About Us

Dave Heil · September 28th 06, 05:31 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

wrote:
From: on Wed, Sep 27 2006 5:58 am

wrote:
on Tues, Sep 26 2006 7:22 pm
wrote:
wrote:

I'm going to hold to what I wrote. Every military veteran I
know will agree with me. If some never-serving sonnovawhich
wants to argue that "subsidy" thing they can shove it.

I love it when you talk tough, Len. The money I received as base pay
for my entire four years in the military totaled about 11.5 thousand
dollars. I got even for that in the end. I had to "buy back" my time
by paying 3% of that sum toward Federal retirement. It was a bargain.

Paul Schleck and the Waffen SS guy can go do ALL the "personal,
non-professional life" background checks on me they want.

Who is the "Waffen SS guy"?

Google provides--in spades.

They
won't turn up anything heroic (no "seven hostile actions")...

You keep selling yourself short. There was the threat of the Soviet
bombers. There was the classic sphincter post which recounted what it
is like to undergo an artillery barrage. Where and when was it that you
underwent this ordeal? Can your friend Gene confirm it? Did his
sphincter tighten too?

...just
doing my job(s) as best I could, following the rules, getting
paid regularly, never being fired for cause.

That's the story of most of us, Len. You have taken it upon yourself to
hint that others defrauded their employers, were incompetent in what
they did, never did what they've said they did or that you know better
how they should have accomplished their jobs. That's strange, don't you
think?

From Jimmie Miccolis we don't have enough hints that he DOES
have a "personal, non-professional life" to DO a full back-
ground check.

Why, has he violated the IEEE Code of Ethics?

He is proud of doing nothing at work.

Why did you write the obvious untruth?

Hans
Brakob, Phil Kane, Bill Sohl, myself have all said what we
did and what we do for a living. So have others.

You recounted portions of your work so many times that I'm quite certain
that some of us would be able to recite it from memory.

But not
Jimmie M. All we hear from Jimmie are his amateur radio
adventures.

Maybe you can clarify something for me. Is it "Jimmie" or "Jimmy". You
keep switching from one to the other. What kind of thing would you like
from him in this amateur radio newsgroup? Why makes you feel that
you're entitled to the information?

He may have no other life.

Is that your belief, Len, or are you simply honked that he hasn't opted
to share it with you. After all, there is certainly precedent for Jim
to believe that you'd simply use the information to attempt belittlement
of his work or home life.

But, he is THE
'expert' on ALL matters, never ever hesitating to call
others "wrong" when they are in disagreement with him.

I've noticed that others are told they are wrong when they are, in fact,
wrong. I've also noticed that you seem to set yourself up as an expert
in areas where you have little or no experience--amateur radio, State
Department communications, U.S. Navy communications, U.S. Coast Guard
communications.

Jimmie's latest, his infamous "military persons get
'SUBSIDIZED' by taxpayers" is perhaps his crowning
achievement in looking down at all others. About a
million 'others.' How is a LIFE 'subsidized?'

I happen to live in a state where a substantial portion of the residents
have their lives subsidized by government/taxpayers. These subsidies
include food, shelter and medical care. That doesn't mean that a crime
has taken place.

That is NOT an amateur radio subject, certainly not policy.

Drifting off into your military experiences, the war in Iraq, your
PROFESSIONAL radio experiences--those things aren't amateur radio
subject, but you've never let that stand in your way.

Plain and simple fact: It is out of line, INSULTING to
anyone who is or has been in the United States military.

I don't feel insulted.

Miccolis won't apologize for that insult. He is always
"right." QED.

Len Anderson has never apologized for any of his mistakes or deliberate
untruths in this venue. QED.

You might note that Robesin's QRZ bio has been altered. He
doesn't mention his "USMC career" at all now! Wonder why?
:-)

I just noticed that )having checked on it interesting it still shows
up on his home page

That's how it goes with the robeswine,

Who is "robeswine"?

HIS words are the ONLY
"facts" we can get. NO documented proof from real official
sources, not even a snapshot of him in that alleged 18-year
military career. Just His words.

Imagine that. I guess you'll just have to deal with it or await the
outcome of Brian Burke's contact with the "Stolen Valor" folks, huh?

["signature" omitted due to not receiving a "subsidy" for
posting in here...to those who object to what I wrote, the
ByteBrothers' famous phrase is invoked]

I'm unfamiliar with it, Len. What is it?

Dave K8MN

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine	N9OGL	Policy	89	April 18th 06 07:16 AM
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine	N9OGL	General	34	December 21st 05 04:03 AM
FCC Affirms Jack Gerritsen $42,000 fine	[email protected]	General	0	December 5th 05 04:22 PM
FCC levies $10,000 fine for unlicensed operation	Mike Terry	Broadcasting	11	January 31st 05 08:43 PM
FCC issues forfeiture order against Jack Gerrittsen, formerly KG6IRO	Splinter	Policy	1	December 15th 04 12:16 AM

Menu

About Us