Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been here a few years now, and listened to a lot that has been
said and done. I've come up with some ideas about how we might attract people to the ARS. What I think will work, and what won't work. What won't work: Bitch, Bitch, Bitch! There are a number of hams that have an amazing, big chip on their shoulders. Everything is going to be the downfall of Amateur radio. We eliminate Element one, and pretty soon we're all worshiping Satan and registered Democrats. Yeah, that's a way to attract new people! If your that unhappy, turn your license in and then you'll finally be satisfied. But it's kind of like Abe Lincon said "people are just about as happy as they make up their minds to be". Your anger is your addiction. If we can only make it simple enough! Want to attract kids? Make the tests so simple that anyone can pass them. Well this worked well with the Citizens band didn't it? The world is full of examples of things that have been improved by making them really easy, isn't it? Want to see a kid get rid of a video game? Give him or her one that is real easy to beat. It will be traded in in no time. A game that is just difficult enough will keep 'em busy for a long time. If there is no intellectual investment in the hobby, then there is no intellectual investment in the hobby. A challenge is not a bad thing. The Freakin' Sky is Fallin' Man! Get the wagons in a circle, and man the phasers! Mixed metaphors on purpose. If a prospective ham looks into the hobby, and they see a multitude of ARRL and others crying wolf, they just might decide they want to spend their time on an avocation that has a future. I'm glad I didn't see the "overwhelming band threats" when I was getting started. That there are threats, inadvertent and purposeful is not the issue. The stridency and panic factor is. I am the Great TEchNoDwEEb!!!! I remember when I was a rank General, I almost gave up on ever putting together a station because I was pretty well convinced it was impossible. After all, Those dipoles suck they don't work DX and you have to have them up a hundred feet in the air the Verticals suck because they aren't efficient and you have to be crazy to put in a ground rod because radials are the only way to go and you have to dig up your whole yard to put in radials and if you don't have at least 120 of the darn things at a quarter wavelength the antenna won't work for a darn and you have to use coax because ladderline is sensitive to moisture and you'll lose all your power in the tuner and besides it's so old school but the coax sucks because you have to make an antenna for the specific band but traps suck because they don't use all the wire in an antennas and who the heck ever thought you could put a stinkin' hf antenna on a car and ever hope to work anyone with it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh..... G5RV's suck and are great too! Now what I think will work. I have to say think, because I haven't seen much of it lately. Show a newbie that it is fun. Let them make a DX contact with you as a control op. If they are shy to talk, maybe that keyboard and PSK31 might be a catalyst! Hmm, PSK31? Let them see that the ARS is involved with computers. Not just logging and antenna design programs, but they can work the world with 'em! Show them the multitude of modes available, but not everything. You want them to be able to discover some stuff by themselves. Give 'em a few links to good websites that have Show them you're proud of being an amateur. Let them get a sense of the excitement of talking around the world on a few watts, or even the joy of putting out a big signal with that linear and the glowing tubes in it. Maybe they have a competitive streak. Let them work in a contest if you can. One of the greatest things done for me as a neophyte was for the club I belong to to let me do a lot of operating in a contest or two when I was still a technician. It took me a while to realize that the control op was a lot better than me, and I was dragging the scoring down a bit, but I was hooked, and now am reasonably proficient as well as having gone for the higher level licenses. That is one reason why I am happy to spend the daytime operating at field day as the control op for the GOTA station. I want to repay the kindness. But most importantly, they need you to let them know how much fun it is, and to not belabor them with the complaining that we so often fall into "Those darn people that want to eliminate the Morse code test will be the downfall of Amateur radio" is not something the prospective ham wants to hear, as well as " We're going to get rid of that stupid code test, and those old fuddy duddies are just going to have to live with it" isn't going to help either. Be enthusiastic, friendly and do good work. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... I've been here a few years now, and listened to a lot that has been said and done. I've come up with some ideas about how we might attract people to the ARS. What I think will work, and what won't work. What won't work: Bitch, Bitch, Bitch! There are a number of hams that have an amazing, big chip on their shoulders. Everything is going to be the downfall of Amateur radio. We eliminate Element one, and pretty soon we're all worshiping Satan and registered Democrats. Yeah, that's a way to attract new people! If your that unhappy, turn your license in and then you'll finally be satisfied. But it's kind of like Abe Lincon said "people are just about as happy as they make up their minds to be". Your anger is your addiction. Well said. If we can only make it simple enough! Want to attract kids? Make