Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: wrote in oups.com: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: according to him anyone not devoted to cw is a lowlfie That's really sad. ...and pathetic. No one should have to go through life as a lowlfie. (extraneous groups deleted) So who do you think Slow Code is? Kelly? Coslo? Deignan? I haven't the slightest idea. Well, I know "Slow Code" is not me. Beyond that, he could be anybody with a computer and an internet connection. "Slow Code" could be Len Anderson, who has used at least seven different screen names here - that we know of. How many screen names have you used here - that you know of? "Slow Code" could be Brian Burke, N0IMD, Slow Code could be Jim/N2EY, despite protests that it isn't him. Ditto Robesin, Coslo, Bruce, Dan, Larry Roll, or anyone else who "appears" to be absent from RRAP. Why don't you build up your CW skills and quit worrying about who everyone is. 73 de Slow Code OK, Len. I'll stop worrying. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
'Mark in the Dark' wrote in
: On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:33:30 GMT, Slow Code wrote: wrote in groups.com: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: according to him anyone not devoted to cw is a lowlfie That's really sad. ...and pathetic. No one should have to go through life as a lowlfie. (extraneous groups deleted) So who do you think Slow Code is? Kelly? Coslo? Deignan? I haven't the slightest idea. Well, I know "Slow Code" is not me. Beyond that, he could be anybody with a computer and an internet connection. "Slow Code" could be Len Anderson, who has used at least seven different screen names here - that we know of. How many screen names have you used here - that you know of? "Slow Code" could be Brian Burke, N0IMD, Slow Code could be Jim/N2EY, despite protests that it isn't him. Ditto Robesin, Coslo, Bruce, Dan, Larry Roll, or anyone else who "appears" to be absent from RRAP. Why don't you build up your CW skills and quit worrying about who everyone is. whjy should he He has passed the test and hold a general class license Mark in the Dark. He can keep building his code skills to make himself a better operator. Why does everyone only want to do the minimum and not improve. It's because they're lazy. They don't care to be good communicators, all they want is a hand-out license that doesn't require skill or knowledge. If that's what they want they should have stayed on CB. SC |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: 'Mark in the Dark' wrote in : On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:33:30 GMT, Slow Code wrote: wrote in groups.com: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: according to him anyone not devoted to cw is a lowlfie That's really sad. ...and pathetic. No one should have to go through life as a lowlfie. (extraneous groups deleted) So who do you think Slow Code is? Kelly? Coslo? Deignan? I haven't the slightest idea. Well, I know "Slow Code" is not me. Beyond that, he could be anybody with a computer and an internet connection. "Slow Code" could be Len Anderson, who has used at least seven different screen names here - that we know of. How many screen names have you used here - that you know of? "Slow Code" could be Brian Burke, N0IMD, Slow Code could be Jim/N2EY, despite protests that it isn't him. Ditto Robesin, Coslo, Bruce, Dan, Larry Roll, or anyone else who "appears" to be absent from RRAP. Why don't you build up your CW skills and quit worrying about who everyone is. whjy should he He has passed the test and hold a general class license Mark in the Dark. He can keep building his code skills to make himself a better operator. Again, the pro-coders only equate code speed with being a good operator. Amateur radio has only a single dimension for them - CW on HF. Their attitude is bankrupting amateur radio. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dr.Ace wrote: "john" wrote in message ... Slow Code is a disgrace to Amateur Radio! I doubt that SC even has a call sign . Ace - WH2T you may be right But honestly I don't think so I beleive that SC is a older hams who moved to some retirement village, did not read the fine print, and so can't go on the air anymore and having put his saving in it is just plain screwed andf unable to move and not driving much can't go HF mobile even and he come on here and takes it out on us |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: On 25 Oct 2006 04:04:07 -0700, wrote: Slow Code wrote: 'Mark in the Dark' wrote in : On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:33:30 GMT, Slow Code wrote: wrote in groups.com: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: according to him anyone not devoted to cw is a lowlfie That's really sad. ...and pathetic. No one should have to go through life as a lowlfie. (extraneous groups deleted) So who do you think Slow Code is? Kelly? Coslo? Deignan? I haven't the slightest idea. Well, I know "Slow Code" is not me. Beyond that, he could be anybody with a computer and an internet connection. "Slow Code" could be Len Anderson, who has used at least seven different screen names here - that we know of. How many screen names have you used here - that you know of? "Slow Code" could be Brian Burke, N0IMD, Slow Code could be Jim/N2EY, despite protests that it isn't him. Ditto Robesin, Coslo, Bruce, Dan, Larry Roll, or anyone else who "appears" to be absent from RRAP. Why don't you build up your CW skills and quit worrying about who everyone is. whjy should he He has passed the test and hold a general class license Mark in the Dark. He can keep building his code skills to make himself a better operator. Again, the pro-coders only equate code speed with being a good operator. Amateur radio has only a single dimension for them - CW on HF. Their attitude is bankrupting amateur radio. be fair they equate Code and some even promote code acuratcy The late Dick Carrol/W0EX prided himself on being able to send code so poorly that even a computer code reader couldn't copy him. This was in order to prevent unworthy No-Code Technicians from eavesdropping on him. BTW, all the other Pro-Code Extras were good with it, coming up with cool, old-timey sounding excuses for such bad behavoir. "Banana Boat Swing" and "unique fist" were heard. A ham needn't try to produce CW that meets the Morse Code specification for dots, dashes, inter-dot/dash spacing, inter-character spacing, and inter-word spacing. |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "john" wrote in message ... Slow Code is a disgrace to Amateur Radio! I doubt that SC even has a call sign . Ace - WH2T |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thats Right_ 20wpm" wrote in message ... Slow Code is the kind of guy that everybodys hates on the air. He is the Jammer because no one listens to him. Probably because he doesn't have an amateur radio license . Ace - WH2T |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in
oups.com: Slow Code wrote: 'Mark in the Dark' wrote in : On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:33:30 GMT, Slow Code wrote: wrote in groups.com: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: wrote: according to him anyone not devoted to cw is a lowlfie That's really sad. ...and pathetic. No one should have to go through life as a lowlfie. (extraneous groups deleted) So who do you think Slow Code is? Kelly? Coslo? Deignan? I haven't the slightest idea. Well, I know "Slow Code" is not me. Beyond that, he could be anybody with a computer and an internet connection. "Slow Code" could be Len Anderson, who has used at least seven different screen names here - that we know of. How many screen names have you used here - that you know of? "Slow Code" could be Brian Burke, N0IMD, Slow Code could be Jim/N2EY, despite protests that it isn't him. Ditto Robesin, Coslo, Bruce, Dan, Larry Roll, or anyone else who "appears" to be absent from RRAP. Why don't you build up your CW skills and quit worrying about who everyone is. whjy should he He has passed the test and hold a general class license Mark in the Dark. He can keep building his code skills to make himself a better operator. Again, the pro-coders only equate code speed with being a good operator. Amateur radio has only a single dimension for them - CW on HF. Their attitude is bankrupting amateur radio. Improving your skills doesn't make you a better operator? Sheeesh. You can still have your microphone, but you should have to pass a code test before you're allowed to use it. I like 5 WPM for Tech, 13 for General, and 20wpm for Extra, but then, I'm not lazy. SC |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dr.Ace" wrote in
: "Thats Right_ 20wpm" wrote in message ... Slow Code is the kind of guy that everybodys hates on the air. He is the Jammer because no one listens to him. Probably because he doesn't have an amateur radio license . Ace - WH2T Tnx, 73, good luck in the contest. SC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
hey BB did steve do somethign specail toy uo laely? | Policy | |||
More News of Radio Amateurs' Work in the Andamans | Shortwave | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Broadcasting | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy |