RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   SO2R Policy? (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/72596-so2r-policy.html)

[email protected] June 14th 05 12:55 AM

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Oddly enough, much of the advancement in ham rigs has
come about because of contesting.

For example, one of the first uses of computers in ham
radio was their use in logkeeping. I think one of the
university stations gets credit for that, using the
U's mainframe to dupe and print out their SS logs
circa 1968.

The improvements in receiver sections to have better
dynamic range, phase noise, and filtering is, IMHO,
largely driven by the contest/DX folks. And primarily
the big guns, who would plunk down big bucks for a
top-of-the-line rig if it gave them an advantage.

Then, of course, the technology that first appeared in
the top-of-the-line rigs worked its way into less expensive
ones. So we all benefit.

(makes me wonder if Hans has his IC-7800 yet...)

73 de Jim, N2EY


Stop picking on Hans,


Who's picking on Hans? If there's anybody who can get the
most out of an IC-7800, and deserves to be using one, it's
K0HB. I'm just wondering if he's got one yet.

I hear his...well at least his call, real regular in
the contests. g


I've worked you and he in SS many, many times. Thanks for
the points and AL, btw.

73 de Jim, N2EY


Dan/W4NTI June 14th 05 10:32 PM


wrote in message
oups.com...
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Oddly enough, much of the advancement in ham rigs has
come about because of contesting.

For example, one of the first uses of computers in ham
radio was their use in logkeeping. I think one of the
university stations gets credit for that, using the
U's mainframe to dupe and print out their SS logs
circa 1968.

The improvements in receiver sections to have better
dynamic range, phase noise, and filtering is, IMHO,
largely driven by the contest/DX folks. And primarily
the big guns, who would plunk down big bucks for a
top-of-the-line rig if it gave them an advantage.

Then, of course, the technology that first appeared in
the top-of-the-line rigs worked its way into less expensive
ones. So we all benefit.

(makes me wonder if Hans has his IC-7800 yet...)

73 de Jim, N2EY


Stop picking on Hans,


Who's picking on Hans? If there's anybody who can get the
most out of an IC-7800, and deserves to be using one, it's
K0HB. I'm just wondering if he's got one yet.

I hear his...well at least his call, real regular in
the contests. g


I've worked you and he in SS many, many times. Thanks for
the points and AL, btw.

73 de Jim, N2EY

My pleasure....same back to you.

Dan/W4NTI



Dave Heil June 18th 05 12:47 AM

Dee Flint wrote:
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
ink.net...


[snip]


Why do I contest? To improve my score by improving my station and myself.

Its as simple as that.

Have a good day

PS; I worked a bunch of sporadic skip yesterday on six meters in the June
VHF contest.....with 8 watts and a 3 ele yagi at 20'.

It's all a matter of perspective.

Dan/W4NTI




I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange
thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On
the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all
the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the
code (as some would have us believe)?


Oh, they're still trapped on VHF, Dee. Most of 'em are so trapped that
they know only one mode--FM and do all of their operating via repeaters.

Dave K8MN

Jim Hampton June 18th 05 01:40 AM


"Dave Heil" wrote in message
ink.net...
Dee Flint wrote:
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
ink.net...


[snip]


Why do I contest? To improve my score by improving my station and

myself.

Its as simple as that.

Have a good day

PS; I worked a bunch of sporadic skip yesterday on six meters in the

June
VHF contest.....with 8 watts and a 3 ele yagi at 20'.

It's all a matter of perspective.

Dan/W4NTI




I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very

strange
thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators.

On
the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are

all
the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass

the
code (as some would have us believe)?


Oh, they're still trapped on VHF, Dee. Most of 'em are so trapped that
they know only one mode--FM and do all of their operating via repeaters.

Dave K8MN



Hello, Dave

Yep, I'm only on 10 and 440. On 10 meters, I use SSB (one FM contact) as
the thing has no provision for CW. On 440 I stay on FM. One guy was
really talking up the need for CW so I did, with the repeater owner's
permission, change to MCW. 40 words per. No problem. :)



73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA



bb June 18th 05 12:56 PM



Dave Heil wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
ink.net...


[snip]


Why do I contest? To improve my score by improving my station and myself.

Its as simple as that.

Have a good day

PS; I worked a bunch of sporadic skip yesterday on six meters in the June
VHF contest.....with 8 watts and a 3 ele yagi at 20'.

It's all a matter of perspective.

Dan/W4NTI




I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange
thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On
the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all
the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the
code (as some would have us believe)?


Oh, they're still trapped on VHF, Dee. Most of 'em are so trapped that
they know only one mode--FM and do all of their operating via repeaters.

Dave K8MN


What a wunnerful attitude you have toward Techs, Oh Mighty DXer. And
people have to ask who chased away the Techs. I guess the only time
you would embrace a Tech is if he were calling you out of band on 6M.
Hi!


bb June 18th 05 01:04 PM



Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...

I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very
strange thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician
operators. On the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So
where are all the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they
"can't" pass the code (as some would have us believe)?

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Hey Dee,

Good question actually. Perhaps they are part of the vast majority of hams
that are inactive.

More likely they are all "stuck" on FM and have not a clue what else is
going on with V/Uhf. What a shame.

Dan/W4NTI


Ah, yes. The Shameful, Clueless Techs. With attitudes like yours,
it's no wonder they don't hang around.


bb June 18th 05 01:13 PM



Dee Flint wrote:

I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange
thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On
the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all
the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the
code (as some would have us believe)?

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Dee, I'm going to guess (i.e., don't ask me for facts, figures,
substantive studies, reports from the FCC/ARRL, etc) that of the Techs
that have stayed in amateur radio, most have done so for the emergency
communications aspect of the service. As such, they would typically
stay on FM.

The ones who could learn Morse Code and have had to time to do so have
moved up. Those who didn't have the time or couldn't learn it have
moved on.

It's nice to see Miss Manners finally noticing something amiss in the
ARS.


bb June 18th 05 01:17 PM



wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:

I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange
thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On
the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all
the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the
code (as some would have us believe)?


It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of
the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


w3rv


It's so refreshing to see Extras being Extras again; having their usual
disdain for the No Code Techs. And some people have to ask who chased
away the Techs.


bb June 18th 05 01:22 PM



Dan/W4NTI wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:

I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very
strange
thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators.
On
the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all
the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass
the
code (as some would have us believe)?


It's Techs being Techs again, they're too busy "advancing the state of
the art" to be bothered with learning the code and contesting.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


w3rv


BWAHHHHHHHHH....we both know the "Tech" license stopped being technical in
nature way back in the early 60s.


Dan, I've never seen you advocating "Truth in Licensing." Have you
said as much to the FCC in any of your NPRM comments?

And MOST VHF/UHF contesting is done in SSB mode.

Dan/W4NTI


If most of the VHF/UHF Contestors are Extra's as Dee says, why isn't CW
used most often?


Dave Heil June 18th 05 04:45 PM

bb wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

Dee Flint wrote:

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
thlink.net...


[snip]



Why do I contest? To improve my score by improving my station and myself.

Its as simple as that.

Have a good day

PS; I worked a bunch of sporadic skip yesterday on six meters in the June
VHF contest.....with 8 watts and a 3 ele yagi at 20'.

It's all a matter of perspective.

Dan/W4NTI




I and the OM also worked some of the VHF contest and noticed a very strange
thing. Only 10% of the contacts that we made were Technician operators. On
the other hand, 80% of them were Extra class operators. So where are all
the Techs who are "trapped" in VHF and above because they "can't" pass the
code (as some would have us believe)?


Oh, they're still trapped on VHF, Dee. Most of 'em are so trapped that
they know only one mode--FM and do all of their operating via repeaters.


What a wunnerful attitude you have toward Techs, Oh Mighty DXer. And
people have to ask who chased away the Techs. I guess the only time
you would embrace a Tech is if he were calling you out of band on 6M.
Hi!


I don't embrace radio amateurs at all, "bb". A firm handshake is good
enough for me.

My attitude toward many of the current crop of new techs is one bathed
upon five years observation, since returning to the U.S. I haven't
chased them anywhere. In fact, it has been just the opposite. I've
tried to encourage them to use simplex on FM. I've tried to encourage
them to try 6 meters along with 432 and 144 MHz SSB and CW. I can't be
faulted that they don't act after being encouraged. If these folks are,
in fact "trapped" in a world of 2m only FM repeater operation, they have
fashioned the trap themselves by not being more curious about the rest
of VHF/UHF amateur radio. There are avenues open to them but they
aren't participating.

Dave K8MN



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com