Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() They USE to have no code license designations, starting with "N". Oops, that was a *fact*. The "all code" license designations had an "N" for the second character in the callsign. Changed to "A" or "B" upon upgrade. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
WA8ULX wrote:
No-Code Licenses should come a designator following there Callsign, that lets people know there status. Such as W5TIT-1, or W5TIT-2, that way we will know if they are Mentally Challenged Operator, or a Lazy Operator, 1 being Mental, 2 being Lazy, that way we would know which ones not to talk to. You mean like WA8ULX-1 ? ;-) |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Casey wrote in message ...
WA8ULX wrote: No-Code Licenses should come a designator following there Callsign, that lets people know there status. Such as W5TIT-1, or W5TIT-2, that way we will know if they are Mentally Challenged Operator, or a Lazy Operator, 1 being Mental, 2 being Lazy, that way we would know which ones not to talk to. You mean like WA8ULX-1 ? ;-) Almost. The way I read it is "WA8ULX-1-2" Does that make more sense? ;^)) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using Existing Law Against BPL | General | |||
BPL - Comments on the original Inquiry document | General | |||
jury-rigging radio antenna for HDTV use? | Antenna | |||
Whaddya think folks? | Policy | |||
existing plc qrn?? or something else? | Policy |