![]() |
WRC-07
an_old_friend wrote:
KH6HZ wrote: ah MD I did not recnize you the man of a thousand Callsisgns "Alun L. Palmer" wrote: I doubt if Carl would be interested in attending. His single issue was abolition of code testing, and he WON that back in 2003. Heh heh heh, Mark..."man of a thousand callsigns!" :-) Actually just about 12 ham calls plus a private ship radio license from the state of Washington...considering Mikey D. was a resident of Rhode Island at the time, it is difficult to recognize "residency" in two different far-apart states. He had another ship radio license for a motorboat at the same time, required mailing address given as Rhode Island. We did a lengthy bunch of posts on "the man of a thousand calls" several years ago in here. Eventually Mikey ran away from here. The FCC made him give up all his FAKE "club calls." The "clubs" just didn't exist. The last one to die was the one for the "RF Commandos!" :-) I don't think Alun was in here at the time. He would have enjoyed reading that series of posts, I think. :-) Aloha, LA |
WRC-07
wrote:
[blah blah blah] Diaper's still soiled, eh, Lennie? Visiting nurse hasn't shown up yet? |
WRC-07
|
WRC-07
KH6HZ wrote: wrote: [blah blah blah] Diaper's still soiled, eh, Lennie? Visiting nurse hasn't shown up yet? nah steve has been silnet sine last weeks outburst well man of a thousand callsign how does it FEEL to be the only RRAPer known the have had the FCC act aginst him. I certainly have never receieved any letter from them myself and code testing is supoosed to weed out the bad one . so I guess you are just another case where it FAILED |
WRC-07
"an_old_friend" wrote in message ups.com... Charlie Rangel and Jesse Jackson who blame eveything wrong in the black comunity on the white rasism OFF TOPIC POST! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
WRC-07
"an_old_friend" wrote:
well man of a thousand callsign how does it FEEL to be the only RRAPer known the have had the FCC act aginst him. Which Part 97 rule did I violate, Morkie? I don't seem to ever recall getting a pink slip from the FCC telling me I've violated Part 97. I certainly have never receieved any letter from them myself Probably due to the fact, as someone else pointed out, your address is gibberish. and code testing is supoosed to weed out the bad one . so I guess you are just another case where it FAILED Where have I stated code testing weeds out anyone? Well... For years it weeded YOU out... so that certainly was a good thing, IMO. |
WRC-07
wrote in message ... On 17 Jan 2007 03:56:34 -0800, wrote: A little on-topic discussion never hurt anything. except for the mind of Dave and Jim and Steve and Roger OFF TOPIC POST! hijacking these NG for your wars and vendaatas is what YOU do -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
WRC-07
From: "an_old_friend" on Mon, Jan 22 2007 8:47 am
wrote: an_old_friend wrote: KH6HZ wrote: ah MD I did not recnize you the man of a thousand Callsisgns "Alun L. Palmer" wrote: I doubt if Carl would be interested in attending. His single issue was abolition of code testing, and he WON that back in 2003. Heh heh heh, Mark..."man of a thousand callsigns!" :-) indeeed an exagertion or just a prediction of the result if if he been allowed to contiue I know that and you know that, but watch out for Jimmie NOserve...he is probably warming up to several years' worth of ruler-spanking by his Nun of the Above character all about exaggeration, etc. :-) Actually just about 12 ham calls plus a private ship radio license from the state of Washington...considering Mikey D. was a resident of Rhode Island at the time, it is difficult to recognize "residency" in two different far-apart states. He had another ship radio license for a motorboat at the same time, required mailing address given as Rhode Island. he sure did get around Well, in truth, we can't really prove he did anything other than falsify his amateur vanity callsign mailing address...and be forced to give up all his many "club" callsigns. [it was a "coincidence" is the strongest defence any sympathizer can come up with...] But, Deignan HAS NOT REFUTED HIS ALLEGED WASHINGTON BOAT RADIO LICENSE. All he did was try to invent a bunch of "infirmaties" about me, a supposed "polite" insult or suggest that bringing up a topic already done before is "obsession." Tsk. "Judge" Miccolis has already "ruled" that "there is no statute of limitations" in newsgroups! [did Jimmie get bit by a legal beagle in the butt?] I don't think Alun was in here at the time. He would have enjoyed reading that series of posts, I think. :-) it was interesting reading for this jerk to lectturing on lawlessness is hoot Oh, oh, now "Judge" Miccolis will make another "ruling!" It is "NOT" lawlessness...it is just "working around loop-holes in the law," all perfectly "legal" and acceptable. Have NO amateur license and one is a criminal. Have MANY amateur licenses, all active, and one is a valiant "hero!" Hoooo-RAWWHHHH! LA |
WRC-07
KH6HZ wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote: well man of a thousand callsign how does it FEEL to be the only RRAPer known the have had the FCC act aginst him. Which Part 97 rule did I violate, Morkie? "Good Amateur Practice." I don't seem to ever recall getting a pink slip from the FCC telling me I've violated Part 97. Riley says good amatuer practice is enforceable. He enforced it on you. I certainly have never receieved any letter from them myself Probably due to the fact, as someone else pointed out, your address is gibberish. Only Riley is to judge. Meanwhile, Deignan has addresses scattered across the USA and perhaps several US possessions, courtesy of Coast Guard friednds... and code testing is supoosed to weed out the bad one . so I guess you are just another case where it FAILED Where have I stated code testing weeds out anyone? Below. Well... For years it weeded YOU out... so that certainly was a good thing, IMO. Mark has been a ham for years. |
WRC-07
wrote:
"Good Amateur Practice." No communication I ever received from the FCC ever cited "good amateur practice". Riley says good amatuer practice is enforceable. He enforced it on you. Cite anywhere in communications addressed from the FCC to me the words "good amateur practice". Sorry, doesn't exist. Only Riley is to judge. Meanwhile, Deignan has addresses scattered across the USA and perhaps several US possessions, courtesy of Coast Guard friednds... Or, could be having my own private jet affords me the luxury of easy interstate travel. Mark has been a ham for years. Alas, even RoundUp doesn't kill all the weeds you spray it on, so I suppose we can't expect the code-test to keep out all the undesirables, huh? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com