![]() |
Randy A. Hefner wrote:
The problem with many (not all) ham radio operators is that they think they own the frequencies assigned to them and they have a "right" to use them. Neither is true! In one sense we hams all "own the ham band frequencies", ie, the FCC allocated them for us to use. But no one ham has exclusive right to any one frequency. You first check that the frequency is clear, then use it, then when you're done give it up for others to use. |
Also, Baxter is a felonious lawbreaker. He's a criminal and a punk. No more...No less. Aside from violating a few FCC part 97 rules, what did he do? |
"Charles Brabham" wrote This is because CW uses prosigns and abbreviations (such as the Q-Code) which mean the same thing world wide regardless of language. Now, what other mode allows you to do that? Pretty much any mode. The "Q-code" is the same in CW, spoken, ASCII, Baudot, or even waved with semaphore flags. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
"Alun" wrote in message ... "Randy A. Hefner" wrote in : The problem with many (not all) ham radio operators is that they think they own the frequencies assigned to them and they have a "right" to use them. Neither is true! Randy KD4OWL "Psychiatrist to Hams" wrote in message ... "HammComm" wrote in message . com... K1MAN does it he's a jammer and a lid. W1AW does it it's a service to the amateur radio community. Hams are hypocrites, just little whiners who got their asses kick at school everyday now they think they're something. Hams like to whine & cry. To wit: -A.M. guys whined & cried about how sideband was the ruin of ham radio. -Incentive licensing ruined ham radio. -No code licenses will ruin ham radio. -ARRL is ruining ham radio. -KV4FZ will ruin ham radio. -K1MAN will ruin ham radio. -(this space reserved for future whining & crying.) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.802 / Virus Database: 545 - Release Date: 11/26/2004 This whole thread so far seems like a troll, but if it is it's not really working, because you're right. There is a large contingent of hams who don't want anything to change, ever. For a technology based hobby that's a seriously weird POV, as the whole basis of technology is change itself. Change is as inevitable as death and taxes. FWIW, I have no problem with K1MAN, as I don't see much difference between his bulletins and those of W1AW. The only differences are of the same order as those between, say, ABC and CBS. The remedy is also the same, i.e. if you don't like one or the other, change the channel/frequency. The international requirement for a code test had a beginning and an end. It began in 1927, and ended in 2003. It wasn't there at the beginning of the hobby, and it's not there now. It's a pity that the FCC will take so long to do anything about it, but they will. Hopefully then this issue will go the same way as spark and AM. 73 de Alun, N3KIP The issue can't go the same as spark and AM as these two activities went different directions. Spark is simply not allowed due to the fact that it chews up so much spectrum. On the other hand AM is still allowed and has developed into a niche subhobby of ham radio. While the code test may go away, I doubt if code will be forbidden. And due to its usefulness, it's unlikely to descend to the small niche that AM has. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
"Steve Robeson K4YZ" wrote in message ... Subject: amateur radio hypocrites From: "KØHB" Date: 12/3/2004 1:07 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Steve Robeson K4YZ" wrote Again with the profanities, Hans? Bull****. Unless you engage in religious worship males bovines, the word isn't profane. Sure is is. No it is merely a vulgarity not a profanity. Unfortunately people confuse the difference between the two. They are only approximately synonymous not exactly synonymous. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Subject: amateur radio hypocrites
From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 12/3/2004 5:41 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Steve Robeson K4YZ" wrote in message ... Subject: amateur radio hypocrites From: "KØHB" Date: 12/3/2004 1:07 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Steve Robeson K4YZ" wrote Again with the profanities, Hans? Bull****. Unless you engage in religious worship males bovines, the word isn't profane. Sure is is. No it is merely a vulgarity not a profanity. Unfortunately people confuse the difference between the two. They are only approximately synonymous not exactly synonymous. I dare you to say it over your Amateur Radio station knowing that the FCC is monitoring, Dee. I consider it profane, approximately or otherwise, and so does Uncle. Please use your assigned callsign, and make sure you remind all listeners that it's "merely" vulgar, and not "profane". I am sure they will be impressed as they write out the citation. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
