![]() |
In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes: Kim: There you go again, begging for this thread to be dropped! Whassamatta? Getting tired of defending the indefensible? Running out of arguments? Feeling like you're at the end of your rope? I thought so. Well, as it happens, you know how to make this thread go away. Start acting like an intelligent, mature, and decent human being, and get rid of that obnoxious call sign! 73 de Larry, K3LT OMYGAWD!!! "Begging for this thread to be dropped!"?????????? Larry, puhleeze. You're not that stupid. A) I do not defend my callsign: I like my callsign Kim: You'd better like it, because plenty of other hams don't! B) No "arguments" needed for my callsign. It's mine. Period. Nobody is disputing that, for obvious reasons! C) End of my rope?? Over a phucking callsign? Now, now, Kim, no need to be crude, just because you know how! Ooops, just remembered your call sign, so I guess that being crude comes naturally. Now, I *DARE* you to keep this callsign going beyond your usual "time-of-year" spin with it. I believe you mean this thread, and it will continue as long as there are posts being made to it, by you, by me, and by other participants. Isn't that how all threads work? But, just to let you know up front, the I have *no* intention of changing my callsign and I don't think I could get any more decent a human than I am. Get that sentence to the cleaners by noon tomorrow, and they'll have it ready for you by Friday! As to learning, I do that every day--thank goodness. As to being intelligent, I think I speak too lofty for you now as it is! You "speak too lofty" for me? Right. Very intelligent. But only if you're stacking up examples of ungrammatical sentences. Toss this one in the laundry bag with the one above it. Gads, you're getting hilarious. I've been "hilarious" all of my life -- I have a great sense of humor! Only thing is: we're packing to move so this is the last I'll be on for a while!. I see. Well, at least you won't need someone to help you sit on the suitcase to get it closed! I'll be back on sometime around the first of March. Gonna have this thread still going, there, big fella? Possibly. If not, tell ya what, I'll drag it up again! ROFLMAO!!! That's mighty nice of you! I'll hold you to that! Be careful during the move. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes: Kim: That sounds like wishful thinking. However, you asked for it, and as long as you've got it, you're gonna get it! This thread has a life of it's own, and as long as I am a participant in this newsgroup, it will always pop up whenever you least expect it. 73 de Larry, K3LT I think you're beyond "popping up," Larry... Kim W5TIT Kim: Now just exactly what do you mean by that? Remember, that as someone who has accused others of having "dirty minds" when it comes to your call sign, you'd better be pretty careful how you answer! Oh, now I get it. Well, when you are around, I can understand how such things would be unlikely to "pop." 73 de Larry, K3LT |
In article . net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes: I don't think so. I don't know about you, but I don't go around approaching strangers so I can comment about their breasts. However, during the course of many conversations with female friends and associates over the years, some of them have used the word "tits" and so have I in response. Clearly, since the women led off with the use of that word, they obviously were not offended by my use of it in response. Clearly, at lot of this depends on the situation. With a stranger, if the subject even came up, only the most polite words would be used. With a friend, more casual conversation is acceptable. In my opinion, the woman always decides when that point is reached. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ Dwight: I have many female friends and acquaintences, and I almost never hear the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally, but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others who are, or may be, involved in the ARS. As a woman who presumes to be taken seriously as an intelligent, competent woman of the modern era, she is, in actuality, setting herself and all other women back to the time when they were mere objects of prurient interest. Or could it be that she really wants to be seen that way? Unfortunately, the image is objectionable in any context, and it's effect on the ARS has the potential to be exactly as Mr. Hollingsworth predicted. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
In article , Dave Heil
writes: Don't forget that Kim wants it both ways. She describes her more-than-ample superstucture and requests a callsign because of it but she notes with disdain the looks she gets from women on the street (as if she has a way of knowing what other women are thinking). She want to draw attention to herself but claims that she didn't ask to be born with.... Well, you know the drill. Kim empathizes with strippers, lets us in on what she'd like to tell other women at cocktail parties, tells us which foul words she'd yell at a football game and clue us in to what prompted her to choose her tacky call based upon a dare. Dave K8MN Dave: All of which is why our Kim is such a constant source of amusement. However, I doubt that any other YL's who happened to be regular participants in this NG would find her very entertaining. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote:
the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally, but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse. Alex / AB2RC |
"Alex Flinsch" wrote in message ... In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote: the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally, but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse. Alex / AB2RC I'd hate to think what kind of sex oriented twist some folks might place on my callsign and it's the original assigned to me by the FCC. Harold KD5SAK |
Alex Flinsch wrote:
In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote: the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally, but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse. Alex / AB2RC Are you kidding? I doubt she can even send Morse. |
Alex Flinsch wrote in message ...
In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote: the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally, but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse. Alex / AB2RC Great for contests and DX! |
JJ wrote in message ...
Alex Flinsch wrote: In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote: the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally, but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse. Alex / AB2RC Are you kidding? I doubt she can even send Morse. You don't have to send - just copy. |
William wrote:
JJ wrote in message ... Alex Flinsch wrote: In article , Larry Roll K3LT wrote: the word "tits" used to describe their breasts. "Boobs," yes, occasionally, but not the "t" word. I digress; this is about Kim, the reason why she requested her call sign, and the unfavorable image it projects on others gee, and all this time I thought she took that callsign because TIT was simple to send and had a nice rhythm in morse. Alex / AB2RC Are you kidding? I doubt she can even send Morse. You don't have to send - just copy. So how are you going to converse with another Morse station, assuming you are in the CW portion of the band, if you don't send? Reread the post, it was talking about sending. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com