![]() |
In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: The Game's Afoot! From: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) Date: 6/24/2004 3:08 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: The criteria for federal agencies operating on FCC regualted radio services is very narrow. "Routine" communications and communications conducting the business of the organization are NOT "authorized" uses. Opertional missions are not "legitimate" uses either, except where inoperability or coordination with other rescue agencies is critical, are not authorized either. Excuse me... "Opertational" and "interoperabiltiy". Oh, my...nursie be amateur radio OPERTATOR! :-) Temper fry... LHA / WMD |
In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: The Game's Afoot! From: (Len Over 21) Date: 6/23/2004 2:40 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: You hate Amateur Radio and Amateur Radio licensees. That's blatantly obvious. No. Amateur radio is a fine hobby, interesting, a fine recreation with great technological learning capabilities. Except to a few, such as nursie. I have enjoyed Amateur Radio since 1972, Lennie. It's the ONLY radio you know, nursie. It has been a great tool, a source of recreation, and a social gathering place. Nursie regular bon vivant, trashed bakeries with visitors, etc. And as of today, youa re still not a part of it, save for being a sidelined scufflaw. Mea not bother. Mea been in lots of places youa nevah be in radio. Tsk, tsk. :-) Nursie does NOT "represent" all or even a part of United States amateur radio. Sure I do...At least 1/675,000 part of it. Less of a fraction than that. Over 700 thousand U.S. amateur licenses granted and on the books, nursie, all still valid. Which is 1/675,000 more than you are. Nursie have strange mathematic in nursieland. :-) I dare say that judging by many of the other responses in this forum, than some of my opinions are also held by others. Google refers. Nursie bad speller. Spelled "google reefers" wrong. Nursie get one response in favor, exaggerates that. Just like the Katapult King exaggerated his single patent into 26! :-) I DO antagonize those who have a compulsive disorder known familiarly as "control freaks" who seek to dominate others by any means possible. Those are simply wanna-be dictators. There is only one "control freak" here, Lennie. Incorrect. SEVERAL control freaks busy with industrial-strength ethnic cleanser trying to brush away all NCTAs. Scrub scrub scrub, three men in a tubie. Nursery rhymes by the nannies. [nano-technology trying to replace brains] Nursie just wanna FIGHT. Nursie FIGHT anyone who have opposite opinions of nursie's. Bark, bark, bark, little nursie. Seems I'm the little doggie that got ahold of YOU, Lennie! Bark, bark, bark, little nursie. Nursie not "get" anyone. Nursie get worse. Nursie got nuts with nursieworld facts and ZERO INVOLVEMENT in space biz trying to make like Weiner von Brawn. This not "meaningful discourse," only diss and cuss time by nursie. Not normal. Not sane. Nursie need help. Temper fry... LHA / WMD |
In article , Dave Heil
writes: I guess you told me, Len. Say goodnight, Dave... LHA / WMD |
In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: The Game's Afoot! From: (Len Over 21) Date: 6/23/2004 2:40 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: CAP has had a lot of in-fighting about FRS. Since FRS is "civilian" and we are under NTIA, there's been a lot of arguing about the legalities of it. "Legalities?!?" :-) For an unlicensed radio service?!? Don't show more ignorance than what you have already shown us, Lennie. FRS is regulated under Part 95 of the FCC'S Rules and Regulations. ...and NO LICENSE is required to use one. :-) Not in "Part 15" that nursie keeps bringing up...:-) CAP, as a defacto federal agency (as attested to by the Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force and the Attorney General of the United States...) is obligated to operate under NTIA. Wow! That sounds so OFFICIAL!!! I'll bet all the CAP aces have cute uniforms with pretty patches and salute one another on or off the flight line... The criteria for federal agencies operating on FCC regualted radio services is very narrow. "Routine" communications and communications conducting the business of the organization are NOT "authorized" uses. Opertional missions are not "legitimate" uses either, except where inoperability or coordination with other rescue agencies is critical, are not authorized either. "...where inoperability?!?" :-) These "restrictions" are not