Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The following are approximate numbers of US amateurs on the stated
dates, compared to the US population. 1930: US population 122 million, US hams 18,000, 1 ham per 6778 Americans 1940: US population 131 million, US hams 50,000, 1 ham per 2620 Americans 1950: US population 150 million, US hams 90,000, 1 ham per 1667 Americans 1960: US population 179 million, US hams 230,000, 1 ham per 779 Americans 1970: US population 223 million, US hams 270,000, 1 ham per 825 Americans 1980: US population 227 million, US hams 350,000, 1 ham per 649 Americans 1990: US population 249 million US hams 550,000, 1 ham per 453 Americans 2000: US population 281 million, US hams 683,000, 1 ham per 411 Americans May 5 2007: US population (estimated) 301,773,107 US hams 655,219, 1 ham per 460 Americans Except for the 1960s, every decade from the 1930s to the 1990s saw US Amateur Radio growing faster than the US population. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dick Grady AC7EL" wrote ...
Some areas of the country have a higher density of hams. My town (Pahrump, NV) has about 35,000 population and 284 hams, for a ratio of 1 ham per 123 residents. Does any other town or city have a higher density? Dayton, OH? (at least at certain times of the year :-) Richard, KE7GKP |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 6 May 2007 12:06:48 EDT,
) wrote: In article , Dick Grady AC7EL wrote: Some areas of the country have a higher density of hams. My town (Pahrump, NV) has about 35,000 population and 284 hams, for a ratio of 1 ham per 123 residents. Does any other town or city have a higher density? Some years ago, I realized that a lot of the people I ran across in my brief visit to Fairbanks were hams. If someone here has an easy way to get the number of licensees up there, we can compare it to the Census Bureau's 2003 estimate of 31,000 people. According to the license database at http://www.wm7d.net/fcc_uls/ there are 558 licenses with Fairbanks addresses, including 3 clubs. That leaves 555 individual hams. Dividing 555 into 31,000 computes to 1 ham per 56 residents. 73 de Dick, AC7EL |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dick Grady AC7EL wrote: According to the license database at http://www.wm7d.net/fcc_uls/ there are 558 licenses with Fairbanks addresses, including 3 clubs. That leaves 555 individual hams. Dividing 555 into 31,000 computes to 1 ham per 56 residents. Thanks, Dick. So it still is a very high percentage. Patty |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() " wrote in message ... In article , Dick Grady AC7EL wrote: Some areas of the country have a higher density of hams. My town (Pahrump, NV) has about 35,000 population and 284 hams, for a ratio of 1 ham per 123 residents. Does any other town or city have a higher density? Some years ago, I realized that a lot of the people I ran across in my brief visit to Fairbanks were hams. If someone here has an easy way to get the number of licensees up there, we can compare it to the Census Bureau's 2003 estimate of 31,000 people. Patty N6BIS Use the FCC site -- it says 693 licenses in Fairbanks AK -- Includes Club Stations URL: http://www.arrl.org/fcc/fcclook.php3...a&listofst=680 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 6, 4:06 pm,
) wrote: Some years ago, I realized that a lot of the people I ran across in my brief visit to Fairbanks were hams. If someone here has an easy way to get the number of licensees up there, we can compare it to the Census Bureau's 2003 estimate of 31,000 people. If you look at the numbers on a "by state" basis, Alaska has the largest per-capita density of hams, at about 4.8 hams per thousand. New York and Louisiana are least dense with about 1.4 hams per thousand. The Northwest seems for some reason to be popular for hams. My home state of Oregon has 3.6 hams per thousand, and all the other W7 states except Arizona have over 3 hams per thousand, while the national average is significanly lower at 2.1 hams per thousand. 73, RDW |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm totally surprised. I was under the impression that ham radio had
