Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 03, 07:34 AM
Larry Roll K3LT
 
Posts: n/a
Default Reflections on rrap

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

I'd wager that if you put all us in a room, we'd get along just fine.

- Mike KB3EIA -



You and me? Sure. Jim/N2EY and I? Sure. Brian and I? Sure. Here's who
I wouldn't even consider being in the same room with: Larry Roll, Dick
Carroll, Dan/W4whatever, Dave Heil, Waddles (Waddles is non-existent in my
book), and that's just a few. I have no desire to "get along" with people
like that.

Kim W5TIT


Kim:

Well, that's pretty sad. I guess you're overlooking the fact that a person's
online "personality" can be quite different than what one would experience
in person, since the written word, particularly in a virtually immediate forum
such as Usenet, is, indeed, quite impersonal by nature. Moreover, your
expression of a lack of desire to meet with certain members of this forum
could cause all the rest, even those not included on your list, to not wish
to meet with you.

I would jump at any chance to meet any and all of the regulars in this
newsgroup, for no better reason than to see what they are really like in
person. I think that even Len Anderson could prove to be a quite affable
chap, given a chance to get to know him better. I may be wrong, but
at least I'm willing to take that chance. I would like to think that given
the opportunity, your curiosity would ultimately get the upper hand over
your stated objections. If not, one could quite legitimately call your
character into question, at a level far deeper than anything ever said
in this forum.

73 de Larry, K3LT

  #2   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 03, 01:21 PM
Kim W5TIT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , "Kim W5TIT"


writes:

I'd wager that if you put all us in a room, we'd get along just fine.

- Mike KB3EIA -



You and me? Sure. Jim/N2EY and I? Sure. Brian and I? Sure. Here's

who
I wouldn't even consider being in the same room with: Larry Roll, Dick
Carroll, Dan/W4whatever, Dave Heil, Waddles (Waddles is non-existent in

my
book), and that's just a few. I have no desire to "get along" with

people
like that.

Kim W5TIT


Kim:

Well, that's pretty sad. I guess you're overlooking the fact that a

person's
online "personality" can be quite different than what one would experience
in person, since the written word, particularly in a virtually immediate

forum
such as Usenet, is, indeed, quite impersonal by nature. Moreover, your
expression of a lack of desire to meet with certain members of this forum
could cause all the rest, even those not included on your list, to not

wish
to meet with you.


And, I would be upset....because? I don't get on a forum in a newsgroup
with the intention of meeting and greeting. Your excuses for your behavior
that this is "just a newsgroup" are weak and shrill at best. I think those
of us who probably would meet in real life are those who have been frank and
honest about who we are, up front and without using the guise of a newsgroup
to act in a manner inconsistent with who we are as people. THOSE are the
people who would end up meeting and not having to waste time muddling
through who we are and who we ain't, Larry.


I would jump at any chance to meet any and all of the regulars in this
newsgroup, for no better reason than to see what they are really like in
person. I think that even Len Anderson could prove to be a quite affable
chap, given a chance to get to know him better. I may be wrong, but
at least I'm willing to take that chance. I would like to think that

given
the opportunity, your curiosity would ultimately get the upper hand over
your stated objections. If not, one could quite legitimately call your
character into question, at a level far deeper than anything ever said
in this forum.

73 de Larry, K3LT


I am not in least bit curious about the majority of people in this
newsgroup. Most of all, those mentioned above.

Kim W5TIT


  #3   Report Post  
Old September 24th 03, 07:04 AM
Ryan, KC8PMX
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, that's pretty sad. I guess you're overlooking the fact that a
person's
online "personality" can be quite different than what one would experience
in person, since the written word, particularly in a virtually immediate

forum
such as Usenet, is, indeed, quite impersonal by nature. Moreover, your
expression of a lack of desire to meet with certain members of this forum
could cause all the rest, even those not included on your list, to not

wish
to meet with you.


