Dave Heil wrote:
Roger Wiseman, posing as " wrote:

You mean he isn't "maquerading?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Dave Heil makes a bad guess again when he wrote:

" wrote:

an old fraud wrote:


widower? Wismen and an old man with his comments about assraping old
men?


You assrape your dying daddy, Markie, your neighbors tell us it's so.

Marks



"Mark's," stupid.


neighbors contact Roger Wiseman, posing under an alias. That's
rich, UnWiseman.


Sort of like your claims about your State Dept. "job."

Why, no, Roger. I'm sure

I'm sure they would laugh at your building up of a flunky job like
that.



I challenge


You can't even spell "membership rolls" or "valley" correctly...

membership rolls, valley

Looks like you lose, Rog.

Too bad you need to cut and paste them, huh, "maquerading," boy?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!


...you fat,
molested by your dead priest daddy when he was alive, piece of ****.
You can't "challenge" anybody, asshole.

Wouldn't it be "molested-by-your-dead-priest-daddy-when-he-was-alive"?

So you admit he molested you.

Well, Rog, contrary to your fantasies, my dad molested me while he
was alive and surely couldn't have done so after his death.

That why you continue the "family tradion of it with your grandkids?


Davey K8MN, the lying hypocrite proves he can play the stupid "roles"
most effectively when talking about membership rolls in
et:
"You were on the membership roles"

Looks like your never learned how to spell.

"meber" "streeetwalker" "frioends" "yourt"

"maquerading?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Remember, Rog, that the main difference between us is that you're nuts.

You mean Roger has some nuts while you don't, you hide behind a woman.
And what is this fetish you have for nuts?

"maquerading?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Roger Wiseman, posing as " wrote:

You mean he isn't "maquerading?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!
get some therapy

Roger Wiseman, masquerading as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Roger Wiseman, posing as " wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


Roger Wiseman, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:



wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

The possessed Megan character looks like your Finnish ex streetwalker
wife.

That'd be impossible. I don't have a Finnish ex-streetwalker wife.


Sure you do.

It is sure that I don't.


Sure it is, liar.

Sorry, Rog, your claim simply isn't true.


You met the fat ugly whore in Helsinki.

I met no whore, much less a fat and ugly one in Finland.


First you say you didn't meet her there, now you said you did.

You're incorrect again.

Her teel look like
they've been filed down...

I'm sorry, Rog. My wife has no "teel".



She doesn't have much left in the way of teeth, either.

I knew you were talking about some other woman. My wife has a full set
of teeth. Why are you interested in my wife's teeth, Roger?

Davey boy needed one like that since he lives from what I'm told is the
butt of many jokes in Marshall County, the Cameron area.

Study that photo of your palatial estate in that luxury subdivision out
Glen Dale Creek, Rog old boy.


...so she looks like that dog that laps her
vagina.

What dog is that? Do you believe that we have a dog with filed down teel?


No just one that laps your whore wife's vagina.

You believe that? Does that sort of thing arouse you? Does it get you hot?


These thoughts of yours about sex with animals, do they arouse you? It
that the sort of thing you think of often?


Looks like it is true your wife lets the dog service her.

Does thinking about such things get you excited? From reading your
newsgroup posts, I'd gather that you've entertained these thoughts for
nearly a decade at least.


At any rate, my wife didn't show up here posting Exorcist-like filth,
you did.


No, she's busy sucking off people in the mall's public restrooms.

Do you have these thoughts often? Are they symptomatic of your written
form of Tourette's Syndrome? Do these thoughts arouse you?

Hit a nerve, huh?

The nerve that I hit must have been yours. Care to respond to my
questions? Do you become aroused when you think such thoughts or type
them in a newsgroup post? Are such thoughts frequent?


Must
be tough with you working as a flunky courier and all.

I am not now, nor have I ever been employed as a courier for anyone.


Sure you are.

There is no evidence to support your statement.

Or did you get fired already.

I've been retired for nearly six years, UnWiseman.


Are you employed?


Yep.

I don't believe you, Roger.



As I expected, you didn't show up for the ARES meeting.

He's not a meber of that organization, why would he show up, stupid?

