RadioBanter - Poor pathetic Mark, he thinks it about him LOL

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)

- Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)

- - Poor pathetic Mark, he thinks it about him LOL (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/117344-poor-pathetic-mark-he-thinks-about-him-lol.html)

Poor pathetic Mark, he thinks it about him LOL

Mark is once again continuing with his tirade of stalking and actually
believes that I would waste my time suing him. I've said multiple
times that he is not worth suing because he doesn't have anything of
value. He is a pauper at best. I would be better off litigating
against a homeless person, at least they can pan handle and obtain
some kind of income. Nevertheless, we see how Mark is a man of his
words, he tells me to take down my blog (which I did, but not because
he said) and to not post about him, which I didn't, yet here he is, as
usual he proves.....well you know.

And since he started this for today, I had to laugh when I saw one of
his posts begging everyone to come over on his boring blog and post
some comments, he sounds like Lloyd. He is so needy isn't he. He was
so needy for attention he even sent me an email to my gmail account.
What a joke.

Dloyd.

Dloyd the staker back for more

On Mar 27, 8:18?pm, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 17:07:00 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

Mark is once again continuing with his tirade of stalking and actually
believes that I would waste my time suing him.

"In consideration of the recent situation on RRAM and RRAP, and
threats of death and blackmail received by me. I was advised to
archive my two blogs pending possible further litigation and approval
of protectionary "John Doe" status before proceeding in this matter.
So at this time I have suspended my blogs until further notice"

I supose you do have apoint I was indeed silly to believe you might
ever tell the truth about anything

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable
Dloyd Lavies renagade cyber theif and terroist

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Mark's pathetic plea for attention is not granted

Being married to an alleged woman while lusting after men
is unacceptable, Mark Morgan Bi-Sexual Cyber Stalker
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com

Dloyd the staker back for more

On Mar 27, 8:55?pm, "
wrote:
On Mar 27, 8:33 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:

On Mar 27, 8:18?pm, wrote:

Being married to an alleged woman while lusting after men
is unacceptable, Mark Morgan Bi-Sexualhttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com

unacceptable to whom? you you are not even a real person just a card
board cut out

one Id like to use for target practice, sadly the law would never
allow that. It would and oes allow me to simply kill under a number of
circumstances, circumstances that I do hope come to pass, as I would
indeed enjoy it

well at least you are coming out the closet as a gay bashing bigot as
opposed to denying that obvious fact about yourself

Well at least you finally admited that your are in fact gay.

Nevertheless, I like gay's just fine, its those screwed up bi-sexuals
like you who are an enigma. "but if you don't like this treatment you
know what you can do"

I tell you what, do you want to really want to have person to person
conflict. Find a place where it is legal, and we can have it out. I
have no problems handling firearms, been shooting almost weekly for
the past 25+ years. So if your really want to prove your valor,
reseach the possibilities, and I will give it serious consideration.

Dloyd the staker back for more

On Mar 27, 9:09?pm, "
wrote:
On Mar 27, 9:05 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:

On Mar 27, 8:55?pm, "
wrote:

On Mar 27, 8:33 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:

On Mar 27, 8:18?pm, wrote:

Being married to an alleged woman while lusting after men
is unacceptable, Mark Morgan Bi-Sexualhttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com

unacceptable to whom? you you are not even a real person just a card
board cut out

one Id like to use for target practice, sadly the law would never
allow that. It would and oes allow me to simply kill under a number of
circumstances, circumstances that I do hope come to pass, as I would
indeed enjoy it

well at least you are coming out the closet as a gay bashing bigot as
opposed to denying that obvious fact about yourself

Well at least you finally admited that your are in fact gay.

No Dloyd stalker and teroist I admit you claim I am gay

Nevertheless, I like gay's just fine,

an obvious lie you post just up the page on google (in other
Newsreader YMMV) that find it it unacactable for me to be involed with
someone you claim is a man

if you truly had no problem with gay youd have no problem with the
alleged she male I married- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I never said I ever had a problem with who you marrried. I even
commited at one time that I thought that she seemed to be a well
adjusted individual, but odd that she ended up with a wacko like you.
She must of been hard up, though her biological clock was ticking
away. BTW its others that call her a she-male, not I, I just said
alleged because you have never clarified with so many posters bringing
it into question.

