Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is on a 10 gig receive setup. There is no LNFE, just antenna
to mixer direct couple in a balanced waveguide mixer assembly. The question is, if I remove the 1N23E/1N23ER pair, and go with a balanced set of schottkey microwave diodes, this would allow me to drop my local oscillator injection perhaps 6db. Will I see any increased sensativity, or should I just keep the 1N23 setup? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not sure, but let me know if you need any of them. I've got a partial
reel of HP dual diodes in a SOT-23 package. They are intended for use in your application. Pete "gudmundur" wrote in message ... This is on a 10 gig receive setup. There is no LNFE, just antenna to mixer direct couple in a balanced waveguide mixer assembly. The question is, if I remove the 1N23E/1N23ER pair, and go with a balanced set of schottkey microwave diodes, this would allow me to drop my local oscillator injection perhaps 6db. Will I see any increased sensativity, or should I just keep the 1N23 setup? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
gudmundur wrote:
This is on a 10 gig receive setup. There is no LNFE, just antenna to mixer direct couple in a balanced waveguide mixer assembly. The question is, if I remove the 1N23E/1N23ER pair, and go with a balanced set of schottkey microwave diodes, this would allow me to drop my local oscillator injection perhaps 6db. Will I see any increased sensativity, or should I just keep the 1N23 setup? wow, those 1N21/23 diodes are stone age! They are Germanium diodes and usually have to be biased for lowest noise, best conversion figure. Also when used in cavities, the diode itself forms part of the coupling network. The letter in the diode part is a measure of noise figure, the higher up in the alphabet you go, the lower the rated noise figure. BTW those diodes a dated from the 1940's! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:16:01 -0500, Ken Scharf
wrote: wow, those 1N21/23 diodes are stone age! BTW those diodes a dated from the 1940's! So am I (1937 actually) but I still work fine!! Just 'coz it's old doesn't mean it's had it! :-) Peter, G3PHO |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Youngster - 1936 here
vk4aok Peter wrote: On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:16:01 -0500, Ken Scharf wrote: wow, those 1N21/23 diodes are stone age! BTW those diodes a dated from the 1940's! So am I (1937 actually) but I still work fine!! Just 'coz it's old doesn't mean it's had it! :-) Peter, G3PHO |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:16:01 -0500, Ken Scharf
wrote: gudmundur wrote: This is on a 10 gig receive setup. There is no LNFE, just antenna to mixer direct couple in a balanced waveguide mixer assembly. The question is, if I remove the 1N23E/1N23ER pair, and go with a balanced set of schottkey microwave diodes, this would allow me to drop my local oscillator injection perhaps 6db. Will I see any increased sensativity, or should I just keep the 1N23 setup? wow, those 1N21/23 diodes are stone age! They are Germanium diodes and usually have to be biased for lowest noise, best conversion figure. Also when used in cavities, the diode itself forms part of the coupling network. The letter in the diode part is a measure of noise figure, the higher up in the alphabet you go, the lower the rated noise figure. BTW those diodes a dated from the 1940's! when the devices were too old, they couldn't use them, and called them 1N451(?), and had modern diodes for another 50 years --- J. M. Noeding, LA8AK, N-4623 Kristiansand http://home.online.no/~la8ak/c.htm |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:16:01 -0500, Ken Scharf wrote: wow, those 1N21/23 diodes are stone age! BTW those diodes a dated from the 1940's! So am I (1937 actually) but I still work fine!! Just 'coz it's old doesn't mean it's had it! :-) Peter, G3PHO Never meant to infer that old stuff doesn't work (and sometimes well) after all some of the guys on this NG also frequent the antique radio NG. I wasn't aware that the 1n21/23 series diodes were considered state of the art until the late 70's/early 80's though. Actually in the 60's many hams used PAR-AMPS (which are a kind of MASER!) in front of their diode mixers. (I remember an article in QST from the 60's on a reflex klyston pumped par-amp using an early varicap diode). |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm the youngster -- 1938.
Seems that I'm in the right circle of 'Old Farts' to ask: Has anyone a data sheet available on the 723A/B Reflex Klystron? These (along with the 1N21 diodes) were used in the AN/APS-3 RADAR and since have found use in physics demonstration devices, and to a limited extent ham radio (with modifications). It is basically a 3-cm or 10-GHZ oscillator. I have a pin-out, but not a full-blown data sheet. Can anyone help me out on this? Thanks in advance, and 73's. Harry C. p.s. Evidently a large number of 723A/Bs were produced by Raytheon, but in spite of a 15-year employment with the Raytheon Company, I've never been able to locate a data sheet. Evidently devices of this type were heavily classified during WWII, and consequently most of the documentation was classified and eventually, in accordance with security instructions, destroyed. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | Homebrew | |||
Interesting question | CB | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
BPL Video On-Line | Policy | |||
Question regarding police tactics and scanners | Scanner |