Dear Airy,

I can't resist the temptation to read most of what you write. It's habit
forming.

It's because there appears to be an unexpected element of truth in many of
your thought-out if unruly statements.

But try not to be so offensive in your, chip-on-the-shoulder, mode of
expression. You could be even more effective.
----
Reg.

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Dear Airy,

I can't resist the temptation to read most of what you write. It's habit
forming.

It's because there appears to be an unexpected element of truth in many of
your thought-out if unruly statements.

But try not to be so offensive in your, chip-on-the-shoulder, mode of
expression. You could be even more effective.

Reg, break the habit.

You won't miss much.

--
Brian Reay
www.g8osn.org.uk
www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk
FP#898

Dear Reg,

Thank-you for your few kind words.

I, in my turn, read with interest your contributions to the
various NG. From what you profess, I have much to
learn about the common sense of what really happens
in antennae and feeders and I am an avid pupil of yours.
(That is part of parcel of Ham Radio, not only to
improve one's own knowledge, but also to encourage
others in what is essentially a technical pursuit.)

As to offensiveness, none is intended. If it was your
intention to refer to my stance against the gangrenous
degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme,
then I regret that I can offer you no apology. We Radio
Hams must take a stand now, and that stand must be to
refuse to have anything to do with what are essentially
second-class citizens in the radio context.

In other matters, if you do indeed refer to other matters, I speak
my mind and I speak the truth as I see it. Do not be so
surprised at candidness and openness. (If there are those
who take the liberty of taking offence at ideas expressed
that are not their own ideas, then they would be well advised
not to read an international forum such as this NG.

Caveat Lector.

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Dear Airy,
I can't resist the temptation to read most of what you write. It's habit
forming.
It's because there appears to be an unexpected element of truth in many of
your thought-out if unruly statements.
But try not to be so offensive in your, chip-on-the-shoulder, mode of
expression. You could be even more effective.

"Brian Reay" wrote:

: Brilliant Harold, no one can dress an insult up like an American. I love
: it!
:
: ROTFLMAO !

said m3osn who objected to the morse test but sat a morse assessment to
get his m3 callsign !!

"G1LVN" wrote:

: Yep 6 replies - obviously the other 4 users of this newsgroup have
: killfiled you Bean (or are on Hoilday with Slim).

i thought you left ?

"Brian Reay" wrote:

: Reg, break the habit.
:
: You won't miss much.

said m3osn

Please don't post your rudeness into groups to which
you do not subscribe.

"J M Noeding" wrote in message
...
please keep your rubbish to the English cb group, don't spread the
noise into the amateur radio newsgroup "rec.radio.amateur.homebrew"
(I wouldn't see any replies since I don't subscribe to the cb group)

The Mongolian Hordes of CBers are present in Britland,
particularly in the shape of the gangrenous degeneration that
is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.

If we stand aside and let them take over, then who will
speak out for the excellent technical pursuit that is Ham Radio?

Yes - the NG uk.radio.amateur has become largely a CB
group, not the least reason being the sometimes-vicious
and always-infantile abusive tirades from those who
are CBers in one guise or another, as overt CBers,
as M3/CBers and as CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams.

Do we let them sweep away all that is excellent about Ham Radio,
or do we take a stand against them by staying in, and continuing to
demonstrate our own standards in, the NG uk.radio.amateur?

"J M Noeding" wrote in message
...
please keep your rubbish to the English cb group, don't spread the
noise into the amateur radio newsgroup "rec.radio.amateur.homebrew"
(I wouldn't see any replies since I don't subscribe to the cb group)

Airy R.Bean wrote:
The Mongolian Hordes of CBers are present in Britland,
particularly in the shape of the gangrenous degeneration that
is the M3/CB Fools' Licence scheme.

If we stand aside and let them take over, then who will
speak out for the excellent technical pursuit that is Ham Radio?

Yes - the NG uk.radio.amateur has become largely a CB
group, not the least reason being the sometimes-vicious
and always-infantile abusive tirades from those who
are CBers in one guise or another, as overt CBers,
as M3/CBers and as CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams.

Do we let them sweep away all that is excellent about Ham Radio,
or do we take a stand against them by staying in, and continuing to
demonstrate our own standards in, the NG uk.radio.amateur?

"J M Noeding" wrote in message
...

Oh, so sometimes-vicious and always-infantile abusive tirades are a sign
of a CB'er?

Well, 10-4 good buddy, and you can 10-3 for as long as you want.

I hope that helps, you don't seem to understand English on this point.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Mr.Westcott continues with his rather silly and infantile
tirades, his Children's Broadcast (CB) below seeming
to classify him.....


"Tim Wescott" wrote in message
...
Oh, so sometimes-vicious and always-infantile abusive tirades are a sign
of a CB'er?
Well, 10-4 good buddy, and you can 10-3 for as long as you want.
I hope that helps, you don't seem to understand English on this point.