Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is to be expected. The engineers who work at the job all day, every
day, know and understand a lot more about the circuits they're designing than someone to whom it's only a hobby. And, considering the incredible time and effort that goes into the design of each product, Tektronix and similar companies can't afford to be making instruments that can be perfectly copied within days. I never saw any conscious effort to obscure a design, but the normal process of developing state-of-the-art equipment required use of techniques out of the reach of amateurs or even most manufacturing companies. Let me give you just a few examples. 1. Circuit board layout becomes critical for many high performance circuits, and sometimes several iterations are required before all problems are solved. There are also mechanical considerations such as maintaining necessary air flow. In a product I worked on, we had to solder the turns of a delay line together to reduce coupling from a CRT deflection circuit. In another, the ground was broken in a critical point to interrupt ground current flow. 2. Design techniques are used which aren't well known outside the industry. For example, look at the schematic of the vertical amplifiers in older Tek analog scopes. You'll find series RC combinations, sometimes with a thermistor as the R, between the emitters of the differential stage transistors. These served two functions. One was to compensate for the delay line loss which increases as the square root of frequency. The other is to compensate for thermals -- the fact that a common-emitter stage gain changes as the transistor heats up in response to a signal voltage change. This can usually be ignored in a time-domain application, but can cause serious distortion of a voltage step or other time-domain waveform. Changing the transistor type or sometimes even its package type changes the compensation requirements. 3. Component selection and design are often critical, as is material selection. As an example, some high impedance attenuators are built on special circuit board material such as polysulfone, because of a nonlinear property of FR4 and other materials called "hook" which causes signal distortion. 4. Manufacturing techniques. The list of these is almost endless. It becomes a major determining factor in circuit performance particularly at very high frequencies, such as the 20 - 50 GHz sampling heads I helped design. I recall showing a photomicrograph of a new sampling head to a company which was very sensitive to security, and telling the surprised engineers that I'd be happy to give them a copy. I also told them truthfully that even if I gave them the schematic and parts list, they still wouldn't be able to build it. I'd guess that a competing company with world-class engineers might be able to do so in about a year. There were just too many special and selected components and manufacturing tricks. So it's wishful thinking to believe that you can duplicate one of these high-performance circuits by soldering parts together from a circuit diagram. There's a very lot that goes into these products that most people have no idea of. Roy Lewallen, W7EL J M Noeding wrote: . . . On the other hand one may experience that HP and Tek uses some extra components which are difficult for the average constructor to explain or understand the function for, and one may experience that even among the amateurs somebody manage some technique which almost nobody else can copy - not even very experienced persons, may I mention SM5BZR Leif's techniques, it is many constructions, they may look so easy, but one often need some more deeper understanding to succeed, what say's G3SEK? 73 Jan-Martin --- J. M. Noeding, LA8AK, N-4623 Kristiansand http://home.online.no/~la8ak/c.htm |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() my favorite commercial design "oops" was a pricey multi-port TTY (teletype) i/o board for the then new Nova 4/X minicomputer (data general). Worked great, as long as you only used video terminals emulating a TTY on a current loop. Put on a _real_ teletype, and you quickly fried the board, every time. No protection against counter-EMF. After two board exchanges (in warranty, thankfully), we finally just put in opto-isolators on our own TTY lines and it worked thereafter. ;-) grins bobm -- ************************************************** ********************* * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:43:13 -0700, Tim Wescott
wrote: Buy it, it's worth it. I just have and it is. Especially since I got a brand new copy for just over 5 quid! ($30 cover price) Next target: "Experimental Methods...." :-) -- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Old Radio Related Books | Homebrew | |||
FS: Old Radio Related Books | Equipment | |||
FS: Old Radio Related Books | Homebrew | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment |