|
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm
Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... :-) We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. 3. If a military unit is mentioned, it is protocol (format) for a unit to be spelled out for the first mention, then abbreviated. This is for clarity in responding to non- military correspondents (identifiable by headers in e-mail when correspondence does not come over the military's network). Correct. Poor feller Dud just doesn't understand, perhaps no know about, the DSN and its header information, terminal software able to identify civilians from military personnel on Internet tie-ins. 4. It is extremely easy to forge a third-party "message," then include it as part of a message in here. That is NOT "proof" of anything. Correct. Well, it's proof that fraud was committed. :-) 5. Contrary to Major Dud's claims, United States Army units do NOT always keep careful records of their history. The entire United States military undergoes periodic changes in structure and new units may be created out of old ones while older units may be dissolved. Any "history" of a unit depends on the commanding officers' assignment of historian duties within that unit, NOT considered an important/prime task in that unit's mission. Neither are unit historians typically "in contact" with other units' historians. Correct. The priority usually falls somewhere below that of the unit A NCOIC MARS. Heh heh heh. MARS functions in existing units is still largely concerned with morale services for unit personnel. It is hardly there to "back up" any regular unit communications, much less be some key ingredient in some pipe-dream "Homeland Defense Against Terrorists" or other wild imaginings. On putting together a photo essay of my own service days at a major Army communications station http://sujan.hallikainen.org/Broadca...s/My3Years.pdf and /AlphabetSoup.pdf I ran into the usual shoulder-shrugging "don't know" from a number of official agencies at first, everyone from the Army's Center for Military History to Fort Gordon's Signal Museum Historian's Office. It took a LOT more digging and communicating with other agencies and units to get the final evolutionary path (including the USAF, I might add) of the 71st Signal Service Battalion of 1945 to the 78th Signal Battalion of today (based at Camp Zama, Japan, near Yokohama). It helped to have acquired a paper copy of my old battalion's own printing in 1962 describing the (then) updated station ADA and its mission, equipment, and history (to that date). Even the Pacific Stars and Stripes military newspaper (HQ in Tokyo) helped with data. Ask nicely and it is surprising how helpful some can be. A not-quite-related sorce of information on Army communications turned up the fact that the old callsign "ADA" of Tokyo times in the '50s still exists and is now the HQ callsign of USARPAC, the United States Army, Pacific. An even more detailed and comprehensive history of Army history (on Signal units) in Europe since 1945 ("USAREUR") is on-line at: http://usarmygermany.com/Units/Signa...ignalCorps.htm 6. Probably the best place for old unit information of the United States Army is the Army Center for Military History. They have a website with some limitation on available information for non-military/non-government research. They have permanent quarters with considerably detailed written and photographic records for research by authorized historians. The United States Navy has a similar organization, also with a website. A careful web-search will turn up their URLs. And will probably turn up Steve's faked career. Heh heh, no. Neither historical agency has lists of fakers. The only place where Robeson's "military career" could be verified or shown non-existant is NARA, the National Archives and Records Administration, and their massive military records archive in St. Louis. Getting such data requires a minimum knowledge of Robeson's social security number and proof of being a member of his family. NARA gives definitions of that and other necessary information to obtain individuals' records. Since Robeson has refused to display even one item of official information, personal photograph while in-service, all on a claimed "18 year active duty" with the USMC, we have to conclude he NEVER HAD ANY SUCH ACTIVE DUTY TIME. The only photos he has had for claims of anything have been as a TN STATE Guard "1st Lieutenant" (scowling pose in cammies) or the infamous snot-on- moustache pose in a (used) flight suit with embroidered Captain's bars on the shoulders, as a member of the CAP. Not ONE single bit of information from EIGHTEEN YEARS claimed on active duty in the USMC. The only conclusion possible is that Robeson is a fraud, an imposter, a wanna-be who never-was. If Robeson makes fraudulent claims about 18 years of his life, what ELSE is he claiming fraudulently? 