Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() William wrote: (N2EY) wrote in message . com... "[their] hobby is wasting time. Your time." Free speech doesn't mean you have to listen to what everyone says. 73 de Jim, N2EY If you want to witness a true waste of time, read a Heil post. Just because it takes you an inordinate amount of time, does not mean that others are having the same difficulty, William/Brian. Dave K8MN |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (N2EY) writes: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... I have also used the term "Mr. Anderson". ...but not for very long. Even once makes it 100% more than the "courtesy" you ahve extended him, Putz. Don't forget "nursie" and being addressed by the wrong gender. How do we know "his" gender? There is no physical exam for an amateur radio license rank. You mean other than the fact that my picture is on the net in several places...?!!? He is treated and addressed in the same tone and with the same viciousness as he unleashed. And you have provided the exact response desired. Right...so, when are YOU going to insult my wife, my occupation, my experience, and everything else like you consider "acceptible amateur behavior?" This forum, as YOU ahve pointed out, Your Scumminess, is NOT Amateur Radio, is NOT moderated, nor is it under the auspices of FCC control. Rhetorical question. The answer is obvious: Whenever I agree with any of your opinions I will be in a most-favored category and all who oppose me are "unacceptibles." No one expects everyone to agree all the time. I certainly ahve my disagreements with many here, and they with I, but the only ones who I feel compelled to "reply in kind" to are you and your puppet-in-training, Brain. By responding in kind, you have lowered yourself to the level of the very people you oppose, and (in their minds) given them the OK to continue to behave that way. :-) I have a problem with you lying. Do you think that such lies will ever be admitted? For example, I have been accused of altering Kim's posts - which is not what happened at all. Prima facie evidence in Google proves you ALTERED things. I read the posts. He altered nothing. I have a problem with you following in the footsteps of a person who is a known pathological liar and antagonist. It's embarrassing to see a contemporary Veteran and Amateur licensee resorting to Lennie's tactics. And by responding in kind...... Poor baby. All those "hurt" feelings allowing insulting behavior towards others is somehow "justified?" Jim's not the problem...He has not "justified" anything, and if you read any of his posts for anything OTHER than something you thought you could lash onto and make a rant out of, you'd notice he's expressed his disdain for the frequent spankings I've given you for YOUR conduct. Good old Amateur Extra Double Standard! Good old Lennie not paying attention. Instead, you choose to be even MORE argumentitive and demeaning, even further cementing your reputation. Then why bother, Steve? Haven't you seen enough examples to know what the responses will be? Don't you already know that your questions will not be answered? What "questions?" We'd expect nothing less...Not that you could DO less, Lennie. The gunnery nurse wastes my time. You waste your own time...Lying...antagonizing, trying to "argue" about topics you clearlya re ignorant in...But hey...It's your "retirement"... There's a reason for killfiles and filters. I find my rrap experience to be much better for the use of them. DENIAL. Ostrich syndrome. Mama Dee does the same. Lennie's expression of gratitude for being publically humiliated on numerous occassions... Living in an imaginary world where everyone thinks as nobly and purely as yourself? The "yourself" who always has the "correct" answer? More evidence of Lennie not paying attention...again... You've got kids, Steve. Haven't you had the situation where a kid argues with you about bedtime - at bedtime? By arguing with the kid, bedtime effectively becomes later because the kid isn't in bed when s/he's arguing. But if you refuse to argue, you get less of a hassle. Poor baby. Seven-year-old-Extras seem to be all about, aren't they? Go to bed, Jimmie. You waste everyone's time with your puerile behavior. Upgrade. Become an eight-year-old extra. Thanks, Lennie, for proving my point. Thanks also for proving me right...Again...I'd say I "owe you one", but so far most of what you've said about ANYTHING is so far off base as to be laughable, or just plain false. I'll try to find SOMETHING in one of your posts I can "corroborate" for you...But don't hold your breath. Steve, K4YZ |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(William) wrote in message om...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Because, BRAIN, it's not about how I address YOU... I say it is. Until you behave yourself, its TAFKARJ!!! Then I'd say you've pretty well proven that I am right about your general lack of character. About what I'd expect from someone who expresses public admiration for a known liar and antagonist. It's about why do YOU address Jim Miccolis with belittling endearments when HE has never addressed YOU as anything except your proper name? Tuff. I'm holding TAFKARJ metaphorically hostage until you straighten your insane a$$ out. My regrets to Jim. I'll send out for Schlottskey's deli. Still haven't answered the question, which in itself I'd say puts you in the "coward" category, but the INSISTENCE on being insulting where no insult was offered puts you solidly in the "scumbag" category, too. Do you often get involved with other people's issues? Only when I see creepy scumbags acting like bullies towards people who have treated them with nothing but respect. You'd be that bully, ergo you'd be that scumbag. I am sure you family line is proud of you. He can. He has. And to a reasonable person, effectively. But TAFKARJ remains in another world. A Ham in a Bubble. So far everything he's said, other than that that he clearly states as opinion, is true. You and Lennie the Liar do not have that reputation. Are YOU that weak minded and foolish? Don't know. I do.... On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most weak-minded and foolish, how high would you rate me? Ummmm.... a solid 8.5. You ahve the potential to be redeemed, but I doubt it. You occassionally manage to express a vaild opinion without being insulting or dememaning, but your inability to substantiate your claims leaves you wanting pretty badly. He did the same thing with me when he launched into allegations of being a "jack booted thug", "Nazi", "elitist", "Dill Sergeant", etc etc etc, when I had not so addressed him. He is treated and addressed in the same tone and with the same viciousness as he unleashed. Ahem. I hate to be the one to break it to you, Steve, but you are just a wee little bit over the top. Ask ANYone! Perhaps I am...But I refuse to be talked down to, pushed, or otherwise be bullied by cowards and creeps like you and Lennie. Sorry if that hurts your feelings. Perhaps asking yourself how you came to this juncture would be warranted? Is that how you feel? Do YOU need to belittle Jim in order to effectively express yourself when discussing things with/about him? Do you need to belittle me in order to express yourself? Nope. You belittle yourself just fine. But since you deem it necessary to address people the way you do, I just assume that this is the manner in which you find it most effective to communicate. Rhetorical question. I already know the answer. No you don't. You ASSUME that you know an answer. And, no, I don't need to belittle TAFKARJ. Have I done so? THAT was a rhetorical question, Brain. Please do not humiliate yourself by trying to misdirect this question by asking ME about how I address Lennie...I've already answered that. See above. Why do you need to try to belittle ME? Because it seems to be the form of communication that you understand. Stay focused...you were asked a direct, specific question. Which was? Which was obviously not important enough for you to answer like a man. You CAN answer direct, specific questions, can't you? If I can recall them. Obviously you ARE Gene Pool Deficient... Cut and snip to... PS: I will assume any answer to the question that attempts to redirect or obfuscate the response to be "I am unwilling to directly answer the question as I know the truth to be other than what I stated". Simple enough? See above. Questions answered. Now what? No, they weren't...but I am sure that you think that you danced your way around the point. THE POINT is that Brian Burke is not a person of reputable character. Not that we'd expect anything less from a person who publically expresses admiration for a known pathological liar and antagonist. Thanks, Brain...You DO make this easy...You have now admitted to publically lying...not that "we" didn't already know that. Steve, K4YZ |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
William wrote: (N2EY) wrote in message . com... "[their] hobby is wasting time. Your time." Free speech doesn't mean you have to listen to what everyone says. 73 de Jim, N2EY If you want to witness a true waste of time, read a Heil post. Just because it takes you an inordinate amount of time, does not mean that others are having the same difficulty, William/Brian. Dave K8MN David, the reading of it takes no time at all since there is so little content. It's the contemplation, wonderment, and disappointment afterwards that you are supposed to be some kind of hotshot in the amateur radio world, yet none of it comes through in the way you express yourself here. Simply amazing. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message om... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Because, BRAIN, it's not about how I address YOU... I say it is. Until you behave yourself, its TAFKARJ!!! Then I'd say you've pretty well proven that I am right about your general lack of character. About what I'd expect from someone who expresses public admiration for a known liar and antagonist. It's about why do YOU address Jim Miccolis with belittling endearments when HE has never addressed YOU as anything except your proper name? Tuff. I'm holding TAFKARJ metaphorically hostage until you straighten your insane a$$ out. My regrets to Jim. I'll send out for Schlottskey's deli. Still haven't answered the question, which in itself I'd say puts you in the "coward" category, but the INSISTENCE on being insulting where no insult was offered puts you solidly in the "scumbag" category, too. Do you often get involved with other people's issues? Only when I see creepy scumbags acting like bullies towards people who have treated them with nothing but respect. You'd be that bully, ergo you'd be that scumbag. I am sure you family line is proud of you. He can. He has. And to a reasonable person, effectively. But TAFKARJ remains in another world. A Ham in a Bubble. So far everything he's said, other than that that he clearly states as opinion, is true. You and Lennie the Liar do not have that reputation. Are YOU that weak minded and foolish? Don't know. I do.... On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most weak-minded and foolish, how high would you rate me? Ummmm.... a solid 8.5. You ahve the potential to be redeemed, but I doubt it. You occassionally manage to express a vaild opinion without being insulting or dememaning, but your inability to substantiate your claims leaves you wanting pretty badly. He did the same thing with me when he launched into allegations of being a "jack booted thug", "Nazi", "elitist", "Dill Sergeant", etc etc etc, when I had not so addressed him. He is treated and addressed in the same tone and with the same viciousness as he unleashed. Ahem. I hate to be the one to break it to