Dloyd the staker back for more

On Mar 27, 9:24�pm, "
wrote:
On Mar 27, 9:18 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:

On Mar 27, 9:09?pm, "
wrote:

I never said I ever had a problem with who you marrried.

"Being married to an alleged woman while lusting after men
is unacceptable, Mark Morgan Bi-Sexual "
liar
Dloyd Lavies cyber terorist theif and biphobe extraorfidnary

*it is amazing how much you do sound like Robeson

if it wee not for the fact I know BiPhobes are *comon
and general more screwed than mere Gay bashers
*you might indeed convince to go after Robeson for
*your entertainment

OTOH ifyou had truly obtained the advice of conseul
*as you alege on you revived blog he would have told
*you to stay away from me, lest you **** up your chances in court

I know you are a theif. a coward, and truely a mad man, and liar

I have no reason to stay away from you, albeit YOU started up with
today's session. Nevertheless, the possible litigation has very
little to do with you. You are yet just one vehicle of many that may
provide the basis of possible litigation, and yet you may even reap
some benefits from a possible action. However, at this time it is
very premature and these types of actions can multiple years to
complete.

Dloyd the staker back for more

On Mar 27, 9:38?pm, wrote:
would you consider doing a favor and point out what this is at some
point? I am mild curious from an acedemic PoV

Not at this time, the firm I have employed meets at the end of next
month to discuss this issue and at that time will determine the
validity of filing an action. However, I have one of the junior
partners on board thus far.

Dloyd the staker back for more

On Mar 27, 10:03�pm, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 19:01:38 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 27, 9:38?pm, wrote:
would you consider doing a favor and point out what this is at some
point? I am mild curious from an acedemic PoV

Not at this time,

I see *with go for it

BTW did anyone disabuse you of the ntion that merely mentioning your
chosen nickname on USENET is not a criminal act

I know that Mark, but I believe that the terms that you used in
indicating your intent to carry out my death were excessive.

and You realy expect any milage out of posting a fake death threat on
your blog?

I did not know it was fake. Someone emailed that to me through
blogger at my gmail account and it appeared to have came from one of
your valid email addresses. I am not an IT forensics analyst, I leave
that up to the professionals. As you know there are many forgers on
here, you even have one post on your blog that did not come from me
(the one that said you will never catch me), but there always will be
people who want to inflame a situation if they can.

Poor pathetic Mark, he thinks it about him LOL

"Dloyd Lavies" wrote:

I've said multiple
times that he is not worth suing because he doesn't have anything of
value.

Doesn't he have a cool cookbook, and Steven Segal videos?

Dloyd the staker back for more

On Mar 27, 10:38�pm, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 19:22:28 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 27, 10:03?pm, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 19:01:38 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 27, 9:38?pm, wrote:
would you consider doing a favor and point out what this is at some
point? I am mild curious from an acedemic PoV

Not at this time,

I see 7ith go for it

BTW did anyone disabuse you of the ntion that merely mentioning your
chosen nickname on USENET is not a criminal act

I know that Mark............

then you were lying when you claimed that my mentioning your name was
stalking you in violation of Michigan stalking laws

That is not what I claimed, what I claimed was your continued posting
to my blog implying that you were going to cause me harm, after I had
told you to stop posting is a violation of Michigan law. One of the
parameters of Michigan anti-stalking laws is you have to make it clear
that you have demanded the party to STOP the harrassing behavior. I
have clearly asked you to stop the behavior yet you persisted, in
violation of your own states law.

............., but I believe that the terms that you used in
indicating your intent to carry out my death were excessive.

possiblly but I don't. nor does my friend the sheriff here but
analysing the rresult of various senarios is not an expression of
intent you reading are really poor Dloyd

No, I think your writing skills are also not the best.

and You realy expect any milage out of posting a fake death threat on
your blog?

I did not know it was fake.

did not know? does this mean you NOW know it is fake.

I am willing to take your word.

frankly I am shocked you have not receieved dozens of such emailI have
received at least 40 of them claiming to be from from YOU promising my
death at your hands

I have never e-mailed you. You may find this hard to believe but I do
have standards. As far as your wifes account is concerned I never
hacked into anything, all of the information came up on a routine
search on google, if anything I would be mad at Amazon for not
securing the information if you deemed it so personal.

such things are part and parcel of the stalker that seek to provoke
combat on RRAP for their entertainment

I agree.

a faction that you are either part of or a tool of

I am nethier a part of or a tool, everything I have posted has been on
my own accord in response from what I percieve is attacks/harrassment
by you.

*Someone emailed that to me through
blogger at my gmail account and it appeared to have came from one of
your valid email addresses.

again the question stands do you now accept it as a fraud?

I will have to take your word if you deny sending the email, it is
still in my gmail account.

*As you know there are many forgers on
here, you even have one post on your blog that did not come from me
(the one that said you will never catch me), but there always will be
people who want to inflame a situation if they can.

not sure which you are referring to I do recall clearing a post
perporting to you that I added a further sugesting I belived it likely
a forgery

I also submit you have alose admitted you know there are many forgers
trying to inflame RRAP

Indeed that is one reason I can never acced to your stated demand that
refrain from replying to your posts since if I agreed to such I rather
suspect every one of the RRAP forgers would suddenly be "Dloyd Lavies"
and I could not post any replies at all

I agree, but attacking me at will is something that I will not sustain
for your entertaiment purposes.

another being I often don't look at who is posting but resrict my
comentary to meat of the post

But can you conceed that renaming every thread is not really
accomplishing anything, it only makes the NG hard to read for people
like me who read directly through google, I would never subscribe too
much spam.

thrid of course being Principle as I see it any demand I refrain
excerising my free speech right esp by means of a threat as you is
extrotionate attack on my civil rights

But also under the same principle, I should also have the right to
post without being deluged with boilerplate posts that state "stalking
thread" or woger this or dloyd that.

If you accept the email as fraud I demen that either remove at once,

I will remove the email, if in fact it is fraud but of course I am
maintaining a copy in my email for possible future reference.

No more posting tonight CU

dloyd lavies cyber terroists

wrote:

more proof of the crimial nature of your actions against Dloyd that
you provided futher blood in the water

This sentence doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

this BTW Dloyd the reason it ****es me off so I am tried of the
stlaker like Mike I am replying to continuing to harras e with such
inane postings

I wasn't talking to you.

dloyd lavies cyber terroists

On Mar 27, 11:02?pm, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:57:28 -0400, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
Doesn't he have a cool cookbook, and Steven Segal videos?

more proof of the crimial nature of your actions against Dloyd that
you provided futher blood in the water

this BTW Dloyd the reason it ****es me off so I am tried of the
stlaker like Mike I am replying to continuing to harras e with such
inane postings

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable
Dloyd Lavies renagade cyber theif and terroist

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

I am also tired, but I have no solution to the issue that you would
agree upon. I can only control myself and my actions and once again
for a third time attempt to post in this NG with engaging with you
into this type of behavior.

dloyd lavies cyber terroists

On Mar 28, 12:21?am, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 20:13:34 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 27, 11:02?pm, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:57:28 -0400, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
Doesn't he have a cool cookbook, and Steven Segal videos?

I could use that as a fire starter I guess

more proof of the crimial nature of your actions against Dloyd that
you provided futher blood in the water

this BTW Dloyd the reason it ****es me off so I am tried of the
stlaker like Mike I am replying to continuing to harras e with such
inane postings

Then stop responding to every single post, that is your option, but
you contine to feed the frenzy (pouring blood into the water).

I am also tired, but I have no solution to the issue that you would
agree upon.

your point

I am responding that your said you were tired of the BS, I agree but I
have no solution, that is your sole responsibilty to find a way to
deal with it without including everyone on the group

I can only control myself and my actions......

never said otherwise Dloyd

I never said you did

but when you take action that have reasonably forseeable consequences you share inthe respoiniblity for the actions of those 3rd parties

First I have seen no proof of consequenses that you said occured, I
therefore share in nothing but my own actions. You set out to obtain
the attention of everyone on the group with your reign of harrassment.
You made a point that you have so many friends, and I legally obtained
information that appears to discredit you.

when you posted about my wife and certain book you knew or should have known that the filth mongers would run with it

