Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 13th 06, 03:15 AM
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2005
Posts: 156
Default Wd2xsh

What's up with this nonsense? --- http://www.500kc.com/

I don't think we need "experimental" stations to prove in the use of 500Kc/s for radio communications. Maritime mobile stations have been doing that since the days just after Titanic sailors started breathing salt water.

The Man in the Maze
QRT from Baboquivari Peak, Arizona
  #2   Report Post  
Old December 13th 06, 11:30 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 300
Default Anymouse Not Get Facts Right


Iitoi wrote:
What's up with this nonsense? --- http://www.500kc.com/

I don't think we need "experimental" stations to prove in the use of
500Kc/s for radio communications.


That's not the purpose of the experimental license, Anymouse.

The purpose of the license is to prove that less-than-optimal
loaded antenna systems can provided the desired communications.

Previous users of the band were not so restricted and had antenna
farms that were hundreds of feet high and covered acres, not a few
hunded square feet. Some of the antenna combinations being tried at
600 meters might be likened to trying to use a rubber duck on 20
meters.

Steve, K4YZ

  #3   Report Post  
Old December 13th 06, 11:55 PM
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2005
Posts: 156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K4YZ
Iitoi wrote:
What's up with this nonsense? --- http://www.500kc.com/

I don't think we need "experimental" stations to prove in the use of
500Kc/s for radio communications.


That's not the purpose of the experimental license, Anymouse.

The purpose of the license is to prove that less-than-optimal
loaded antenna systems can provided the desired communications.

Previous users of the band were not so restricted and had antenna
farms that were hundreds of feet high and covered acres, not a few
hunded square feet. Some of the antenna combinations being tried at
600 meters might be likened to trying to use a rubber duck on 20
meters.

Steve, K4YZ
Most maritime mobile stations (the "previous users") aren't "hundreds of feet high and covered acres"! Except for a few passenger vessels, most "antenna farms" at sea are located on the stack or aft deckhouse and are intermingled with cargo cranes, mast stays, and other deck machinery and paraphenalia. The most common 600-meter-band antennae at sea are 28-foot base loaded whips, side mounted with huge masses of steel, aluminun, and other conductive surfaces in the near-field. Only large non-cargo vessels (ie., the Titanic and QE2) have the luxury of stringing longer wire antennae.

This WD2XSH "experimental station" boon-doggle is remindful of amateur wheel-wrights slicing cross sections from logs of petrified wood out here in the desert, boring a hole somewhere near the center, and crying "Eureka, we've communicated on 600 meters... someone quick go tell the BF Goodrich!"

The Man in the Maze
QRM from Baboquivari Peak, Arizona
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WD2XSH Experimental CW on 506.05 kHz [email protected] Shortwave 5 December 4th 06 11:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017