Dave Heil wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

N9OGL wrote:

Again you are violating of Copyright Law

You are as unknowledgeable about copyright law as you are about
communications law.


I wouldn't bet on it if I was you....



I'd bet the ranch on it, Todd. It is possible for anyone to copyright
original material. It is not possible to copyright original material
posted to a newsgroup.


I hold a number of copyrights


I'll bet you've held some copyrights. You've likely held "Reader's
Digest" and "QST". You have apparently have copyrights which aren't
copyrighted and inventions which haven't been invented. You know all
about packet BBS software but you don't know how to set it up. Oh, and
you're the president and CEO of a broadcasting company which has only
pirate outlets. Are there other employees or are you the president, CEO
and janitor? Do you have offices or is your company headquartered in a
bedroom in your parents home?

You seem to have a tough time with reality, Todd.

Dave K8MN

http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...tion/about.htm

States that a ham with a vanity call of N9FU (no profanity intended)
established this pirate broadcasting company with him!

N9OGL wrote:
Again you are violating of Copyright Law

Who's violating what, bugbrain?

You won't cite your attributions, so who's to tell who you are
talling to...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:

And didn't cite attributiosn...AGAIN!

WHAT AN IDIOT!

(K4YZ)...Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal laws....

K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?!

(K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or
remain a
licensee.

(K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or
remain a
licensee

What I was refering to was PART 15 DEVICES.

BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! !

"Mr. #### the FCC" is now snivveling away under the scrutiny of a
REAL FCC attorney!

Your "Part 15 devices" do NOT run more than 100mw, Todd!

Every one of your posts cites devices running at least 10 watts
with your expressed intent to go to 100 or more!

C O W A R D ! ! ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

And didn't cite attributiosn...AGAIN!

WHAT AN IDIOT!

(K4YZ)...Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal
laws....

K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?!

(K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or
remain a
licensee.

(K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or
remain a
licensee

What I was refering to was PART 15 DEVICES.


BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! !

"Mr. #### the FCC" is now snivveling away under the scrutiny of a
REAL FCC attorney!

Your "Part 15 devices" do NOT run more than 100mw, Todd!

Every one of your posts cites devices running at least 10 watts
with your expressed intent to go to 100 or more!

Accually, Part 15 depends on Frequency, 100mw can be ran on the AM
broadcast Band, on 160 to 190 I believe is 1 watt, at 13MHZ part 15 is
10,000 Microvolts per meter at 30 meters, on the FM Broadcast Band it
250 microvolts per meter @ 30 meters, and on Some frequencies it's high
on other's it low. for more information goto:

http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineeri...3/oet63rev.pdf

Todd N9OGL

C O W A R D ! ! ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ

Dave Heil wrote:

More of our r.r.a.p. Tom Swift, gleaned from the archives:

from alt.sci.time-travel

Todd Daugherty
Jun 26 2003, 7:24 pm

I've have this Idea for a "simple" Time Machine. A operator would set up
a
computer up to a high power wireless system. They would then set the
computer to transmit a message say in 30 years and hope that in thirty
years someone would reply back. comments?

Todd Daugherty N9OGL

Sounds more like stuff that a 10 year old would think up.

K4YZ wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

More of our r.r.a.p. Tom Swift, gleaned from the archives:

from alt.sci.time-travel

Todd Daugherty
Jun 26 2003, 7:24 pm

I've have this Idea for a "simple" Time Machine. A operator would set

up

a
computer up to a high power wireless system. They would then set the
computer to transmit a message say in 30 years and hope that in

thirty

years someone would reply back. comments?

Todd Daugherty N9OGL
Amateur Radio Operator


As absolutely assinine as this is, did he HAVE to use his callsign
and "Amateur Radio Operator" in the signature line?

Does he not think that if this would have worked, we would have
already gotten messages from "the future"...?!?!

Do ANY "time travel" proponents not think that if time travel
worked, we wouldn't have seen some evidence of it already?

