Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
************************************************** **
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL INTERFERENCE ISSUES Amateur radio enthusiasts are submitting copious comments that are flooding the docket for the FCC's notice of proposed rulemaking on broadband-over-powerline technologies. The comments are coming well in advance of a May 3 due date. "From what I've seen, BPL will wipe out the [high frequency] and some [very high frequency] bands," said one typical filing. "It's been rejected in other places and should not be allowed in the United States. In an emergency, government and communities are loosely held together by using these bands with emergency communications. Don't let Big Money outweigh the good of our country." Sources say the FCC has been respectful of amateur radio concerns but also has recognized that they may not reflect real problems. "The FCC has determined that the end-of-the-world interference scenarios put forward by some in the amateur community are unrealistic," said Mitchell Lazarus, a lawyer who represents BPL service provider Current Technologies. "The NPRM is a good beginning of the process of finding a fair balance between the needs of broadband users and users of the radio spectrum." Last month when the FCC approved the NPRM, Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein said, "While we must be mindful of harmful interference, we cannot let unsupported claims stand in the way of such an innovation as BPL systems." The FCC approved the NPRM on Feb. 12 and released it 11 days later, but it was not published in the Federal Register until today, starting a 45-day clock for comments. Reply comments are due 30 days later. - Howard Buskirk, http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2004/td031704/index.htm |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|