Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#131
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: hack EVERYONE PAY ATTENTION. The newsgroup moderator has spoken. look like Stvie is indeed claiming the title and.. Carry on, Lennie... giving lenn the floor Steve, K4YZ |
#132
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an_old_pervert:
My gawd yes man, we are fascinated by female genitalia and boobs. As a very young man, 10-12 years of age, they became a lifetime pursuit of mine! I have been studying them and doing "experiments" ever since, I am no where nearing the end of such endeavors! I suspect they effect me in exactly the way men's genitalia and buttz set you off... John "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ wrote: John Smith wrote: Cmdr Buzz: Hey, did you really think--I think, she really has 5 size W boobs? disappointed-look-on-face Six, but one got away and is living in UP Michigan these days... and you call any of that english It does go on to show your obsession with gentials prehaps the porblem is that you realy need to get laid Steve, K4YZ |
#133
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John Smith wrote: an_old_pervert: My gawd yes man, we are fascinated by female genitalia and boobs. As a very young man, 10-12 years of age, they became a lifetime pursuit of mine! I have been studying them and doing "experiments" ever since, I am no where nearing the end of such endeavors! I suspect they effect me in exactly the way men's genitalia and buttz set you off... indeed although you over look 2 things One female gential are also exceitng to me two this just isn't the newsgroup for it there is a whole seris alt.sex. anything you can imgaine and few things you you see and still can't Stevie you for that matter need ot learn a place ofr everything and evrything in its place This gential obsession of stevie came out when he, in looking for ways to attack me went out on USEnet looking for **** to use, first to tried to black mail me into silence by threatening to expose my interests (not ashamed of them just know this isn't the place) on RRAP John "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ wrote: John Smith wrote: Cmdr Buzz: Hey, did you really think--I think, she really has 5 size W boobs? disappointed-look-on-face Six, but one got away and is living in UP Michigan these days... and you call any of that english It does go on to show your obsession with gentials prehaps the porblem is that you realy need to get laid Steve, K4YZ |
#134
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You idgit. From the study done years ago, it was revealed we men
think about sex every 3 to 5 minutes, I am sure the women realize that by now--our male secret is out. And, since that is indeed true, sex permeates all our waking hours (sometimes I even dream about it), quite often while carrying on a QSO with an aussie gal--I think about it. I have thought about it when building antennas. Working on radios. Stringing coax. Reading ARRL literature (ever notice those guys never have a pin-up girl on their website? ARRL gone gay?) Get real... hey, you aren't sexophobic are ya? Anyway, don't give me the bisexual line, you are either gay or straight in my book--there is NOT a half-way point buddy! And, gays are perverts! John "an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... John Smith wrote: an_old_pervert: My gawd yes man, we are fascinated by female genitalia and boobs. As a very young man, 10-12 years of age, they became a lifetime pursuit of mine! I have been studying them and doing "experiments" ever since, I am no where nearing the end of such endeavors! I suspect they effect me in exactly the way men's genitalia and buttz set you off... indeed although you over look 2 things One female gential are also exceitng to me two this just isn't the newsgroup for it there is a whole seris alt.sex. anything you can imgaine and few things you you see and still can't Stevie you for that matter need ot learn a place ofr everything and evrything in its place This gential obsession of stevie came out when he, in looking for ways to attack me went out on USEnet looking for **** to use, first to tried to black mail me into silence by threatening to expose my interests (not ashamed of them just know this isn't the place) on RRAP John "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ wrote: John Smith wrote: Cmdr Buzz: Hey, did you really think--I think, she really has 5 size W boobs? disappointed-look-on-face Six, but one got away and is living in UP Michigan these days... and you call any of that english It does go on to show your obsession with gentials prehaps the porblem is that you realy need to get laid Steve, K4YZ |
#135
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 Jul 2005 06:25:00 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: From: Mike Coslo on Jul 22, 4:01 pm wrote: From: Michael Coslo on Fri 22 Jul 2005 13:37 snip Your "answer" doesn't answer the question, Lennie. Poor attempt at a redirect. Try to stay focussed. "Focused", Lennie. Webster's refers. Or are you just "mad" again...?!?! The Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary does indeed refer - both spellings are correct: Main Entry: focus Function: verb Inflected Form(s): fo·cused also fo·cussed http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...ry&va=focussed snip Steve, K4YZ 73, Leo |
#136
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:11:21 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Dee: This is going to sound like a joke (and heaven knows I NEVER JOKE!--but it isn't...), I once heard the little windshield wiper pumps, the ones which spray on the window cleaner were the by-product of nasa technology adopted by the auto industry; you wouldn't know about that, would you? Funny, but that question has stuck in my mind for years. I had made a mental note to ask, if ever given the chance... sometimes doesn't take much to entertain me... frown I actually doubt it... I mean, the cleaner would freeze in the tank in space, immediately freeze and/or crystallize to ice when discharged, etc... or, perhaps they meant the pumps used by nasa were actually for another purpose and just adapted to windshields here on terafirma... John Don't know about the pumps unfortunately. However it is amazing some of the things that came out of the space program. The original ball point pen was one. Not true. The ball-point pen was invented in 1935 - a long time before space travel became a reality. NASA did spawn the invention of a pressurized ball-point pen that would write in zero-gravity conditions (where the regular pen was quite useless) - I assume that you were referring to this more modern adaptation of a much older design. http://www.ideafinder.com/history/in...s/story055.htm snip Dee D. Flint, N8UZE 73, Leo |
