RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   The Pool (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/26579-pool.html)

Larry Roll K3LT January 30th 04 04:23 AM

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

Kim:

There you go again, begging for this thread to be dropped! Whassamatta?
Getting tired of defending the indefensible? Running out of arguments?
Feeling like you're at the end of your rope? I thought so. Well, as it
happens, you know how to make this thread go away. Start acting like
an intelligent, mature, and decent human being, and get rid of that
obnoxious call sign!

73 de Larry, K3LT


OMYGAWD!!! "Begging for this thread to be dropped!"?????????? Larry,
puhleeze. You're not that stupid.

A) I do not defend my callsign: I like my callsign


Kim:

You'd better like it, because plenty of other hams don't!

B) No "arguments" needed for my callsign. It's mine. Period.


Nobody is disputing that, for obvious reasons!

C) End of my rope?? Over a phucking callsign?


Now, now, Kim, no need to be crude, just because you know how!
Ooops, just remembered your call sign, so I guess that being crude
comes naturally.

Now, I *DARE* you to keep this callsign going beyond your usual
"time-of-year" spin with it.


I believe you mean this thread, and it will continue as long as there
are posts being made to it, by you, by me, and by other participants.
Isn't that how all threads work?

But, just to let you know up front, the I have
*no* intention of changing my callsign and I don't think I could get any
more decent a human than I am.


Get that sentence to the cleaners by noon tomorrow, and they'll have
it ready for you by Friday!

As to learning, I do that every day--thank
goodness. As to being intelligent, I think I speak too lofty for you now as
it is!


You "speak too lofty" for me? Right. Very intelligent. But only if you're
stacking up examples of ungrammatical sentences. Toss this one in the
laundry bag with the one above it.

Gads, you're getting hilarious.


I've been "hilarious" all of my life -- I have a great sense of humor!

Only thing is: we're packing to move so
this is the last I'll be on for a while!.


I see. Well, at least you won't need someone to help you sit on the
suitcase to get it closed!

I'll be back on sometime around
the first of March. Gonna have this thread still going, there, big fella?


Possibly.

If not, tell ya what, I'll drag it up again! ROFLMAO!!!


That's mighty nice of you! I'll hold you to that! Be careful during the
move.

73 de Larry, K3LT


Larry Roll K3LT January 30th 04 05:09 AM

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

Kim:

That sounds like wishful thinking. However, you asked for it, and as long
as you've got it, you're gonna get it! This thread has a life of it's

own, and
as long as I am a participant in this newsgroup, it will always pop up
whenever you least expect it.

73 de Larry, K3LT


I think you're beyond "popping up," Larry...

Kim W5TIT


Kim:

Now just exactly what do you mean by that? Remember, that as someone
who has accused others of having "dirty minds" when it comes to your
call sign, you'd better be pretty careful how you answer!

Oh, now I get it. Well, when you are around, I can understand how such
things would be unlikely to "pop."

73 de Larry, K3LT


Larry Roll K3LT January 30th 04 05:09 AM

In article . net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes:



I don't think so. I don't know about you, but I don't go around
approaching strangers so I can comment about their breasts. However, during
the course of many conversations with female friends and associates over the
years, some of them have used the word "tits" and so have I in response.
Clearly, since the women led off with the use of that word, they obviously
were not offended by my use of it in response. Clearly, at lot of this
depends on the situation. With a stranger, if the subject even came up, only
the most polite words would be used. With a friend, more casual conversation
is acceptable. In my opinion, the woman always decides when that point is
reached.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


Dwight:

I have many female friends and acquaintences, and I almost never hear
the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally,
but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she
requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others
who are, or may be, involved in the ARS. As a woman who presumes to be
taken seriously as an intelligent, competent woman of the modern era, she
is, in actuality, setting herself and all other women back to the time
when they were mere objects of prurient interest. Or could it be that
she really wants to be seen that way? Unfortunately, the image is
objectionable in any context, and it's effect on the ARS has the potential
to be exactly as Mr. Hollingsworth predicted.

73 de Larry, K3LT



Larry Roll K3LT January 30th 04 05:09 AM

In article , Dave Heil
writes:


Don't forget that Kim wants it both ways. She describes her
more-than-ample superstucture and requests a callsign because of it but
she notes with disdain the looks she gets from women on the street (as
if she has a way of knowing what other women are thinking). She want to
draw attention to herself but claims that she didn't ask to be born
with.... Well, you know the drill.

Kim empathizes with strippers, lets us in on what she'd like to tell
other women at cocktail parties, tells us which foul words she'd yell at
a football game and clue us in to what prompted her to choose her tacky
call based upon a dare.


Dave K8MN


Dave:

All of which is why our Kim is such a constant source of amusement.
However, I doubt that any other YL's who happened to be regular
participants in this NG would find her very entertaining.

73 de Larry, K3LT


Alex Flinsch January 30th 04 03:41 PM

In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote:
the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally,
but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she
requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others


gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was
simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse.

Alex / AB2RC

Harold Burton January 30th 04 06:19 PM


"Alex Flinsch" wrote in message
...
In article , Larry Roll K3LT

wrote:
the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes,

occasionally,
but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she
requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others


gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was
simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse.

Alex / AB2RC


I'd hate to think what kind of sex oriented twist some folks might
place on my callsign and it's the original assigned to me by the FCC.

Harold
KD5SAK



JJ January 30th 04 06:41 PM

Alex Flinsch wrote:
In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote:

the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally,
but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she
requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others



gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was
simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse.

Alex / AB2RC


Are you kidding? I doubt she can even send Morse.


William January 30th 04 10:02 PM

Alex Flinsch wrote in message ...
In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote:
the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally,
but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she
requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others


gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was
simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse.

Alex / AB2RC


Great for contests and DX!

William January 31st 04 12:51 AM

JJ wrote in message ...
Alex Flinsch wrote:
In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote:

the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally,
but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she
requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others



gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was
simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse.

Alex / AB2RC


Are you kidding? I doubt she can even send Morse.


You don't have to send - just copy.

JJ January 31st 04 05:45 AM

William wrote:

JJ wrote in message ...

Alex Flinsch wrote:

In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote:


the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally,
but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she
requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others


gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was
simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse.

Alex / AB2RC


Are you kidding? I doubt she can even send Morse.



You don't have to send - just copy.


So how are you going to converse with another Morse station, assuming
you are in the CW portion of the band, if you don't send? Reread the
post, it was talking about sending.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com