What is the problem, this information was available on a public
accessible profile. If you or a member of your family are "in the
closet" certainly they should have had better sense than to make that
information widely available to the public. There wasn't any
breaking in or "hacking" into anything. Your mad at me because your
family member didn't have enough sense to keep her private information
private and I discovered this information. You implied we were at war
quoting from the "Art of War", and call me your foe, did you expect me
to restrain my posting. You don't restrain your posting. You attacked
Steve and tried to use the death of his daughter as nail to drive
through his heart to get at Steve, I used your wife to get at you "tit
for tat". You made light of the death of a child, and said she should
have been aborted and somehow he was responsible for her death, how
anymore dispicable can you get, to attack the fact that someone has
lost a child. You wife's sexuality pales in comparison. I have always
said I would keep it on the net which I did, I never called you or
sent you emails, prove otherwise, all information was obtained on the
internet. I would be more upset at the people who call my wife a
shemale without any proof. Nevertheless, I haven't seen a great
number of posts harping on this one subject, but now that you have let
it know that it bothers you, I am sure there will be an increase.
Again your giving out too much information

you should have known posting that list would result all kinds of off
topic and disruptive to this NG post by the filth mongers

you undertook those action with I believe to be mailce toward a poin t
I believe you effected admited to when you you admited you "lashed
out" you sought to harm in fit a pique at best or deliberate and
preditated calualtion at worst

No, it was only posted to refute your claims, how damaging can a
wedding registry list be to someone, its not like you asked for a
bunch of weird stuff. Nevertheless, this group has been disrupted for
many years.

the damge you have done me is beyond your power to retreive you are
therefore at best a losse cannon proune to do me harm without any
cause therefore I will attack you and contiue to seek to obscure you
threads and post til i can assured you will not be in apostion to do
me further harm if you decide (or fail to control yourself) and "lash
out at me and my wife and good knows what ever memebr of y family or
friends you vent your lashing on

Again you are harping on one term as if it has great meaning, besides
the word lash I could have used the word response, to me there are
interchangable. I believe that no damage has been done, and without
proof, I cannot believe you because of your pattern of lying.

If you pout blood in shark infested water with swimers in the water
some folks would called that Homocide of anyone that then dies in the
next few minutes from sharck attack

Well if the news groups postings kill your, I would really be
interested of how words jumped of of the monitor and did you damage.
What was your wife up all night crying that it got out? She should
have protected herself, that was her responsibility. I think more
than likely she probably chewed your ass for even engaging in this
behavior and that is why you are so ****ed. Maybe you need a new
outlet.

...... and once again
for a third time attempt to post in this NG with engaging with you
into this type of behavior.

which is not ilegal or imoral

It is in my opinion, a legitamate effort at self defense

it is a techneque I have more effective than any other at my disposal

I have told what will happen in various senarios and left the choice
of how to proceed

I sumerize them agin You can abandon the Dloyd Nick and thus go beyond my abilty to track your posting for a cintiuation of this treatment,
which you claim to object to(that I point of fact believe you are
geting exactly the response you want is yet matter)

or you can continue to post as "Dloyd" and be subject to what you
claim to see as harrassment and I see as proactive self defense aginst
a person I preceive to my foe

you have no legal rght under the guise of claiming to demand I cease
to protect myself aginst attack by yourself and others

My legal counsel says otherwise, but again he said if you have very
little assest, its like beating a dead horse, why bother. But then
again it is done, once again I tried to reason with you, be cordial,
but your are an unreasonable/unstable person, I will continue to post
under this nick because the first admendment gives me that right. That
arguement has already been weighed by the US Supreme Court. You want
to continue the behavior and your reign of harrassment, that is your
option. As I have said before, I will not succumb to your demands of
blackmail by threats, "do as I say or I will continue my attack", I
have attempted to be reasonable but your behavior is blackmail, and so
be it. Again you have lied I took you at your word which was
disengage and for me to remove the blogs, and you would disengage,
both of which I have complied, although not altogether just because
you said . But like a blackmailer, you keep changing the terms asking
for more and more, until you are satisfied, which appear to be never,
next you will be asking for a cash payment, but I don't think you
would be that stupid. So I will continue to post under my name that I
have used for many years and you will continue to be like the little
boy who cried wolf, and eventially what you post about me will be
totally ignored and irrelvent, but useful for my purpose. So flame
away!

dloyd lavies cyber terroists

Double standard Mark

On Mar 28, 12:28�pm, wrote:
On 28 Mar 2007 06:17:51 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 28, 12:21?am, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 20:13:34 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

your point

I am responding that your said you were tired of the BS, I agree but I
have no solution, that is your sole responsibilty to find a way to
deal with it without including everyone on the group