3. His claims of anything on QRZ.COM and his AOL home page are made only by him and are NOT "checked" or "investigated (for truth)" by either QRZ or AOL. Note that his biography now has him as "CHOP" (presumably an abbreviation for Chief Operator) of a second MARS station, whereas he had claimed earlier on the newsgroup as being "Assistant Chief Operator" on only one MARS station. A NCOIC MARS? You betcha. Go to the K4YZ "detailed info" link and use the link at the end to access his home page. In that he claims a SECOND MARS station service, this time as THE NCOIC. Just more embellishment by the imposter. Robeson needs IMAGE of his mighty and heroic accomplishments. Slathering on more embellishments (never before mentioned) seem to be a part of that. Mark, watch for the responses from the Mighty Major on this post. :-) His actions will be as I've described. Tsk, tsk on me...I forgot to include Robeson's usual response and answer to things he can't prove as being "LIES" by the challenger. :-) To him, it IS a "LIE." His fantasy world is made up differently than the reality we are all accustomed to...any departure from that fantasyland will SEEM like a "LIE" to him. Naturally he is disturbed about his fantasyworld being torn asunder. --------- We can all concentrate on the personal squabbles of a few, the anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes happily talking dirty...OR...consider the FCC document release of 7 August 2006 on Access BPL. That's available at www.fcc.gov as FCC-06-113A1 in PDF or MS Word format. That's a REAL Policy matter. But it's too difficult for those anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes who would rather throw trash and dirty words on others. Len, how've you been? Just dandy, Brian, hope you've been the same. :-) Been too busy with other things than to come into this Din of Inequity more than once or twice a month. Not worth it with some of these creatures. :-) LHA |
Markie, get some therapy
an old fraud wrote: wrote: an old fraud wrote: no steve got caught the NG is now full of proof The NG is full of your spams and lies, too. no spam or lies Yep, Google has those spams and lies of yours archived. you ca n follow the links yourself More lies. You were caught lying about your "unit". no spam ever from me or at least nothing Hughes net considers spam Sure they do. It's spelled out in their policies. both units that he claim never existsed did Nope, you claimed to be a part of it when you weren't. I was abut still stve claimed the units do not exist they do Nope. so steve lied No, he caught you in a lie, though. get some therapy both of you You need it for your chronic lying. that is tranference you lie all the time so assume everybody else does Plagiarizing, Markie???? The term "transference" was in a previous post about you. get some therapy Get some for your lying, fraud. |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... :-) We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] Robescum is "lough out loud" funny. 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. Reminds me of the Japanese WWII soldiers still being pulled out of the bush in th ePI in the 1970's. Robescum is out of touch with communications theory and practice. 3. If a military unit is mentioned, it is protocol (format) for a unit to be spelled out for the first mention, then abbreviated. This is for clarity in responding to non- military correspondents (identifiable by headers in e-mail when correspondence does not come over the military's network). Correct. Poor feller Dud just doesn't understand, perhaps no know about, the DSN and its header information, terminal software able to identify civilians from military personnel on Internet tie-ins. Robescum requires his own "AIG" and comm center. 4. It is extremely easy to forge a third-party "message," then include it as part of a message in here. That is NOT "proof" of anything. Correct. Well, it's proof that fraud was committed. :-) I'd be wrong if I said that everything that Robescum posts is fraudulent. So I won't. Let the reader beware that they need to inspect every Robescum posting for fraud. 5. Contrary to Major Dud's claims, United States Army units do NOT always keep careful records of their history. The entire United States military undergoes periodic changes in structure and new units may be created out of old ones while older units may be dissolved. Any "history" of a unit depends on the commanding officers' assignment of historian duties within that unit, NOT considered an important/prime task in that unit's mission. Neither are unit historians typically "in contact" with other units' historians. Correct. The priority usually falls somewhere below that of the unit A NCOIC MARS. Heh heh heh. MARS functions in existing units is still largely concerned with morale services for unit personnel. It is hardly there to "back up" any regular unit communications, much