All we are here is merely a typeset or font! Until I either talk to the
person in person, on the phone or over the air, all of these people here are
merely fictional characters in my book. No way to really prove it is even
them posting for that matter, and I take most negative comments with a grain
of salt in that matter. To me it is purely entertainment, with the rare,
occasional educational value to it.




I would jump at any chance to meet any and all of the regulars in this
newsgroup, for no better reason than to see what they are really like in
person. I think that even Len Anderson could prove to be a quite affable
chap, given a chance to get to know him better. I may be wrong, but
at least I'm willing to take that chance. I would like to think that

given
the opportunity, your curiosity would ultimately get the upper hand over
your stated objections. If not, one could quite legitimately call your
character into question, at a level far deeper than anything ever said
in this forum.


I would agree as well, because after sitting down and actually chatting with
all of these people, we might actually find out that some of these people
are not really as bad as we think. At least we then could say we actually
"have gotten to know" each other and not just see them for the way in which
they communicate here, which may not necessarily be the way they are in
person. Can you imagine that even Brucie might actually be a decent person
in real life? Hell, anything is possible.

I had another idea, of which I thought would be cool..... Since we all need
to practice on message handling/sending, I think it would be cool to get
some type of message traffic going with RRAP people as the participants.
The only problem I have is, with sending message traffic, everything I have
learned from "old school" hams is that you MUST have a phone number included
with the message traffic. I personally do not wish to have my number go
through the system which now is a cellphone number, as opposed to a landline
number. Am I wrong in my information that within a messagegram that you
MUST include a phone number????

If I am not wrong, anyone feel like sharing traffic ?? Send your interest
and contact info that you wish to use to my email address of kc8pmxNO JUNK
OR (remove the NO JUNK OR SPAM to reply.) I definitely
can always use the practice, and what the hell, it might actually be fun!



--
Ryan, KC8PMX
FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!)
--. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-.
... --. .... - . .-. ...










  #4   Report Post  
Old October 16th 03, 03:08 AM
Brian
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ...
"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , "Kim W5TIT"


writes:

I'd wager that if you put all us in a room, we'd get along just fine.

- Mike KB3EIA -



You and me? Sure. Jim/N2EY and I? Sure. Brian and I? Sure. Here's

who
I wouldn't even consider being in the same room with: Larry Roll, Dick
Carroll, Dan/W4whatever, Dave Heil, Waddles (Waddles is non-existent in

my
book), and that's just a few. I have no desire to "get along" with

people
like that.

Kim W5TIT


Kim:

Well, that's pretty sad. I guess you're overlooking the fact that a

person's
online "personality" can be quite different than what one would experience
in person, since the written word, particularly in a virtually immediate

forum
such as Usenet, is, indeed, quite impersonal by nature. Moreover, your
expression of a lack of desire to meet with certain members of this forum
could cause all the rest, even those not included on your list, to not

wish
to meet with you.


And, I would be upset....because? I don't get on a forum in a newsgroup
with the intention of meeting and greeting. Your excuses for your behavior
that this is "just a newsgroup" are weak and shrill at best. I think those
of us who probably would meet in real life are those who have been frank and
honest about who we are, up front and without using the guise of a newsgroup
to act in a manner inconsistent with who we are as people. THOSE are the
people who would end up meeting and not having to waste time muddling
through who we are and who we ain't, Larry.


I would jump at any chance to meet any and all of the regulars in this
newsgroup, for no better reason than to see what they are really like in
person. I think that even Len Anderson could prove to be a quite affable
chap, given a chance to get to know him better. I may be wrong, but
at least I'm willing to take that chance. I would like to think that

given
the opportunity, your curiosity would ultimately get the upper hand over
your stated objections. If not, one could quite legitimately call your
character into question, at a level far deeper than anything ever said
in this forum.

73 de Larry, K3LT


I am not in least bit curious about the majority of people in this
newsgroup. Most of all, those mentioned above.