(SNIPPAGE)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

this from alt.radio.pirate, in which Todd assists a new "pirate" in
breaking the law. Note that Todd's media empire has expanded to

cover

three towns:

n9ogl
Jan 2 2001, 6:12 pm

There are many places on the internet where you can find kits for
shorwave transmitter kits. If you can't find it under shortwave kits

try

under amateur radio. The hams have a number ofshortwave bands. You

can

all sorts of Ham kits for the shortwave band. As for what's the best
band I would say somewhere in the 6MHz range. 7Mhz is too crowded

with

hams and high power shortwave broadcast.

Todd Daugherty N9OGL
President
LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION
107.9 F.M. LPFM
Taylorville, Langleyville, Hewittville
http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...ion/index.html


-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal laws....

K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?!


from alt.radio.pirate, Todd explains that being a TV "pirate" isn't

all

it is cracked up to be:


n9ogl
Jul 27 2000, 12:00 am

I agree with that.....I ran a ten watt pirate TV station there for a
while. After 3 blocks there was no signal at all.I gave up trying to
get it to go farther, so i'm going to try my luck with LPFM which the


window is suppose to open at the end of august.maybe I'll have better


luck with it.

Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL


Maybe someone in "alt.pirate" looked up "N9OGL" and realized that
he was lying about his name...Then wonder what else he's lying about.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------

another from alt.radio.pirate. In this one, Todd's plans to up his
"pirate" TV power to 100w. He uses an ATV transmitter converted to
channel 14 and has issues over the use of three "fowl words":

n9ogl
Apr 7 2000, 12:00 am show options


Hello John,

I had to respond to your letter. You do have to run a lot of

depending

on your range it can run from 10 watts to 100 watts. The reason is
because you are pushing a six MHz wide signal instead of a 10 KHz

wide

signal. My pirate TV station running at ten watts but we aren't

getting

the distance we really want so we are raising the power output to 100


watts.


Admission of violation of FCC rules and regulations...and he
wonders why he's not a broadcast licensee....

Another question for K2ASP...Phil, isn't this yet ANOTHER
disqualifying act?

Can't we bring this to the Commission's attention and see if we
can't get him off of Amateur Radio too...???

(Some more snippage to....)


Here On of the programs I was trying
to air on public access wasn't allowed to air because of three fowl
words (two hell's and one dam) The cable company refused to air it;
unless I did a "complete editing" of the content. (in other words

they

wanted the program to be edited in half because it contained

"obscenity"

anyway...there my two cents. I run a Low power pirate TV station and
I'm not under anyones control execpt my own.
(sorry for any grammar or spelling)


Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....

His motivation for getting on the air is

(1) to watch people swearing while having sex,

(2) use profanity himself (even spelled wrong...Nothing more
humiliating that an ignorant man trying to express himself profanely
that can't even spell it correctly!)

(3) Expresses his complete lack of belief that just because he is
operating illegally that he's not responsible to federal regulations


Todd O'Dochartaigh
WLPS-TV channel 14
Taylorville, Illinois


Then can't even spell his own last name correctly.

(More snippage.....)


------------------------------------------------------------------------

This priceless gem comes from alt.sci.physics.new-theories:

n9ogl
Aug 29 1999, 12:00 am


Hello

To start, I would like to excused for the poor typing of this text.

I'm

not very good with grammar nor am I with spelling.

1. Objects and Time
In the small community of Taylorville; where I live there once was
a house known as Vanderveer House. It was once of course owned by the


Vanderveer family. in the 1980's the house was totally destroyed and

a

Wal-Mart was put in it place. The question is this Is the Vanderveer
house still there after being destroyed back in the 1980's The Answer

is

But it isn't in this "Time Frames". Basic physics dicatates "that no

two

object can occupy the same space at the same point in time" however

the

second part should go something like this "but, two object can occupy


the same space at different points in time" What most people see as
ghost or shadows from the past might be where the time frames are

close

enough that they can see both way. Time is a mesurement, which we
measure by either clock or by "cause and effect" By cause and effect

I'm

of course refering to events with history. for example many people

can

remember events from their tenth birthday. So when you think of time

or

a object like a building or a love one perhaps you should look at it
fourth dimensional.


This isn't even bad science fiction, let alone "physics".....