solely applicable to CAP. They apply to all other federal entities also. You sound like the JIG...Judicial Inoperability Group. Lots of word dancing. Doesn't mean much because the tune is off key. Maybe nursie suggest using MARS. Actually Civil Air Patrol has quite a few stations authorized to operate in Air Force MARS, Lennie. Nursie say "Sorry Hans, MARS IS amateur radio!" If MARS be amateur radio, it can't be "Air Force." Air Force be military. No, can't do that, nursie say "MARS IS amateur radio!" :-) Nursie made an "ace" of himself again. No...you did, Lennie. By your lack of practical experience and operational knowledge. Nursie be stuck on "inoperability" with most things here. :-) DoD 4650.2 (eff. 21 Nov 03). Ever hear of it? Putz.. Tsk, tsk, tsk. More "meaningful discourse?" No, just nursie's dissing and cussing. Perfect example of the best that ham radio can be? Temper fry... LHA / WMD |
|
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Dave Heil writes: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: The Game's Afoot! From: (Len Over 21) Date: 6/23/2004 12:13 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: You hate Amateur Radio and Amateur Radio licensees. That's blatantly obvious. No. Amateur radio is a fine hobby, interesting, a fine recreation with great technological learning capabilities. Aside from hearsay or SWLing, how would you know, Leonard? Heil, you've done that schtick already. It doesn't apply. It doesn't work. Give up on that ploy. It isn't schtick and it is no ploy, Leonard. If some kid, assuming that he is above the age which you believe should be the minimum for amateur radio licensing, comes to you and says, "What can you tell me about amateur radio, Mr. Anderson?", the best you'll be able to do is tell him that you heard from a friend that amateur radio is.... or that you read in a book that amateur radio is... You're shucking and jiving, Leonard. Dave K8MN Interesting. I think so. I think so. I once said that a prospective ham almost had to know a ham to become a ham. I don't recall that. There's that famous Heil selective memory at work. Next thing you know you'll forget all about those out of band Frenchmen on 6 meters. Then you guys set upon me like the pack of wild dogs that you are... Which "you guys" would that be? PCTA. Know any? ...telling me of acts of heroism... Acts of heroism? I don't believe you. Yup. And because they display bravery and heroism in the face of the old-timey exams and examiners, all who wish to enter the Kingdom must also face those same exams and examiners. But since those old-timey exams and examiners have gone away, all the new hammies are just not worthy. Common theme throughout R.R.A.P. how you got the book and read it and went down to the steely-eyed fcc examiner and became a ham. No sir! No help from no one. Novice exams weren't taken in front of any FCC examiner, much less a stelly-eyed examiner. Steely-eyed. K8CFT wasn't steely-eyed at all. SK W8MN sparked my interest in becoming a ham but he couldn't learn the theory for me and I'd moved to a different town by the time I began practicing morse to increase my speed. So you knew hams prior to being licensed. That fits my story. So what are you disagreeing with now? So Len could tell the kid to get a book. Oh, he wouldn't likely do that. He'd go into one of his Foghorn Lenhorn pontifications. Or he could drag out a box of out of band QSL cards... Which according to your comment above, a book just isn't going to give sufficient information to be able to answer questions about amateur radio. A book can provide information to an extent. A book can provide everything needed to become an amateur. No good golfer became one by reading a book. No good fisherman became one by reading a book. Would you like to add a few more non-radio related categories to your list? No good radio op became one by reading a book. Now you wish to qualify your statement with the word, "good," and change the subject matter from amateur radio operator to undifferentiated radio operator. You have substantially changed the subject matter. Previously, the subject was a young, unlicensed person wanted to know about Amateur Radio. Have it your way. One can become licensed in amateur radio simply by reading a -single- book and taking an exam. Unless you are saying that those PCTA's who told me so are liars. Practice and experience are the keys. Of course, now that you've substantially changed the subject. Len has neither. Above you say, "No good radio op became one by reading a book." You don't differentiate