the tests so simple that anyone can pass them. Not all the tests...the ARRL and NCVEC are ONLY proposing a new entry level. No changes are proposed for testing for General or Extra. Well this worked well with the Citizens band didn't it? Bad analogy...there never was any license testing at all for CB. The world is full of examples of things that have been improved by making them really easy, isn't it? Want to see a kid get rid of a video game? Give him or her one that is real easy to beat. It will be traded in in no time. A game that is just difficult enough will keep 'em busy for a long time. If there is no intellectual investment in the hobby, then there is no intellectual investment in the hobby. A challenge is not a bad thing. There's no reason the intellectual investment can't be for General and Extra. Hell, that's what many of us did when we started with the old Novice. The Freakin' Sky is Fallin' Man! Get the wagons in a circle, and man the phasers! Mixed metaphors on purpose. If a prospective ham looks into the hobby, and they see a multitude of ARRL and others crying wolf, they just might decide they want to spend their time on an avocation that has a future. I'm glad I didn't see the "overwhelming band threats" when I was getting started. That there are threats, inadvertent and purposeful is not the issue. The stridency and panic factor is. I don't see ARRRL (or NCVEC) crying wolf. I don't understand the reference? I am the Great TEchNoDwEEb!!!! I remember when I was a rank General, I almost gave up on ever putting together a station because I was pretty well convinced it was impossible. After all, Those dipoles suck they don't work DX and you have to have them up a hundred feet in the air the Verticals suck because they aren't efficient and you have to be crazy to put in a ground rod because radials are the only way to go and you have to dig up your whole yard to put in radials and if you don't have at least 120 of the darn things at a quarter wavelength the antenna won't work for a darn and you have to use coax because ladderline is sensitive to moisture and you'll lose all your power in the tuner and besides it's so old school but the coax sucks because you have to make an antenna for the specific band but traps suck because they don't use all the wire in an antennas and who the heck ever thought you could put a stinkin' hf antenna on a car and ever hope to work anyone with it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How did you come up with those misconceptions :-) :-) Now what I think will work. I have to say think, because I haven't seen much of it lately. Show a newbie that it is fun. Let them make a DX contact with you as a control op. If they are shy to talk, maybe that keyboard and PSK31 might be a catalyst! OK by me. I have had the chance to be a new hams first contact on a couple of occasions. Such situations should always be handled by the experienced ham as a chance to foster goodwill and a warm welcome to the newcomer. Hmm, PSK31? Let them see that the ARS is involved with computers. Not just logging and antenna design programs, but they can work the world with 'em! Show them the multitude of modes available, but not everything. You want them to be able to discover some stuff by themselves. Give 'em a few links to good websites that have Agree 100% Show them you're proud of being an amateur. Let them get a sense of the excitement of talking around the world on a few watts, or even the joy of putting out a big signal with that linear and the glowing tubes in it. Agree 100% Maybe they have a competitive streak. Let them work in a contest if you can. One of the greatest things done for me as a neophyte was for the club I belong to to let me do a lot of operating in a contest or two when I was still a technician. It took me a while to realize that the control op was a lot better than me, and I was dragging the scoring down a bit, but I was hooked, and now am reasonably proficient as well as having gone for the higher level licenses. That is one reason why I am happy to spend the daytime operating at field day as the control op for the GOTA station. I want to repay the kindness. Agree 100% But most importantly, they need you to let them know how much fun it is, and to not belabor them with the complaining that we so often fall into "Those darn people that want to eliminate the Morse code test will be the downfall of Amateur radio" is not something the prospective ham wants to hear, as well as " We're going to get rid of that stupid code test, and those old fuddy duddies are just going to have to live with it" isn't going to help either. Be enthusiastic, friendly and do good work. Agree again 100%. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Sohl wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message I am the Great TEchNoDwEEb!!!! I remember when I was a rank General, I almost gave up on ever putting together a station because I was pretty well convinced it was impossible. After all, Those dipoles suck they don't work DX and you have to have them up a hundred feet in the air the Verticals suck because they aren't efficient and you have to be crazy to put in a ground rod because radials are the only way to go and you have to dig up your whole yard to put in radials and if you don't have at least 120 of the darn things at a quarter wavelength the antenna won't work for a darn and you have to use coax because ladderline is sensitive to moisture and you'll lose all your power in the tuner and besides it's so old school but the coax sucks because you have to make an antenna for the specific band but traps suck because they don't use all the wire in an antennas and who the heck ever thought you could put a stinkin' hf antenna on a car and ever hope to work anyone with it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How did you come up with those misconceptions :-) :-) HOWL!!!! Perfect comeback Bill! Thanks, I needed that this afternoon! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: How to attract people to the Amateur Radio Service