I have no such responiblity Dloyd

you OTOH do have a responiblity to refairn from comiting criminal acts

such as the posting harrasing or anoyying post from an false or
deceptive status it is that crime you have been reported for and that
crime a very low priority crime so I am not sanguine about the
likelyhood of result but one does what one can

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable

demdning I do what you conceed I can not or suffer
*further attack is unacepteable
Dloyd Lavies renagade cyber theif and terroist

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

"You implied we were at war quoting from the "Art of War", and call me
your foe, did you expect me to restrain my posting. You don't restrain
your posting. You attacked Steve and tried to use the death of his
daughter as nail to drive through his heart to get at Steve, You made
light of the death of a child, and said she should have been aborted
and somehow he was responsible for her death, how anymore dispicable
can you get, to attack the fact that someone has lost a child. You
wife's sexuality pales in comparison."

Notice how Mark ignored this part of my post. He claims he is the
"victum" and he keeps it on the net. Yet it is ok for him to go to
another web site (Steve's), obtain information, and use the death of
an innocent child to further his harrassment of Steve. Mr. Morgan is
a peice of human dung. Yet with his double standard, when someone
does the same, he calls foul.

Dloyd

dloyd lavies cyber terroists

On Mar 28, 3:42�pm, wrote:
On 28 Mar 2007 11:07:12 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 28, 12:28?pm, wrote:
On 28 Mar 2007 06:17:51 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 28, 12:21?am, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 20:13:34 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

your point

I am responding that your said you were tired of the BS, I agree but I
have no solution, that is your sole responsibilty to find a way to
deal with it without including everyone on the group

I have no such responiblity Dloyd

Oh, so it is somebody eles's responsibilty to find a solution to your
problem?

never said thatr either

but in fact since you bring it up I do feel it the responiblity of
anyother to find a solution that being Law enforcemnt but they are
doing a **** poor job

and for that Matter I am not saying that a requirement of any solution
is that it not affect the rest of the NG

you land the rest use the rest of the ng as Human shields

another example of your cyber terroist tactics

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable

demdning I do what you conceed I can not or suffer
*further attack is unacepteable
Dloyd Lavies renagade cyber theif and terroist

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't use anybody for anything. The simple solution is to follow
your previous word and disengage this diatribe of me and I will also
disengage , but as you seemed determine to clearly be the agressor in
this situation, I will contine to press you to provide proof when you
continue to make your slanderous unsupported accusations.

Dloyd

Double standard Mark

On Mar 28, 2:48�pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 28, 12:28?pm, wrote:

On 28 Mar 2007 06:17:51 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 28, 12:21?am, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 20:13:34 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

your point

I am responding that your said you were tired of the BS, I agree but I
have no solution, that is your sole responsibilty to find a way to
deal with it without including everyone on the group

I have no such responiblity Dloyd

you OTOH do have a responiblity to refairn from comiting criminal acts

such as the posting harrasing or anoyying post from an false or
deceptive status it is that crime you have been reported for and that
crime a very low priority crime so I am not sanguine about the
likelyhood of result but one does what one can

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable

demdning I do what you conceed I can not or suffer
?further attack is unacepteable
Dloyd Lavies renagade cyber theif and terroist

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

"You implied we were at war quoting from the "Art of War", and call me
your foe, did you expect me to restrain my posting. You don't restrain
your posting. You attacked Steve and tried to use the death of his
daughter as nail to drive through his heart to get at Steve, *You made
light of the death of a child, and said she should have been aborted
and somehow he was responsible for her death, how anymore dispicable
can you get, to attack the fact that someone has lost a child. You
wife's sexuality pales in comparison."

Notice how Mark ignored this part of my post. *He claims he is the
"victum" and he keeps it on the net. Yet it is ok for him to go to
another web site (Steve's), obtain information, and use the death of
an innocent child to further his harrassment of Steve. *Mr. Morgan is
a peice of human dung. *Yet with his double standard, when someone
does the same, he calls foul.

Dloyd- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Why don't you address your double standard Mark?

