid 256. I also tried making a 0-100 scale by means of Excel / PowerPoint / Openoffice, but their rendering hits very soon an unsightly rough degree of approximation. Is there any place on the web whence I can download some high-definition graph for a 0-100 or 0-180 scale? I'd print it out in large format and then reduce it to the size I need by means of an ANALOG photocopier. TIA Spammy |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey! Another swell use for Excel. I just did my meter faces with a drawing
program. I do all kinds of graphing in Excel. -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. "Tom Bruhns" wrote in message m... Nice and very useful, but appears to not do log scales as I believe the OP wants. I hacked a simple Excel spreadsheet that would do fine, except for the fact that Excel plots INCORRECT size segments sometimes! Grrrr. Otherwise seems like it would be fine; it prints just fine, to whatever your printer resolution is. If the OP wants to try it in Excel perhaps a different way than he first tried, here's what I did... o One cell for degrees span, referenced in next-to-last step. o Make a column with the values where you want tics (e.g., 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100). There can be any number of them, at any values (in sequence, of course). o Next column over, take the log of the tic values o Next column over, take the differences between adjacent values in previous (log) column. There will be n-1 of them. o Just below last cell of differences column, create a cell with sum(column_above)*(360-degrees_span)/degrees_span in it. o Create a "donut" plot of the n values in the last column. Adjust the colors to be all the same (or not, as you please) and the inner circle to be the radius you want. This doesn't label the tics, but you should be able to do that in other progs if you want. And the tics are all the same length, which is suboptimal. Should be easy to do in Scilab, too, and use Ghostscript to print (like Panel and Dial do). That gives the ability to make different size tics and to label them. Cheers, Tom "xpyttl" wrote in message ... go to: http://hfradio.org/wb8rcr On the lower left is a link to "Panel (not QSLmaker)" .. "SpamLover" wrote in message om... I have a few slow-motion drives with pointers that I'd like to equip with simple log scales. I have tried to split a half-circle scale by means of a compass, and found it to be quite doable, but 1) time-consuming, 2) messy, 2) leading to power-of-two end-of scale values (obviously) that are anything but intuitive. I am not an binary / octal / hex / kind of guy, and have no affinity for scales that end at 64 or 128 or G_d forbid 256. I also tried making a 0-100 scale by means of Excel / PowerPoint / Openoffice, but their rendering hits very soon an unsightly rough degree of approximation. Is there any place on the web whence I can download some high-definition graph for a 0-100 or 0-180 scale? I'd print it out in large format and then reduce it to the size I need by means of an ANALOG photocopier. TIA Spammy |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey! Another swell use for Excel. I just did my meter faces with a drawing
program. I do all kinds of graphing in Excel. -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. "Tom Bruhns" wrote in message m... Nice and very useful, but appears to not do log scales as I believe the OP wants. I hacked a simple Excel spreadsheet that would do fine, except for the fact that Excel plots INCORRECT size segments sometimes! Grrrr. Otherwise seems like it would be fine; it prints just fine, to whatever your printer resolution is. If the OP wants to try it in Excel perhaps a different way than he first tried, here's what I did... o One cell for degrees span, referenced in next-to-last step. o Make a column with the values where you want tics (e.g., 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100). There can be any number of them, at any values (in sequence, of course). o Next column over, take the log of the tic values o Next column over, take the differences between adjacent values in previous (log) column. There will be n-1 of them. o Just below last cell of differences column, create a cell with sum(column_above)*(360-degrees_span)/degrees_span in it. o Create a "donut" plot of the n values in the last column. Adjust the colors to be all the same (or not, as you please) and the inner circle to be the radius you want. This doesn't label the tics, but you should be able to do that in other progs if you want. And the tics are all the same length, which is suboptimal. Should be easy to do in Scilab, too, and use Ghostscript to print (like Panel and Dial do). That gives the ability to make different size tics and to label them. Cheers, Tom "xpyttl" wrote in message ... go to: http://hfradio.org/wb8rcr