you, Steve, but you are just a wee little bit over the top. Ask ANYone! Perhaps I am...But I refuse to be talked down to, pushed, or otherwise be bullied by cowards and creeps like you and Lennie. Sorry if that hurts your feelings. Perhaps asking yourself how you came to this juncture would be warranted? Is that how you feel? Do YOU need to belittle Jim in order to effectively express yourself when discussing things with/about him? Do you need to belittle me in order to express yourself? Nope. You belittle yourself just fine. But since you deem it necessary to address people the way you do, I just assume that this is the manner in which you find it most effective to communicate. Rhetorical question. I already know the answer. No you don't. You ASSUME that you know an answer. And, no, I don't need to belittle TAFKARJ. Have I done so? THAT was a rhetorical question, Brain. Please do not humiliate yourself by trying to misdirect this question by asking ME about how I address Lennie...I've already answered that. See above. Why do you need to try to belittle ME? Because it seems to be the form of communication that you understand. Stay focused...you were asked a direct, specific question. Which was? Which was obviously not important enough for you to answer like a man. You CAN answer direct, specific questions, can't you? If I can recall them. Obviously you ARE Gene Pool Deficient... Cut and snip to... PS: I will assume any answer to the question that attempts to redirect or obfuscate the response to be "I am unwilling to directly answer the question as I know the truth to be other than what I stated". Simple enough? See above. Questions answered. Now what? No, they weren't...but I am sure that you think that you danced your way around the point. THE POINT is that Brian Burke is not a person of reputable character. Not that we'd expect anything less from a person who publically expresses admiration for a known pathological liar and antagonist. Thanks, Brain...You DO make this easy...You have now admitted to publically lying...not that "we" didn't already know that. Steve, K4YZ Steve, in your own eyes-rolled-back kind of way, I'm sure you really believe what you say. But I don't. I think you're nuts. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (William) wrote in message om... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... THE POINT is that Brian Burke is not a person of reputable character. Not that we'd expect anything less from a person who publically expresses admiration for a known pathological liar and antagonist. Thanks, Brain...You DO make this easy...You have now admitted to publically lying...not that "we" didn't already know that. Steve, in your own eyes-rolled-back kind of way, I'm sure you really believe what you say. Of course I do, Brain. Why would a rational person say something he DIDN'T believe? But I don't. Of course you don't, Brain. Probably due tot he fact that it's your failure to understand why YOUR behaviour is the one in question here... YOU claim to have operated as "DX" from an area of the world in which you obviously had no permission to operate from. I say "obviously" since you cannot produce a single bit of evidence that you DID have permission. When asked to provide some documentary evidence of this operation, you cannot provide a single QSL card, a single callsign of somone who can verify they "worked" you, etc. You then follow up THAT act by publically expressing admiration and claiming as your "mentor" a person who ahs been clearly and repeatedly documented as intentionally untruthful and openly spiteful of the very radio service of which you are a licensee. Several folks here have expressed disdain of my poking at you and the Putzy one...Not because you don't deserve it, but because they believe if you are "left alone", you'll go away. I did that for a while and you didn't...Neither did your lying friend. I for one believe when you try to placate bullies and liars, you only serve to embolden them. Just as it is your right to lie and misrepresent, it's my right to challenge and expose your lies and misrepresentations. You and Lennie certainly give me plenty of opportunites to address them. I think you're nuts. If thinking that makes you feel warm and fuzzy and let's you sleep at night, Brain, you go right on ahead and think it. Consider it yours. Steve, K4YZ |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (William) wrote in message om... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... THE POINT is that Brian Burke is not a person of reputable character. Not that we'd expect anything less from a person who publically expresses admiration for a known pathological liar and antagonist. Thanks, Brain...You DO make this easy...You have now admitted to publically lying...not that "we" didn't already know that. Steve, in your own eyes-rolled-back kind of way, I'm sure you really believe what you say. Of course I do, Brain. Why would a rational person say something he DIDN'T believe? He could be: a. lying. b. not rational and doesn't know what he's saying. I think you're not rational (nuts). |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Of course I do, Brain. Why would a rational person say something he DIDN'T believe? He could be: a. lying. b. not rational and doesn't know what he's saying. I think you're not rational (nuts). Of course you do. You (and your "mentor") are the one's with credibility problems here. So.....How do YOU go about "fixing" it...?!?! You do your best to try and put the onus of inpropriety off on anyone BUT yourself. Since I work the hardest to keep your frequent foolishness in the public eye, I catch the flak. No problem. The worst YOU have to suggest is that I am "nuts" or "irrational" for not allowing you and Lennie to get away with bullying and lying. So far, you've failed. Try again...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|