RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Ethical question (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/102904-ethical-question.html)

[email protected] August 30th 06 05:04 AM

disgusting troll
 

Slow Code wrote:
If you were in a crowded radio store and had to fart. Would you endure the
pain and hold it in until you were alone, or would you silently let it out
and hope someone else gets blamed for it?



you post **** like this and are critize anyone for their concent?


jawod August 30th 06 05:34 AM

disgusting troll
 
wrote:
Slow Code wrote:

If you were in a crowded radio store and had to fart. Would you endure the
pain and hold it in until you were alone, or would you silently let it out
and hope someone else gets blamed for it?




you post **** like this and are critize anyone for their concent?

May be a bit childish, but it's not THAT bad.

anonymous August 30th 06 01:41 PM

Ethical question
 
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:12:29 +0000, Slow Code wrote:


If you were in a crowded radio store and had to fart. Would you endure the
pain and hold it in until you were alone, or would you silently let it out
and hope someone else gets blamed for it?

there is no ethics involved here.

now a true ethical question:
can an unlicensed person using radio technology to violate part 15 still
be in violation if he had a ham license (we're talking about using 802.11A
at full power for a 10 mile shot folks!).


Jack Ricci August 30th 06 03:30 PM

Ethical question
 
"anonymous" wrote in message
can an unlicensed person using radio technology to violate part 15 still
be in violation if he had a ham license (we're talking about using 802.11A
at full power for a 10 mile shot folks!).


I didn't look up any rules or sections of law anywhere, so I guess I'm
answering a question blindly. I'm in Canada, but I felt compelled to answer
even if I misunderstood the question.

I believe that government has written into law that a licensed ham
should only use the power, or enough power required or necessary to
communicate. Ten miles down the road is not a really great distance,
contrary to what some CBers think, so maybe you could still use smoke
signals to communicate unless you are then violating pollution-control laws,
and or harming the tree environment/ecology system of the area by burning
code into the sky.

I think that this part of the law still stands in Canada....that one
should only use enough power to communicate whether it be an emergency or
not.

If I missed your intention by 10 miles, please ignore this post. Thanks,

Jack

"anonymous" wrote in message
. com...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:12:29 +0000, Slow Code wrote:


If you were in a crowded radio store and had to fart. Would you endure
the
pain and hold it in until you were alone, or would you silently let it
out
and hope someone else gets blamed for it?

there is no ethics involved here.

now a true ethical question:
can an unlicensed person using radio technology to violate part 15 still
be in violation if he had a ham license (we're talking about using 802.11A
at full power for a 10 mile shot folks!).




Tharsheblowsboys August 30th 06 03:52 PM

disgusting troll
 

wrote in message
ups.com...

Slow Code wrote:
If you were in a crowded radio store and had to fart. Would you endure

the
pain and hold it in until you were alone, or would you silently let it

out
and hope someone else gets blamed for it?



you post **** like this and are critize anyone for their concent?


.....the proper word is "content" you sopping wet trailer-house living
douchebag!


an old friend August 30th 06 04:54 PM

disgusting troll
 

Tharsheblowsboys wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Slow Code wrote:
If you were in a crowded radio store and had to fart. Would you endure

the
pain and hold it in until you were alone, or would you silently let it

out
and hope someone else gets blamed for it?



you post **** like this and are critize anyone for their concent?


....the proper word is "content"

sorry I was gaging on it what ever it was


Irv Finkleman August 30th 06 06:12 PM

Ethical question
 
Slow Code wrote:

If you were in a crowded radio store and had to fart. Would you endure the
pain and hold it in until you were alone, or would you silently let it out
and hope someone else gets blamed for it?

SC


Let it out in morse code! People will look around to
see which radio it's coming from and you'll remain
undetected.

Irv VE6BP
--
--------------------------------------
Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html
Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm
Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm
--------------------
Irv Finkleman,
Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Irv Finkleman August 30th 06 06:15 PM

disgusting troll
 
" wrote:

Slow Code wrote:
If you were in a crowded radio store and had to fart. Would you endure the
pain and hold it in until you were alone, or would you silently let it out
and hope someone else gets blamed for it?


you post **** like this and are critize anyone for their concent?


Oh Oh! The newsgroup policeman! Lighten up KB9!

Irv VE6BP
--
--------------------------------------
Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html
Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm
Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm
--------------------
Irv Finkleman,
Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Cecil Moore August 30th 06 07:06 PM

Ethical question
 
Irv Finkleman wrote:
Let it out in morse code! People will look around to
see which radio it's coming from and you'll remain
undetected.


Seems anyone who can do it at 1kHz is a tight a$$. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Jack Ricci August 30th 06 07:08 PM

Ethical question
 
"anonymous" wrote in message
can an unlicensed person using radio technology to violate part 15 still
be in violation if he had a ham license (we're talking about using 802.11A
at full power for a 10 mile shot folks!).


I didn't look up any rules or sections of law anywhere, so I guess I'm
answering a question blindly. I'm in Canada, but I felt compelled to answer
even if I misunderstood the question.

I believe that government has written into law that a licensed ham
should only use the power, or enough power required or necessary to
communicate. Ten miles down the road is not a really great distance,
contrary to what some CBers think, so maybe you could still use smoke
signals to communicate unless you are then violating pollution-control laws,
and or harming the tree environment/ecology system of the area by burning
code into the sky.

I think that this part of the law still stands in Canada....that one
should only use enough power to communicate whether it be an emergency or
not.

If I missed your intention by 10 miles, please ignore this post. Thanks,

Jack




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com