less be some key ingredient in some pipe-dream "Homeland Defense Against Terrorists" or other wild imaginings. I think he just liked listening in on phone patches from real servicemen to their wives. He probably got in a few minutes of "comfort time " with the wives after the patch went "dead." On putting together a photo essay of my own service days at a major Army communications station http://sujan.hallikainen.org/Broadca...s/My3Years.pdf and /AlphabetSoup.pdf Fascinating stuff. If only Robescum had served... he might have such a scrapbook. I ran into the usual shoulder-shrugging "don't know" from a number of official agencies at first, everyone from the Army's Center for Military History to Fort Gordon's Signal Museum Historian's Office. It took a LOT more digging and communicating with other agencies and units to get the final evolutionary path (including the USAF, I might add) of the 71st Signal Service Battalion of 1945 to the 78th Signal Battalion of today (based at Camp Zama, Japan, near Yokohama). It helped to have acquired a paper copy of my old battalion's own printing in 1962 describing the (then) updated station ADA and its mission, equipment, and history (to that date). You probably did more to update their archives... Even the Pacific Stars and Stripes military newspaper (HQ in Tokyo) helped with data. Ask nicely and it is surprising how helpful some can be. A not-quite-related sorce of information on Army communications turned up the fact that the old callsign "ADA" of Tokyo times in the '50s still exists and is now the HQ callsign of USARPAC, the United States Army, Pacific. Wondr how that sounds in Morse Code? An even more detailed and comprehensive history of Army history (on Signal units) in Europe since 1945 ("USAREUR") is on-line at: http://usarmygermany.com/Units/Signa...ignalCorps.htm I never served in Europe even though I was on the volunteer list forever. Three tours in PACAF. 6. Probably the best place for old unit information of the United States Army is the Army Center for Military History. They have a website with some limitation on available information for non-military/non-government research. They have permanent quarters with considerably detailed written and photographic records for research by authorized historians. The United States Navy has a similar organization, also with a website. A careful web-search will turn up their URLs. And will probably turn up Steve's faked career. Heh heh, no. Neither historical agency has lists of fakers. There is a group that goes after fakers. I think they're called "Stolen Valor." They're probably aware of Robescum. The only place where Robeson's "military career" could be verified or shown non-existant is NARA, the National Archives and Records Administration, and their massive military records archive in St. Louis. Getting such data requires a minimum knowledge of Robeson's social security number and proof of being a member of his family. NARA gives definitions of that and other necessary information to obtain individuals' records. He said that we were welcome to his VA records. Maybe he'll shoot us his SSN via the "backchannel," though I doubt he remembers it himself. Since Robeson has refused to display even one item of official information, personal photograph while in-service, all on a claimed "18 year active duty" with the USMC, we have to conclude he NEVER HAD ANY SUCH ACTIVE DUTY TIME. If Robescum told me that the sun would rise tomorrow morning at 6:23 AM, I'd have to get up and verify it myself. The only photos he has had for claims of anything have been as a TN STATE Guard "1st Lieutenant" (scowling pose in cammies) or the infamous snot-on- moustache pose in a (used) flight suit with embroidered Captain's bars on the shoulders, as a member of the CAP. Hmmm? A 1LT with Captain's bars? Typical Robescum. Wasn't he claiming to be enlisted in the USMC? I'll bet he got a boner putting on that used flight suit. Oh, was that his stomach sticking out? Not ONE single bit of information from EIGHTEEN YEARS claimed on active duty in the USMC. Some people are proud of their service, others have something to hide. The only conclusion possible is that Robeson is a fraud, an imposter, a wanna-be who never-was. Mitty. Walter Mitty. If Robeson makes fraudulent claims about 18 years of his life, what ELSE is he claiming fraudulently? His YL hasn't backed him in years. 