2. Radio Waves

Since the complete comercialization of radio the study of what
radio is and how they travel remain somewhat a complexing mystery.


Only Todd would think that radio wave propagation is some sort of
"complexing mystery".


Some say that radio waves travel through "aether"


No, some don't. At least not since the 1920's.


But what radio waves are is a fourth dimensional and interdimensional

wave.

He should be slapped just for the grammatical abuses.


Radio waves are fourth
dimensional because they can transcend time. radio waves which travel

at

a speed of 3.00 X 10/8 ms-1 or 186,000 mps for a radio wave

everything

around it is going slow time has in fact slow down for it. radio I
believe are also interdimensional because a radio wave is "wormhole"

it

way through not only time but space as well.


Living IN a "wormhole" probably gives one the opinion that
anything that you can't reach out and touch is from a wormhole too.


radio wave could also
punching through "parallel universes". if that the case you might ask


why can't we hear messages from other Parallel worlds? because their
Qunta is different to are universe. just because some is one way in

one

universe doesn't by no mean make it work in another universe. So we
can't them nor can they hear us.


"Qunta"...?!?! "are universe"...?!?!


3. life on other planets

i have heard from both sides about life on "other planets" and i've
deiced to write on it.


You NEED to "deice", Toddie! Maybe soon?


there is some theory about what is need for life
on other planets. well throw that away. it don't mean squat. humans

try

to embelish this idea on how life is formed and how it is to operated

on

other planets. all the theorist on this little planet can come up

with

all the little theories about that they want. the bottom line is that


human are basing other life on other planet on are own worthless
existance Don't; life through evoultion can adapt it self to a
enviroment without the need of air, water, food or sunlight.


BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

W H A T A M O R O N ! ! ! ! ! ! !


well that's it for now....some of theses idea i've been working on

for a

long time i have more stranger ideas that maybe sometime in the

future I

will post. What do you think???


It get's S T R A N G E R ?!?!?!?!?! GOD FORBID!


Again sorry for any spelling or poor grammar.


Lessee...This piece was dated August 1999. He knew THEN he had
spelling and grammar deficiencies, yet six years later he's not done a
single thing about it!

Snippage again...

If moronic behaviour was transmissible, I'd be lobotomizing myself
about now!


-------------------------------------------------------------------------

This series, from alt.radio.pirate is classic Todd:

daughert
Apr 2 2001, 6:10 pm

Beretta wrote:


On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 19:49:18 -0500, daughert



wrote:


WHERE'S THAT HOMEPAGE THAT YOU CAN FAX JOHN MCCAIN
TODD

Your caps lock key seems to be broken. I suggest you replace your

keyboard

PGP Key: 0x194DF369
Fingerprint: B777 DB2A FB11 55FA 509D CE63 F3DE D665 194D F369

NO I'M F--KING ****ED OFF AND RIGHT NOW YOU DON'T REALLY WANT TO F--K


WITH ME. I'M GOING TO EMAIL OR FAX THAT SON OF A BITCH MCCAIN AND

TELL

THAT DUMB F--K OFF ALONG WITH THOSE BUTTF--KERS FCC....NO ONE F--K'S

ME

OUT OF A LICENSE FOR THE SEVENTH TIME
TODD

(and)

daughert
Apr 2 2001, 7:24 pm

here the letter I sent to McCain.....

Subject: LPFM
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 21:15:17 -0500
From: daughert
To:

Senator McCain,

I am writing you in regards to the FCC New Report and Order dealing
with LPFM (FCC O1-100) in it my groups application was dismissed
because on form 318 was said yes to a question dealing with

unlicensed

broadcast; which I will talk about in a minute. The reason we did

this

by saying yes was simply put to tell the truth and not perform

purgery

which is a Federal offence.


He's functionally illiterate, admits to violating federal law, and
sends it to one of the most powerful Senators in the United States.

I'm impressed.


The reason we said yes is a looong story.


Uhhhhhhhh...could it be because the proper answer WAS "yes"...?!?!

How long a story could that be?


