Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack Ricci" wrote in message ... Why do you want to "kill" the English language? wrote in message oups.com... ...According to research, communication in English can still be maintained if the first and last letters in a word are correctly placed, and the rest are messed up. Check out the sentence below : I lvoe tihs fncikug palce! Jcak That is valid research . |
#72
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friendless Sodomite wrote: cease Cease breathing, Spammer. |
#74
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Watchman" wrote in
ps.com: huh huh ah ha_ what a bunch of idiots in here...aint no wonder there aint to many cbers become hams they all to ignorant ya dimwits 4 rogers gud buddies 10-4 and im steppin`... ``The Watchman`` I Am Watching You... You out a work again? Well watch all you want, but we would appreciate it if you would stop jerking yourself off while watching. Tnx. Do you also listen to Omega One? Sc |
#75
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: "Watchman" wrote in ps.com: huh huh ah ha_ what a bunch of idiots in here...aint no wonder there aint to many cbers become hams they all to ignorant ya dimwits 4 rogers gud buddies 10-4 and im steppin`... ``The Watchman`` I Am Watching You... You out a work again? Well watch all you want, but we would appreciate it if you would stop jerking yourself off while watching. Tnx. trolling right along |
#76
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: it is your title steve when you leaving the ARS? The Atlanta Rhythm Section? I was never in the ARS...Although I caught them live in Atlanta once in the 70's...Hardly "classic rock" but it was a lot of fun. They had some definite "10's" for groupies though! Steve, K4YZ |
#77
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
cmdr buzz corey wrote:
wrote: On 9 Aug 2006 20:30:59 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey" wrote: an old idiot wrote: Part 97 does not define Ham radio, Part 97 defines the rules WE define Ham radio And again your compete ignorance springs fourth to show you for the total moronic half-wit you are. But then, what's new? §97.3 Definitions. (4) Amateur service. A radiocommunication service for the purpose of self-training, intercommunication and technical investigations carried out by amateurs, that is, duly authorized persons interested in radio technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest. your poitn We defeine Ham radio the FCC merely defines the rules we must obey in doing so http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Get a six-year-old to read and explain to you part 97.3 (Definitions), subpart (4) where it DEFINES the Amateur service, note the word service, nowhere does it say hobby. Try not to look so ignorant. You still around "Buzz Corey?" Your amateur TV show got cancelled decades ago. Crawl back in the kinescope. "Buzz," try looking at ALL of Title 47 C.F.R. You will find (probably in horror to your self-righteousness) that ALL Parts refer to a Radio SERVICE. Even CB is Citizens Band Radio SERVICE! So is Radio Control Radio SERVICE! The word "service" in Title 47 is a regulatory term denoting a type and kind of radio use. Look further in the "definitions and purpose" and you will see that amateur radio is defined as "non-essential communications" and "without pecuniary interest." THAT makes it "amateur." Nowhere in Part 97, Title 47 C.F.R. does the FCC ever refer to "ham" radio. According to the FCC (in a rare show of honesty) "ham" was a pejorative applied to amateurs by professional morsemen. Was that too hard for you to understand? Shall we get a 5-year-old to explain it to YOU? |
#78
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() cmdr buzz corey wrote: wrote: On 9 Aug 2006 20:30:59 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey" wrote: an old idiot wrote: Part 97 does not define Ham radio, Part 97 defines the rules WE define Ham radio And again your compete ignorance springs fourth to show you for the total moronic half-wit you are. But then, what's new? §97.3 Definitions. (4) Amateur service. A radiocommunication service for the purpose of self-training, intercommunication and technical investigations carried out by amateurs, that is, duly authorized persons interested in radio technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest. your poitn We defeine Ham radio the FCC merely defines the rules we must obey in doing so http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Get a six-year-old to read and explain to you part 97.3 (Definitions), subpart (4) where it DEFINES the Amateur service, note the word service, nowhere does it say hobby. Tsk, tsk, tsk, "Buzz," if you look harder at Definitions and "Basis and Purpose" political boilerplate, you will see that amateur radio is for "non-essential communications" and done "without pecuniary interest!" That pretty much defines an AVOCATION, "Buzz." You know what? An avocation is a HOBBY! [amazing but true] If you look farther in Title 47 Code of Federal Regulations you will see that ALL Parts use the word "service." [amazing but true] The FCC uses the word "service" as a regulatory term defining a type and kind of radio. How about that Citizens Band Radio SERVICE, "Buzz?" :-) [got yer uniform on?] Try not to look so ignorant. We can get a FIVE-year-old to explain it to you? |
#79
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: On 7 Sep 2006 02:14:31 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: it is your title steve when you leaving the ARS? The Atlanta Rhythm Section? I was never in the ARS.. lying agin doing anything to avoid facing your words Nope. Just following YOUR lead, Morkie. It seems that intentional miquoting and taking things out of context is "OK" in the Mork Moron Book Of Posting Style, so i was just trying to make you feel at home. And I was never in the Atlanta Rhythm section...Love the music, though. Stop lying about being misquoted "What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's genitals"sayth Robeson steve has been quoted exactly See...Just like that. Still at it, I see.... And still looking jsut as stupid. Steve, K4YZ |
#80
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
IN THE REAL WORLD ANTI GIRLS CAN DO NOTHING TO STOP THIS... | CB | |||
Reflection Delay is it real??? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |