Tapioca Pudding AKA two-test Wogie wrote:
In article
Cmd Buzz Corey


Yes, indeed I did blatherings


No, Gopher face, you got one in 1999.

BZZZZT! Wrong again wogie. Post some proof of this alleged letter I
received from the FCC in 1999. Either put up or shut up.


Never had to retest


And it's a good thing, too, because you sure couldn't pass it if
you had to retake it today.

I don't violate the rules, so the FCC never has ask me to retest, unlike
two-test wogie.


Bet wogie couldn't pass even the General exam, blatherings


He's already proven he could, **** for brains. And he was only
retested once, you alcoholic moron.

Two-test wogie couldn't pass if he had to take the test when they were
real tests, in front of an FCC examiner. He can only pass by taking them
at a license give-away VE session where the answers to the questions are
available to be memorized from a question pool. No knowledge required.
Wogie holds an Extra yet he doesn't have a clue about RMS or ask him
about negative SWR. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Poor two-test, had to be retested because he violated FCC rules.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
By the way two-test, there are more holders of the Advanced license than
Extra.

George Orwell wrote:
In article
excuse maker Cmd Buzz Corey

Tapioca Pudding AKA two-test Wogie wrote:


Poor Gopher face, he couldn't even pass the Extra ONE time.


In article
Cmd Buzz Corey



Yes, indeed I did blatherings


No, Gopher face, you got one in 1999.

BZZZZT! Wrong again wogie. Post some proof of this alleged

letter I

received from the FCC in 1999. Either put up or shut up.


Circa 1999-2000, how's that for specifics, Gopher face?
Here's your letter:
---------------------------------------------------------

March 29, 2000


CERTIFIED MAIL--RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED


Mr. Steven A. Tunder

72643 Glasgow Road

Freeport, OH 43973

Licensee of N8WGM


Mr. Roger L. Wiseman

610 Glen Haven Avenue

Glendale, WV 26038-1302

Licensee of KC8JBO


Dear Messrs. Tunder and Wiseman:

The Commission has been made aware of an ongoing personal
dispute between
you, and there have been allegations of interference or jamming
on the
Twenty-Meter Band.

The purpose of this letter is to caution you both to review
Section 97.1 of
the Amateur Radio Service rules, and to make certain that
whatever disputes
that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies.

Please call me at 717-338-2502 if you have any questions about
this matter.


Sincerely,

W. Riley Hollingsworth

Special Counsel, Amateur radio

Enforcement Bureau
------------------------
Would you like some pepper for that foot in your mouth, Gopher
face?

How about the foot in your mouth wogie, I ain't Steve, not even close.
Poor two-test wogie, doesn't have a clue who he is talking about, but
then what's new?

You sure did snivel the "damnage control" about it on the so-
called "Liberty net."

Like I said two-test, I have never even listened to the "liberty net",
much less been on it. Again, you don't have a clue.


Never had to retest


And it's a good thing, too, because you sure couldn't pass

it if

you had to retake it today.

I don't violate the rules, (more lies)


You violate the rules all the time, Gopher face. You jam people
on 75 and 80 meters.
You stopped for a time jamming people on 20.
Especially after that letter above.

That is pretty hard to do since the only antenna I have up is a 40 meter
dipole. Again two-test, you don't have a clue.


Bet wogie couldn't pass even the General exam, blatherings


He's already proven he could, **** for brains. And he was

only

retested once, you alcoholic moron.

Poor two-test.

Two-test wogie couldn't pass (incoherent blatherings, Gopher

face must be snorting cocaine again)

But Roger did pass a commercial license exam in front of an FCC
examiner in 1976, Gopher face. You lose again.

Well, well. I got my First Class Phone in 1960, so what does that have
to do with anything, other than two-test wogie couldn't have passed a
ham exam in front of an FCC examiner. The only way two-test could pass
is at a license give-away VE session where all the questions had the
answers available for memorization. So two-test got an Extra lite, big
deal, but he is still a novice and always will be. Poor two-test.

And he's already proven he could pass the amateur tests,
regardless, unlike you, who has to settle for an obsolete
license.