It started in the late ninties. I had appplied for a Low Power
Television license. I applied for this license six times and each

time

I applied my application was returned sometimes for the dumbest

things

like they sent one back because They said I would have to have FAA
approval for my tower. The tower was only 60 ft up....under FAA and

FCC

anything below 200ft doesn't require FAA approval.


Unless you're within certain distances of other FAA or FCC
facilities.


the next was I had
to pay the licensing FEE although my group is a Non-profit

orginization

and it was stated on the application that it was.


Perhaps it had sometig to do with the lack of articles of
organization and proper IRS documentation of non-profit status...?!?!


Then there was the main
thing.....that I didn't file it through a "filling windows" yet

when I

asked when it was they wouldn't tell me and to top it off they were
granting construction permits for Low Power Television. bottom line
they
didn't want a small orginization like us to have a license.


I guess it didn't have anything to do with filing incorrectly,
failing to meet licensure criteria, failure to meet technical criteria,
and complete lack of faith that you'd be a credible and trustworthy
licensee...?!?!


So after
applying six times for a licenses for Low power TV and said the hell


with it and began running a low power TV station without a license.


Uhhhhh...Yup! You go R I G H T A H E A D and tell that Senator
that you violated federal law and then expect him to come to your aid!


My signal although was putting out 10 watts only went one to two

street

blocks. I did it simply because the FCC wouldn't license me and

because

some people and congress don't care. I broadcast for two months
december
and january after that my transmitter went out.


Thank God for small favors, eh?


I was never caught nor
fined by the FCC yet these new ruling states simply that it dosen't
matter. well Senator I come to the conclusion that the FCC once

again

has screwed me and my group out of a license and like always I type
these letters to a group of congress that don't seem to care.


LOVE IT! All of the above and THEN he accuses the Senator of being
apathetic! I know that would motivate ME to help him out!


So my
group and I are going to go on the air without a license because

were

sick of being screwed by the FCC, were sick of doing the hard work

to

fill out thoses applications and we might even sue the FCC and you

all

for all trouble and trama they've caused me and my group

Todd E Daugherty N9OGL
CEO/PRESIDENT
Langley Park Telecommunication

(and, after some commented on his lack of language skills, our
state-tested-high-IQ pirate broadcaster wrote)

daughert
Apr 3 2001, 3:58 pm

hey f--k you all I have a Learning disability so F--K YOU

ASSHOLES!!!!

624 East Maincross
Taylorville, Illinois 62568
AMATEUR OPERATOR, RESTRICED PERMIT OPERATOR


Like I said....

WHAT IS IT with Illinois and functionally illiterate clods...?!?!


-------------------------------------------------------------------------

this from alt.radio.broadcasting:

n9ogl
Dec 18 2000, 9:12 am

...At any rate I know I got F--K out of a
license, again for the seventh time. So I'm done messing with the FCC


and going back to do what I do best Pirating....So much for the so
called "Legal way" The Congress and this hell hole we call a country


can kiss my Ass and to that dumbass Eddie Fritts I hope someday you
choke on you own jucies and die! As for the FCC well boys I done

being

F--ked by you so S--K IT!!!!

LATER
Todd O'Dohartaigh
CEO/PRESIDENT
Langley Park Telecommunication


Guess that's how we came to be sooooooooooooooooooooooooo lucky as
to be violated by this junior wannabe broadcaster...

And he wonders why, after all of the profanities, threats, and
admissions of guilt to violations of the Communications Act tha the FCC
won't "reconsider" his applicaitions.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's another from alt.sci.physics.new-theories

n9ogl
May 28 2000, 12:00 am


Hello,

There has in the past about time travel and the possiblity of going
back
and forth in time. Some scientist (and in my humble opinion i uses

that

term lossly) believe that traveling down a black hole or through a
black
hole could lead to the past, the future or perhaps parallel

universes.

that's if you can get pass the gravational field of a black hole not

to

mention the huge amounts of radiation a black hole omittes. Some
suggest
going faster then the speed of light (FTL) after all a takon

particle

can go faster the speed of light. but, alast, this idea is not thing
but
that a idea. I myself have come up with many ideas on the possiblity

of

Time Travel. One of these ideas is so possible that with the

techonolgy

today makes it very possible. I believe we will never be able to

time

travel areselves but, i beleive it is possible to send a message to

the

future by means of the combination of computer techonolgy and radio
communication. the idea is simple take a computer hook it to a

wireless

modem and have it sit on a given radio frequency.wireless modems

called

Terminal Node Controls can be set to a certian time frame to

beacon.so

you set it to beacon 30 years into the future this instance tiem

travel

to the future. it will be however up tothe future how to respond

back.

