Fritz Wuehler wrote:
In article
.com
"K4YZ" wrote:

I don't have to play, Anonymous Coward.

Yes, you do, Nursie. It's like when you were younger.


Why? To know that Roger Wiseman is a legal scofflaw?
That Lloyd
Davies is a coward and a liar and that Toiddie Dougherty is a
weakminded fool?

Oh, Nursie, that's not very Christian of you. Hypocrite.

You claim that I claim to be a Christian. Where's the post?

Not necessary. The are public records. Nothing more
damning that
records you can't hide from or alter.

Yet, you never give any details or specifics. You are talking
out of your wide ass, Nursie.

It's not that wide, thank-you.

You keep trying to chip away with the flabby comments, yet
there is
documentary evidence to the contrary. Makes you a LYING
anonymous
coward.

Nursie, you look like a balding, fat teddy bear. Your picture
shows it.

Balding and "teddy-bear", for sure. "Fat"..?!?! Well, that's
your opinon unsubstantiated by fact.

So is your incompetence which caused a patient's death,
Nursie.

And you're welcome to produce a record of that, Anonymous
Coward.

So defensive, Nursie.

Not defensive. I just know better.

And you're still welcome to produce a record of ANY patient death
that occured on my watch that you suggest was due to any incompetence
on my part. (Hint...there isn't one)

Since there's not one to hide, the flightsuit doesn't need
to hide
anything.

Admitting you are nothing, Nursie?

Nope...Just nothing to hide.

Especially me. One more thing you're welcome to try and
provide
some documentary evidence of, Anonymous Coward

Sort of like the evidence you have against Roger, huh, Nursie?

The "evidence" is public records, anonymous coward.

Nope. Not even in the 40's.

Only when you wear that girdle, Nursie.

You're still welcome to see. (You can skip the homophobic
jokes..I know you'd refuse simply because it would prove you wrong)

You need to sharpen up your "detective skills," too.

Naaaaaaah. Got e-mail headers and friends who can "work
the
numbers" for me if I want.

Sure you do, Nursie. You keep guessing wrong. As usual.

I don't guess.

No, they're not...but nice try.

Yes, they are, Nursie. You are just too stupid to see them.

Nice snip.

Nope. No profanity there, Anonymous Coward. Nor were
there any
threats.

Your reading skill need sharpening, Nursie.

And you snip again without attribute.

Nice try.

You've still not impressed me. Or shall I say "positively"
impressed me..!?!?

Nursie, nobody wants to "impress" you. You are an unmitigated
blowhard.

Easy to say when you won't own up to your own rhetoric.

You're still an anonymous coward, and proof evident of the
liar,
too.

And Nursie, you are an illiterate, bootlicking weasel.

And you're STILL an anonymous coward.

(Not to mention that facts disprove your assertions, which also
makes you a lair...but then that's why you have to hide)

Too bad you're not half the man you IMAGINE you are...You
could
stand up behind your words...Instead you've ducked behind the
anonymizer.

Nursie, you need to keep your whining down to a dull roar.

You're still a coward.

Coward.

Whiner.

Coward.

Steve, K4YZ

Fritz Wuehler wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

What is "recieved"?

What just a transposition of letter, but you "received" your
daddy's d--k up your a--hole.

"What just a transposition of letter"? Nice job, Grog. What makes you
veer toward discussions of father-son homosexual activity? Is this
something from your childhood?

You ar a liar.

What is "You ar"?

Looks like a dropped letter. Do you need glasses?

Nope, I saw right away that something was wrong. Why is it that you can
notice every typo in Steve's posts, but none on your own?

Yes, Roger, you've had a number of chats with Chief
Stenger.

No, I haven't. Still not Roger, dumbass Dave.

Ah, I see. If you were Roger, you'd have had a number of chats with
Chief Stenger.

He isn't about to get another one either, dumbass.

If I were you, I wouldn't want to make a bet on that.

Aww, is the big tough Nazi going to snivel and whine to the
cops?

I don't know about any Nazis or any sniveling and whining, but I'll be
quite pleased to forward this recent series to the Chief, using the
e-mail address provided me for just this purpose.

I'd still bet he won't get one.

