I see. When it is correctly pointed out to you that your intellectual
superiors consider your blatherings to be a waste of oxygen, you attack
the
messenger rather than the facts presented.
when you falsely claim I have intelectual superoirs in posting in the
NG you cease to be a messenger and become a libeler, let alone go on
about wasting O2

....
Prove that there are those of us who are NOT your intellectual superior. By
which yardstick are you going to measure or determine this? By the very
simple fact that we post correctly, use good grammar and don't splatter our
posts with misspelled words is example enough.

....
thee are those that consider my efforts a waste. I would conceed that
they ight have point if the facts were clearly to the contary
you presented no facts you just repeat more libel
....
I repeated nothing. I made a statement based upon my observations. There is
no libel involved.
....

here are some facts

Fact: I set out to stop what has been K4YZ multi year effort to libel
everyone he is seriously oposed to. I have achived that goal.
....
Fact: You "saw" Steve in post after post that were not his. You falsely
accused Steve of making anon posts when he, in fact, did no such thing when
you yourself were accused of the same. How many email addresses and sock
puppets do you need? Steve has one...his REAL name and callsign.
....

Fact: I decided to resist the effort of many folks to use an accusation
of Homosexaulity as weapon in these NG's. I have not been entirely
succesfull to date OTOH most posters have come to the point of noting
"so what?" (or words to that effect) in response to such efforts, thus
I am satfied with the results
....
The accusations you refer to were mostly posts made by Wiseman in his
attempt to anger you after your forty to fifty posts per day. Wiseman is no
intellectual giant but you went way past the typical boundaries and even
went so far as to follow Wiseman to the Nim Busters boards where you further
antagonized him. Last I heard, Mark, the Admin banned you from the Nim
Boards and to be banned from that group of misfits takes some bit of doing.
.....

Fact:in resisting the effort of various folks to label tech and
NoCoders as incapple Ham I believe the way such trolls as "slow code"
and Al klein quiting the feild have shown that my point is made.
....
This is a moot point. If you were so easily offended by comments aimed
toward No-Coders, the problem is yours. Had you any intellect you would have
ignored the posts, but you couldn't leave well-enough alone. You just HAD to
stick your nose in.
....

Fact: in persuing justice for all (even Wismen as I try to restrain
those tat feel the need to enhance his records of sin further) I have
prefromed a Mitvah
....
Fact: You are not "persuing" justice for all. You are taking every
opportunity to spam, irritate, and inject inane comments where none are due.
You have performed nothing other than flooding the newsgroups with
one-liners that make little to no sense.
....

The price I have paid for this is what? Making it more obvious (not
that it was ever a secert) that I suffer from dyslexia and aphasia
which make my words esp with typed with passion (or boredom as is often
the case in hauling out Wisemen trash) an adventureto say the least to
read. For you I supose this would be mortifing to me it is indeed
something I had to get used too by the 3rd or 4th grade
....
That, Mark, is an excuse. There are many of your peers who have overcome
what you claim to be an affliction. You could do likewise, were you not so
lazy. I have no pity for you or your excuses.
....

you may make of my typos all you like it hardly bothers me (msotly it
bothers me when the mispeeling at point near the heart of the peice of
writing is seized upon to avoid the point itself but even that makes my
oint in many cases
....
If my "corrections" regarding your poor spelling didn't bother you, you
would have not made the above comment. If you want to make a point, and make
it intelligently, then take the time to do it correctly. Your compositions
are akin to those that a second-grader would create. You can hardly expect
your "points" to be taken seriously when you cannot present them in a format
that the majority of us can understand. You are at fault here, Mark. Not the
rest of us who speak English.
....

you are a cowwrd and clearly without honor
....
Was that supposed to cut to the core of my being? Upset me? Send me crying?
To the contrary, Mark, your words, misspelled as they are, are meaningless.
As I've said in the past, I look at you as a bouncy-ball toy to be slapped
around much as a cat would do with a mouse. You are entertainment, Mark. A
diversion. A nonentity. I respond to you for two reasons. First, I am bored.
Secondly, you are so easy to bounce around that I find you mildly amusing
and a soft target to boot.
Now let me see how you will twist this. Did I "libbel" you by referring to
you as a soft target? Did I comport myself as being the Antichrist by using
"666"? It will be interesting to see how you will surely misinterpret my
commentary.
Lecture me not about honor, Mark. You, of all people, know not the meaning
of the word.