Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
I find the obligatory 599 or 59 report absolute nonsense , if not stupid , especially in connection with contests ,because it does not provide 'any information' . So, like you want me to sit at the rig with magnifying glass and observe the meter with 5% accuracy? Reports became largely redundant, most people chose to 59 them, but nobody is stopping you from using accurate report. . . It's lots of fun to jump into a DX contest for a while and give honest RST reports. Totally blows the other guy's mind. I suspect most can't even figure out a way to log it. I'm sure Yuri would get a big kick out of folks doing that to him during a hot contest. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:02:27 -0800, Noise From Afar hath writ:
The reason for the 59 or 599 is contesters don't want to waste time with lesser reports so they always give 59 or 599 and their computers are programmed for 59 or 599 Paper loggers just enter 59 or 599 in one entry and draw a line thru the column Time is of the essence in a contest This practice altho wrong has been going on for years and undoubtedly will continue And a contester is not after RST information per se but must satisfy the rules -- just quick rapid contacts is the drill Q-Rate me lads Q-Rate That's whay (as an earlier poster in the thread mentioned) VHF contests are more honest. The exchange has to be the (correct) grid square. Thus, the contest judges have a excellent way to locate mis-matched calls:grids. 73 Jonesy -- | Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux | Gunnison, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | OS/2 __ | 7,703' -- 2,345m | config.com | DM68mn SK |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:02:27 -0800, "Noise From Afar"
wrote: The reason for the 59 or 599 is contesters don't want to waste time with lesser reports so they always give 59 or 599 and their computers are programmed for 59 or 599 Paper loggers just enter 59 or 599 in one entry and draw a line thru the column that is bad logging practice, you write 5 for 559, 7 for 579, and leave open for 599 with 25WPM it is no real problem on this side --- J. M. Noeding, LA8AK, N-4623 Kristiansand http://home.online.no/~la8ak/c.htm |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Noise From Afar" wrote in message news:7zord.190863$hj.186448@fed1read07... The reason for the 59 or 599 is contesters don't want to waste time with lesser reports so they always give 59 or 599 and their computers are programmed for 59 or 599 Paper loggers just enter 59 or 599 in one entry and draw a line thru the column Time is of the essence in a contest This practice altho wrong has been going on for years and undoubtedly will continue And a contester is not after RST information per se but must satisfy the rules -- just quick rapid contacts is the drill Q-Rate me lads Q-Rate AS time and the Q rate is important and everyone is going 599, why don't the contest rules just do away with that requirement ? What good is it ? |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() It's lots of fun to jump into a DX contest for a while and give honest RST reports. Totally blows the other guy's mind. I suspect most can't even figure out a way to log it. I'm sure Yuri would get a big kick out of folks doing that to him during a hot contest. Roy Lewallen, W7EL No problem, just one more keystroke, unless one has jumped the gun, assumed 599 and logged the QSO before the other station sent the real report. Then it is few more keystrokes :-( Yuri, K3BU.us |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SWR meter calibration question - hooked up backwards? | Equipment | |||
SWR meter calibration question - hooked up backwards? | Antenna | |||
inline swr meter question | Antenna | |||
10 meter ant impedance at 15 meter | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |