About Us

July 17th 03, 05:51 AM

In article ,
(Brian) writes:

There can be no doubt that you experience psychosomatic illness when
you expose yourself to Len's comments. Your reactions are quite
severe. It would be prudent to stop reading them.

Brian:

That's good advice -- and "Kim" could be just as easily substituted for
"Len."

73 de Larry, K3LT

July 17th 03, 06:05 AM

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message om...
Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote in message . ..

However, the reference to shuttles
burning up on reentry was a poor choice of words.

You have to understand the liar behind the postings, John.

The shuttle didn't burn up upon reentry? SOB! Those damned
media-biased jerks pulled a fast one on us again, huh? Wait till
Wayne Greene hears about this!!!

Leonard H Anderson is one of the most prolific, hateful, spite-filled
pathological liars to ever darken USENET.

Yer Damned Right!

That he can even consider, let alone publish, the hateful and
just plain mean-spirited trash he just let out and then try to
"justify" it in some Morse Code related rhetoric is absoulety
shameful.

Lies! All Damned Lies! That lowlife SOB. If I ever get my Hands...

I thought his attempts to embellish his Army "career" record by
assosciating himself with Soldiers who died 3 years before he was even
sworn in was disgusting.

Some Army units have a history. Patch on the left arm, patch on the
right arm stuff. You just wouldn't understand being a CAP Bigshot and
all. Go talk to Kelley, he's got real military experience and all
that. He'll get you turned around in a hurry.

Lennie puts the "scum" in scumbag, that's for sure.

Scum of the worst kind. Lying and all that about the Shuttle
tradgedies.

Jeez Us H !!!

So anyway, Steve, where is NASA hiding the atronauts? I mean, you
said that awful SOB Len was lying about it, right? They're on
Ascension Island handing out 40,000+ United Nations QSOs on Raytheon
HF gear or what? Right?

Riiight?

RIIIIGHT???

------

Steve, get a grip. Go seek counseling. I don't know how to say this,
so I'll just say it straight up. There really was another space
shuttle tradgedy. Len wasn't lying. Do a search on the New York
Times or something. The truth will set you free.

73, Brian

(Len, sorry to defame you in the above "Tuff Love" series. It was
beyond necessary - he needs more help than I can provide, but I
tried.)

July 17th 03, 02:47 PM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , Radio Amateur KC2HMZ
writes:

An astronaut/ham's license is renewable for the life of the
astronaut/ham. So is any other ham's license. Once a ham becomes a
silent key, responsibility for licensing him or her passes to a higher
authority (who is a ham and has just bestowed the ultimate license
upgrade to the newly deceased - the privileges are unparallelled, but
the licensing requirements are rather steep - although no
demonstration of Morse proficiency is required, the written test is
reputed to be a real killer). However, the reference to shuttles
burning up on reentry was a poor choice of words.

As to your last sentence, John, you would be right only in discounting
certain individuals in here.

Nice try at wiggling your way out of the corner you backed
yourself into with that vile and demeaning slur about the Columbia
astronauts.

You only look more disgusting than what you are.

This thread got started by one who is obsessed with throwing any kind
of garbage at myself for the slightest reason...or as manufactured
garbage through the use of inference, misdirection, or outright
malicious quoting out of context.

"Out of context"...?!?!

No obsession was needed to take offense at your cold-hearted
slash at the Columbia crew.

As one who has been IN the aerospace industry and actually worked
ON spaceflight hardware (including man-rated), I'm in the category of
ardent fans of the overall effort and certain honor the men and women
who have been chosen as astronauts...and cosmonauts.

Obviously not, or you wouldn't have made such a scurrilous
comment.

A problem with the ordinary public is that they consider space flight
"safe," just like a long plane ride. It is most definitely NOT so. Every
single manned flight is a high-risk activity. That it has appeared safe
for many successful flights is due largely to thousands of non-astronauts
who did the engineering, design, fabrication of the vehicles and payloads.
The public is largely ignorant of them...at best only knowing the ones
around consoles at the MSFC Mission Control room.

So this makes it OK for Leonard H. Anderson to suggest that dying
on re-entry is OK...

Still, each and every space flight is not without risk today. The tragedy
of Columbia proved that very unfortunately. Back when Grissom, White,
and Chaffee lost their lives in a ground capsule test fire for Apollo, I was
working...(SNIP)

Yadayadayadayda. None of it believeable.

Before you get involved in castigating someone, consider carefully who
started this thread and the manner in which it was written. Like tens of
thousands of others, I honor ALL the names of men and women who
have gone in space...even those who have joined the space endeavor
knowing full well what their risks are.

You "honor" no one save yourself, Lennie. Never have...never
will. If John takes it upon himself to investigate what kind of
person you really are, he'll find out what we already know to be
true...that you are an untrustworthy, documented pathological liar
whose only reason for being here is the promulgation of hate, discord
and deceit.

Steve Robeson

July 17th 03, 08:56 PM

ospam (Larry Roll K3LT) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Brian) writes:

There can be no doubt that you experience psychosomatic illness when
you expose yourself to Len's comments. Your reactions are quite
severe. It would be prudent to stop reading them.

Brian:

That's good advice -- and "Kim" could be just as easily substituted for
"Len."

73 de Larry, K3LT

I don't think Mrs Anderson goes that way, nor Kim's husband.

July 18th 03, 04:58 AM

In article ,
(Brian) writes:

Brian:

That's good advice -- and "Kim" could be just as easily substituted for
"Len."

73 de Larry, K3LT

I don't think Mrs Anderson goes that way, nor Kim's husband.

Now, talk about two long-suffering people! Mrs. Anderson and Mr. Walker
surely must be headed for sainthood!

