RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   The Pool (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/72597-pool.html)

Not Roger Too June 25th 05 06:20 AM


"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Kim wrote:


Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap?

Kim W5TIT


From one with TIT in her call.

The only one "fouling" things here is AB8MQ, a social misfit and openly
insane individual.
Pray for him and urge him to seek help.



K4YZ June 25th 05 10:33 AM



an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand


No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.


It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back
yourself and do it lazy bumm


I always get a laugh from people like you who HIDE behind the
American's with Disabilities Act calling others "lazy".

You've not done that yet.


Nope and I am NOT carring your freight.


I doubt you have a car of any signifigance to carry any freight
in, Markie.

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart


How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?


Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek


You keep trying to impose arbitrary religious content here,
Markie. Why?

And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!


becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely


I used to.

Then you started following Lennie's lead with "Stevie" and calling
me a "lier" when the facts are clear that YOU are the one who's wrong.

Stop lying and start calling me "Steve" and I will reciprocate by
calling you "Mark".

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.


I am gald you stoped the false coutesy


What? Huh? Stoped? What's a "false coutesy"...???

You meant "false courtesy"...?!?! If I said it, it wasn't false.

You seem to not do that.


No I don't. What was your first clue?


Anything you write south of "KONSTANS". Pretty much a sure bet
that there's falshoods or other misrepresentations to follow from there
on down...

I'll go one a bit here

Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse?


What in the world is a "morse deserved term"...?!?!

As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your
posts


"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.


and I am thanking you for it


Only you, Morgan!....Only you...

BBBWWWWHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA
! ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ


Kim June 25th 05 02:50 PM

"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Kim wrote:


Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap?

Kim W5TIT


From one with TIT in her call.


Your mind running wild with you, not mine. And, I may have the TIT in my
call, but I'm not the one acting like an ass.

Kim W5TIT



Kim June 25th 05 02:50 PM

"Not Roger Too" SocialMisfit@notRoger wrote in message
...

"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Kim wrote:


Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap?

Kim W5TIT


From one with TIT in her call.

The only one "fouling" things here is AB8MQ, a social misfit and openly
insane individual.
Pray for him and urge him to seek help.



Is that good enough?



Kim June 25th 05 02:51 PM

"K4YZ" wrote in message
ups.com...


an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right

on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top

post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand

No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.


It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back
yourself and do it lazy bumm


I always get a laugh from people like you who HIDE behind the
American's with Disabilities Act calling others "lazy".

You've not done that yet.


Nope and I am NOT carring your freight.


I doubt you have a car of any signifigance to carry any freight
in, Markie.

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the

FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not

hack
my posts apart

How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?


Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek


You keep trying to impose arbitrary religious content here,
Markie. Why?

And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!


becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely


I used to.

Then you started following Lennie's lead with "Stevie" and calling
me a "lier" when the facts are clear that YOU are the one who's wrong.

Stop lying and start calling me "Steve" and I will reciprocate by
calling you "Mark".

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.


I am gald you stoped the false coutesy


What? Huh? Stoped? What's a "false coutesy"...???

You meant "false courtesy"...?!?! If I said it, it wasn't false.

You seem to not do that.


No I don't. What was your first clue?


Anything you write south of "KONSTANS". Pretty much a sure bet
that there's falshoods or other misrepresentations to follow from there
on down...

I'll go one a bit here

Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse?


What in the world is a "morse deserved term"...?!?!

As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from

your
posts

"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.


and I am thanking you for it


Only you, Morgan!....Only you...


BBBWWWWHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ




Cmd Buzz Corey June 26th 05 02:41 AM

Kim wrote:

Your mind running wild with you, not mine. And, I may have the TIT in my
call, but I'm not the one acting like an ass.

Kim W5TIT


I would say getting a call like that makes you pretty much one.

an_old_friend June 26th 05 11:25 PM

K4YZ Jun 25, 5:33 am show options

Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "K4YZ" - Find messages by this author
Date: 25 Jun 2005 02:33:06 -0700
Local: Sat,Jun 25 2005 5:33 am
Subject: The Pool
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse




- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result


Top posting, Markie?



Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?



OTH...(SNIP)



You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".



again you understand



No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.



It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back
yourself and do it lazy bumm




) I always get a laugh from people like you who HIDE behind the
)American's with Disabilities Act calling others "lazy".

Hide Behind?

you are lazy Stevie

Nope and I am NOT carring your freight.




) I doubt you have a car of any signifigance to carry any freight
)in, Markie.

Got it half right Stevie. These days I don't own a car. I my pickup and
an SUV no cars.

As to signifance the depends, but it would take a lot to care your
fright Stevie

Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek




) You keep trying to impose arbitrary religious content here,
)Markie. Why?

Becuase you insit and makeing MY religion an issue. Turn about is
always fair play


Mike Coslo June 27th 05 12:49 AM

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
Kim wrote:

Your mind running wild with you, not mine. And, I may have the TIT in my
call, but I'm not the one acting like an ass.

Kim W5TIT


I would say getting a call like that makes you pretty much one.


Okay, I've been waiting for this one.

Kim takes a lot of crap in here for her callsign.

At Dayton this past year, I noticed a group of hams from Texas, who
referred to themselves as the K5TIT group. They are some kind of APRS
group IIRC. They have a logo which is a rather obvious breast shaped
hilltop.

The self-righteous need to complain to the FCC about this group.

I'm not planning on it, finding it much ado about nothing, but time to
put the money where the mouth is guys. ;^)

- Mike

Bill Sohl June 27th 05 02:43 PM


"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...
Bill where do come up with that date
(july 1 06) in case google edits all down

Just curious


Just a SWAG based on several things:
1. Prospect (unknown) of an NPRM from the FCC before the end of
this year (2005) which then...
2. requires a set of comment phases...followed ultimately by
3. an actual rules change with an effective date usually several
months from the published date.

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK



an_old_friend June 27th 05 05:07 PM

Thanks for the answer was having hopeing maybe you knew something as
oppsoed to guessing

Bill Sohl wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
ups.com...
Bill where do come up with that date
(july 1 06) in case google edits all down

Just curious


Just a SWAG based on several things:
1. Prospect (unknown) of an NPRM from the FCC before the end of
this year (2005) which then...
2. requires a set of comment phases...followed ultimately by
3. an actual rules change with an effective date usually several
months from the published date.

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com