3. His claims of anything on QRZ.COM and his AOL home page are made only by him and are NOT "checked" or "investigated (for truth)" by either QRZ or AOL. Note that his biography now has him as "CHOP" (presumably an abbreviation for Chief Operator) of a second MARS station, whereas he had claimed earlier on the newsgroup as being "Assistant Chief Operator" on only one MARS station. A NCOIC MARS? You betcha. Go to the K4YZ "detailed info" link and use the link at the end to access his home page. In that he claims a SECOND MARS station service, this time as THE NCOIC. Just more embellishment by the imposter. Forever the "career" climber. Hi! If any of it were truth! Robeson needs IMAGE of his mighty and heroic accomplishments. Slathering on more embellishments (never before mentioned) seem to be a part of that. Robescum is pathetic. Mark, watch for the responses from the Mighty Major on this post. :-) His actions will be as I've described. Tsk, tsk on me...I forgot to include Robeson's usual response and answer to things he can't prove as being "LIES" by the challenger. :-) Robeson is the one, the only, the original truth-teller. To him, it IS a "LIE." His fantasy world is made up differently than the reality we are all accustomed to...any departure from that fantasyland will SEEM like a "LIE" to him. Naturally he is disturbed about his fantasyworld being torn asunder. Mitty. Walter Mitty. --------- We can all concentrate on the personal squabbles of a few, the anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes happily talking dirty...OR...consider the FCC document release of 7 August 2006 on Access BPL. That's available at www.fcc.gov as FCC-06-113A1 in PDF or MS Word format. That's a REAL Policy matter. But it's too difficult for those anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes who would rather throw trash and dirty words on others. Len, how've you been? Just dandy, Brian, hope you've been the same. :-) Been too busy with other things than to come into this Din of Inequity more than once or twice a month. Not worth it with some of these creatures. :-) LHA By his absence, I thought that Robescum might have been incarcerated or doiing some heavy duty counseling. Summer is about over. Been working too much. I took the kids to the barber and to the movies - Ant Bully. Need to do something fun before school starts so the kids remember that I'm still their dad. didit |
Mork Moron Pontificating About "Honnor"
wrote in multiple, unrelated NG's (snipped): On 10 Aug 2006 20:00:31 -0700, wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. Reminds me of the Japanese WWII soldiers still being pulled out of the bush in th ePI in the 1970's. Robescum is out of touch with communications theory and practice. The "ePI"...?!?! A new electronics formula, Lennie? at least were still touch with honnor (HUGE SNIP) Mork, YOU have GROSSLY DIShonored both yourself and members of the United States Armed Forces with your pathetic lies...first about being a field grade officer, then about being an Enlisted man. Don't you DARE presume to talk about Honor in uniform, little boy! You're just not up to the task! And Lennie has dishonored himself with HIS pathetic attempts to "glorify" his newsgroup postings with his lame references to having served in a communications batallion that had KIA's in Korea in such a way as to make it appear as though he was somehow part-and-parcel of the sacrifices those brave men made. And then we have Lennie's "Incomming Artillery" story...what a hoot!~ The only difference between you and Lennie is that Lennie has provided SOME proof that HIS service was legitimate...It's just too bad he tarnished it with that disgusting end-run for the sake of pathetic newsgroup messaging points... Putz. Or more appropriately...putzii Steve, K4YZ |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... :-) We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] Robescum is "lough out loud" funny. 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. Reminds me of the Japanese WWII soldiers still being pulled out of the bush in th ePI in the 1970's. Robescum is out of touch with communications theory and practice. indeed when robeson is reduced to blowing gasket over misplacing a space it is almost funny to watch he try and twist that in to extreme dishonnor with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty impoving my spelling on her |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
an old fraud wrote: wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... :-) We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] Robescum is "lough out loud" funny. 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. Reminds me of the Japanese WWII soldiers still being pulled out of the bush in th ePI in the 1970's. Robescum is out of touch with communications theory and practice. indeed when robeson is reduced to blowing gasket over misplacing a space it is almost funny to watch he try and twist that in to extreme dishonnor No, you lied about your military service. with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty impoving my spelling on her You don't have any spelling skills to "improve," you illiterate *******. |
Mountains and Mountains of Morkie's Military Mularkie