I don't suppose you're very good at cards.

Goddamn, are you one stupid f--k.

Then again, I'm not the one getting into scrapes with the law
and with
the FCC.

Neither am I. And you still are a stupid f--k.

I get it. If you were Roger, you'd have had a number of encounters with
law enforcement and with the FCC. In your world, one who has never had
such encounters is stupid and you're the sharp guy. That's interesting.

What is your fixation on homosexuality, Roger?

What is your fixation on Roger?

You answer my question and I'll answer yours.

Okay, you've visited my
web site. You've seen a photo of me with Muddy Waters. Now
what?

Oh, so you did have an "intimate" relations with him.

I've said nothing like that. I admit to having a web site and to having
a photo of me and the late Muddy Waters on it. Now what?

You mean you made forged tapes of him and sent them in.

Well now, that would have been tricky. You see, I was in
Tanzania when
you had your run in with the FCC.

It figures you'd be in a backwater, but since I'm not Roger, I
haven't had any run ins with the FCC.

I see. You haven't had any such run-ins, but Roger has. What about
your accusation that I submitted "forged" tapes and sent them to the
FCC? What happened to that?

You and
your fatassed buddy Bertie, who when talks about a hard drive
describes the physical dimensions, not the capacity.

I see another problem with your theory, Roger. Bert was on
active duty
with the military in Germany during that period. That leaves
you locked
on the horns of a dilemma.

Am I, Roger saw fatassed Bertie in a computer store querying
about a replacement hard drive. And it sure as hell wasn't in
Germany.

....and it sure as hell wasn't during the period in which Roger (not you)
got his ass in a crack with the FCC over malicious interference. Bert
was on active duty with the Army in Europe. Now, what about your silly
accusation?

By the way, I know the local who did it, but
I'm not telling. Needless to say that the FCC found the tape
convincing.

Really, since when is a warning letter to Roger with alledged
evidence convincing.

The FCC was concerned enough to send you the letter based upon the
existence of the recordings. The FCC was concerned enough to have you
retest. Oh, and the word is "alleged".

Let's ask Phil Kane if he has ever heard of an instance in
which the FCC
forced a retest for no reason at all. By the way, do you
consider your
upgrade as "doing something for amateur radio"?

Oh, does Phil Kane have a role as the "official FCC spokesman"?

Phil was a career FCC employee. He'd know about such things. Would you
like me to drop a line to someone currently in the employee of the FCC?

Apparently, you are in denial. What have you done for amateur
radio.

You left out the "?" I'm not in denial. You spewed something about
your upgrading your license as if that were "doing something for amateur
radio". I'm a VE under the Laurel, Maryland VEC. I've administered many
Novice exams in the pre-VE days. I've provided time and money to third
world amateur radio licensees and clubs. I've served as the President
of a IARU-affiliated amateur radio society in Botswana. I've provided
an opportunity for tens of thousands of DXers and contesters to work a
new country, a new band-country or mode-country from seven DXCC
entities. I've written articles for CQ and Ham Radio Horizons
magazines. I served as President of the Southwest Ohio DX Association.
I acted as moderator for the Dayton Hamvention DX forum for a number of
years. I've made presentations on my DX operations at the Dayton
Hamvention, SWODXA annual dinner, the W9DXCC dinner, the Greater
Cincinnati Amateur Radio Association and the NPARC.

Your turn.

Your posts sure don't do anything for it.

Maybe I don't have the hang of it. Perhaps if I spent a number of years
posting vile filth and lies about any number of people, threw in a
number of references to the deaths of loved ones, tossed in some
material about homosexual or incestuous activity and spewed some filthy
material about spouses, I could reach your level. I might go in for
some sociopathy lessons.

And Roger still passed the "retest" and even upgraded....much to
your chagrin.

Yes, he did, much to my chagrin. He can't keep from shooting himself in
the foot though--so there's still a goodly chance that he'll not be
involved in amateur radio for very long. You see, Roger is never heard
on the air in a QSO. There's never a, "Hello, Jack. I've been busy in
the garden" from AB8MQ. Roger lurks and hides, just like he does here.

I noticed you dodged the question of what you have done for
amateur radio.

I provided some information above. Your turn. A single, truthful line
of your contributions will suffice.

For somebody who says they've been a ham as long as you are,
you
sure don't know Part 97.

There is no proof of your statement. I've never had any
problems with
the FCC--none.

Yeah, that's not what a FOIA inquiry says.

Cough it up. Post it here. Otherwise, you'll remain forever a liar.

Obviously, you have a reading comprehension problem, too.

I understood what you wrote. It isn't even close to being true.

High-el forgets to mention the years of therapy he had to
endure
after his daddy assraped him repeatedly as a child.

What is this homoerotic fixation you have, Roger? Have you
sought help
for it?

What is this homoerotic fixation you have on Roger?

You seem confused. I wrote nothing homoerotic about Roger Wiseman or
anyone else. I simply responded to the lies you wrote, Roger-Not-Roger.

Maybe you
are in denial about your homosexuality.

You write frequently about homosexual acts and incestuous sex acts with
children and that is supposed to make me a homosexual? There are some
flaws in your thinking processes. Then again, that has been obvious for
quite some time.

Pot kettle black.
You have been running your mouth and doing
nothing.

You can check in with your local police. You'll find that
they have a
large number of your newsgroup posts and e-mails to me on hand.

Since I'm not Roger, how would my local police have your e-mails.

I get it. ;-) If you were Roger, the local police would have a large
number of your newsgroup posts and e-mails on hand.

They probably don't have Roger's either.

Run down and ask them. Since you aren't Roger, you won't have anything
to worry about.

I've visited them a number times when you were the only topic.
That isn't
exactly "doing nothing".

No, it's showing what a sniveling whining c-nt you are.

That isn't correct. Your lack of respect for law enforcement is likely
based in your experience with them. Folks who don't get involved on the
wrong side of the law aren't ever likely to have any such feelings.


In this case, you are both the pot and the
kettle. It is evident that you have a problem with "black".

Do you always get your logic from Pee Wee Herman?

We're you the fellow you used the "N" word? Aren't you the fellow you
uses the word "Jew" as a weapon?

Tell us how your deceased Episcopalian priest daddy
didn't molest you and the other altar boys.

Is that from one of your fantasies? Do you have a thing about
altar
boys?

No, but weren't you an altar boy in your daddy's church?

Are you writing a book or an article about me? If I was an altar boy,
would that make me the victim of molestation? Would it make my father
the perpetrator? What is your interest in the topic? Have you had such
an experience? Are you looking for one?

You brought up the topic. You asked me to "Tell" about something which
never took place. It isn't the first time you've shown such an
interest.
What is the basis for your interest?

Crawl back into your closet until nightfall, Roger. Then you can emerge
with all of the other creepy-crawlies. You might make an interesting
"Fear Factor" episode, though there are some things people with simply
choose not to be around--not even for big money.

Dave K8MN

George Orwell wrote:
In article
.com
"K4YZ" wrote:

To whom do you refer? No one I know, drunk or othrwise,
has passed
away since my daughter died.

Your daddy didn't pass away? Lying on your website?

Yes he did, and no I didn't.

You need to go back and re-read what was written in the part you
SNIPPED in the previous response AND my resposne above.

(comprehension, anonymous lying coward...there's that
comprehension issue of yours leaking out again!)

And Dad didn't drink.

You're welcome to re-post the items wherein you claim I am
lying,
Anonymous Coward, but I bet they won't be forthcoming.

Aww, is Nursie getting upset?

Nope. Just giving the Anonymous Lying Coward a chance to prove the
accusations. Of course, the "proof" is not forthcoming.

And why would I need to? I am working as an ACLS ER Nurse.

You never hear anything, Nursie, your balding skill is
tickling
your prostate.

Dodge, dodge, dodge.

Pot kettle black......

So far, I've not dodged anything, least of all the weak,
underhanded soft-ball slow pitches you've been trying to field!

Why should I? I'm not the one with a morals and ethics
problem.

That's not what your neighbors say, Nursie.

Again with claims...Again with not a single bit of any
evidence...Still an anonymous lying coward.

A letter transposition is not an English skills deficiency,
Anonymous Coward.