I see.


Nope, your head is up your fat ass. Wiseman isn't on the "membership
rolls." What are "membership roles?" Is that what you and the leader do
back in the van?

The leader? Do you mean the Fearless Leader?


Got that name of the "widower" yet?

I've had it all along.

What are "membership roles," hmmm?

That's where Roger Wiseman joins Marshall County ARES, never returns
after his initial meeting and now pretends to have not been a member.


Do you like to think about people doing things in the back of a van,


No, I have done things with women in the back of a van though.

Did her screams bring assistance? Were you forced to release her and
run for your life?

Unlike a
square like you who longs for the opressive 1950's.

It's "oppressive", Rog. I don't recall sharing my memories of the
fifties with you at any point.


Roger?


Paranoid much?

He most certainly is!


Did anyone ever lock you up somewhere and do things to you?


You sound like an expert, since you are the son of a priest.

....and when they called you a "cute little *******" during your
childhood, it wasn't just a figure of speech.


Did you see something as a child which you weren't supposed to see?


You saw something from your molesting preist daddy, huh?

There go the evil voices in your head again, Rog. My father never
molested me or anyone else.

Did you experience something awful in your youth? Did someone do things
to you which no child should have to experience? Is that where all your
filth comes from? Is that where you get your sexual ideas about the
spouses, parents, children and pets of others?



What wasn't so predictable is the news that you've taken
up with the old widower down the road from you. I hear you're at his
place all of the time.

But you claimed none of his neighbors like him.

He isn't a near neighbor at all. He's an old fellow who lives
considerly up the road to the north. He doesn't know what you are yet.


He doesn't exist, since you can't provide his name.
You are a liar.

Heh. I suppose I lied about taking photos of your cracker box.


Says the **** who wishes the coal company would by his hovel before it
falls into an old mine so he can move to southern WV and attend those
churches with the rattlesnakes in the worship service.

Except for the parts where I live in a hovel, have any old mines under
my home or where I have any desire to attend a church service involving
snakes, you're doing pretty well. You should wish for a coal mine.


Perhaps I lied about visiting your house.

So you admit to stalking him.

I did? That's funny, I don't recall doing that.


Sure, Roger, the old gent exists. Two
people confirmed that he exists and provided a name and the location of
his home.


Yet, you still can't name him......or his location.

Sure, I can.


Name him, I'd love to pass along your posts saying a relationship
exists when it doesn't.



I'm told that you don't have a job so you have


Prove Roger dioesn't have a job.

In the study of logic,


Which you never could do, since you are just a ex-State dept. flunky.
The fact is you spend more time online than Morkie does.

Naw, Rog, the State Department has no "flunky" job descriptions.


Sure they do...

Go ahead, Rog. Point out the url. Direct us to some piece of evidence
supporting your peculiar claim.



...and with your entry level "position" you were sent to the
absolute ******** assignments.

One could assume that my first posting was "entry level". That was to
Helsinki--hardly a "******** assignment". My second and all subsequent
postings were all in supervisory positions. Deal with it.


I'm retarded I can spend as much time online as I choose.


You certainly are.

No, I certainly do. What's it to you?



Yet you, with
your unproven employment, seem to have much more time to post and hang
out with your new elderly pal.


What new elderly pal?

Haven't you been reading along?

What unproven employment? You need to learn to
read the times on the headers, dumbass.

And that would demonstrate exactly what, nutball?


Prove that you have a job. Prove that you aren't on Disability Social
Security.


Prove he doesn't.

It is impossible to prove a negative. I've already shared that with
you. Please pay attention, nutball.

Prove he is on SSI.

You have to receive an income from some source, Rog. Since you don't
work...

You can't name this "elderly
gentelmen."

"Gentleman"

Yes, I could name him. I'm not about to drag his name through your mud.

"You said Roger has no friends and his neighbors don't like
him. Looks like you lied again.

"You?

He isn't a near neighbor, Rog. I will go on record as saying, "Roger
Wiseman--To know him is to loathe him".



plenty of time to hang out with the old timer. Does he know about your
double life on the internet? Is he your invisible friend?


