Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How do I design an automatic antenna tuner with no moving parts?
This is a good question. How to do it - without relays, motor driven capacitors and inductor cotacts? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Andrey
writes How do I design an automatic antenna tuner with no moving parts? This is a good question. How to do it - without relays, motor driven capacitors and inductor cotacts? To make any tuner variable, you have to vary something (and this can only be an L or a C). If you don't vary them physically with moving parts, you have to vary them electrically. You can change C using Varicap diodes (where you vary a DC voltage. You can change L by using inductors with cores which you can partially saturate by varying a DC current. Neither technique is really applicable to transmission. Ian. -- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:43:57 -0800, "Andrey"
wrote: How do I design an automatic antenna tuner with no moving parts? This is a good question. How to do it - without relays, motor driven capacitors and inductor cotacts? 1.) Since you did not specify the power level, use varactor diodes and inductors on a suitable core material and vary the core permeability with an external magnet field, controlled by a variable DC-current. 2.) Alternatively, get rid of the antenna tuner by using resonant and matched broadband antennas. Paul OH3LWR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is a link to the original 1996 QST article on homebrewing a tuner
called the AT-11. It is now made by LDG Electronics. It uses relays to switch inductive and capacitive elements in an L-network tuner configuration. http://www.3764.net/qst/1996-1999/au...tuner_at11.pdf The article presents the complete schematic and theory of operation, but there is no microprocessor source code included. The author does say that you can but a programmed chip from him, but I don't know if that's still available. Maybe someone in this group can suggest where to get source code or a hex file of the object code. Joe W3JDR "Paul Keinanen" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:43:57 -0800, "Andrey" wrote: How do I design an automatic antenna tuner with no moving parts? This is a good question. How to do it - without relays, motor driven capacitors and inductor cotacts? 1.) Since you did not specify the power level, use varactor diodes and inductors on a suitable core material and vary the core permeability with an external magnet field, controlled by a variable DC-current. 2.) Alternatively, get rid of the antenna tuner by using resonant and matched broadband antennas. Paul OH3LWR |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrey" wrote in message
... How do I design an automatic antenna tuner with no moving parts? This is a good question. How to do it - without relays, motor driven capacitors and inductor cotacts? I'm not so sure that is really all that off the wall. Most autotuners are pretty mindless ... you only need to get down to a "reasonable" SWR, so you can use a finite number of LC circuits. Most tuners count frequency (easy) and use that to look up where they were the last time they were near that frequency, so they randomly try everything at first, but then use their experience to get there quicker the next time. A few actually look at the phase angle to figure out which way to go, but they are in a minority and it isn't all that clear that they do much better than just guessing. Typically, relays are used in commercial autotuners. Latching relays are simple, cheap, and require very little power. But I can see no reason why one couldn't use PIN diodes if the "no moving parts" was a requirement. It would ratchet up the price a bit, and probably also the power consumption, so I can see why it wouldn't be a common commercial approach, but if the no moving parts limitation is a hard requirement I can't see why it wouldn't work. I would also think about the "why" on the no moving parts. Something like PIN diodes is going to mean constant power consumption, which in turn means constant generated heat. It isn't obvious to me that this will result in better reliability than latching relays, which are pretty darned good these days as far as reliability is concerned. It will also end up (I think) increasing the parts count quite a bit, which again will hurt the reliability, to say nothing of the cost. ... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As others have noted, it's certainly possible to do with the only moving
parts being relays -- there are several commercial tuners on the market in this category. But it'll be awfully tough to replace the relays, if your intention is to transmit. Relay contacts have very high impedance (low capacitance) when off, and very low resistance when on. They'll handle very large voltages and currents. And the impedance, both on and off, doesn't change with applied signal level. There isn't any other component that has all these characteristics, and some or all are required in a wide range tuner. You might, by very careful analysis of the circuitry under various load conditions, come up with some sort of switch (e.g., PIN diode, VMOS FET, etc.) which can handle the voltages and currents at each switch point, while having acceptable on resistance, off capacitance, and linearity (non-variation with signal level). But it won't be a simple task. And you'll probably still have to sacrifice some efficiency and tuning range. In a receive-only tuner, you still have the problem of getting adequate on and off impedances, but you are relieved of the voltage and current requirements. Relays are just simply very hard to beat for some applications -- and this is one of them. Of course, you can try varying the L and/or C by a number of methods, such as others suggested -- using saturable reactors for L and varicaps for C. Again, though, you run into voltage and current limitations. And these devices tend to be nonlinear -- that is, the L or C depends also on instantaneous signal level. So when they encounter a large signal, they create distortion which produces harmonics. This would be a fine approach for a receive-only tuner, but not a good one if you want to use it for transmitting. So, that's how you do it. Good luck! Roy Lewallen, W7EL Andrey wrote: How do I design an automatic antenna tuner with no moving parts? This is a good question. How to do it - without relays, motor driven capacitors and inductor cotacts? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Interested in high-performance tube-based AM tuner designs | Shortwave | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner | |||
FA ICOM AH-4 Automatic Antenna Tuner | Swap |