Sure it isn't, excuses-making Nursie.

What excuses? You've not proven an "excuse".

Nope. Nice snip, though.

That's what they should have done to you, snipped you so you
couldn't procreate, Nursie. You wouldn't produce defective kids
that die too young.

I didn't "produce defective kids that die too young". The crop
duster that laid cotton defoliant over our house by mistake did,
though.

Nast what that stuff can do to a woman in the first trimester.

Then you have a comprehension problem that exceeds even my
estimations. Seek remedial assistance.

Nursie, you should follow your own advice...especially when you
type "not al" for "not all".

Typographic errors are not "comprehension" deficiencies, anonymous
lying coward.

You still have comprehension problems that are not being
addressed. And you still have an ego and character deficiency that
prevents you from being a self-actualizing human being.

Steve, K4YZ

"A.Melon" wrote:

Not just A. Melon, but THE Melon (as Fritz Wuehler) wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

"What just a transposition of letter"? Nice job, Grog. What
makes you
veer toward discussions of father-son homosexual activity? Is
this
something from your childhood?

Wasn't your daddy a priest or something?

If you want to play question and answer, you'll need to do some
answering, Roger.

Nope, I saw right away that something was wrong. Why is it
that you can
notice every typo in Steve's posts, but none on your own?

Oh, do tell, "I didn't ask if you cold read" boy.

Watch this, Rog. It really is this easy: I made a typo.

Ah, I see. If you were Roger, you'd have had a number of
chats with
Chief Stenger.

You are slowly cating on, aren't you?

Cating? I caught on a long time ago. You deny that you are you. You
hide behind anonymous remailers because you can't afford to have
yourself identified with your posts. You've had so many run-ins with
law enforcement and have lost so many internet accounts that it just
wouldn't be prudent.

I don't know about any Nazis or any sniveling and whining, but
I'll be
quite pleased to forward this recent series to the Chief,
using the
e-mail address provided me for just this purpose.

Go right ahead. Knock yourself out. Since you keep guessing
wrong about who I am, I suppose you like to look foolish offline
as well.

You have to be a complete feeb to believe that no one sees through your
I'm-not-me routine.

I don't suppose you're very good at cards.

Yeah, but unlike you I don't play "old maid."

What? I guess you really told me, Un-Roger.

I get it. If you were Roger, you'd have had a number of
encounters with
law enforcement and with the FCC. In your world, one who has
never had
such encounters is stupid and you're the sharp guy. That's
interesting.

Yet, you continue to talk out of your ass.

No, I'm just typing, sharp guy.

What is your fixation on homosexuality, Roger?

What is your fixation of Roger?

Of Roger?

You answer my question and I'll answer yours.


I've said nothing like that. I admit to having a web site and
to having
a photo of me and the late Muddy Waters on it. Now what?

Uh-Huh. Yeah, right, faggot.

You seem to believe that any two adult males who have a friendship or a
business relationship are homosexuals. Do you have any males friends,
Roger? Any female friends? Any friends of any of the several genders?

So, you visit my web site. You've seen a photo of me with Muddy Waters.
Why is it a fetish for you? Are you a musician? Do you have a problem
with black men? Do you have a problem with white men or do you simply
dislike anyone who speaks out against your newsgroup-posted filth?

I see. You haven't had any such run-ins, but Roger has. What
about
your accusation that I submitted "forged" tapes and sent them
to the
FCC? What happened to that?

You tell me, apparently Wiseman only got a warning letter and a
retest. No fine, no suspention or revocation, so you tell me.

That doesn't answer the question I posed to you, Un-Roger.

...and it sure as hell wasn't during the period in which Roger
(not you)
got his ass in a crack with the FCC over malicious
interference. Bert
was on active duty with the Army in Europe. Now, what about
your silly
accusation?

Uh-Huh. Nobody but you said it was during that period.

Why sure "somebody" said it. You said it. You claimed that N8NN and I
sent "forged" tapes of you to the FCC, resulting in your getting a
letter from the Commission. The fact that I was in Africa and Bert was
in Germany just zooms over your pointed head.

The FCC was concerned enough to send you the letter based upon
the
existence of the recordings. The FCC was concerned enough to
have you
retest. Oh, and the word is "alleged".