73 de Larry, K3LT

July 18th 03, 10:18 AM

(Brian) wrote in message . com...

You called Len a liar. You were wrong. Be strong and face up to it.

Brian, Lennie IS a liar in more ways than one.

In this case he's an insensitive creep who used a horrific
tragedy to try and "make a point" about Amateur Radio licensing and
the "Ham in Space" program.

I am not wrong. His track record of pathological mistruths is
clear and well documented. In this there is no error.

That you so adamantly support and defend him can only mean that
YOU support lying and insensitivity as legitimate forms of
communication. That makes YOU as equally disgusting and foul as
he...perhaps even more so since his conduct may be due to some mental
health abboration and yours MUST be a voluntary choice of actions.

No, Brain...No need for me to "face up to it" here. Lennie has
created the path he's following. That you choose to drop in behind
him only means you LIKE the stench and the reputation of being
associated with a liar and a creep.

That's for YOU to "face up to".

Steve Robeson, K4YZ

July 18th 03, 03:06 PM

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com...

You called Len a liar. You were wrong. Be strong and face up to it.

Brian, Lennie IS a liar in more ways than one.

How many ways are there to be a liar?

In this case he's an insensitive creep who used a horrific
tragedy to try and "make a point" about Amateur Radio licensing and
the "Ham in Space" program.

Being insensitive is called "being insensitive," not lying.

I am not wrong. His track record of pathological mistruths is
clear and well documented. In this there is no error.

You are clearly wrong.

Did the shuttle tragedy not occur? Have the astronauts not perished?

That you so adamantly support and defend him can only mean that
YOU support lying and insensitivity as legitimate forms of
communication.

Ahh. I disagree with you and so I now support lying?

Now you're wrong again.

That makes YOU as equally disgusting and foul as
he...perhaps even more so since his conduct may be due to some mental
health abboration and yours MUST be a voluntary choice of actions.

Typical liberal tactic.

No, Brain...

It's "Brian."

No need for me to "face up to it" here.

But there is. You're delusional, and it's time to get a grip.

Lennie has
created the path he's following.

He would have to be ahead of himself to create that path.

That you choose to drop in behind
him only means you LIKE the stench and the reputation of being
associated with a liar and a creep.

Is that what it means?

That's for YOU to "face up to".

Steve Robeson, K4YZ

I'm sure you have a nice health plan working as a nurse. Go get some help.

July 18th 03, 03:09 PM

ospam (Larry Roll K3LT) wrote in message ...
In article , Radio Amateur KC2HMZ
writes:

However, the reference to shuttles
burning up on reentry was a poor choice of words.

Do you think?

73 de Larry, K3LT

Larry, there's another fella on here who used to use a whole lot of
"poor choice of words."

Brian

July 19th 03, 02:36 AM

"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Brian) writes:

Brian:

That's good advice -- and "Kim" could be just as easily substituted for
"Len."

73 de Larry, K3LT

I don't think Mrs Anderson goes that way, nor Kim's husband.

Now, talk about two long-suffering people! Mrs. Anderson and Mr. Walker
surely must be headed for sainthood!

73 de Larry, K3LT

Yep, that really looks ham radio related to me, Larry...NOT. Gosh, I didn't
even have to do a search to prove you wrong.

Kim W5TIT

---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to

July 19th 03, 06:35 AM

(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com...

Being insensitive is called "being insensitive," not lying.

I don't know what's worse...An callous putz like Lennie who makes
light of people who died a horrific death, or a milktoast pantywaist
putz such as yourself who tries to defend him.

But I guess you both fill a need...If it weren't for the callous,
the insensitive and the dishonest, what would we have to gauge the
rest of society by...?!?! We need creeps like the two of you to
appreciate the sensitive, the thoughtful and honest by.

I am not wrong. His track record of pathological mistruths is
clear and well documented. In this there is no error.

You are clearly wrong.

I am sure you'd like to think so. I am not.

Did the shuttle tragedy not occur? Have the astronauts not perished?

It did. It does NOT negate the fact that Lennie used it in a
disgusting manner to "make a point" over something completely
unrelated, nor does it negate the fact that he's a documented
pathological liar.

That you so adamantly support and defend him can only mean that
YOU support lying and insensitivity as legitimate forms of
communication.

Ahh. I disagree with you and so I now support lying?

It's not "disagree(ing)" with me, Brain...It's trying to defend
Lennie that does that.

Now you're wrong again.

Nope. You defend Lennie's use of mistruth and callous
insensitivities. That makes you part-and-parcel of his misdeeds.
Some game of "Follow the Leader" you play, Brain.

That makes YOU as equally disgusting and foul as
he...perhaps even more so since his conduct may be due to some mental
health abboration and yours MUST be a voluntary choice of actions.

Typical liberal tactic.

I am quite a long-ways away from being "liberal" anything.

No, Brain...

It's "Brian."

Whatever.

No need for me to "face up to it" here.

But there is. You're delusional, and it's time to get a grip.

Facts are facts, and the facts are you are trying to defend the
indefensible. Now who's delusional?

Lennie has
created the path he's following.

He would have to be ahead of himself to create that path.

Not when you're just going around in circles. Lennie does that
well. It's one of the few things he DOES do well.

That you choose to drop in behind
him only means you LIKE the stench and the reputation of being
associated with a liar and a creep.

Is that what it means?

Fraid so.

That's for YOU to "face up to".

I'm sure you have a nice health plan working as a nurse. Go get some help.

I am not the one defending a documented pathological liar and
insensitive creep. That's your schtick, for whatever reason you feel
it appropriate.

You've shown your colors here, Brain. Thanks for making my point
for me...Again.

Steve, K4YZ

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Menu

About Us