"Steve Robeson K4YZ" wrote I dare you to say it over your Amateur Radio station knowing that the FCC is monitoring, Dee. I consider it profane, approximately or otherwise, and so does Uncle. Please use your assigned callsign, and make sure you remind all listeners that it's "merely" vulgar, and not "profane". I am sure they will be impressed as they write out the citation. First, this newsgroup isn't Amateur Radio and FCC doesn't give a rats ass what we write here. Second, even though "profane" or even "vulgar" language is in bad taste on Amateur Radio, it is not illegal so no citation has been (nor would be) issued for "profane" or "vulgar". Obscenity would get you a citation, but bull**** is not on the famous "7 words" list. Sunuvagun! 73, de Hans, K0HB --- The good old days ain't what they used to be, but then again, they never were. |
"robert casey" wrote in message k.net... Randy A. Hefner wrote: The problem with many (not all) ham radio operators is that they think they own the frequencies assigned to them and they have a "right" to use them. Neither is true! In one sense we hams all "own the ham band frequencies", ie, the FCC allocated them for us to use. But no one ham has exclusive right to any one frequency. You first check that the frequency is clear, then use it, then when you're done give it up for others to use. We did encounter one looney a few years ago who said a certain repeater output was his frequency. It had been given to him by somebody he named (a name that none of us had ever heard). He stepped on our QSOs, using his own, real callsign, for a few hours and then no more. Padded cell time, maybe. "Sal" |
Hans has a point, there. - But like most folks, I don't skate around the edges of the law while on the air; preferring to have a bit of cushion there. A little extra civility while on the air is a very good policy in my opinion, law or no law. Charles, N5PVL "KØHB" wrote in message k.net... "Steve Robeson K4YZ" wrote I dare you to say it over your Amateur Radio station knowing that the FCC is monitoring, Dee. I consider it profane, approximately or otherwise, and so does Uncle. Please use your assigned callsign, and make sure you remind all listeners that it's "merely" vulgar, and not "profane". I am sure they will be impressed as they write out the citation. First, this newsgroup isn't Amateur Radio and FCC doesn't give a rats ass what we write here. Second, even though "profane" or even "vulgar" language is in bad taste on Amateur Radio, it is not illegal so no citation has been (nor would be) issued for "profane" or "vulgar". Obscenity would get you a citation, but bull**** is not on the famous "7 words" list. Sunuvagun! 73, de Hans, K0HB --- The good old days ain't what they used to be, but then again, they never were. |
Subject: amateur radio hypocrites
From: "KØHB" Date: 12/3/2004 6:28 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: t "Steve Robeson K4YZ" wrote I dare you to say it over your Amateur Radio station knowing that the FCC is monitoring, Dee. I consider it profane, approximately or otherwise, and so does Uncle. Please use your assigned callsign, and make sure you remind all listeners that it's "merely" vulgar, and not "profane". I am sure they will be impressed as they write out the citation. First, this newsgroup isn't Amateur Radio and FCC doesn't give a rats ass what we write here. I guess you're just too busy looking for an opportunity to be the bully to ead what was wrote. Go back and re-read what was written, Hans. The stop being an idiot...IF you can. Second, even though "profane" or even "vulgar" language is in bad taste on Amateur Radio, it is not illegal so no citation has been (nor would be) issued for "profane" or "vulgar". Sure it does. Obscenity would get you a citation, but bull**** is not on the famous "7 words" list. Doesn't matter what list it may or may not be on, Hans. Lesser profanites have earned the FCC's ire. Mere description of the sex act, sans graphic language has earned citations. Sunuvagun! Sunuvagun yourself, Hans. Now...Get out of the bully mode, try and understand that not everyone is overly impressed with your underwhelming knowledge. Cussing louder and more frequently does NOT make you more easily understood...It just makes you look like a foul mouthed old man who's frustrated with his waning ability to hold a person's attention just by being overbearing and abusive. Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com