Which means unsubstantiated or poorly presented "evidence." And
readingf the much posted retest letter,

....your much-posted retest letter...

"Readingf" indeed.

there is no reason other
than the FCC can at any time retest somebody under the VE
system.

That the Commission can have a licensee retest at any time does not mean
that the retest is done for no reason whatever, Roger.

Looks like you are puting 2 + 2 and coming up with 5
again.

I haven't been "puting" at all.

Phil was a career FCC employee. He'd know about such things.
Would you
like me to drop a line to someone currently in the employee of
the FCC?

Go ahead, dumbass.

Remember that you've acquiesced.

Why dont' you even go so far as to ask the
Rilkey guy, too?

You may do that if you like.

You left out the "?" I'm not in denial. You spewed something about
your upgrading your license as if that were "doing something for
amateur radio". I'm a VE under the Laurel, Maryland VEC. I've
administered many Novice exams in the pre-VE days. I've provided time
and money to third world amateur radio licensees and clubs. I've
served as the President of a IARU-affiliated amateur radio society in Botswana. I've provided an opportunity for tens of thousands of DXers and contesters to work a new country, a new band-country or
mode-country from seven DXCC entities. I've written articles for CQ
and Ham Radio Horizons magazines. I served as President of the
Southwest Ohio DX Association. I acted as moderator for the Dayton
Hamvention DX forum for a number of years. I've made presentations on my DX operations at the Dayton Hamvention, SWODXA annual dinner, the
W9DXCC dinner, the Greater Cincinnati Amateur Radio Association and
the NPARC.

(I reinserted the portion you snipped as "blather" since it was in
direct response to what I've done for amateur radio, a question you
asked a number of times. Now that I've responded, I'm quite curious to
learn what you, aside from posting filth in a number of amateur radio
newsgroup, participating in malicious QRMing on 20m and being retested
by the FCC, have done for amateur radio.)


You see, Roger is never heard
on the air in a QSO. There's never a, "Hello, Jack. I've
been busy in
the garden" from AB8MQ. Roger lurks and hides, just like he
does here.

Oh, so you are saying you are obsessed with him, you keep tabs
on him?

How does one keep tabs on that which is never present?

I provided some information above. Your turn. A single, truthful
line of your contributions will suffice.

Mheh. You provided unsubstantiated bull****.

Any of the information I posted is easily substantiated. Knock yourself
out.

For somebody who says they've been a ham as long as you are,
you sure don't know Part 97.

There is no proof of your statement. I've never had any
problems with the FCC--none.

Yeah, that's not what a FOIA inquiry says.

Cough it up. Post it here. Otherwise, you'll remain forever
a liar.

Obviously, you are in denial about it.

Denial that you're a liar? Hardly. Where's the information from any
FOIA request which states what you claim?

I understood what you wrote. It isn't even close to being
true.

Uh-huh. Sure it wasn't true.

Yep. Uh-huh. It wasn't true.

You seem confused. I wrote nothing homoerotic about Roger
Wiseman or
anyone else. I simply responded to the lies you wrote, Roger-
Not-Roger.

Yet you still keep tabs on his amateur radio qso's and so forth.

What amateur radio QSOs? I've just written that you/him are never heard
on any of the local repeaters or FM simplex channels. I've never heard
you check into a net, involved in a casual ragchew on 2m, 70cm or any of
the HF bands. I'm on the air a lot.

You claim every anonymous poster is him. Sounds like obsession
to me.


You write frequently about homosexual acts and incestuous sex acts with children and that is supposed to make me a homosexual? There are some flaws in your thinking processes. Then again, that has been obvious for quite some time.

Yep, you are a sniveling whining c--t. And had in the past
unfavorable contact with law enforcement.

Gee, Roger, that'd would have made it tough for me to obtain a security
clearance and to pass the frequent DS background updates. It looks like
your claim is vapor.


We're you

It's so easy: I made a mistake. You should try it sometime.

Let's put that snipped material back in. I asked:

"Weren't you the fellow you used the "N" word? Aren't you the fellow
you
uses the word "Jew" as a weapon?"