Double standard Mark admits that its ok to use the death of a child as a weapon

On Mar 28, 4:26�pm, wrote:
On 28 Mar 2007 11:48:24 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 28, 12:28?pm, wrote:
On 28 Mar 2007 06:17:51 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 28, 12:21?am, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 20:13:34 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

your point

I am responding that your said you were tired of the BS, I agree but I
have no solution, that is your sole responsibilty to find a way to
deal with it without including everyone on the group

I have no such responiblity Dloyd

you OTOH do have a responiblity to refairn from comiting criminal acts

such as the posting harrasing or anoyying post from an false or
deceptive status it is that crime you have been reported for and that
crime a very low priority crime so I am not sanguine about the
likelyhood of result but one does what one can

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable

demdning I do what you conceed I can not or suffer
&urther attack is unacepteable
Dloyd Lavies renagade cyber theif and terroist

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

"You implied we were at war quoting from the "Art of War", and call me
your foe,.......

*I did not imply it Dloyd I stated it as the fact that is

...... did you expect me to restrain my posting.

Honestly no I did not

OTOH since you enage in nit pikcing my psots I must why you ended a
question with a period?

You don't restrain
your posting.

no I do not

You attacked Steve and tried to use the death of his
daughter as nail to drive through his heart to get at Steve, .........

Indeed I did after 8 years on contiued harrasment I got tired of
taking it

but unlike steve attacks on Me I used simple facts sprun a bit to look
as bad as possible, while stave and woger have been using pruefantasy
and peusdo science to attack me as you have you for that matter

......... You made
light of the death of a child,....

No I made a very grim and serious matter of it

......... and said she should have been aborted

which was and is a true statement of my belief in the matter Steve had
been a passion out claiming I shoul;d be aborted retroactively if
possible

and somehow he was responsible for her death,

*as he has claimed I am responible for various death *tit for tat

how anymore dispicable
can you get, to attack the fact that someone has lost a child.

it needed doing, Steve would respond to nothing less

You
wife's sexuality pales in comparison."

in english gramour NAZI if you please

Notice how Mark ignored this part of my post.

I ignored much your psot when they degenerate into ranting

He claims he is the
"victum" and he keeps it on the net.

I make no claim I keep it to the net

Yet it is ok for him to go to
another web site (Steve's),

which is online and steve himslef anouced that death here in RRAP

obtain information, and use the death of
an innocent child to further his harrassment of Steve.

I did not harrass Steve when staeve refused to cease and desit his
years of harrment of me I finaly resorted to lighting a cyber back
fire against his flame war

*Mr. Morgan is
a peice of human dung. *Yet with his double standard, when someone
does the same, he calls foul.

I di not to you what steve did to me

did I call your home and deliver a death to your ailling father?

did I enage in calling you a theif then child molestor and rpist *over
an 8 year period?

did I make flase report that you molested *achild or anal raped your
own father?

did I thereby case your father to have *ahulmiating interview with a
social that only ended when he got up and slugged her telling once
agian to shut her foul mouth and leav him in peace while you were
forced to stand out side able to hear my father being agitated this
way with a State trooper on hand

the perp in the action is known to be a LPN form TN as Steve is he has
adknowledged making reports of elder and child abuse to michigan here
on RRAP I am assuming that the incdents in question are related to one
that steve adknowledes, I have stated that assumtion and Steve while
confrim the contents of his "reports" does not dispute them either

after that Yes I took the offensive, futher shouldmI see an opertunity
to prusue matters even further with Steve i will take it up

Dloyd

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable

demdning I do what you conceed I can not or suffer
*further attack is unacepteable
Dloyd Lavies renagade cyber theif and terroist

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What you put up with just shows your patience. I however, have very
little and I find your attack on me equaling displeaseing as the
alleged situation(s) described by. Therefore, I feel vindicated in my
action that it is ok to use any means necessary within the law when
you are in a situation such as this, proven by your example.

On Mar 28, 6:03�pm, wrote:
On 28 Mar 2007 14:56:45 -0700, wrote:

On Mar 28, 4:26?pm, wrote:
On 28 Mar 2007 11:48:24 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What you put up with just shows your patience.

thank you I supose although I don't know if you are complainting me or
making another snide remark

Complement.

I however, have very
little and I find your attack on me equaling displeaseing as the
alleged situation(s) described by.

then you very thing skined indeed

It's not a skin thing, It's just I will not put up with BS and not
address the situation with an equal response.

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable

demdning I do what you conceed I can not or suffer
*further attack is unacepteable
Dloyd Lavies renagade cyber theif and terroist

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com