NotLloyd wrote: an old fraud wrote: wrote: Reminds me of the Japanese WWII soldiers still being pulled out of the bush in th ePI in the 1970's. Robescum is out of touch with communications theory and practice. What's the "ePI"...?!?! indeed when robeson is reduced to blowing gasket over misplacing a space it is almost funny to watch he try and twist that in to extreme dishonnor No, you lied about your military service. Yep...over and over and over and over and........... Steve, K4YZ |
cease and desist
K4YZ wrote: cease and desist |
Robeson was set up altough he bit off more than I expect from him, but his lies can now be documented by internet webpages
wrote: From: on Tues, Aug 8 2006 7:11 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap wrote: From: an old friend on Tues, Aug 8 2006 8:19 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.misc, alt.military.cap [Quote of alleged response to unit military history by Major Dud] [fake quote omitted for decency] Mark, this alleged "response" to an e-mail inquiry is undoubtedly BOGUS. Let's review the verity of Major Dud's posting: 1. There is NO verification available that such an exchange ever existed through any referencable third-party source, nor any other proof that Major Dud ever made such an inquiry. Correct. Hello Brian...long time no write... :-) We've all seen the usual bluffing, lying, etc., by Major Dud, this time on a slightly different subject. He expects us all to "take his word on it (that it is true). BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! !! [...it is to laugh...out loud and for a long time...] His "word???" They don't call him Robesin for nothing. 2. The respondent ("William C Anders Jr") is not identified by position or rank and it is NOT written all-capitals in any signature. Note: Even civilian employees of the United States military have a position title which is used for all correspondence. Correct. Poor "Major" Dud may have once seen an ancient mineographed order-of-the-day or perhaps has a yellowing 5-bit-code TTY message where everything is in caps. He may think that is still in use, poor guy. It is important for Robesin to make fun of the dead. Shows that he has no bounds, will do whatever it takes. But no one else can make fun of the dead, especially his kin. 3. If a military unit is mentioned, it is protocol (format) for a unit to be spelled out for the first mention, then abbreviated. This is for clarity in responding to non- military correspondents (identifiable by headers in e-mail when correspondence does not come over the military's network). Correct. Poor feller Dud just doesn't understand, perhaps no know about, the DSN and its header information, terminal software able to identify civilians from military personnel on Internet tie-ins. Somebody has got Robesin's terminal software. He's gonna have a long sitdown with that sumbich when they finally get together. 4. It is extremely easy to forge a third-party "message," then include it as part of a message in here. That is NOT "proof" of anything. Correct. Well, it's proof that fraud was committed. :-) Fraus is Robesin's middly name. 5. Contrary to Major Dud's claims, United States Army units do NOT always keep careful records of their history. The entire United States military undergoes periodic changes in structure and new units may be created out of old ones while older units may be dissolved. Any "history" of a unit depends on the commanding officers' assignment of historian duties within that unit, NOT considered an important/prime task in that unit's mission. Neither are unit historians typically "in contact" with other units' historians. Correct. The priority usually falls somewhere below that of the unit A NCOIC MARS. Heh heh heh. MARS functions in existing units is still largely concerned with morale services for unit personnel. It is hardly there to "back up" any regular unit communications, much less be some key ingredient in some pipe-dream "Homeland Defense Against Terrorists" or other wild imaginings. On putting together a photo essay of my own service days at a major Army communications station Major Screwup is what they called Robesin, and he didn't have a whole comm center to help make it happen. Did it all by hisself. http://sujan.hallikainen.org/Broadca...s/My3Years.pdf and /AlphabetSoup.pdf I ran into the usual shoulder-shrugging "don't know" from a number of official agencies at first, everyone from the Army's Center for Military History to Fort Gordon's Signal Museum Historian's Office. Everyone who's anybody has heard of Major Robesin and his legendary screwups!. It took a LOT more digging and communicating with other agencies and units to get the final evolutionary path (including the USAF, I might add) of the 71st Signal Service Battalion of 1945 to the 78th Signal Battalion of today (based at Camp Zama, Japan, near Yokohama). It helped to have acquired a paper copy of my old battalion's own printing in 1962 describing the (then) updated station ADA and its mission, equipment, and history (to that date). All