Todd



-------------------------------------------------------------------------


I guess Todd never thought of writing a letter in the present time

and

leaving it lying around for thirty years. Perhaps he'd even be

around

to open it and to be able to read the words of a Todd thirty years in
the past. He'd still have the problem of how to respond to the Todd
thirty years in the past.

That's Part II of the report from fantasy land. Is there anyone

still

wondering why Todd wasn't issued a license for a broadcast station?


Not me! And if I can talk the Mrs out of it, I am going to send
each of the Commissioners a dozen roses and a letter of apology on
bahalf of all Amateurs to Senator McCain.

73

Steve, K4YZ


Time travel isn't possible, if it were someone from the future would
have come back in time to tell us about it.

N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

And didn't cite attributiosn...AGAIN!

WHAT AN IDIOT!

(K4YZ)...Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal
laws....

K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?!

(K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become
or
remain a
licensee.

(K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or
remain a
licensee

What I was refering to was PART 15 DEVICES.



BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! !

"Mr. #### the FCC" is now snivveling away under the scrutiny of
a
REAL FCC attorney!

Your "Part 15 devices" do NOT run more than 100mw, Todd!

Every one of your posts cites devices running at least 10 watts
with your expressed intent to go to 100 or more!

Accually, Part 15 depends on Frequency, 100mw can be ran on the AM
broadcast Band, on 160 to 190 I believe is 1 watt, at 13MHZ part 15
is
10,000 Microvolts per meter at 30 meters, on the FM Broadcast Band it
250 microvolts per meter @ 30 meters, and on Some frequencies it's
high
on other's it low. for more information goto:


http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineeri...3/oet63rev.pdf

C O W A R D ! ! ! ! ! !

Oooooooh! A WATT at 160khz. Real quick, Mr Pirate Radio Engineer,
work out the ERP at that frequency based upon the antenna restrictions
for that allocation!

And your Part 15 ERP for the other HF allocations STILL works out
to less than an 1/8th to 1/10th of a watt no matter where you go!

But it STILL doesn't mask your illegal activities, specifically
promoting and facilitating unlicensed radio operation.

Idiot!

Steve, K4YZ

Hey, **** you Steve......Smart ass Ham Cop.

N9OGL wrote:
Hey, @@@@ you Steve......Smart ### Ham Cop.

Smarter than you, Todd...not that being smarter than you is any
kind of a challenge.

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL,

Copyright doesn't apply to "educational, discussions, ng posts etc" (It
applies only to websites, magazines, music, broadcasts etc) so therefore
IMHO any court in any democratic society would rule anything on a newsgroup,
to be public domain. Another example is the Metallica v Napster issue.
Whilst Metallica was succesful in having Napster made to comply with
copyright law, there is nothing Metallica can do legally to stop me and my
band playing "Enter Sandman" in the pub. If I was to sell this music
afterwards on CD-for a profit-then I would be obliged to pay Metallica
royalties. Further, for you to sue anyone for breach of copyright, you must
first prove it was at a financial loss to yourself (or company) and that the
person 'stealing' it is making money from it. As it's Amateur Radio,
'without pecuniary interests,' you, nor anyone else can claim to be making
money from/or losing money from something involving Amateur Radio.

Anything transmitted or done about amateur radio belongs, by default, to
every licensed amateur in the world, not me, not you or anyone else.

Only if someone takes your news bulletin, edits it a little and replays it,
you may have a chance, provided the broadcast was on commercial bands
(otherwise laws of commerce such as copyright don't apply). If you use the
amateur band for your bulletin, then under copyright & amateur laws, the
court would rule there was no commercial interest in the copyright and that
by transmitting it on amateur bands you expected for it to be recorded and
replayed by others at a later date. (Otherwise it would be illegal for the
FCC/ACA to monitor and record ham transmissions), but anyone putting
anything out on non-commercial radio frequencies can not have 'a reasonable
expectation' of copyright. (This sounds like Down Under, a couple of UHF
CB'ers (477MHz) tried to sue someone for re-transmitting their audio on
27MHz, but guess what, "How could they expect privacy and copyright on a
public radio band?" and wasted all their money)

Whilst I sought permission from ARNewsline to re-transmit ARNewsLine on UHF
CB in Melbourne out of courtesy, Mr Pasternack said he appreciated the
courtesy, yet I could have started re-transmitting it without his
permission, but if AR News Line was on a commercial FM frequency then I
would have to enter into a commercial agreement with AR Newsline. Or if I
was to copy his website and claim it as 'mine', as the website is in a
commercial domain. The contents of the ARRL Handbook is copyright. If I
photocopy a band plan and give it to another ham I have not breached
copyright. If I upload the entire book to the web for all to use, I have
breached copyright, or re-print it and give it away.

Names, trademarks etc are "copyright" such as I own the copyright to the
magazine name "VicNews" ISSN 1038-6971, but that doesn't prevent teachers
and educators photocopying my magazine for their students, nor does it
prevent anyone here saying "I read in VicNews this week....this guy is
wrong". There is nothing I can do about it. Let's see, by your logic, if I
write here I hate Coca Cola, then Coca Cola could sue me for using their
brand name without permission!

Instead of wasting your time, effort & money on a pirate TV station,
fighting the FCC (our ACA isn't much better btw) why not volunteer your time
and expertise to the local community radio and television stations as I do?
Not only could you broadcast what you want, you could help save the
community station thousands of dollars by carrying out free maintained and
repairs. I leave my broadcasting to broadcast services and amateur to
amateur.

And two questions for US ppl on he 1) Why does the cable channel control
community television? In Melbourne UHF Ch 31 is community tv, and is run by
Melbourne's Uni's as an independent organisation.

2) Why does the ARRL handbook list cable channels on your free-to-air tv
bandplan. Yes, we have cable tv, but our system is ABC 2 (VK's BBC), HSV 7,
GTV 9, ATV 10, SBS 28 & UNI 31 on the normal tv (just plug an antenna into
the set and tune) plus cable via Coax (Fox only downunder). If I wanted to
do a show on Channel 31, I could, what's broadcast is up to Uni's Student
Union, not a tv company.

Perhaps by 'time travel' N9OGL is referring to the fact that when USA hams
QSOs with hams Down Under or in New Zealand you are speaking to us tommorow
and we are speaking to you yesterday

PS N9OGL: To run even a 10% successful television, print or radio
show/program/station/publication you must first learn that there is a
certain 'way' of operating broadcast to amateur, the 'hype' factor I call
it, but for this to be effective requires a well-spoken, educated,
grammatically correct (or incorrect on purpose for desired effects, not just
because you can't spell) (just watch your nightly news or listen to the
radio, not the content, but how that content is presented) (Almost all media
outlets use a book called a "Style Book" which maintains content and how
that content is presented for all media formats in that organisation)

Also, you'll need to get much better at punctuation, as punctuation is
expression. If you are one of those guys who at school read mono-tone then
you haven't a hope. Remember the kid that reads with expression (usually
resulting in getting teased and laughed at hi hi) usually go on to be radio
announcers, journalists, etc. And punctuation, grammar, spelling and
expression go hand in hand.

Example: (From "To Kill A Mocking Bird" by Harper Lee).

With Expression: "Jem heard me. HE THRUST HIS HEAD AROUND THE CONNECTING
DOOR. As he came to my bed Atticus's light flashed on. We stayed where we
were until it went off; we heard him turn over and we waited until he was
still again"

Without: "Jem heard me. He thrust his head around the connecting door. As he
came to my bed Atticus's light flashed on. We stayed where we were until it
went off; we heard him turn over and we waited until he was still again"

Also, I read in the posts about you 'getting upset' at the editing of the
context of your program. Rather than call it 'censorship', and complain, do
what any journalist worth his/her salt would do, re-word your show to still
have the same impact and meaning without the profanity.

You should also note, that NOT swearing is more effective THAN swearing.
Example: you start your show tonight and include lot's of 'hells' 'dams'
'****' etc, and people watch. Ten years down the track same thing. But, if
you didn't swear for ten years at all, then one day came on air and said
"This is bull****" it would be 200% more effective.

Who out there knows someone who never swears? How shocked are you when
"That's ####ed" come out of thier mouth, as opposed to someone who uses it
as every second word. The former has such an impact as most people will
interpret that as "He's really annoyed," "Whatever they did must have been
pretty bad for him to use the f word. Whereas in the latter, it's just
"There goes that gutter mouthed lout again"

Having worked, albiet briefly, for the Herald & Weekly Times (Rupert's first
company, and the one that started News Ltd & Fox) every employee is given a
book which contains information on how certain articles and other issues are
to be dealt with by the journalist. Example alright-those that allow this
word into our media will be made to write "all right" 1000 times. (p.16, HWT
Style Book, 8th Ed, 9/1990)

Listen to AR newsline, an example of 'the format'
"I'm Bill Pasternack W?ITF for Amateur Radio News Line"


This is a post from the future.........(Sent from VK 1438hrs AEST, Thursday
31 March 2005) (UTC: 0338hrs, Thursday 31 March 2005)
Looking forward to my next QSO with the past

Ashley Geelan
VK3HAG

Australian Radio Amateur & Stand-In Volunteer Radio Announcer @ Plenty
Valley FM 88.6FM Melbourne, Australia.

I, too will be starting an on-air news bulletin, two in fact. One on the
local community station, about amateur radio and a brief amateur bulletin
for amateurs only who can call in to the studio (when I'm there) via amateur
radio and go 'on air' with thier thoughts to help promote AR (instead of
using the phone). This won't happen until I have co-ordinated a frequency to
use with the local amateur club. Perhaps, N9OGL I could send/show you the
correct way to format/run a newscast of any description.

N9OGL, if you have an Echo or IRLP node nearby would you like me to connect
to it and give a demonstration on this. No point having a broadcast of any
description until you have the fundamentals in place-grammar, pronunciation,
spelling, don't bother, it's hard enough to capture a (any) audience with
these traits.

"Barry OGrady" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:04:29 GMT, Dave Heil wrote:

More of our r.r.a.p. Tom Swift, gleaned from the archives:

from alt.sci.time-travel

Todd Daugherty
Jun 26 2003, 7:24 pm

I've have this Idea for a "simple" Time Machine. A operator would set up
a computer up to a high power wireless system. They would then set the
computer to transmit a message say in 30 years and hope that in thirty
years someone would reply back. comments?

Its unlikely that your setup would still be functional 30 years from now.

Todd Daugherty N9OGL
Amateur Radio Operator

(and)

Todd Daugherty
Jun 26 2003, 10:44 pm

The Answer to your first question is yes. A computer hooked to a TNC
(which is a wireless modem) is set up with a timing system. Most
"Packet" software for wireless communication has a timer system in it.
It's part of the software. Why wait so long for the signal to transmit?
because you want to be able to send the signal to a time period where
high speed communication systems are in general uses.

The systems in use then may not be compatible.

Scientist are now
just experimenting with high speed communication devices. For a person
to send a signal back in time they would have to uses a high speed
communication devices. Just remember it is a lot easier to sent a
particle or a signal through time then it is human or an object.

Its impossible to send anything through time.

On your
second comment about time travel via the human brain. I believe not only
"time-travel" is possible via the human brain but I also believe while a
person is a sleep the electro-magnetic emissions of say your brain is
connected to the multi-you in every parallel universe. The only time
your able to view those other universes is while your Brainwaves are at
the lowest point of the spectrum (around 1 to 14 hz) This also might
explain
NDE.

No technology can overcome the fact that there is nowhere to travel to.

Todd N9OGL

(and)

snipped

Barry