You claimed he has no friends and his neighbors didn't like him. Looks
like you lied again. I hear you've been sucking Norm Stenger under his
desk you hang out under there all the time, so you can hide behind him
when your ex-streeetwalker wife isd at the mall. She turns tricks
during her lunch break in the mall's public restrooms.

No, I claimed that he had no friends.


Then how could he be "friends" with a non-existent "widower" that is
all in yourt tiny little mind?

"Yourt"?


"courthous?"


Well, Rog, I suppose lies

Your snippage says it all.


You were lying, then.

You've lied throughout your life. Now you hide while doing so. You
have to hide.


I hear you have homosexual relations
with a certain ham who lives up that road in a trailer.

You do?


Sure you do.

Sure I do what?

When Bertie isn't available.

That's an incomplete sentence. You get an "F".

Too bad you missed the ARES meeting, Rog. I was so looking forward to a
long chat with you. (posturing and bull****)

Who did you bring along to hide behind?

If you'd have attended, you'd have known if there was anyone with me.

You 'd never run into Roger...

At least that's what you are hoping, nutball.


...you'd have to bring somebody else along. You wouldn't ever face him
alone, let alone doing something to him if you find him out alone.

There's an easy way to test your theory. Name a place and set a time.
You and I can have a frank and open exchange of views.

You
talk about underestimating people, you just did, hypocrite.

If anything, I overestimated you, Rog. Your much less rational than I'd
previously believed.

Now go whine to a certain "solicitor" (could this be the "old
widower?") who has two DUI convictions (as reported in the Moundsville
Echo and spent a 6 month home confinement on the last one) who
shouldn't even be practicing law. I wonder if the Lawyer board in
Charleston, WV who takes complaints on ethics knows?

I'll leave you now, UnWiseman, as your rant has taken a peculiar turn
toward the bizarre. I haven't the slightest idea what the above is
supposed to represent.

I'm beginning to notice that your frothing and ranting seems to take on
a frantic tone when it coincides with a full moon. Have you looked out
at the night sky in the past two evenings?

Dave K8MN

Roger Wiseman, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Roger Wiseman, maquerading as " wrote:


"maquerading?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!

"Hey..........Maquerading!" BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Dave Heil wrote:


wrote:


Dave Heil guessing wrong again wrote:



Roger Wiseman, posing as " wrote:



Roger Wiseman, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:


He's not a member of that organization, why would he show up, stupid?


Davey never lets his lies get around the truth. I corrected your typo
for you.

It just gets better and better, Rog. You, posing as someone else
correct typos that you made posing as yet someone else. Your grip on
reality grows more and more tenuous.


PKB, stalker boy.

PKB? I haven't posed as anyone, much less corrected my own typo while
posing as yet a third person, Rog.


Sure you have, "Stagger."

It is sure that I haven't. So far, you've accused more than four people
of being "Stagger Lee". I post only as myself. Drill it into your
oversized noggin.


More lies...

You have accused numerous others of being "Stagger Lee". I have not
posed as such nor have I posted as anyone else, ever.

you do post as others. Maybe you were "masquerading" in
denial.

The masquerading is done by you, nutball. You can't post as yourself.
You simply can't. It leaves you bare and vulnerable. Instead, the
little cockroach hides from the light.

You noticed that I *didn't* mention the widowers name. Why is his name
important here? Do you want to see it besmirched along with your own
infamous moniker?


In other words, you have no name to provide. You are a liar.

You've drawn an erroneous conclusion. How dumb are you, UnWiseman?


Then name him.

For what reason? I might be willing to do it, as soon as you are able
to confirm your employment. Quid pro quo, UnWiseman.


So you can't name this non-existent person. You are a liar.

He exists and I can name him. Why play the charade, Roger? You have a
new pal who knows nothing about what you do here. Take pride in it.
Perhaps it'll lead you away your sociopathic past.



I'm told that you don't have a job so you have

Prove Roger dioesn't have a job.

plenty of time to hang out with the old timer. Does he know about your
double life on the internet? Is he your invisible friend?