From: Mike Coslo Date: 4/13/2004 10:31 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: I've been here a few years now, and listened to a lot that has been said and done. I've come up with some ideas about how we might attract people to the ARS. What I think will work, and what won't work. What won't work: B****, B####, B@@@@! There are a number of hams that have an amazing, big chip on their shoulders. Everything is going to be the downfall of Amateur radio. We eliminate Element one, and pretty soon we're all worshiping Satan and registered Democrats. Yeah, that's a way to attract new people! If your that unhappy, turn your license in and then you'll finally be satisfied. But it's kind of like Abe Lincon said "people are just about as happy as they make up their minds to be". Your anger is your addiction. Whew! I can put my hands on some Zoloft if ya want it, Mike! =) (Just kidding...!) Personally, I don't care how hard we "recruit", I think Amateur Radio has always attracted a certain few types of personalities and always will...Just like some people like hang gliding, snow skiing, Scrabble, etc etc etc. There will be the occassional "straggler" that picks up along the way, but consider how many different "incentives" to become Amateurs there have been yet the growth rate, other than in radio's early years, has rarely reached two digits. I honestly believe that if we put a cupon in Popular Science offering an all-privileges license for $20.00 plus the cupon, we'd STILL not see any "marked" growth. Yes...there'd be an initial spurt...Just like all the other "incentives" over the last 80 years, but that would be it. I think the only way to get an idea of what would get more folks into Amateur Radio would be to do a "survey" in PopSci, Popular Mechanics, Popular Communications, etc, and get a feel for what the REAL "John Q" thinks. I think the ARRL's "Novice" idea is wasted time. QST itself has numerous stories of Grade School and Junior High students who routinely pass all three levels of licensure, so all they are doing is adding to the administrative quagmire. Furthermore, if they'd take the hint from other Administrations and just get past the code issue, there'd be no need for it (Novice). 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:
Subject: How to attract people to the Amateur Radio Service From: Mike Coslo Date: 4/13/2004 10:31 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: I've been here a few years now, and listened to a lot that has been said and done. I've come up with some ideas about how we might attract people to the ARS. What I think will work, and what won't work. What won't work: B****, B####, B@@@@! There are a number of hams that have an amazing, big chip on their shoulders. Everything is going to be the downfall of Amateur radio. We eliminate Element one, and pretty soon we're all worshiping Satan and registered Democrats. Yeah, that's a way to attract new people! If your that unhappy, turn your license in and then you'll finally be satisfied. But it's kind of like Abe Lincon said "people are just about as happy as they make up their minds to be". Your anger is your addiction. Whew! I can put my hands on some Zoloft if ya want it, Mike! =) (Just kidding...!) Wayaaayyy too much coffee that day! 8^) But I did have fun typing it!! Personally, I don't care how hard we "recruit", I think Amateur Radio has always attracted a certain few types of personalities and always will...Just like some people like hang gliding, snow skiing, Scrabble, etc etc etc. There will be the occassional "straggler" that picks up along the way, but consider how many different "incentives" to become Amateurs there have been yet the growth rate, other than in radio's early years, has rarely reached two digits. Another hobby of mine, Amateur Astronomy, is the same way. There are people complaining that AA's are too old, that we need to get more children interested in the hobby (disregarding the expense of a good telescope that older folks have the discretionary funds for, and not too many 8 year olds will be allowed out at night when the observing happens to be good!) I honestly believe that if we put a cupon in Popular Science offering an all-privileges license for $20.00 plus the cupon, we'd STILL not see any "marked" growth. Yes...there'd be an initial spurt...Just like all the other "incentives" over the last 80 years, but that would be it. Way to go Steve! you just messed up the end-game strategy for the NCTA's! I think the only way to get an idea of what would get more folks into Amateur Radio would be to do a "survey" in PopSci, Popular Mechanics, Popular Communications, etc, and get a feel for what the REAL "John Q" thinks. I think the ARRL's "Novice" idea is wasted time. QST itself has numerous stories of Grade School and Junior High students who routinely pass all three levels of licensure, so all they are doing is adding to the administrative quagmire. Furthermore, if they'd take the hint from other Administrations and just get past the code issue, there'd be no need for it (Novice). I know. I could have passed the present test at a pretty young age, and I'm nowhere near exceptional. Perhaps they are trying to appeal to people that aren't interested?...... - Mike KB3EIA - |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: How to attract people to the Amateur Radio Service