Again you loose two-test, the Advanceed isn't obsolete and there are
more holders of the Advanced license than there are the Extra.
FCC spanked wogie real good, twice. SPANK SPANK.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!

But Roger did pass a commercial license exam in front of an FCC
examiner in 1976, Gopher face. You lose again.
And he's already proven he could pass the amateur tests,
regardless, unlike you, who has to settle for an obsolete
license.



http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/reports/index.cfm

A search of the above FCC data base yields negative results
for a commercial FCC license in your name Roger. In fact, the
*only* FCC license you hold, according to the FCC, is your
ham radio license. Can't wait to hear your spew of excuses
and lies.

Possible Roger Excuses:

1. I passed it but let it expire.
2. I didn't say the commercial license was issued by the FCC.
3. You are not looking in the right data base.
4. I let it lapse, because I didn't need it anymore.
5. I found it in the FCC data base, why can't you?
6. You must not know how to look up a license.
7. (reserved for Roger)

"anon" wrote in message
...

But Roger did pass a commercial license exam in front of an FCC
examiner in 1976, Gopher face. You lose again.
And he's already proven he could pass the amateur tests,
regardless, unlike you, who has to settle for an obsolete
license.



http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/reports/index.cfm

A search of the above FCC data base yields negative results
for a commercial FCC license in your name Roger. In fact, the
*only* FCC license you hold, according to the FCC, is your
ham radio license. Can't wait to hear your spew of excuses
and lies.

Possible Roger Excuses:

1. I passed it but let it expire.
2. I didn't say the commercial license was issued by the FCC.
3. You are not looking in the right data base.
4. I let it lapse, because I didn't need it anymore.
5. I found it in the FCC data base, why can't you?
6. You must not know how to look up a license.
7. (reserved for Roger)





Note how Roger remains curiously silent on the challenge as to
why his 1976 commercial license is not in the FCC's data base.
Perhaps the DeVry master degree curtains boy has been caught
in a bald face lie?
Your Turn negative SWR boy?

Tapioca Pudding wrote:
In article
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:


How about (more lies)


Nice try Gopher face. You responded to the Gopher face name.
Just like the sniveling little bitch boy you are.


Like I said


You say a lot of things, mainly excuses for why you are too
stupid and lazy to get the Extra license.
And you'd rather hold onto that obsolete license, always
settling for second best, I suppose.

You have a hard time with comprehension don't you two-test. The Advance
isn't obsolete, it is still a valid license. There are more Advanced
class holders then there are Extra.
You only got an Extra-lite, you never would have been able to pass a
real test for Extra, only one where the answers were provided for you.
At least my Advanced license is real, I didn't take the test at some
license VE give-away session where all the answers were provided like
two-test wogie did.
Poor two-test, the Extra lite ham. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!


That is pretty hard to do

Poor two-test.


Poor Gopher face, all he can put up is a lousy 40 meter antenna.
And he even admits it was hard to do.

And where did I admit it was hard to do?

No wonder you never could get the Extra, you can't do antenna
formulas.

You're really funny two-test. NOT!!


Well, well. I got my First Class Phone in (more lies)


No, you didn't. You are lying again, Gopher face.

Try and prove it two-test.

Again, you "lose" Gopher Face. You can't even post in English.
Now go cry because you have that obsolete license.

Now you go cry because the FCC made you retest, apanked you really good
and the best you could do is get an Extra-lite at a license VE give-away
session. HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
--
Gopher Face "Buzz Corey" proves he is quite a "loser" when he
can't even spell "loser" in
:
"Again you loose two-test"


Poor two-test wogie, the FCC spanked him really good. You see, wogie was
caught red-handed violating the FCC rules so Riley made him retake the
exam. Wogie couldn't operate according to the rules like any normal
ham, he had to go and jam other ham's transmissions and Riley caught him
red handed. So wogie had to retest in order to keep his license. Poor
two-test. Lets see the hands of all those who have been called in by the
FCC to retest. Oh, I only see wogie's hand...figures. I have been
licensed since 1961 and never once has the FCC made me retake the exam.
Poor widdle two-test can't say that. Poor two-test, he couldn't have
passed the exam except he took it at a license give-away VE session
where all the answers to all the questions were available for
memorization. Wogie got an Extra-lite, he never could have passed the
old test were knowledge was required and you had to set in front of an
FCC examiner. But on the other hand, someone from the FCC is probably
the last thing two-test wogie wants to see.
You care to explain negative SWR and RMS to us wogie?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Stand up when I talk to you boy. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!

Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
In article
"anon" wrote:

Note how Roger remains curio(whines and backpedaling excuses

why you can't successfully look it up!)

Not how you don't address the fact you are too ****ing stupid to
look up his name on the Universal Licensing System website.

http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/

You LOSE as usual!



HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! It's a restricted radiotelephone operator permit.
Not even a technical license like a First or Second Class Phone, just a
restricted operator permit. Doesn't even require a test, just complete
an FCC form. My pilot's license grants me the same priveledges.
Poor two-test, the best he can do is brag about holding an FCC
commercial RR operator's permit (not license) that doesn't even require
a simple test. Oh, part of the qualifications for holding such a license
does require one to be able to speak and hear, wonder how wogie fooled
them on that part? He can babble on and on, put speaking coherently is
another matter.
Wah-who, a restricted radiotelephone operator permit, hot-dog!!!!! Way
to go wogie, you really accomplished something there, yes sir!!!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Tarapia Tapioco" wrote in message
x.it...
In article
"anon" wrote:

Note how Roger remains curio(whines and backpedaling excuses
why you can't successfully look it up!)

Not how you don't address the fact you are too ****ing stupid to
look up his name on the Universal Licensing System website.

http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/

You LOSE as usual!



Excuse #6, AS PREDICTED

"A.Melon" wrote in message
news:985c2b5a400fd5b6a62ad031f3ea43a5@melontraffic kers.com...
In article
"anon" wrote:


But Roger did pass a commercial license exam in front of an
FCC
examiner in 1976, Gopher face. You lose again.
And he's already proven he could pass the amateur tests,
regardless, unlike you, who has to settle for an obsolete
license.



http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/reports/index.cfm

A search of the above FCC data base yields negative results
(Lardass' incompetence)

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA..Lardass can't even ****ing look up a goddamned
license!

Do a name search at the ULS site , Dumbass Davies!!!!! Or can't
you even handle that simple task?

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/




Excuse # 3, 5 & 6, AS PREDICTED

Anonymous AKA two-test wogie wrote:
In article
"anon" wrote:


"A.Melon" wrote in message
news:985c2b5a400fd5b6a62ad031f3ea43a5@melontraff ickers.com...

In article
"anon" wrote:

But Roger did pass a commercial license exam in front of

an

FCC

examiner in 1976, Gopher face. You lose again.


BZZZZT!! Wrong!!! There is no exam for a restricted radiotelephone
operator permit. It isn't even a license, just a permit. Fill out the
FCC form, send it in, that's all there is to it. Wogie could't pass an
exam in front of an FCC examiner if he tried, especially after Riley and
the FCC spanked him real good for violating FCC regulations. Poor
two-test, having delusions again.

"Anonymous" wrote in message
news:9M7ANVZ938476.9760300926@anonymous...
In article
"anon" wrote:


"A.Melon" wrote in message
news:985c2b5a400fd5b6a62ad031f3ea43a5@melontraffic kers.com...
In article
"anon" wrote:


But Roger did pass a commercial license exam in front of
an
FCC
examiner in 1976, Gopher face. You lose again.
And he's already proven he could pass the amateur tests,
regardless, unlike you, who has to settle for an obsolete
license.



http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/reports/index.cfm

A search of the above FCC data base yields negative results
(Lardass' incompetence)

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA..Lardass can't even ****ing look up a
goddamned
license!

Do a name search at the ULS site , Dumbass Davies!!!!! Or
can't
you even handle that simple task?

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/




(whiny Excuse..as predicted)

And you still couldn't look it up, BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!



Oh, but that was never the point Wogie. You showed us all
once again, what a well trained puppy dog you are Roger.

Fetch Roger, Sit Roger, Down Roger, Good Boy Roger.