Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net...
"Alun" wrote in message ... big snip You know what, though, you are the lid. Alun, N3KIP And I think your a lid. Now what? Dan/W4NTI An impasse? Doesn't have to be. I'll go with Alun on this one. |
#72
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Morse and Contests
From: (William) Date: 5/2/2004 8:41 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: You are the Master of the Obvious. It's obvious that you're a ZERO, Brian. And that has nothing to do with the ZERO in your callsign, byt the way... Steve, K4YZ |
#73
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() You know what, though, you are the lid. Alun, N3KIP And I think your a lid. Now what? Dan/W4NTI Gentlemen ....gentlemen ......I think this can be solved in a civilized manner ......What we need is a Texas Death Match. I would add a cage of barbed wire (non-resonate) of course with the key to the locked door suspended by 20 feet of ladder line above the center of the mat. There would of course be allowed one foreign object per contestant. Dan my choice for you would be a vintage Vibroplex bug attached to a 4 foot length of quarter inch cable. Alun you of course would have to use the same cable set up but with a D-104 at the end. We would let Alun fill the 104 with lead shot to even things up. The winner would be presented with the World No Lid Belt. Ya know this would probably be a lot more interesting than most contests I have been involved with over the years. Take care guys .....remember peace in the valley ..... Tom KI3R |
#74
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "garigue" wrote in message news:TqUlc.22305$Ia6.3248261@attbi_s03... You know what, though, you are the lid. Alun, N3KIP And I think your a lid. Now what? Dan/W4NTI Gentlemen ....gentlemen ......I think this can be solved in a civilized manner ......What we need is a Texas Death Match. I would add a cage of barbed wire (non-resonate) of course with the key to the locked door suspended by 20 feet of ladder line above the center of the mat. There would of course be allowed one foreign object per contestant. Dan my choice for you would be a vintage Vibroplex bug attached to a 4 foot length of quarter inch cable. Alun you of course would have to use the same cable set up but with a D-104 at the end. We would let Alun fill the 104 with lead shot to even things up. The winner would be presented with the World No Lid Belt. Ya know this would probably be a lot more interesting than most contests I have been involved with over the years. Take care guys .....remember peace in the valley ..... Tom KI3R I like that Tom.....I have both the key and the Mic. I'll let the lid provide the cage. Dan/W4NTI |
#75
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in news:HJ9mc.5721
: "garigue" wrote in message news:TqUlc.22305$Ia6.3248261@attbi_s03... You know what, though, you are the lid. Alun, N3KIP And I think your a lid. Now what? Dan/W4NTI Gentlemen ....gentlemen ......I think this can be solved in a civilized manner ......What we need is a Texas Death Match. I would add a cage of barbed wire (non-resonate) of course with the key to the locked door suspended by 20 feet of ladder line above the center of the mat. There would of course be allowed one foreign object per contestant. Dan my choice for you would be a vintage Vibroplex bug attached to a 4 foot length of quarter inch cable. Alun you of course would have to use the same cable set up but with a D-104 at the end. We would let Alun fill the 104 with lead shot to even things up. The winner would be presented with the World No Lid Belt. Ya know this would probably be a lot more interesting than most contests I have been involved with over the years. Take care guys .....remember peace in the valley ..... Tom KI3R I like that Tom.....I have both the key and the Mic. I'll let the lid provide the cage. Dan/W4NTI I already hold the moral high ground. Dan is on record as saying phone ops are lids, and I have not expressed any similar opinion re CW ops, only re him. By my reckoning I have already won. Alun, N3KIP |
#76
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alun" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in news:HJ9mc.5721 : "garigue" wrote in message news:TqUlc.22305$Ia6.3248261@attbi_s03... You know what, though, you are the lid. Alun, N3KIP And I think your a lid. Now what? Dan/W4NTI Gentlemen ....gentlemen ......I think this can be solved in a civilized manner ......What we need is a Texas Death Match. I would add a cage of barbed wire (non-resonate) of course with the key to the locked door suspended by 20 feet of ladder line above the center of the mat. There would of course be allowed one foreign object per contestant. Dan my choice for you would be a vintage Vibroplex bug attached to a 4 foot length of quarter inch cable. Alun you of course would have to use the same cable set up but with a D-104 at the end. We would let Alun fill the 104 with lead shot to even things up. The winner would be presented with the World No Lid Belt. Ya know this would probably be a lot more interesting than most contests I have been involved with over the years. Take care guys .....remember peace in the valley ..... Tom KI3R I like that Tom.....I have both the key and the Mic. I'll let the lid provide the cage. Dan/W4NTI I already hold the moral high ground. Dan is on record as saying phone ops are lids, and I have not expressed any similar opinion re CW ops, only re him. By my reckoning I have already won. Alun, N3KIP A good CW operator could out operate a phone operator with less power, less equipment, and worse propagation. Dan/W4NTI |
#78
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() A good CW operator could out operate a phone operator with less power, less equipment, and worse propagation. Dan/W4NTI A good operator (CW or any other kind) wouldn't say "(insert mode here) operators are lids". Again Alun you are not qualified to judge. Since you are only half a ham. You have no experience to enable you able to judge anything about CW. You need to just admit that before you have the whole USENET laughing at your ignorance on the subject. Dan/W4NTI |
#79
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Morse and Contests
From: (William) Date: 5/6/2004 5:50 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Morse and Contests From: (William) Date: 5/2/2004 8:41 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: You are the Master of the Obvious. It's obvious that you're a ZERO, Brian. And that has nothing to do with the ZERO in your callsign, by the way... Steve, K4YZ Steve, its obvious that you're nuts and I'm not. To WHO...?!?! YOU...?!?! A documented liar? A "man" who won't stand behind his own word? Am I supposed to be impressed by this? Sheeeeeeesh. You really ARE an idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
#80
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in
ink.net: A good CW operator could out operate a phone operator with less power, less equipment, and worse propagation. Dan/W4NTI A good operator (CW or any other kind) wouldn't say "(insert mode here) operators are lids". Again Alun you are not qualified to judge. Since you are only half a ham. You have no experience to enable you able to judge anything about CW. You need to just admit that before you have the whole USENET laughing at your ignorance on the subject. Dan/W4NTI Dan, you are not only a lid, you lack even the rudiments of logical reasoning. I was _not_ judging anything about CW. I don't even care to do so. What I was saying, since you evidently fail to understand, is that anyone who says that users of a particular mode are lids just because they use or prefer that mode is not a considerate person, i.e. you aren't. There is a valid place for each mode that we use in the amateur service, and if anyone wants to do all of their operating using one mode, whether it be CW, or slow-scan, or PSK, or SSB, they should be left in peace and not maligned by the likes of you. IMO none of them should be labelled as 'half a ham'. What should we count you as? One quarter of a ham? One eighth? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General |