Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#181
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: [snip] Also there is a difference in what defines a desireable location. A higher percentage of the men will look at a facility in a rural location and say "now I can go fishing more often." I'd like to be there when some lady engineer/ham lusts for a nice quiet antenna location out in the boonies and is married to some city boy . . Well I'm a lady engineer/ham who lusts for a nice, quiet antenna farm in the country and am married to a city boy. However, he's also a ham and happens to like the quietness of the rural areas. But the work is in the cities. Oh there's some engineering jobs in rural areas and I used to take those. But then when the company cuts back, you are automatically slated to move when you find a new position as it sure isn't going to be in that rural area where you worked at the only firm using engineers. Moving every 5 years or so got old fast. There's probably a whole raft of reasons having nothing to do with discrimination that contribute to the disparity. Indeed: The code has been cracked. w3rv That is my opinion too. There's another factor that crops up. Women do not like to just arbitrarily change jobs in search of higher pay or a promotion. They prefer stability. So they seek out and stay with those firms that seem to fit that bill. There's been some sort of study that I read somewhere on that. The end result is that they rise up the wage scale and promotion scale more slowly. The men who get ahead rapidly are usually those who make judicious job changes every 5 years or so in the early years of their careers. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#182
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Mike Coslo on Jun 19, 11:13 am
wrote: Bingo! We cannot control Len's behavior here. Isn't that so...so..."horrid" (as Dee once put it)? :-) We can however, control our own. NOT ACCORDING TO JIMMIE. He say before he cannot control K4YZ! Jimmie be judge of ALL! I don't know about your mail reader, but mine has a couple levels of filtering. I can filter by name, or the easy way is to simply hit "k" at the subject line. I never see that subject again. K That being said, I have mixed feelings on the filtering. I use it to get rid of the lunatic fringe topics, but little else. NCTA be "lunatic fringe?" K Working station ON the moon is partly "lunatic" thing... Coslo reach "edge of space" yet? I don't filter people like Len though, as I look forward to his postings. They are entertaining. "There's no business like show business, like no business I know..." [Los Angeles be entertainment capital of the world, big business] So if the people who find his postings offensive quit getting into p*****g contests with him by filtering him out or just ignoring him, I'll have lost that bit of fun. The self-righteous shall always be with us, God bless their pointy lil heads. Above all, let's all do our best to ENTERTAIN MIKEY! All in here must honor the PCTA Extras. They are the Elite amateurs. Hail! Ave Imperator! |
#183
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Mike Coslo on Jun 19, 11:02 am
Leo wrote: On 19 Jun 2005 04:48:01 -0700, wrote: It's not my job to point that out to each and every participant on this group Jim - is it yours? Why? You are correct there Leo. Jim is perfectly capable of not responding to anything Len posts. We all are. You can't resist! :-) And of course, Len knows quite well that all he has to do is put in a reference to the Nazi's, and it will get a response. Sets the hook quite regularly, he does! Irresistible bait apparently. I'm beginning to draft a business plan on that, might go COMMERCIAL! Stalemate. Looks like everyone is getting exactly what they want. My wife and I took delivery of a new car Friday. WE GOT EXACTLY WHAT WE WANTED. Got a 10 percent discount beyond the trade-in value. Paid cash, too. :-) See? It's absurdly simply to toss in just a line, no bait, and I gonna get all kinds of bites. Most will be undersized but I just toss 'em back in... :-) |
#184
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Leo on Jun 19, 11:26 am
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:02:42 -0400, Mike Coslo wrote: Leo wrote: On 19 Jun 2005 04:48:01 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 17:30:57 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 10:41:47 -0700, wrote: From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07 You are correct there Leo. Jim is perfectly capable of not responding to anything Len posts. We all are. I'm not sure that I'd agree, Mike. Jim seems to feel compelled to respond to anything and everything regarding Len. From early morning to late at night, 7 days a week, he wages his futile war on the newsgroup. Doesn't look like a choice - more like an obcession. The same way with that warm, wonderful Extra, K4YZ... :-) And of course, Len knows quite well that all he has to do is put in a reference to the Nazi's, and it will get a response. Sets the hook quite regularly, he does! Irresistible bait apparently. Right you are, Mike. One of the most important things I learned from being a parent - if you let the kids know where the buttons are, they can't push 'em! Real hams don't have buttons...just code keys and rotary knobs and switches, lots and lots of them... :-) Jimmie and Stebie and Davie all try to manufacture as many "buttons" as they can. Tsk, tsk, they find that those "buttons" don't connect to any of my circuits, don't do anything. :-) But, they hang in there, wearing out their pudgy lil fingers, pushing, pushing, pushing. Parallel-connected triodes in "push-push" connection, running unneutralized and breaking into oscillation at the least disturbance! Tsk, tsk. Stalemate. Looks like everyone is getting exactly what they want. Or as Mick Jagger says - you can't always get what you want - you get what you need! A Rolling Stone gathers no Carrie Moss. [Megalips Mick was too busy with others...] 73, Leo Most sincere good wishes on this Father's Day (in here it looks more like 'boxing day' but without any Brit connotations), |
#186
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Jun 2005 12:29:05 -0700, wrote:
From: Leo on Jun 19, 11:26 am On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 11:02:42 -0400, Mike Coslo wrote: Leo wrote: On 19 Jun 2005 04:48:01 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 17:30:57 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 10:41:47 -0700, wrote: From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07 You are correct there Leo. Jim is perfectly capable of not responding to anything Len posts. We all are. I'm not sure that I'd agree, Mike. Jim seems to feel compelled to respond to anything and everything regarding Len. From early morning to late at night, 7 days a week, he wages his futile war on the newsgroup. Doesn't look like a choice - more like an obcession. The same way with that warm, wonderful Extra, K4YZ... :-) And of course, Len knows quite well that all he has to do is put in a reference to the Nazi's, and it will get a response. Sets the hook quite regularly, he does! Irresistible bait apparently. Right you are, Mike. One of the most important things I learned from being a parent - if you let the kids know where the buttons are, they can't push 'em! Real hams don't have buttons...just code keys and rotary knobs and switches, lots and lots of them... :-) Jimmie and Stebie and Davie all try to manufacture as many "buttons" as they can. Tsk, tsk, they find that those "buttons" don't connect to any of my circuits, don't do anything. :-) But, they hang in there, wearing out their pudgy lil fingers, pushing, pushing, pushing. Parallel-connected triodes in "push-push" connection, running unneutralized and breaking into oscillation at the least disturbance! Tsk, tsk. Stalemate. Looks like everyone is getting exactly what they want. Or as Mick Jagger says - you can't always get what you want - you get what you need! A Rolling Stone gathers no Carrie Moss. [Megalips Mick was too busy with others...] 73, Leo Most sincere good wishes on this Father's Day (in here it looks more like 'boxing day' but without any Brit connotations), Thanks much, Len - you too! And don't forget, every day is Boxing Day in here...... 73, Leo |
#188
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Leo wrote: On 19 Jun 2005 09:50:58 -0700, wrote: You can state almost anything here, but as long as you remain an "anony-mousie", there's room for doubt. LOL! Anony-mousie? That's a Len term. Jim has begun the free-fall from grace. |
#190
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
Navy launches second Kerry medal probe | Shortwave | |||
U.S. Navy IG Says Kerry's Medals Proper | Shortwave | |||
Navy Radiomen | General | |||
Base Closures | Shortwave |