Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A neighbor tells me that the FCC has recently ruled that broadcast radio
stations are now "legally" able to "say the F word" on the air, as long as it isn't sexual. Yeah, I know, go figure. But, when I did a quick search on the FCC website, I found nothing of it. Anyone know of this...my thoughts are on what will happen in amateur radio now. The broadcast arena has always been the barometer of what people are allowed to say on the air, hasn't it? Kim W5TIT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kim" wrote in message ...
A neighbor tells me that the FCC has recently ruled that broadcast radio stations are now "legally" able to "say the F word" on the air, as long as it isn't sexual. Yeah, I know, go figure. I think it was in response to some rock star accepting an award and saying it was "[expletive deleted]ing wonderful" or some such. FCC said it wasn't a violation in that case. But if he'd said he was so happy he wanted to [expletive deleted] the presenter, it would be a violation. Yeah, go figure. But, when I did a quick search on the FCC website, I found nothing of it. Of course not. They're not gonna advertise it because then everybody would be saying it. Anyone know of this...my thoughts are on what will happen in amateur radio now. Nothing, I hope. The broadcast arena has always been the barometer of what people are allowed to say on the air, hasn't it? Nope. FCC has completely different rules for different services. The fact that somebody gets away with something in the broadcast services doesn't mean it's OK in the ARS. FCC regulates all electronic communications, not just radio waves. Cable TV as well as broadcast TV, for example. Yet there are things the cable folks can show that the broadcat folks can't. The thinking is that people sign up for cable only if they want it, and it's a private system, not the public airways. Broadcast TV is public property. So it's like the difference between what's allowed in a strip club and what's allowed on the street. Between broadcasting and amatuer radio is the question of scheduling and predictability. All broadcasters publish advance schedules, with content warnings. So you can know what you're likely to see and hear *before* tuning in to Howard Stern or the Victoria's Secret Fashion Special. Not the case in amateur radio. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() But, when I did a quick search on the FCC website, I found nothing of it. Of course not. They're not gonna advertise it because then everybody would be saying it. Geee..... didn't Carlin cover this??? (i.e. George Carlin?) Anyone know of this...my thoughts are on what will happen in amateur radio now. Nothing, I hope. The broadcast arena has always been the barometer of what people are allowed to say on the air, hasn't it? Nope. FCC has completely different rules for different services. The fact that somebody gets away with something in the broadcast services doesn't mean it's OK in the ARS. Generally the terminology states soemething to the effect of "good amateur practice." My ONLY PROBLEM with that is WHO gets to decide what the benchmark is for good amateur practice...... If the FCC, who issues our licenses are not going to do it, then who? As for specific words??? Dunno, is there a list?? ![]() then? Are other things other than the known "7 dirty words" included? If someone is of say, for instance a different faith than you, do you get to determine anything they say religiously is offensive and should be banned speech? I am sure there are other examples one could come up with...... -- Ryan KC8PMX "Some people are like Slinkies . . . not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ryan, KC8PMX wrote:
Geee..... didn't Carlin cover this??? (i.e. George Carlin?) As for specific words??? Dunno, is there a list?? ![]() then? Are other things other than the known "7 dirty words" included? If someone is of say, for instance a different faith than you, do you get to determine anything they say religiously is offensive and should be banned speech? I am sure there are other examples one could come up with...... Heard (possible urban legend) that the FCC in "case law" refers to George Carlin's list but doesn't actually list the words. George Carlin's recorded comedy bit is a "published work", like that of a book, and thus can be referred to in another document. I'm no lawyer, so the above could be BS..... |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The George Carlin thing was meant more of a jab at humor rather than fact...
![]() -- Ryan KC8PMX "Some people are like Slinkies . . . not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs." "Robert Casey" wrote in message ... Ryan, KC8PMX wrote: Geee..... didn't Carlin cover this??? (i.e. George Carlin?) As for specific words??? Dunno, is there a list?? ![]() then? Are other things other than the known "7 dirty words" included? If someone is of say, for instance a different faith than you, do you get to determine anything they say religiously is offensive and should be banned speech? I am sure there are other examples one could come up with...... Heard (possible urban legend) that the FCC in "case law" refers to George Carlin's list but doesn't actually list the words. George Carlin's recorded comedy bit is a "published work", like that of a book, and thus can be referred to in another document. I'm no lawyer, so the above could be BS..... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote in message ...
