Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmmmmmmmm.......
Just came back from a 2 day out-of-town assignment to find 126 RRAP messages pending. When I did the math on the one's that WEREN'T in the filter file, over 70 of the posts were from one of three posters...WA8ULX, Lennie or Brain. Theya re the only three I have filered. That way I can read the meaningful stuff first. WA8ULX was NOT in any of the posts, except by mention of another. That put all 72 in the laps of Lennie and Brain. Why do I make mention of this? Probably because it's Lennie who insists that no one here posts "on subject" and only post to "do battle". Interesting, considering his flagrant, frequent attacks on "Jimmy", "der Oberst" ,"Dill Sergeant", "Mama Dee" and others. The other is because last month Brain stated others "can't help yourself, you have to respond...". Guess they have a hard time with objectivity, not that we had any doubts. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting?
From: (William) Date: 9/16/2004 5:14 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... Just for starters. Actually I've lost track of how many different names Len has made up for me. Seems he just can't bring himself to call me "Jim" or "N2EY", even though I call him "Len" or "Mr. Anderson". I can call you Jim. Doesn't matter because you don't like my message. But Len and Biran get you to call them "Putz", "Loser", "Brain" and "PuppetBoy", just for starters. Which is probably their entire game, really. Ahem, that's "Brian." And we don't "get him to call us" anything. Steve does so on the free volition of any number of his various personalities. Oh, I have no "various personalities", Brian. Just K4YZ. Not any one of several different screen names or nomme-de-guerre, such as yourself, Brian. The other is because last month Brain stated others "can't help yourself, you have to respond...". Prove him wrong. Please do. It'll be a first. Guess they have a hard time with objectivity, not that we had any doubts. Of course. So why play their game? I can be Quiteobjective. Try me with some rational discourse. More like "Quiteobjectionable", Brian. And try the "rational discourse" yourself. Start with some validation of your "Unlicensed services play a major role in emergency comms" assertion. Steve, K4YZ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another classic example of how pure democracy doesn't work because there're
so many idiots (greek for 'non-officeholder) out there...for what it (isn't) worth... LJD "Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message ... Subject: Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? From: (William) Date: 9/16/2004 5:14 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... Just for starters. Actually I've lost track of how many different names Len has made up for me. Seems he just can't bring himself to call me "Jim" or "N2EY", even though I call him "Len" or "Mr. Anderson". I can call you Jim. Doesn't matter because you don't like my message. But Len and Biran get you to call them "Putz", "Loser", "Brain" and "PuppetBoy", just for starters. Which is probably their entire game, really. Ahem, that's "Brian." And we don't "get him to call us" anything. Steve does so on the free volition of any number of his various personalities. Oh, I have no "various personalities", Brian. Just K4YZ. Not any one of several different screen names or nomme-de-guerre, such as yourself, Brian. The other is because last month Brain stated others "can't help yourself, you have to respond...". Prove him wrong. Please do. It'll be a first. Guess they have a hard time with objectivity, not that we had any doubts. Of course. So why play their game? I can be Quiteobjective. Try me with some rational discourse. More like "Quiteobjectionable", Brian. And try the "rational discourse" yourself. Start with some validation of your "Unlicensed services play a major role in emergency comms" assertion. Steve, K4YZ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
Seems to me that the PCTA code lovers should be on their radios happily beeping away...instead of sitting at keyboards snarling nastygrams at any NCTA within sight or hearing. :-) It really doesn't mean diddly squat what it seems to you that radio amateurs should be doing. You aren't one of them. They can operate or not. They can use morse code or not. They can post here or not. You, on the other hand, have little to do but post--what do you call them--nastygrams?--in a newsgroup dealing with something in which you play no part. :-) The tired, old, incontinent California landshark can't help being what he is. Keep a stiff dorsal fin! Dave K8MN |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message ... Just for starters. Actually I've lost track of how many different names Len has made up for me. Seems he just can't bring himself to call me "Jim" or "N2EY", even though I call him "Len" or "Mr. Anderson". I can call you Jim. Doesn't matter because you don't like my message. But Len and Biran get you to call them "Putz", "Loser", "Brain" and "PuppetBoy", just for starters. Which is probably their entire game, really. Ahem, that's "Brian." And we don't "get him to call us" anything. Steve does so on the free volition of any number of his various personalities. The other is because last month Brain stated others "can't help yourself, you have to respond...". Prove him wrong. Please do. It'll be a first. Guess they have a hard time with objectivity, not that we had any doubts. Of course. So why play their game? I can be Quiteobjective. Try me with some rational discourse. The PCTA's only "game" is that they've lost at validity of keeping a morse code test and try to "get back" at NCTA using all manner of personal insults and denigrations. I've seen it. "Rational discourse" to the PCTA means having to like morse code...anyplace, anytime. Speak the least thing negative about morse code and the PCTA immediately go ballistic, holler and shout that NCTA are "insulting their honor" (or whatever they bitch about du jour). Boils down to that in here. Seems to me that the PCTA code lovers should be on their radios happily beeping away...instead of sitting at keyboards snarling nastygrams at any NCTA within sight or hearing. :-) Hi hi. I just read a David Heil post where he thinks you shouldn't suggest anything. But I can recall post after post after post scolding me for spending my spare time on RRAP rather than with a code practice oscillator. These guys are PCTA, and exhibit the PCTA double-standard at every opportunity. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? From: (William) Date: 9/16/2004 5:14 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... Just for starters. Actually I've lost track of how many different names Len has made up for me. Seems he just can't bring himself to call me "Jim" or "N2EY", even though I call him "Len" or "Mr. Anderson". I can call you Jim. Doesn't matter because you don't like my message. But Len and Biran get you to call them "Putz", "Loser", "Brain" and "PuppetBoy", just for starters. Which is probably their entire game, really. Ahem, that's "Brian." And we don't "get him to call us" anything. Steve does so on the free volition of any number of his various personalities. Oh, I have no "various personalities", Brian. You must. Just K4YZ. Not any one of several different screen names or nomme-de-guerre, such as yourself, Brian. Who is K4CAP? The other is because last month Brain stated others "can't help yourself, you have to respond...". Prove him wrong. Please do. It'll be a first. Guess they have a hard time with objectivity, not that we had any doubts. Of course. So why play their game? I can be Quiteobjective. Try me with some rational discourse. More like "Quiteobjectionable", Brian. And try the "rational discourse" yourself. Start with some validation of your "Unlicensed services play a major role in emergency comms" assertion. Steve, K4YZ I was talking to Jim. Sorry, Steve, but you you've blown it in the rational discourse department. Try it with someone else. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
William wrote:
I just read a David Heil post where he thinks you shouldn't suggest anything. Then you misread it. But I can recall post after post after post scolding me for spending my spare time on RRAP rather than with a code practice oscillator. Post after post, huh? I think your memory is a bit dim. These guys are PCTA, and exhibit the PCTA double-standard at every opportunity. You've tried to sell this sway-backed horse of a tale for quite some time. Dave K8MN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Money just for posting | Digital | |||
Money just for posting | Digital | |||
Who peed in the pool? | Policy | |||
Guidelines for posting to this newsgroup? | Boatanchors | |||
rsgb now posting their fantastic $2 membership offer | Antenna |