Care to provide a truthful response?

You indicated a fixation on incestuous homosexual activity but you
seemed to become nervous when you snipped the following:

"Are you writing a book or an article about me? If I was an altar boy,
would that make me the victim of molestation? Would it make my father
the perpetrator? What is your interest in the topic? Have you had such
an experience? Are you looking for one?"

"You brought up the topic. You asked me to "Tell" about something which
never took place. It isn't the first time you've shown such an
interest. What is the basis for your interest?"

Have you had time to formulate some answers? Would you like to share
them with us?

What makes it difficult for you to relate to other human beings on the
planet?

Dave K8MN

Nomen Nescio wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

If you want to play question and answer, you'll need to do some
answering, Roger.

Since my name isn't Roger, you can go pound sand.

Then you don't get to play question and answer any more, Un-Wiseman.

That doesn't answer the question I posed to you, Un-Roger.

If Roger Wiseman lives in such an RF "hole" as you claim, how
could he have "interfered" with anybody, dumbass?

I'll be happy to loan you a book on HF wave propagation. Just drive on
over...


That the Commission can have a licensee retest at any time
does not mean
that the retest is done for no reason whatever, Roger.

Then why doesn't Wiseman's "retest" letter state a reason?

Because it isn't necessary to do so, Un-Wiseman.


You may do that if you like.

Why would I?

Because it was your suggestion, that's why.

Wiseman's "retest" letter has been posted to Google
before. It has no reason stated in the letter for the retest.

And you are the only person who seems to believe that the FCC retests
licensees for no reason whatever.


You see, Roger is never heard
on the air in a QSO. There's never a, "Hello, Jack. I've
been busy in
the garden" from AB8MQ. Roger lurks and hides, just like
he
does here.

Oh, so you are saying you are obsessed with him, you keep
tabs
on him?

How does one keep tabs on that which is never present?

See your statement above. You maintain he is never heard.

That's right, I do maintain that. One can't keep tabs on what isn't
there.

Any of the information I posted is easily substantiated.
Knock yourself
out.

Sure it is, sure it is.

Sure. It is.

Denial that you're a liar? Hardly. Where's the information
from any
FOIA request which states what you claim?

Yes, you are in denial.

Where's the statement?


Yet you still keep tabs on his amateur radio qso's and so
forth.

What amateur radio QSOs? I've just written that you/him are
never heard
on any of the local repeaters or FM simplex channels. I've
never heard
you check into a net, involved in a casual ragchew on 2m, 70cm
or any of
the HF bands. I'm on the air a lot.

So you ARE stalking him.

Then I'm stalking Madonna, Senator Byrd and David Letterman too. They
aren't heard on the ham bands here either.

With the thousands of frequencies
available in the ham bands, wouldn't you think it would be
possible not to hear him?

A local station not heard one time in a five year period? That'd be
highly unlikely. That'd be while I operate all HF bands from home and
in the car. That'd be while scanning all area 2m and 70cm FM repeaters.
You've not been heard a single time. But I know you *listen* to 2m as
you've posted material here which would be unknown to anyone except
someone overhearing a conversation on 2m FM locally.

Gee, Roger,

There you go thinking everybody is Roger, again.

Everyone? Nope.

that'd would have made it tough for me to obtain a security
clearance and to pass the frequent DS background updates. It
looks like
your claim is vapor.

More unsubstantiated bull****.

Easily substantiated, Roger. No one may be hired without a security
background investigation. No one may retain his clearance without a
periodic update to that background investigation.


Have you had time to formulate some answers? Would you like
to share
them with us?

Have you?

What makes it difficult for you to relate to other human
beings on the
planet?

You aren't classified as a "human being".

In all of the Google archives of your postings, please produce just a
single one which reveals you to be other than what I've stated.

Anyone can do a search on "KC8JBO", "AB8MQ" or "Roger Wiseman" and come
up with hundreds and hundreds which prove my statement.

Dave K8MN

Anonymous wrote:
In article
.com

You still have comprehension problems that are not being
addressed. And you still have an ego and character deficiency
that
prevents you from being a self-actualizing human being.

Drug out the old Psychology 101 textbooks, eh, Nursie? You
couldn't think up something, could you?