You claimed he has no frioends and his neighbors didn't like him. Looks
like you lied again. I hear you've been sucking Norm Stenger under his
desk you hang out under there all the time, so you can hide behind him
when your ex-streeetwalker wife isd at the mall. She turns tricks
during her lunch break in the mall's public restrooms.


BWHAHAHAHA!

Wow! You laugh at something you wrote?


No, laughing at you, since can't provide the name of the "widower."

I didn't provide it. What is its significance? How would it make you
look any better or worse?

In other words, you are lying.

There aren't any "other words", nutball. I meant precisely the words I
used. Deal with it.


What is this fetish you have with nutballs? Did your now dead preist
daddy make you shave his? Did he make your many chins his rest for
them?

So if someone says, "You're nuts!", you think he is discussing
testicles? Wow, you really do have problems!


You're getting desperate.
You'll have to share that with the rest of your personalities.


You mean you don't want your lie about somebody to come bite you in
your fat ass in Circuit court?

You're full of manure, UnWiseman. There's not a chance in hell that
you'll ever concoct anything which will land me in any court.


Oh, just like there's no chance that a trespassing complaint wan't
filed against you and your ex-streetwalker wife with Glen Dale?

Yeah, *just* like that.

Yep.

Yep. It hasn't happened. The "charge" you gloated over didn't
materialize. The letter that you sent to my wife's place of employment
got you put into the "nut" (not testicle) file and saw to it that
security was alerted. I'd love to see you justifying a tresspassing
complaint after your statements that 1) the visit never happened, 2)
that it was "2 on 1" and 3) you weren't home. Thanks for the grins,
nutball.


Name his name, I'll bet he has you in court for libel.

A kindly old widower would have me in court for what libel--that he is a
kindly old widower? You're absurd.


So you admit he doesn't exist.

You have a reading comprehension problem. Entertain me with some more
"in court for libel" stories, Rog.

There are no "widowers" in Roger's
neighborhood north of him.

Baloney.

In fact there is a house with a couple and
two kids to the "North" than there is a mountain, Mt. Glen.

Mt. Glen--a mountain? There aren't any mountains anywhere near here,
Rog. When you have delusions, so do the hills.

You know
the one that hides that "velley."

It takes hills on both sides to make a valley, Rog.


If you want to test your libel theory, try this one on:

Roger Wiseman of Glen Dale, West Virginia is mentally deficient.


Let's see your medical and Psychologist credentials.

I didn't make a claim for having any, I made a statement to test your
libel theory. There's your ammo. Go for it. If that one didn't suit
you, how about, "Roger Wiseman of Glen Dale, West Virginia is an
unstable individual"?

There, now see what you can do with that.


How about this one, David E. Heil, K8MN, of outside of Cameron, WV is a
child molester.

See, you don't know the difference. It can be demonstrated that my
statements are true. There is no such proof for yours. In fact, your
statement would go toward proving mine. I've gone through psychological
testing and a Bureau of Diplomatic Security background check to obtain
my job. I went through frequent updates as a prerequite for keeping my
security clearance and my job. Now I'd love to see you go through such
psychological testing, UnWiseman. I don't think you want to go there.

Now run and hide under the baseboard, little cockroach, before somebody
stomps you.


It wouldn't ever be you to do that...

You continue to underestimate people, UnWiseman.


So do you, child molester.

I'm no such thing, UnWiseman. Does the idea arouse you? Does it get
you hot?

Your lame little "names" prove you just
don't have what it takes.

It is *your little name*, little UnWiseman. You've earned it.

Maybe that's why you were in the rear echelons durning 'Nam.

Was I? Are you fishing?


...you have to hide behind your
ex-whore wife.

I don't have an "ex-whore wife", Roger.


Sure she was.

That isn't correct. In fact, it is one of the things she'd like to
discuss with you. Does the idea of such things excite you?


My wife is certainly capable of stomping you though.


She does have the ass of an elephant.

She also has the teeth of a lion and the hide of a crocodile. They're
in a closet with the elephant ass.


You are extremely brave while posting filth
anonymously on the internet. As has been amply demonstrated, you a
cowardly humbug when confronted.


And you hid behind her on Roger's porch, didn't you?