between amateur radio operators and military radio operators. Using your changed subject matter, Len has plenty of book reading, training, practice, and experience. I might add that he also has formal education in the subject matter. You guys play both ends against the middle, and now that you've worked down to the middle, your arguments fail because they are contradictory. Go argue with yourself. You, K8MN, are shucking and jiving. I'd say that they appear contradictory to you, "William", because you don't fully understand them. Of course. Heil knows all. He is the very definition of Omniscient. And all others are ignorant. "You don't need a former military weatherman to know which way the wind blows" Apparently, you do. I'd suggest you stop ****ing in the wind. Best of Luck. |
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: The Game's Afoot! From: (Len Over 21) Date: 6/22/2004 4:26 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Poor nursie. Never been involved with the larger world of radio, only other amateurs and posturing, always FIGHTING. I've been in the larger world of radio for half a century. Radio is not a magical mystery to me nor is communications of any sort by visual or audible means, Why does it always have to be about you, Len? It could be about your forgetfulness, but then there wouldn't be much discussion, would there? Radio amateurs are free to seek out information about the "larger world of radio" in any number of venues. And Len disagrees? You ought to take it up with Steve as he refuses to seek out information about the "larger world of radio," specifically MARS in which he claims to be a participant. Many radio amateurs have been or are participants in the "larger world of radio". One in particular also participates in MARS and CAP communications, but apparently has never been trained. He cannot differentiate between the Amateur Service and MARS, repeatedly backing his statement that "MARS IS Amateur Radio." Hi, hi! If you'd like to impress us, obtain an amateur radio license of any class and regale us with those tales. What tales? Steely-eyed FCC examiners? Taking an exam on a lark, without studying, scoring perfectly, in under 8 minutes, and collecting $200 for passing go? Naw, sounds too much like PCTA tales. |
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Dave Heil writes: Why does it always have to be about you, Len? About "me?!?" Yeah, Len, about you. Why'd you snip the crud about your vast experience? Herr Robust getting adalpated again. Too many oriongasms? Who is "Herr Robust"? Nursie all obsessed with hating me...has to bring me up in usual barf messages nearly all the time. Are you getting as bad as nursie? [if so, get help pronto...] Who is "Nursie"? Radio amateurs are free to seek out information about the "larger world of radio" in any number of venues. Feel free. So, when are you going to do that? Probably after you get your "Extra right out of the box". Many radio amateurs have been or are participants in the "larger world of radio". I've worked with some of those longer than herr robust has been a ham. Wonderful. Now if you'd only been a ham as long as I've been a ham... They not behave like Big Dave, the officious pompous authoritity figure telling all what to do and how to do it. You must have me confused with yourself, Big Len. You're all officious. You're certainly pompous and long-winded and you've spent years here attempting to outline how amateur radio should be regulated. Fact is, you have nothing to do with amateur radio. If you'd like to impress us, obtain an amateur radio license of any class and regale us with those tales. "Impressing" big dave is NOT in my life's plan. :-) Then you'll likely want to knock off the countless retellings of your fifty years experience in whatever. Big Dave can only be impressed by looking at his own image in a mirror. :-) I beg to differ. I'm impressed by a great many people, both famous and unknown. You didn't make the list. Dave K8MN |
Len Over 21 wrote:
[he might find out that there's been an electronics world definition of "software" and "firmware" and "hardware" for over three decades...but never saw it in QST so therefore doesn't apply] I provided a definition from several sources, even providing the urls so you could confirm those definitions on your own. You continue to argue the point in the face of cold, hard fact. You're simply wrong, Bozoo. Heil wastes everyone's time. :-) You aren't everyone and you have nothing but time. Dave K8MN |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com