Seems to me I hit it right on the money regardless regardless of
where I "drug it out of"...At least I was able to read (AND comprehend)
what I was reading.

Steve, K4YZ

"A.Melon" wrote in message snipped

Yet, you continue to talk out of your ass.

Now that is original, Roger...

What is your fixation of Roger?

....and what is YOUR fixation with Lloyd? Huh?

Oh, so you are saying you are obsessed with him, you keep tabs
on him?

....as in posting Lloyd's home address, work address, phone numbers, and
other personal information???

Obviously, you are in denial about it.

....just as you are in denial about being Roger.

Yet you still keep tabs on his amateur radio qso's and so forth.
You claim every anonymous poster is him. Sounds like obsession
to me.

....just as YOU claim every anonmyous poster is Lloyd? Sounds like obsession
to me.


Yep, you were a molested altar boy.

....it makes you wish YOU were an altar boy, doesn't it Roger?
--
"There you have it: Just start talking about fags, asses, or
cocksucking, and Woger comes stumbling in stepping on his crank, with
both cap guns blazing." -- John Kimball

Toddy,

Why don't you just give up. There is nobody on this board, or any
other board for that matter, that wants to listen to your BS. Let's
face the facts Toddy boy, you are a two-bit loser that tried to get a
commercial radio license about 7 times and were rejected by the FCC.
You are a friggin moron with the IQ of a friggin 2 yr old trying to
convince people on your blog that you are a smart person. You are a
complete idiot that doesn't understand when you've been beat and when
you have lost. JUST GIVE IT UP AND GET THE F#@K OFF THE AIR AND OFF
THESE NEWSGROUPS!!!

N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
More Humor From N9OGL and Company:

QUOTE:

(n9oglvoice.blogspot.com)

Roger/AB8MQ said...
####ing netKKKop k4yz needs a reacharound
from ####head Hi El, K8MN, again.

Nobody forced k4yz to read this blog, so
#### him.

UNQUOTE:

Roger, judging by your numerous run-ins with law enforcement
and
the court systems, I would have to say that "details" are not your
strength, and this is yet more evidence of that.

Had Toiddie not made the effort to take his "blog" and quote
it
word-for-word on a USENET newsgroup, I wouldn't have known what was
on
his "blog".

Toiddie's "information" bulletins, tainted by his "opinion",
are
of little interest to anyone, least of all me. This extends to his
"blogs".


Well steve, That's your opinion......however, you are not the 600,000
amateurs out there, your just ONE PERSON; Hence, a minority. Secondly
you've never heard my transmissions thus, you can not say they are of
little interest, In my humble opinion wht you say on the air is of
little interest, but that's my opinion. One thing you fail to grasp
is
no amateur station can dictate to another amateur station how they
are
to run their station. As for the Usenets, Newsgroups are "open fourm"
and as long as it on topic I can and will post there. So you and your
little Commie buddies can try to push people around on that newsgroup
but I will not leave!!!


My only "interest" in Toiddie's activities comes from his
abuse-of-priviledge of his Amateur Radio license which could
negatively
impact all Amateurs at some point in the future.

HAM COP ALERT HAM COP ALERT

Steve, INFORMATION BULLETINS ARE LEGAL!!!!!!!!! as long as they are
directed to the amateur radio service and contain amateur radio
material. You don't freaking get it because you and your little moron
friends on that newsgroup are narrow minded assholes.


That he chooses to do so with his poor grammar, sandlot
threats
and prolific profanity only further strengthen MY arguments about
his
incompetence in genereal and his obvious lack of character to be a
Commission licensee.

THANK FREAKING GOD YOU DON'T WORK FOR THE FCC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Todd N9OGL


That he has a social misfit and ner-do-well such as you coming
to
his "defense" is just icing on the cake.

Steve, K4YZ

Absolutely, Julio. Toddy ain't got no job so he can devote all of his
time to such things as building an ELF transmitter. It operates from
1-30 hz, a frequency so low it probably sucks his cock for him. Round
these parts we would call it a ****** boom box.

Oh, and Toddy's girlfriend is the nurse from "Girl Interrupted." The
male one.