declined in popularity over the decades! George K6GW wrote in message oups.com... The following are approximate numbers of US amateurs on the stated dates, compared to the US population. 1930: US population 122 million, US hams 18,000, 1 ham per 6778 Americans 1940: US population 131 million, US hams 50,000, 1 ham per 2620 Americans 1950: US population 150 million, US hams 90,000, 1 ham per 1667 Americans 1960: US population 179 million, US hams 230,000, 1 ham per 779 Americans 1970: US population 223 million, US hams 270,000, 1 ham per 825 Americans 1980: US population 227 million, US hams 350,000, 1 ham per 649 Americans 1990: US population 249 million US hams 550,000, 1 ham per 453 Americans 2000: US population 281 million, US hams 683,000, 1 ham per 411 Americans May 5 2007: US population (estimated) 301,773,107 US hams 655,219, 1 ham per 460 Americans Except for the 1960s, every decade from the 1930s to the 1990s saw US Amateur Radio growing faster than the US population. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We've had a ground-swell of interest in Ham radio here in Pahrump, NV. A lot of
people heard of ham radio due to the publicity it got during Hurricane Katrina. Last December, in conjunction with the local LDS church (Mormons), we held a one-day "ham cram" session: Study the Technician questions in the morning, followed by an exam session in the afternoon. We had 14 students/candidates, and 13 passed. Two weeks ago, one of them got his General. Several of them have joined our local ARES/RACES unit and repeater club. The LDS church preaches self-sufficiency and not depending on government to ride out a crisis. Each family must keep a couple of weeks worth of food and water stored in their house. Ham radio fits in with their self-help philosophy. Three weeks ago, I talked to a ham-to-be in Las Vegas. He said that his Bishop asked him to get a ham license. I asked, "Are you LDS?" and he replied "Yes." BTW, he passed the exam. Two weeks ago, at the license exam session which I run, we had 10 candidates, where we usually have one or two. Most of these were going for upgrades to General. Last year, we had several sessions with zero candidates. The publicity from Katrina, plus the dropping of the code requirement, has re-invigorated ham radio. Dick, AC7EL On Sun, 6 May 2007 20:07:42 EDT, "George" wrote: I'm totally surprised. I was under the impression that ham radio had declined in popularity over the decades! George K6GW wrote in message roups.com... The following are approximate numbers of US amateurs on the stated dates, compared to the US population. 1930: US population 122 million, US hams 18,000, 1 ham per 6778 Americans 1940: US population 131 million, US hams 50,000, 1 ham per 2620 Americans 1950: US population 150 million, US hams 90,000, 1 ham per 1667 Americans 1960: US population 179 million, US hams 230,000, 1 ham per 779 Americans 1970: US population 223 million, US hams 270,000, 1 ham per 825 Americans 1980: US population 227 million, US hams 350,000, 1 ham per 649 Americans 1990: US population 249 million US hams 550,000, 1 ham per 453 Americans 2000: US population 281 million, US hams 683,000, 1 ham per 411 Americans May 5 2007: US population (estimated) 301,773,107 US hams 655,219, 1 ham per 460 Americans Except for the 1960s, every decade from the 1930s to the 1990s saw US Amateur Radio growing faster than the US population. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 6, 8:07�pm, "George" wrote:
I'm totally surprised. I was under the impression that ham radio had declined in popularity over the decades! The numbers say otherwise. And they have for many years. Note that the 1930s, which were dominated by the Great Depression, saw an enormous rise in the number of US hams and the popularity of amateur radio. Yet the 1960s, a time of prosperity, saw almost no growth and an actual decline in popularity. Some might blame the 1960s numbers on "incentive licensing", but those changes didn't go into effect until very late in that decade (November 1968). And the growth came back in the 1970s and 1980s, when those changes had their greatest effect. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How Popular Is/Was Amateur Radio | General | |||
How Popular is CB radio in Australia...... what's taken it's place ? | CB | |||
FA: Assorted older Amateur Radio,73 Mag,Popular Communications Mags | Swap |