On the lower left is a link to "Panel (not QSLmaker)" .. "SpamLover" wrote in message om... I have a few slow-motion drives with pointers that I'd like to equip with simple log scales. I have tried to split a half-circle scale by means of a compass, and found it to be quite doable, but 1) time-consuming, 2) messy, 2) leading to power-of-two end-of scale values (obviously) that are anything but intuitive. I am not an binary / octal / hex / kind of guy, and have no affinity for scales that end at 64 or 128 or G_d forbid 256. I also tried making a 0-100 scale by means of Excel / PowerPoint / Openoffice, but their rendering hits very soon an unsightly rough degree of approximation. Is there any place on the web whence I can download some high-definition graph for a 0-100 or 0-180 scale? I'd print it out in large format and then reduce it to the size I need by means of an ANALOG photocopier. TIA Spammy |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice and very useful, but appears to not do log scales as I believe
the OP wants. I hacked a simple Excel spreadsheet that would do fine, except for the fact that Excel plots INCORRECT size segments sometimes! Grrrr. Otherwise seems like it would be fine; it prints just fine, to whatever your printer resolution is. If the OP wants to try it in Excel perhaps a different way than he first tried, here's what I did... o One cell for degrees span, referenced in next-to-last step. o Make a column with the values where you want tics (e.g., 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100). There can be any number of them, at any values (in sequence, of course). o Next column over, take the log of the tic values o Next column over, take the differences between adjacent values in previous (log) column. There will be n-1 of them. o Just below last cell of differences column, create a cell with sum(column_above)*(360-degrees_span)/degrees_span in it. o Create a "donut" plot of the n values in the last column. Adjust the colors to be all the same (or not, as you please) and the inner circle to be the radius you want. This doesn't label the tics, but you should be able to do that in other progs if you want. And the tics are all the same length, which is suboptimal. Should be easy to do in Scilab, too, and use Ghostscript to print (like Panel and Dial do). That gives the ability to make different size tics and to label them. Cheers, Tom "xpyttl" wrote in message ... go to: http://hfradio.org/wb8rcr On the lower left is a link to "Panel (not QSLmaker)" .. "SpamLover" wrote in message om... I have a few slow-motion drives with pointers that I'd like to equip with simple log scales. I have tried to split a half-circle scale by means of a compass, and found it to be quite doable, but 1) time-consuming, 2) messy, 2) leading to power-of-two end-of scale values (obviously) that are anything but intuitive. I am not an binary / octal / hex / kind of guy, and have no affinity for scales that end at 64 or 128 or G_d forbid 256. I also tried making a 0-100 scale by means of Excel / PowerPoint / Openoffice, but their rendering hits very soon an unsightly rough degree of approximation. Is there any place on the web whence I can download some high-definition graph for a 0-100 or 0-180 scale? I'd print it out in large format and then reduce it to the size I need by means of an ANALOG photocopier. TIA Spammy |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
go to:
http://hfradio.org/wb8rcr On the lower left is a link to "Panel (not QSLmaker)" ... "SpamLover" wrote in message om... I have a few slow-motion drives with pointers that I'd like to equip with simple log scales. I have tried to split a half-circle scale by means of a compass, and found it to be quite doable, but 1) time-consuming, 2) messy, 2) leading to power-of-two end-of scale values (obviously) that are anything but intuitive. I am not an binary / octal / hex / kind of guy, and have no affinity for scales that end at 64 or 128 or G_d forbid 256. I also tried making a 0-100 scale by means of Excel / PowerPoint / Openoffice, but their rendering hits very soon an unsightly rough degree of approximation. Is there any place on the web whence I can download some high-definition graph for a 0-100 or 0-180 scale? I'd print it out in large format and then reduce it to the size I need by means of an ANALOG photocopier. TIA Spammy |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , SpamLover
writes Is there any place on the web whence I can download some high-definition graph for a 0-100 or 0-180 scale? I'd print it out in large format and then reduce it to the size I need by means of an ANALOG photocopier. http://www.qsl.net/wb6bld/meter.html Duncan -- Support bacteria. They are the only culture some people have. Duncan Clark |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |