Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BETA is gone from the consumer market, but there is some commerical
gear out there and is used by different groups including broadcasters, and public access groups. |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9OGL wrote: You didn't answer my question. Does the cable company NOT have control over thie own assets? Yes or no wil suffice nicenly, thank-you. The ONLY POWER A CABLE COMAPNY HAS OVER THE CONTENT IS THE AVABILITY OF THE CHANNEL( I.E. SET UP THE TIME THE PROGRAM IS TO AIR) AND THAT'S IT!!! Stop screaming and slow down. You already type like a fool and you only get worse when you act this way. I didn't say the FCC had jurisdiction, Todd. Please stay focused. I said that the COMMUNITIES have the right to determine the nature of the content in thier communities But it isn't the community that's the problem, it's a cable company that doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel. The cable company is IN the community (or close to it). Gee...You're right, Todd. Threre's one of those "dum### hams badmouthing people on USENET" right now! And PROOF of what I've been saying all along. Well steve if you weren't such an ###hole, perhaps I would treat you a little nicer. No problem, Todd. You're an immature, developmentally delayed adult, and I realize it. I keep prodding you in an attempt to get you to realize your own shortcomings, but you just respond with more screaming and more profanity. In other words, you prove my point. And I am sure if they knew what a swell guy you REALLY are, they wouldn't have bothered. I'm a hell a lot nicer then you think, again if your weren't an ###hole I would be a little nicer. I could care less HOW nice you could be. You're profane, immature and technically incompetent. Call ME all the names you care to, Todd...it WON'T change THOSE facts. And this pertains to your operation of illegal "broadcast stations" how? It don't, I was pointing out that the cable company has been in trouble with the city for repeative violation peoples free speech on the public access channel. And I say they are doing the community a favor by keeping a profane, immature, technically incompetent idiot away from public view. They are doing you a FAVOR Todd, but you keep trying to reprove that you are EXACTLY what everyone else says you are. Doesn't matter, Todd...LOX is not used as a refrigerant because it's an O X I D I Z E R. It makes things burn, in some cases very rapidly (please see any film clip of a Saturn 5 rocket ascending). And if you plan on using LOX A N Y W H E R E near an electrical source, you are introducing an I G N I T I O N source. Now, going back to ELEMENTARY SCHOOL scinence, guess what happens when you mix an oxidizer, an ignition source, and any FUEL...??? ok, then I'll use liquid Nitrogen then. It's only taken you three weeks to wake up to THAT error. Now if we can get you to work on the others...... I said your protocol is several developmental generations behind current technology. That's NOT untrue. The whole idea is to make an alternative system on the amateur bands but Nazi's like you try to stop new modes of communications on the amateur band. I am not a Nazi, Todd. And a "new mode of communications" that is several developmental generations BEHIND current technology is NOT what Amateur Radio needs. Steve, K4YZ |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let's have Toddy use LOX to cool a spark gap xmtr. He can use the
Tesla coil secondary @ 1.4MV and he can convert himself down to his level instead of getting all puffed up on here. |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: Obviously someone in Taylorville is unimpressed with your ability to meet community standards, Todd. First of ####ead...(SNIP) Gee...You're right, Todd. Threre's one of those "dum### hams badmouthing people on USENET" right now! And PROOF of what I've been saying all along. I happen to be a very very very old friend of the mayor of this community, before him it was my uncle who ran this town. (my family is very political) Obviously not political enough. I'm standing by, ready to assist in Todd's upcoming first political race. I have slogans for the bumperstickers all set to go: "Vote For Todd O'Dochertaigh, you f--king c--ksuckers!" or "A Vote For Todd Is A Vote For D--khead" Secondly the cable company has been in trouble with the mayors office because of this matter. Recently my group filed a complaint on behave of a small church who didn't want to start trouble. On "behalf", Todd. And I am sure if they knew what a swell guy you REALLY are, they wouldn't have bothered. The mind boggles at Todd speaking on behalf (or even behave) of any religious group. Dave K8MN |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N9OGL wrote:
Steve K4YZ wrote: Doesn't matter, Todd...LOX is not used as a refrigerant because it's an O X I D I Z E R. It makes things burn, in some cases very rapidly (please see any film clip of a Saturn 5 rocket ascending). And if you plan on using LOX A N Y W H E R E near an electrical source, you are introducing an I G N I T I O N source. Now, going back to ELEMENTARY SCHOOL scinence, guess what happens when you mix an oxidizer, an ignition source, and any FUEL...??? ok, then I'll use liquid Nitrogen then. I hear Emily Litella pronouncing, "Never mind" over Todd's adjustment. I said your protocol is several developmental generations behind current technology. That's NOT untrue. The whole idea is to make an alternative system on the amateur bands but Nazi's like you try to stop new modes of communications on the amateur band. Steve keeps attempting to use his power to keep Todd from looking like a complete boob. Dave K8MN |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N9OGL wrote:
But it isn't the community that's the problem, it's a cable company that doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel. "doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel." Can someone make an attempt to decipher that? |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: N9OGL wrote: But it isn't the community that's the problem, it's a cable company that doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel. "doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel." Can someone make an attempt to decipher that? The cable company doesn't want anyone using the public access channel. |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: The whole idea is to make an alternative system on the amateur bands but Nazi's like you try to stop new modes of communications on the amateur band. Steve keeps attempting to use his power to keep Todd from looking like a complete boob. I'm pedalling as fast as I can, Dave, and I think I am catching up...He's cutting back on his caps locked rants and us of "mother######" and "dick####"... Maybe...just m a y b e .......... Steve, K4YZ |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...tion/about.htm States that a ham with a vanity call of N9FU (no profanity intended) established this pirate broadcasting company with him! From that link: ABOUT LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATIONS LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION IS A NON-PROFIT ORGINIZATION WHICH PROMOTES THEATER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, AND THE PREFORMING ARTS....(SNIP) But obviously does not support basic reading, writing and grammar skills...which leads one to ask how can someone enjoy the "preforming arts" if they are illiterate? LANGLEY PARK WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1999-2000 BY TODD DAUGHERTY N9OGL AND JIM BEUSINGER N9FU ALONG WITH OTHER HAM OPERATORS. Ahhhhhhhhh....Here it's "Daugherty"... "I'VE ALWAYS WANTED TO ENTERTAIN PEOPLE" SAID TODD DAUGHERTY CEO/PRESIDENT OF LANGLEY PARK. Well, then, Toddy m'boy, You've succeeded! "LANGLEY PARK WILL CREATE A PLACE WHERE IDEAS CAN ROAM FREE AND PEOPLE CAN SHOW OFF THEIR TALENTS" Hence this picture of you? http://img61.exs.cx/img61/6216=AD/steve5ye.jpg Some talent. =20 Steve, K4YZ |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: Jim wrote: LANGLEY PARK WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1999-2000 BY TODD DAUGHERTY N9OGL AND JIM BEUSINGER N9FU ALONG WITH OTHER HAM OPERATORS. Ahhhhhhhhh....Here it's "Daugherty"... OH ME! How could I have missed THIS one..?!?! For the last two weeks it's been "MF hams" this and "MF hams that" from Todd... But HERE, when it serves his greater ego to do so, it's a point of pride. And of course we have Todd admitting that yes, he IS one of those very same hams that he's been foul-mouthing all month... Two faces...one head...Waddayaknowbouthat...?!?!? Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boy broadcaster N9OGL - Part One | Policy | |||
The Death of Amateur Radio | Policy | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB |