| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
January 3rd 06, 08:14 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
|
|||
|
|||
BF981 substituting BF964?
I've found that the BF981 is lower noise than the BF964.
Does anyone know if it works as a direct substitute, or would I be asking for trouble if I decided to do this? Sam |
|
#2
January 3rd 06, 05:51 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
|
|||
|
|||
|
BF981 substituting BF964?
The BF981 is obsolete.
Leon |
|
#3
January 3rd 06, 06:59 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
|
|||
|
|||
|
BF981 substituting BF964?
What substituted the BF981?
Sam "Leon" wrote in message oups.com... The BF981 is obsolete. Leon |
|
#4
January 3rd 06, 11:09 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
|
|||
|
|||
|
BF981 substituting BF964?
BF981 is substituted by BF991 of BF996S.
both DG fets are SMD package SOT143  BF981 is still widely available, but production stopped. Regards, Willem PE2WDO "Samuel Hunt" schreef in bericht ... What substituted the BF981? Sam "Leon" wrote in message oups.com... The BF981 is obsolete. Leon |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Effect of substituting ferrites with ordinary resistors in PA circuit? | Homebrew | |||
| Effect of substituting ferrites with ordinary resistors in PA circuit? | Homebrew | |||
Linear Mode
