Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes: Dave Heil wrote: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , (William) writes: If I may be so direct, it's because he can rely on a good row with Steve and you. I understand your rationale, but he'll be happy to fight with y'all as long as y'all are happy to fight with him. just newsgroup BPL. 8^) You're right in one way, Mike. Mr. FS wants to Put Me Down. What's with the "Put Me Down"? I don't think that highly of you. Just plain old "put me down" would suffice. Oh, and I'm not Mr. Field Strength, Loon. It's his way of asserting control over this automotive chat room. This is a newsgroup, not a chat room. If I had control over it, you certainly wouldn't be posting here. He's tried all sorts of ways to put me down and hasn't yet succeeded. It must be terribly frustrating that he doesn't Get His Way. You must not be paying attention. You've been easily had easily and recently. I just love a good Los Angeles Marathon tale. Dave K8MN |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N2EY wrote:
In article , Dave Heil writes: If someone like him moved next door to me, I'd give serious thought to planting a "For Sale" sign on my lawn--or maybe I'd just paint my house lavender and put in a yard full of pink plastic flamingos. Did you ever see the John Waters film by that name? No. Then again, I was away for a long time. Dave K8MN |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
I hate to agree with Len. But he is right on this one. Dan/W4NTI Gotta admit too Dan, and give Len credit here, he makes a very good point. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, "Dan/W4NTI"
w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes: I hate to agree with Len. But he is right on this one. Dan/W4NTI "Len Over 21" wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: Dave Heil wrote in message ... You know, I've never needed your assistance in posting my comments to the FCC before. What made you think I'd need it now? Dave K8MN Len stated, "It's also apparent that way too many commenters are trying to voice their grievances to the FCC in the wrong place." Len did not state that "David Heil/K8MN is trying to voice his grievances to the FCC in the wrong place." What made you think he did? Mr. Foreign Serviceman thinks that every PUBLIC posting I make is aimed straight at him and his ego wounds are grievous. The gunnery nurse thinks every PUBLIC posting I make is aimed straight at him and he is mad as heck and can't take it any more. But, over 600 comments have been filed on NOI 03-104 since the 04-29 NPRM was released...over 600 comments that will have no effect on FCC decision-making on NPRM 04-29. As of the close of FCC business on 15 March 2004, the number of comments on 04-29 and 04-37 are the SAME number as on the close of business on 11 March 2004. No one seems to be filing anything. Not even FISTS...but then "CW gets through when nothing else will" according to them and they aren't worried about Access BPL. Everyone else seems happy and content with personal in-fighting in newsgroups instead of going out and DOING anything about BPL. That shows everyone how "dedicated" they are to preserving their hobby lifestyles. Dedication = nothing. Imagination and fantasy = everything. LHA / WMD Thank you, Dan. Checking the FCC website ECFS for 16 March 2004 after the close of business there (about 8:10 PM EST), there were NO additional comments filed on 04-29 since 10 March 2004. There were only 2 comments on 04-37 by Lionel Booth, PE, N3LB, MARS AR6IP, and good old rambling Earl Gosnell III, also a licensed radio amateur. Booth's comment is good since he is approaching the problem in broad terms, that of the electric power lines becoming actual RF radiators. Those affect ALL wanting to use HF to low VHF. It is a literate document and worth reading the 11 pages on file. If folks don't want to trouble themselves with engineering details or EM theory, then at least they ought to scan the Booth document and say they SUPPORT it...in public...on the ECFS. The FCC sees all those and considers them for a final R&O. It isn't difficult to file a comment at the FCC. Anyone can do it on-line for a short comment, no fancy formatting or word processing needed. Hundreds have already done so on other subjects. The FCC has made it EASY for ordinary citizens to comment. There's no real excuse to sit like lumps in a bog, doing nothing but on-line newsgroup combat. That won't make Access BPL go away, won't stop the BPL interference from that power line in front of the house. Red-dog the FCC ECFS, hit both 04-29 and 04-37. If anyone goes to 04-29 and wants to comment based on Booth's comment, then mention his filing under Et Docket 04-37 for 16 March 2004. I can understand some who hate my guts for other reasons and won't want to mention my comments on both 04-29 and 04-37. But, LIonel Booth filed under 04-37 and he IS a licensed radio amateur as well as a registered Professional Engineer. At least reference Booth's comment and SUPPORT it. LHA / WMD |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Citizen Band was created when they started issueing licenses without a CW requirement. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , JJ
writes: Dan/W4NTI wrote: I hate to agree with Len. But he is right on this one. Dan/W4NTI Gotta admit too Dan, and give Len credit here, he makes a very good point. He's just repeating what ARRL and many of us have been saying for about a year now - get the facts and comment to FCC in the appropriate places. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NPRM and VEC | General | |||
BPL NPRM Approved | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse coderequirement. | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |