Nomen Nescio aka anonymous necessario wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

Then you don't get to play question and answer any more, Un-
Wiseman.


You see Wiseman everywhere.

Wrong-o. I don't see Wiseman anywhere. I don't hear him on the ham
bands either. He's under deep cover.

Oh, and I'll post anywhere I damn well please.

If Roger Wiseman lives in such an RF "hole" as you claim, how
could he have "interfered" with anybody, dumbass?

I'll be happy to loan you a book on HF wave propagation. Just
drive on
over...

Why would I ? I don't have a ham license, dumbass?

Then you'll not concern yourself with RF and radio interference,
Un-Wiseman.

Your outdated
information would be of no use to anybody.

And I don't live in
West Virginia, so I can't "drive over".

Oh shucks, I forgot. You're under deep cover and likely living in
Honolulu.

And you didn't answer the question.

I told you: You don't get to play question and answer any more.
I've told you what I've done for amateur radio. It's your turn.

Because it isn't necessary to do so, Un-Wiseman.

Then "interference" wasn't the reason for Wiseman's retest.
Even the letter which has been posted when it was first issued
didn't give a reason.

The FCC doesn't force licensees to retest for no reason. What do you
think the reason might be?

Wiseman's "retest" letter has been posted to Google
before. It has no reason stated in the letter for the retest.

And you are the only person who seems to believe that the FCC
retests
licensees for no reason whatever.

You still didn't answer the question above.

You don't get to play question and answer any more.

And even in the Part 97 rules you are supposed to know, it says
the FCC can retest any VE administered ham licensee at any time.

Duh. The Commission does not retest without reason. Roger Wiseman gave
'em a reason.

See your statement above. You maintain he is never heard.

That's right, I do maintain that. One can't keep tabs on what
isn't
there.

But you are the one who says he isn't heard.

Yes, I'm aware of that.

You wouldn't know
that if you didn't keep tabs on him, stalker.

You can't keep tabs on what is not there.


Where's the statement?

Where's the answer to the above question?

You don't get to play question and answer any more. You asked a
question about what I've done for amateur radio. I provided a full
response. Your turn.

Then I'm stalking Madonna, Senator Byrd and David Letterman
too. They
aren't heard on the ham bands here either.

But you specifically said Wiseman wasn't heard.

I'm now specifically stating that Madonna, Senator Byrd and David
Letterman have not been heard on the ham bands.

Like you care about whether he is or not.

Oh, don't get me wrong. I care. I much prefer not to hear Roger
Wiseman on the ham bands. I like it that way. He's deep under cover,
don't you know.

You must, you wouldn'thave posted it.

That's right. There's no "The antenna here is a wounded octopus" or
"I'm driving to see a friend in Stuebenville" (okay, it is a bit
far-fetched to think that Wiseman has a friend), or "Yeah, Bill, I've
spent my morning posting filth to various newsgroups". Zippo, nada,
zilch, nuttin'.

A local station not heard one time in a five year period?
That'd be
highly unlikely.

Yep, you are too stupid to find him on the air.

You have to know better.

That'd be while I operate all HF bands from home and
in the car. That'd be while scanning all area 2m and 70cm FM
repeaters.

When I'm not in ham radio, why would I be heard in your area or
anywhere else, dumbass?

Yeah, I forgot--you're in deep cover, anonymous internet posts, unlisted
amateur radio callsign. ;-)

You've not been heard a single time.
But I know you *listen* to 2m as
you've posted material here which would be unknown to anyone
except
someone overhearing a conversation on 2m FM locally.

I did? I'm not even in ham radio, you f--king isiot. How would I
be able to hear you?

You're playing this I'm-not-me routine to the hilt, huh?


No one may be hired without a security
background investigation. No one may retain his clearance
without a
periodic update to that background investigation.

Uh, huh. Says you, liar.

Feel free to do any slight amount of research before making yourself
look more foolish.

Have you?

Have I what?

You must have forgotten again.

In all of the thousands of frequencies available on ham radio,
you still haven't come across Roger, so you maintain he isn't
heard.

Yes, I maintain that I have not heard KC8JBO or AB8MQ in nearly five
years.

What a moron.

Yes, he is.

Dave K8MN