From: Mike Coslo Date: 4/15/2004 7:05 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Perhaps they are trying to appeal to people that aren't interested?...... BINGO! Here's a bit of interesting trivia... Have you ever taken the time to stroll through "QRZ's" bios? If you do, I think you'll notice that certain "hobbies" and career paths keep turning up. A very large number make reference to flying, some type of active outdoor sports (usually camping or hiking), participatioon as volunteer FD or EMS, or active or retired career in the Armed Forces. THERE'S where we need to be "recruiting"...In "FLYING" , "Emergency Medical Services", the various military papers (NAVY Times, ARMY Times, AF Times), "Field and Stream", etc. Throw the occassional ad into "Boy's Life", and the science related magazines I noted earlier and a few (such as your Astronomy field) that I am sure others can come up with. Hmmmmm??? Steve, K4YZ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:
Subject: How to attract people to the Amateur Radio Service From: Mike Coslo Date: 4/15/2004 7:05 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Perhaps they are trying to appeal to people that aren't interested?...... BINGO! Here's a bit of interesting trivia... Have you ever taken the time to stroll through "QRZ's" bios? If you do, I think you'll notice that certain "hobbies" and career paths keep turning up. A very large number make reference to flying, some type of active outdoor sports (usually camping or hiking), participatioon as volunteer FD or EMS, or active or retired career in the Armed Forces. THERE'S where we need to be "recruiting"...In "FLYING" , "Emergency Medical Services", the various military papers (NAVY Times, ARMY Times, AF Times), "Field and Stream", etc. Throw the occassional ad into "Boy's Life", and the science related magazines I noted earlier and a few (such as your Astronomy field) that I am sure others can come up with. Absolutely. We need to have a target audience. Right now, it seems like there is a scattershot approach. Its nice that there are some pretty ladies that are hams, and it's nice that there are a few celebrities that are hams, but by and large, we are the techie's. I doubt L'il Kim or Brittany Spears or Justin Timberlake will ever be hams, or (name your popular type person) will ever even think about it. Well, that's just fine. Ham radio wasn't, isn't, and never will be Kewl. And that's kewl by me. If those type people were involved in it, I probably wouldn't be. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mike Coslo wrote: | The world is full of examples of things that have been improved by | making them really easy, isn't it? Want to see a kid get rid of a | video game? Give him or her one that is real easy to beat. It will | be traded in in no time. A game that is just difficult enough will | keep 'em busy for a long time. If there is no intellectual | investment in the hobby, then there is no intellectual investment in | the hobby. A challenge is not a bad thing. Bad analogy, a game vs. ham radio. The FCC tests are a tiny fraction of what there is to learn out there. The FCC could replace all the tests with a `check here to get your license' form, and ham radio wouldn't be any easier, harder or less or more interesting. You make it sound like ham radio is all about the FCC test, and if that's easy, ham radio is suddenly easy. Well, I disagree. The tests are already easy -- it's all the other stuff to learn, the *useful* stuff, that's interesting and challenging. Really, all the tests do is keep the riff-raff out. (Which seems *very* important to many people.) And I guess as far as 30 mHz goes, I'm riff-raff. For now. ![]() | Show a newbie that it is fun. Let them make a DX contact with you as a | control op. If they are shy to talk, maybe that keyboard and PSK31 might | be a catalyst! I actually was able to decode several PSK31 discussions last night on 14.073. I was very pleased. I was beginning to think that the dipole I set up in my garage was somehow wrong. ![]() I've passed elements 2, 3 and 4 and am working on 1, but I'm still a rank amateur and I know it. Still, I'm really bummed that I can't transmit on anything under 50 mhz until I pass the CW test, even though I'm not really that interested in doing CW. (And passing element 1 isn't going to magically make me stop being a rank amateur. But at least then I'll be able to transmit `down there'.) -- Doug McLaren, , KD5YRD 01234567 - The amazing* indent-o-meter! ^ (*: Indent-o-meter may not actually amaze.) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: I honestly believe that if we put a cupon in Popular Science offering an all-privileges license for $20.00 plus the cupon, we'd STILL not see any "marked" growth. Yes...there'd be an initial spurt...Just like all the other "incentives" over the last 80 years, but that would be it. Way to go Steve! you just messed up the end-game strategy for the NCTA's! Actually, I am willing to bet they'd either whine about the $20.00, demanding that it be halved, or they'd complain about how cutting out the cupon aggrivated thier carpal tunnel, and they'd subsequently sue under the American's with Disabilities Act to have the cupon requirement waived. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415  September 24, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415  September 24, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1398  May 28, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1367 – October 24 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | Policy |