But, when I did a quick search on the FCC website, I found nothing of it. Of course not. They're not gonna advertise it because then everybody would be saying it. Geee..... didn't Carlin cover this??? (i.e. George Carlin?) Yep, 1970's. George and Buddy got rich off of being nasty. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Ryan, KC8PMX"
writes: Geee..... didn't Carlin cover this??? (i.e. George Carlin?) His "seven words" bit is where the list originated. No such list existed in the FCC rules. Anyone know of this...my thoughts are on what will happen in amateur radio now. Nothing, I hope. The broadcast arena has always been the barometer of what people are allowed to say on the air, hasn't it? Nope. FCC has completely different rules for different services. The fact that somebody gets away with something in the broadcast services doesn't mean it's OK in the ARS. Generally the terminology states soemething to the effect of "good amateur practice." My ONLY PROBLEM with that is WHO gets to decide what the benchmark is for good amateur practice...... If the FCC, who issues our licenses are not going to do it, then who? Here's one guide: http://members.aol.com/berrymanp/alyrics/fword.html As for specific words??? Dunno, is there a list?? ![]() then? Are other things other than the known "7 dirty words" included? If someone is of say, for instance a different faith than you, do you get to determine anything they say religiously is offensive and should be banned speech? I am sure there are other examples one could come up with...... Common sense and good taste used to be the guide. But I guess such concepts are old-fashioned nowadays, from what some folks tell me when I oppose the use of such language on the air and in newsgropups..... 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 Nov 2003 20:16:48 GMT, N2EY wrote:
The broadcast arena has always been the barometer of what people are allowed to say on the air, hasn't it? Nope. FCC has completely different rules for different services. The fact that somebody gets away with something in the broadcast services doesn't mean it's OK in the ARS. Quite a while back, there was a case against an amateur operator in Los Angeles, and the ALJ ruled that the standards of broadcast indecency articulated in the _Pacifica_ case (the "Seven Dirty Words" case) also applied to the ARS because ARS transmissions are readily available to the general public (i.e. are not protected by privacy or secrecy statutes). Generally the terminology states soemething to the effect of "good amateur practice." My ONLY PROBLEM with that is WHO gets to decide what the benchmark is for good amateur practice...... If the FCC, who issues our licenses are not going to do it, then who? Amen, brother. As for specific words??? Dunno, is there a list?? ![]() No. Who makes the list then? George Carlin, at last count. Common sense and good taste used to be the guide. But I guess such concepts are old-fashioned nowadays, from what some folks tell me when I oppose the use of such language on the air and in newsgropups..... Agreed. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil Kane wrote:
Quite a while back, there was a case against an amateur operator in Los Angeles, and the ALJ ruled that the standards of broadcast indecency articulated in the _Pacifica_ case (the "Seven Dirty Words" case) also applied to the ARS because ARS transmissions are readily available to the general public (i.e. are not protected by privacy or secrecy statutes). Well, today I heard the f word and the s word on an FM broadcast station WLIR at about 12:50PM. In a song. And it's not a RAP station. Oddly enough civilization did not end at 1PM..... Who makes the list then? George Carlin, at last count. Is it an urban legend, or is there a reference to George Carlin's published work that contains that list in FCC "case law" or in an FCC rule? That way, the FCC doesn't have to mention directly the bad words, but just refers to a reference? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Phil Kane"
writes: On 15 Nov 2003 20:16:48 GMT, N2EY wrote: The broadcast arena has always been the barometer of what people are allowed to say on the air, hasn't it? Nope. FCC has completely different rules for different services. The fact that somebody gets away with something in the broadcast services doesn't mean it's OK in the ARS. Quite a while back, there was a case against an amateur operator in Los Angeles, and the ALJ ruled that the standards of broadcast indecency articulated in the _Pacifica_ case (the "Seven Dirty Words" case) also applied to the ARS because ARS transmissions are readily available to the general public (i.e. are not protected by privacy or secrecy statutes). Sure - but as I read that, (insert standard "layman, not a lawyer" disclaimer here) that means the ARS cannot go beyond what the BC services can do. IOW the ARS "lower bound of decency" cannot be lower than that of the BC services. Generally the terminology states soemething to the effect of "good amateur practice." My ONLY PROBLEM with that is WHO gets to decide what the benchmark is for good amateur practice...... If the FCC, who issues our licenses are not going to do it, then who? Amen, brother. Yea, verily. As for specific words??? Dunno, is there a list?? ![]() No. Who makes the list then? George Carlin, at last count. More like nobody. How did we all get to hear that routine? Common sense and good taste used to be the guide. But I guess such concepts are old-fashioned nowadays, from what some folks tell me when I oppose the use of such language on the air and in newsgropups..... Agreed. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rules changes/enforcement at Dayton Hamvention | Boatanchors | |||
RILEY SAYS K1MAN BROADCASTS ARE LEGAL | General | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
Language Translator (Was La chance de votre vie) | Homebrew | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General |