![]() |
Say, Len.....
On Feb 26, 6:40�pm, "
wrote: wrote: ? ... Yet here it is several days later and you have are still posting to RRAP. You wrote that you were going to leave, but you're still here. Why? * *Well, John, it's like this: *I CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT * *POSTING IN HERE! * :-) Perhaps. Your use of a smiley says you don't mean it. * *In fact, I mentioned that in another thread earlier. I missed that. I don't read everything posted to rrap. Could you post a link to where you wrote about changing your mind, please? * *Self-styled guru cum "moderator" seems to be * *of the belief system that, once some statement is * *posted, the stater MUST HOLD TO THAT "PROMISE!" You wrote that you were here for one reason, and would leave. But you didn't, Len. It seems that you are reliably unreliable, Len. When you write about what you will do, the opposite is pretty much true. Or maybe you're just lying. |
Say, Len.....
|
Say, Len.....
Stefan Wolfe wrote:
... His post admitting to lieing his done irreparable damage to his credibility. People who read these articles size up a man for his word and Len now sizes up as a miniature poodle in RRAP. If telling one lie committed one to a life of perpetual lack of credibility, I could trust no one here--and that would be including myself! Get real ... JS |
Say, Len.....
On Feb 27, 3:25�pm, John Smith I wrote:
wrote: Perhaps. Your use of a smiley says you don't mean it. Not very likely. *Len usually says what he means and means what he says. True enough. Problem is, one just CANNOT have any opinion contrary to Miccolis' absolute words. :-) I missed that. I don't read everything posted to rrap. Could you post a link to where you wrote about changing your mind, please? Would you like one of his first baby pictures too? I have a couple cute ones. :-) I'd rather send a digitized photo of my '53 Austin-Healey. You wrote that you were here for one reason, and would leave. But you didn't, Len. It seems that you are reliably unreliable, Len. When you write about what you will do, the opposite is pretty much true. Or maybe you're just lying. Or, maybe he found a reason to stay which you are just unaware of? That's pretty much it, JS. wink, wink, nudge, nudge :-) But, we can't spoil Miccolis' "fun" in here, can we? :-) No SIR, we have to "mind our manners" and be respectful to them olde-tyme extry brass-pounders, uncover, and never look 'em in the eye about anything... But, Miccolis just hasn't posted in here HOW he gets all those "statistics" on ham numbers. He be busy, busy over in Moderated giving everyone the lowdown on them numbers. None can say nay to those, lest they be called "liars." :-) 73s, LA |
Say, Len.....
On Feb 27, 4:16�pm, John Smith I wrote:
Stefan Wolfe wrote: * ... His post admitting to lieing his done irreparable damage to his credibility. People who read these articles size up a man for his word and Len now sizes up as a miniature poodle in RRAP. If telling one lie committed one to a life of perpetual lack of credibility, I could trust no one here--and that would be including myself! Get real ... JS, Steppinwolfe done made several Class-A (with oak leaf clusters) boo-boos in here and HE is "reliable?" :-) Let's see...oh, yeah, SEVEN YEARS AGO I was supposed to have made some kind of "Solemn Promise" about some- thing in one newsgroup! Egad! The way Miccolo and this Steppin character have it, I lay face down in the nave, my body in the shape of an ARRL logo diamond and took a LIFE OATH?!? :-) I don't think so. :-) Wow, this group of olde-tyme brass-pounding weirdos is sure solemn about things, ain't they? Yup, they be the "Elders" of the Church of St. Hiram all right...complete with some transgendered Sisterhood Auxilliary busy doing the knuckle-spanky thing with rulers. It's sorta like that old folk-saying: "Give a ham an inch and he thinks he's a ruler!" 73, LA |
Say, Len.....
"John Smith I" wrote in message ... Stefan Wolfe wrote: ... His post admitting to lieing his done irreparable damage to his credibility. People who read these articles size up a man for his word and Len now sizes up as a miniature poodle in RRAP. If telling one lie committed one to a life of perpetual lack of credibility, I could trust no one here--and that would be including myself! However, THIS lie was particularly iniquitous because it was used as the basis of providing a rationale that was highly significant to his very reason for participating here. So innocuous was the morse code requirement that he would champion a righteous cause to bring down the highly inequitable morse code requirement and bring truth, justice and synchronicity of the amateur radio service with contemporary technology. So committed was he that he would cease all future activity on this group one his dream was realized. Now we know that the commitment was bogus. He has unfurled the flag of his true colors. Get real ... If a man's word is not real, better he not clutter the bandwidth with the pablum of lies. |
Say, Len.....
Stefan Wolfe wrote:
... If a man's word is not real, better he not clutter the bandwidth with the pablum of lies. Not quite what I would expect from a budding Hemingway ... Len? I don't know, when I look around at the character, stature, record and caliber of those "avg" news group citizens, I think I'd trust old Len ... remember, nobody's perfect ... look at how long the myth of CW was hoisted on an ignorant public. JS |
Say, Len.....
From: John Smith I on Tues, Feb 27 2007 5:59 pm
Stefan Wolfe wrote: ... If a man's word is not real, better he not clutter the bandwidth with the pablum of lies. Not quite what I would expect from a budding Hemingway ... Now, now, he was TRYING, ya know. [very trying, tsk] Len? I don't know, when I look around at the character, stature, record and caliber of those "avg" news group citizens, I think I'd trust old Len ... remember, nobody's perfect ... look at how long the myth of CW was hoisted on an ignorant public. Heh heh heh heh. Tsk, that Myth hung on forever and ever from 50 years ago until just a couple months ago. What is interesting is that - MAYBE - US amateur radio MIGHT have actually LED radio operations a half century ago by going to voice. Note: 50 years ago was BEFORE 11m CB was created. :-) But...nnnooo...it had to continue and continue and continue with SEE-DUBBLE-YOU as the Epitome, the ne plus ultra of methods of communication by radio. Mebbe Seppinwolfe got suckered by OOK CW? We don't know. He no exist in the FCC ULS. Big Zero. Threes, JS, LA |
It all comes down to this ...
On Feb 25, 2:20?pm, John Smith I wrote:
Would you buy a used car from these men? Paul W. Schleck, K3FU Bob Diepenbrock, KC4UAI Jack Cook, VK2CJC Jim Hampton, AA2QA Ace Ratliff, WH2T Jeff Angus, WA6FWI Hans Brakob, K0HB Bill Horne, W1AC Mike Coslo, KB3EIA Personally, I'd decline. JS The question is, why WOULDN'T one of those folks SELL you a car, used or otherwise? Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com