those MWR/USNMC MARS phone patches home to lonely stateside wives is what got Major Robesin innerested in phone patchin to begin with. Forget that official message traffic stuff. Even the Pacific Stars and Stripes military newspaper (HQ in Tokyo) helped with data. Ask nicely and it is surprising how helpful some can be. A not-quite-related sorce of information on Army communications turned up the fact that the old callsign "ADA" of Tokyo times in the '50s still exists and is now the HQ callsign of USARPAC, the United States Army, Pacific. An even more detailed and comprehensive history of Army history (on Signal units) in Europe since 1945 ("USAREUR") is on-line at: http://usarmygermany.com/Units/Signa...ignalCorps.htm He asked for a mission. For his sins, they gave Major Robesin one. Eavesdropping on USNMC MARS phone patches to stateside wives. 6. Probably the best place for old unit information of the United States Army is the Army Center for Military History. They have a website with some limitation on available information for non-military/non-government research. They have permanent quarters with considerably detailed written and photographic records for research by authorized historians. The United States Navy has a similar organization, also with a website. A careful web-search will turn up their URLs. And will probably turn up Steve's faked career. Heh heh, no. Neither historical agency has lists of fakers. They should start one for his sake. The only place where Robeson's "military career" could be verified or shown non-existant is NARA, the National Archives and Records Administration, and their massive military records archive in St. Louis. Getting such data requires a minimum knowledge of Robeson's social security number and proof of being a member of his family. NARA gives definitions of that and other necessary information to obtain individuals' records. Since Robeson has refused to display even one item of official information, personal photograph while in-service, all on a claimed "18 year active duty" with the USMC, we have to conclude he NEVER HAD ANY SUCH ACTIVE DUTY TIME. The only photos he has had for claims of anything have been as a TN STATE Guard "1st Lieutenant" (scowling pose in cammies) or the infamous snot-on- moustache pose in a (used) flight suit with embroidered Captain's bars on the shoulders, as a member of the CAP. Not ONE single bit of information from EIGHTEEN YEARS claimed on active duty in the USMC. He's hiding something. The only conclusion possible is that Robeson is a fraud, an imposter, a wanna-be who never-was. If Robeson makes fraudulent claims about 18 years of his life, what ELSE is he claiming fraudulently? 3. His claims of anything on QRZ.COM and his AOL home page are made only by him and are NOT "checked" or "investigated (for truth)" by either QRZ or AOL. Note that his biography now has him as "CHOP" (presumably an abbreviation for Chief Operator) of a second MARS station, whereas he had claimed earlier on the newsgroup as being "Assistant Chief Operator" on only one MARS station. A NCOIC MARS? You betcha. Go to the K4YZ "detailed info" link and use the link at the end to access his home page. In that he claims a SECOND MARS station service, this time as THE NCOIC. Just more embellishment by the imposter. Can't be true. He was VERY specific about the "A" in front of NCOIC. So he's lying again. Always got a be just a little better than he actually was. Robeson needs IMAGE of his mighty and heroic accomplishments. Slathering on more embellishments (never before mentioned) seem to be a part of that. Somebody come to Robesin's rescue. Mark, watch for the responses from the Mighty Major on this post. :-) His actions will be as I've described. Tsk, tsk on me...I forgot to include Robeson's usual response and answer to things he can't prove as being "LIES" by the challenger. :-) To him, it IS a "LIE." His fantasy world is made up differently than the reality we are all accustomed to...any departure from that fantasyland will SEEM like a "LIE" to him. Naturally he is disturbed about his fantasyworld being torn asunder. Everyone lies except for Robesin. --------- We can all concentrate on the personal squabbles of a few, the anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes happily talking dirty...OR...consider the FCC document release of 7 August 2006 on Access BPL. That's available at www.fcc.gov as FCC-06-113A1 in PDF or MS Word format. That's a REAL Policy matter. But it's too difficult for those anonymous middle-school-mentality-macho-wanna-bes who would rather throw trash and dirty words on others. Len, how've you been? Just dandy, Brian, hope you've been the same. :-) Been too busy with other things than to come into this Din of Inequity more than once or twice a month. Not worth it with some of these creatures. :-) LHA Bacteria. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com