Kim W5TIT


Kim, get the OM a shiney new pair of HD brass-riveted jeans and
yourself a shiney new HD steel-belted brittany spear brazier, and join
us at Dayton 04.

I promise I won't make any Texas jokes til you'se guys show up.

By the way, do you know how they separate the men from the boys in
Texas...

Brain, (more or less.)
  #8   Report Post  
Old October 22nd 03, 12:52 PM
Brian
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message om...
(Brian) wrote in message . com...

Kim, get the OM a shiney new pair of HD brass-riveted jeans and
yourself a shiney new HD steel-belted brittany spear brazier, and join
us at Dayton 04.

What was it you were suggesting to Mike Coslo about being rude,
Brain?

I promise I won't make any Texas jokes til you'se guys show up.

A promie from you is like pre-election fodder....

By the way, do you know how they separate the men from the boys in
Texas...

Brain, (more or less.)

Then I dare say you'd best not go to Texas...You've been
seperated from your brain for a long time.

Steve, K4YZ


It was my attempt to get Kim to lighten up a little.

But you don't know how to do that - always on the job as the RRAP
Avenging Angel, I see.


No, Brain, it was YOUR "Avenging Angel" personna that was at
work. When YOU do something like that it's "levity"...trying to get
someone to "lighten up". When I say something similar you whip out
this new "Avenging Angel" spin in order to try and disguise your own
conduct.


If I've offended Kim, I'm sorry.

I say it's yet one more example of following in the footsteps of
Lennie the Liar..."Don't So As I Do...Do As I Say"...

Bascially, I just think you're two-faced.

Steve, K4YZ


No, Steve, not true. I have the capacity to say I was wrong an
apologize.

I leave the Avenging Angel stuff to you. You do what you're best at -
trying to destroy anyone who might disagree with you.

Sayonara.
  #10   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 03, 02:35 AM
Brian
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...

No, Brain, it was YOUR "Avenging Angel" personna that was at
work. When YOU do something like that it's "levity"...trying to get
someone to "lighten up". When I say something similar you whip out
this new "Avenging Angel" spin in order to try and disguise your own
conduct.


If I've offended Kim, I'm sorry.


You offend more than Kim, Brain. You offend yourself, but you
are too self-centered to se it.


You offend everyone and embarass your family name. But you are too
self-centeered to realize it.

I say it's yet one more example of following in the footsteps of
Lennie the Liar..."Don't So As I Do...Do As I Say"...

Bascially, I just think you're two-faced.

Steve, K4YZ


No, Steve, not true. I have the capacity to say I was wrong an
apologize.


Being able to "apologize" is worthy, Brian.

Being able to not offend in the first place is even better.


We all make mistakes.

I leave the Avenging Angel stuff to you. You do what you're best at -
trying to destroy anyone who might disagree with you.


It's not about "destroy(ing) anyone who might disagree with
(me)", Brain...It's about not tolerating that which I know to be false
and is known to others.


There are many falsehoods promoted on RRAP. Yet you target only Len
(and me) for destruction. Your Avenging Angel Wings provide sanctuary
to your favorite falsehoods. In doing so, you lie to yourself.

You make silly, even stupid assertions and claims and then take
offense when people pile up on you for being silly and stupid.

That's YOUR "fault".


I accept and admit that I made a mistake, and I apologized.

What is your excuse?

Go get professional help.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tx Source Impedance & Load Reflections Richard Fry Antenna 8 May 28th 04 07:29 PM
Reflected power ? new thread, new beginning, kinda ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 6 May 26th 04 12:45 AM
Reflections on rrap Ryan, KC8PMX Antenna 0 September 24th 03 07:04 AM
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the Richard Harrison Antenna 58 September 3rd 03 05:49 AM
The BPL of rrap Mike Coslo Policy 48 August 29th 03 01:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017