Did I? Is that according to the it-never-happened scenario, the
it-was-2-on-1 scenario or the Roger-wasn't-home scenario? Well, little
cockroach, if you'd really thought I'd hide from you, you'd have had no
problem attending this past Monday's meeting. I'd have been quaking in
my boots, according to you. I reminded you of the meeting. You didn't
show up. What conclusion can we draw?

But then, you
always have somebody around when you confront Roger.

Always? I sat right next to you at the only ARES meeting you attended.
You didn't answer your door on the next opportunity for a face-to-face.
Despite frequent reminders of this past Monday's ARES meeting, you
waffled, backtracked and did not show up. Your record isn't very good.


You belong in a mental institution where you can receive the treatment
you need.

You've already been in one.

I have? Well know, that presents a problem for you. There is no record
of that anywhere.

They'd keep you away from computers and the ham bands. That
way, you could do no harm to others and you could be safe from the
others that you've had dealings with.

You aren't well and you prove it daily.

Opinions vary.

Not on your mental stability, they don't.

Some say you are a facist asshole.

At least from your various sock puppets, that seems to be the prevailing
view. But then, you're nuts.

Dave K8MN

Roger Wiseman, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Roger Wiseman, posing as " wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


Roger Wiseman, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:

You surely hope that you're never stopped for speeding or running a stop
sign in Glen Dale, UnWiseman.


Why would he speed or run stop signs.

Please refer to the words, "You surely hope that you're never" Read the
rest again for comprehension.

You certainly do speed, though,
don't you?

Do I?


Why does your gay lover Stenger the corrupt policeman want to hear
about your stalking again?

Be sure to quote yourself accurately. I know I'll get it right.


Unlike you. eh?

Please read the part which states "I know I'll get it right".
Read the entire passage again for comprehension.


Have at it, Roger. You're already known for what you are.


Be sure to tell him about your "maquerading." BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I'll simply pass along copies of your posts, Rog. You've certainly
endeared yourself to your local and county law enforcement personnel.
In addition to being unbalanced, you appear to be not very bright.

Dave K8MN

Roger Wiseman, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Roger Wiseman, posing as " wrote:

Dave Heil makes a bad guess again when he wrote:


Roger Wiseman, posing as " wrote:


an old fraud wrote:



widower? Wismen and an old man with his comments about assraping old
men?


You assrape your dying daddy, Markie, your neighbors tell us it's so.

Marks



"Mark's," stupid.



neighbors contact Roger Wiseman, posing under an alias. That's
rich, UnWiseman.


Sort of like your claims about your State Dept. "job."

Why, no, Roger. I'm sure


I'm sure they would laugh at your building up of a flunky job like
that.

Building up? What building up is that? Tell me, Rog: What kind of job
do you hold?


...you fat,
molested by your dead priest daddy when he was alive, piece of ****.
You can't "challenge" anybody, asshole.

Wouldn't it be "molested-by-your-dead-priest-daddy-when-he-was-alive"?


So you admit he molested you.

Go back and read it again for comprehension.


Well, Rog, contrary to your fantasies, my dad never molested me while he
was alive and surely couldn't have done so after his death.


That why you continue the "family tradion of it with your grandkids?

Does that sort of idea get you excited, Roger? Do you have these
thought often? Have you discussed them with mental health
professionals? Do you have grandchildren, Roger? Are you permitted
anywhere near them?


Remember, Rog, that the main difference between us is that you're nuts.


You mean Roger has some nuts while you don't,

I mean that if I say "you're nuts", the first thing to enter your tiny
mind is "testicles". It speaks volumes, UnWiseman.

...you hide behind a woman.

As I've told you, there's a very easy way to test your theory. Where's
your woman, Rog? You don't want to tangle with mine. Your behind might
end up in the closet along with the crocodile hide and elephant ass.

And what is this fetish you have for nuts?

It appears to be your fetish, Rog. Every time someone says that you're
nuts, you believe that they're speaking of testicles. That's very, very
strange. I'll bet you go wild when someone tells of a squirrel
gathering nuts for winter or whenever someone offers you peanuts.

Dave K8MN