Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Al Klein wrote: On 12 Aug 2006 15:49:50 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: Al Klein wrote: On 12 Aug 2006 09:57:19 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: it is not a sign sign of any superior knowledge to know that is a particular circut is Collpitts or hartley ocilator It's a sign of having learned it. a sign of havigng learned something of NO value No value to you - that doesn't matter very much to the other 6 billion+ people on the planet. You still don't understand the difference between memorizing facts and memorizing answers. at pesent their is no different To you - which was what I said. for some of the materail the only rational way of approuching it is memorization For some, yes. I'm referring to those who use the method for all the answers - people like you. , for other section you can learn some part of the underlying theroy and use it but short of the Full course of Eltromatic Theroy I hadin colledge you don't learn much I doubt you learned much in college either. He went to clown college. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
STFU MORON! DROP THE SUBJECT
WHO GIVE ****. wrote: On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:33:53 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On 12 Aug 2006 19:27:59 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey" wrote: Al Klein wrote: On 10 Aug 2006 22:12:58 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey" wrote: an old friend wrote: I am honest. I don't think CW has ANY value in todays world. Kinda like you. Except that code was useful once. And still more useful today than an old idiot is. Urdu and Sanskrit are a lot more useful today than he is. to you I am sure that is true but you are looking more like Robeson and Wismen daily not a good thing http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0633-0, 08/14/2006 Tested on: 8/14/2006 3:33:01 PM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote: you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not listen to them either Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic "representatives"? never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to the FCC The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the FCC thinks. but indeed enlight me what value is derived from the knowledge that an occiclaotr is colpitss type or hartley Plenty of value to those who have to work with oscillators of various types. It's difficult to design a circuit when you have no understanding of it. nknowing the name and undertsnading the circut are 2 different things Since you know neither, it's a distinction without a difference for you. why should I care if my vfo is a colpiitts or hartley occilator as long as it ocilates at the right freq? Oh, maybe you'd care to know why it's microphonic? Or what to look for if it starts doing something wrong? Different circuits are prone to different problems. your personal attack only show the wekness of your arguement And yours doesn't, I suppose. |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
STFU MORON! WHO **** CARES
Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote: you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not listen to them either Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic "representatives"? never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to the FCC The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the FCC thinks. but indeed enlight me what value is derived from the knowledge that an occiclaotr is colpitss type or hartley Plenty of value to those who have to work with oscillators of various types. It's difficult to design a circuit when you have no understanding of it. nknowing the name and undertsnading the circut are 2 different things Since you know neither, it's a distinction without a difference for you. why should I care if my vfo is a colpiitts or hartley occilator as long as it ocilates at the right freq? Oh, maybe you'd care to know why it's microphonic? Or what to look for if it starts doing something wrong? Different circuits are prone to different problems. your personal attack only show the wekness of your arguement And yours doesn't, I suppose. --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0633-1, 08/15/2006 Tested on: 8/15/2006 8:29:36 AM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0633-1, 08/15/2006 Tested on: 8/15/2006 8:30:10 AM avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:57:55 -0400, Al Klein wrote: the knowledg is of no value to most of those people either I'm glad to know that you've been appointed to speak for them but, if you don't mind, I'd rather hear it from them. you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not listen to them either Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic "representatives"? never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to the FCC The same people who are interested in the fact you conversed with bootleggers. but indeed enlight me what value is derived from the knowledge that an occiclaotr is colpitss type or hartley Plenty of value to those who have to work with oscillators of various types. It's difficult to design a circuit when you have no understanding of it. nknowing the name and undertsnading the circut are 2 different things Neither of which you can do with your limited intelligence. You weren't born, Markie, you were **** out. why should I care if my vfo is a colpiitts or hartley occilator as long as it ocilates at the right freq? That's our Markie, representing the Red States! without adding something to mix they answer it has no value Your contributions to these threads are what have no value. in your opinion obviously mine differs In everybody's opinion, stupid. But not to those actually involved in the study of memory and learning. when did you become nominated to speak for them When those telepathic representatives of yours became appointed to tell us what everyone thinks. then ae nopt authirized and should stop Post when you sober up. you are very sloppy about your facts How would you know? You wouldn't recognize a fact if it came up to you and hit you. your personal attack only show the wekness of your arguement Oh, the irony. |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote: you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not listen to them either Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic "representatives"? never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to the FCC The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the FCC thinks. agred in practice but you are the one going about therory .. |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friendless cocksucker wrote: Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:38:03 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:47 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:37:50 -0400, wrote: you have heard from the appointed legel representives and you did not listen to them either Oh? I didn't know that we legally appointed "representatives" to tell us what people think. Who, pray tell, are these telepathic "representatives"? never said anything about their being telpaths but I was refering to the FCC The FCC doesn't tell us what the people think, it tells us what the FCC thinks. agred in practice but you are the one going about therory What the hell would you know, you are a no code beginner training wheel ham who makes up EME contacts. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
IN THE REAL WORLD ANTI GIRLS CAN DO NOTHING TO STOP THIS... | CB | |||
Reflection Delay is it real??? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |