AB8MQ, N0VFP, KB9RQZ. What a waste of perfectly good callsigns.
 

The three stooges of amateur radio.

The reason no new hams are coming in is prospective hams stop here and see
you three and then leave thinking ham radio is full of retards.

Sc

slow code ""What a waste of gay sex""
 

Slow Code wrote:
The three stooges of amateur radio.

The reason no new hams are coming in is prospective hams stop here and see
you three and then leave thinking ham radio is full of retards.

Sc

slow code ask mork nicely and he may blow you

troling right along
 

wrote:

fuuny hwow doy uo explain then that were not coiming between 200 and
2005 when I was not posting at all

Anyone want to take a stab at what the hell morkie is attempting to say?

AB8MQ, N0VFP, KB9RQZ. What a waste of perfectly good callsigns.
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...

The three stooges of amateur radio.

The reason no new hams are coming in is prospective hams stop here and see
you three and then leave thinking ham radio is full of retards.

Sc


The problem with your supposition is that, to the best of my knowledge,
Lloyd Davies does NOT post here. If he does, please provide evidence of
same. (posters assuming Lloyd's name ain't "proof")
Second problem is that despite Wiseman's attempts to disrupt a few
newsgroups, Mark Morgan has done far, far more to cause disruption than
Wiseman has.
Wiseman, or his third person persona, makes his usual spate of filthy
comments and leaves for a while. Not so Mark Morgan. Mark, despite his
claims of being employed, seems to have hour upon free hour to flood the
groups with his drivel and he cares little of what a thread is about or who
initiated it. Mark feels he must have SOMETHING to say to just about each
and every post made, and 98% of his responses have absolutely no value...if
one can even decipher them.
Mark must be far more lonely than Wiseman.

troling right along
 

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On 29 Aug 2006 19:59:36 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
wrote:


wrote:

fuuny hwow doy uo explain then that were not coiming between 200 and
2005 when I was not posting at all

Anyone want to take a stab at what the hell morkie is attempting to say?

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Well, he wants to know hwow doy uo explain then that were not coiming
between 200 and 2005 when he was not posting at all?

Sheesh, just answer the man's question.


--
Mr Bill

AB8MQ, N0VFP, KB9RQZ. What a waste of perfectly good callsigns.
 

Slow Code wrote:
The three stooges of amateur radio.

And you , Sniveling ****, is the "Shemp" of the group, who ****es
himself, bedwetter.

AB8MQ, N0VFP, KB9RQZ. What a waste of perfectly good callsigns.
 

Not Lloyd wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...

The three stooges of amateur radio.

The reason no new hams are coming in is prospective hams stop here and see
you three and then leave thinking ham radio is full of retards.

Sc


The problem with your supposition is that, to the best of my knowledge,

Which is very little.

Lloyd Davies does NOT post here.

Hi Lardass
Llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllllllllloyd!

If he does, please provide evidence of
same. (posters assuming Lloyd's name ain't "proof")
Second

Hey Lardass, tell us why you are still a virgin.

troling right along
 

wrote:

indeed these are the same people that claim they can read CW under
poor condcitions where sruely a chartacer gts lost now and then
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

Unlike you morkie, the people I communicate with on CW can put
together a coherent sentence which makes it rather easy to fill in a
missed character or two.

troling right along
 

Bill Turner wrote:
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On 29 Aug 2006 19:59:36 -0700, "cmdr buzz corey"
wrote:


wrote:

fuuny hwow doy uo explain then that were not coiming between 200 and
2005 when I was not posting at all

Anyone want to take a stab at what the hell morkie is attempting to say?

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Well, he wants to know hwow doy uo explain then that were not coiming
between 200 and 2005 when he was not posting at all?

Sheesh, just answer the man's question.

Well, i thnk he dosn no whan yers he wlus psoting

troling right along
 

"cmdr buzz corey" wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:

indeed these are the same people that claim they can read CW under
poor condcitions where sruely a chartacer gts lost now and then
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

Unlike you morkie, the people I communicate with on CW can put
together a coherent sentence which makes it rather easy to fill in a
missed character or two.


Yeah, really! Sheeesh............ Just because they do CW doesn't mean they
misspell. Conditions are one thing - **** poor spelling is another. Just
because the brain is "supposed" to be able to decipher codes and some
sentences even if misspelled, doesn't give you (Morkie) the absolute right
to act like an asshole and keep typing stupid ****. Maybe it is Morkie who
can't comprehend what they're saying. HELL - he can't spell to start with.
At least that is what I've gotten from all the examples I've seen. How did
you EVER pass the tests?

If you spelled like that all through your eh - learning years, I'm willing
to bet you bombed in school. Between what I've seen in the news group(s) and
on your web site - wow! Use a damned spell checker. At least that "effort"
will make you appear "a" little brighter. Oopps, I forgot, you (Morkie)
don't know what "effort" is. You remind me of the dork in Rec.Antique Radio
and Phono - always being a pain in the ass to people. He hardly ever makes
any sense - even if he does spell correctly, which in this case, I'll give
HIM credit for at least that - spelling correctly.

L.