#137
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leo:
I found Dee's description close enough, I got my first "Parker" (the civilian adaptation of the nasa pen) in about 1969-70, so was familiar with it from that time on.... Yanno, the Russians just used a pencil, lighter, cheaper and I'll just venture to guess--their development costs much less... John "Leo" wrote in message ... On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:11:21 -0400, "Dee Flint" wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Dee: This is going to sound like a joke (and heaven knows I NEVER JOKE!--but it isn't...), I once heard the little windshield wiper pumps, the ones which spray on the window cleaner were the by-product of nasa technology adopted by the auto industry; you wouldn't know about that, would you? Funny, but that question has stuck in my mind for years. I had made a mental note to ask, if ever given the chance... sometimes doesn't take much to entertain me... frown I actually doubt it... I mean, the cleaner would freeze in the tank in space, immediately freeze and/or crystallize to ice when discharged, etc... or, perhaps they meant the pumps used by nasa were actually for another purpose and just adapted to windshields here on terafirma... John Don't know about the pumps unfortunately. However it is amazing some of the things that came out of the space program. The original ball point pen was one. Not true. The ball-point pen was invented in 1935 - a long time before space travel became a reality. NASA did spawn the invention of a pressurized ball-point pen that would write in zero-gravity conditions (where the regular pen was quite useless) - I assume that you were referring to this more modern adaptation of a much older design. http://www.ideafinder.com/history/in...s/story055.htm snip Dee D. Flint, N8UZE 73, Leo |
#138
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Leo on Jul 23, 11:23 am
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:11:21 -0400, "Dee Flint" wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message Funny, but that question has stuck in my mind for years. I had made a mental note to ask, if ever given the chance... sometimes doesn't take much to entertain me... frown I actually doubt it... I mean, the cleaner would freeze in the tank in space, immediately freeze and/or crystallize to ice when discharged, etc... or, perhaps they meant the pumps used by nasa were actually for another purpose and just adapted to windshields here on terafirma... Don't know about the pumps unfortunately. However it is amazing some of the things that came out of the space program. The original ball point pen was one. Not true. The ball-point pen was invented in 1935 - a long time before space travel became a reality. NASA did spawn the invention of a pressurized ball-point pen that would write in zero-gravity conditions (where the regular pen was quite useless) - I assume that you were referring to this more modern adaptation of a much older design. From a quick trip to the living room bookshelves - "...the fountain pen was invented in 1884. Then in the 1930s Ladislau Biro, a Hungarian artist and journalist, invented the ball-point pen in Budapest. He fled when the Second World War broke out, eventually reaching Argentina." " With the help of his brother Georg, a chemist, he perfected the pen and manufactured it in Buenos Aires during the war. In 1944 he sold his interests in the invention to one of his backers, who produced the Biro pen for the Allied air forces because it was not affected by changes in air pressure." From Reader's Digest "How In The World?" 1990, published in Pleasantville, NY, and Montreal, Canada, page 14. In fiction, novelist Len Deighton's excellent 5th book in his 'WWOCP' espionage series, "Horse Under Water," 1963, is the discovery of a ball-point pen in the submerged wreckage of a German submarine, said submarine supposedly sunk prior to 1944 (it wasn't and was used in post-WW2 times to smuggle contraband and heroin - the "horse" of the title). A ball-point pen requires SOME air pressure INSIDE the ink reservoir in order for it to feed ink. Without that, there would be a partial pressure loss inside the ink tube that would inhibit ink flow. Yes, it works by capilliary action at the TIP, but that requires feeding from the ink reservoir INSIDE the pen. The ink is oil-based, of more viscosity than the ink in fountain pens (which are entirely operating on gravity and capilliary action). While a ball-point pen can operate at high altitudes much better than a fountain pen, both are inhibited in writing action in microgravity. The "Biro Pen" use by the RAF in 1944 may lead, erroneously, to its alleged ability to be used in microgravity. Similarly, the Phase-Locked Loop or PLL was invented in France in 1932! The basic PLL principle was not adaptable to any consumer electronics frequency control applications until the 1960s and the availability of digital circuit packages. That principle led to the Fractional-N frequency synthesis and, quickly, to the Direct Digital Synthesis (DDS) now found in single chip products of Advanced Micro Devices. An offshoot of the original PLL was the "locked oscillator" operating at a multiple of a reference frequency. The locked oscillator principle was used in early TV receivers for sweep circuits but its fussiness in operation confined it to limited commercial applications. While the ubiquitous ball-point pen is used for making notes in ham "logs," the precise frequencies noted down are kept accurate by the PLL or DDS in modern amateur transceivers. NASA has a rather large PR department, adjacent to a large "technology licensing" department, all of which is intended to help support NASA operations' budgets. Their PR is on a higher level than the ARRL's PR, but both tend to generate a considerable number of MYTHS in their respective areas. :-) For an example of cross-pollination of myths, the "space amateur radio" carried on by space station and (previous) shuttle astronauts is done almost entirely by no-code-test Technician class licensed astronauts. It is part of their overall task assignment (every astronaut must adhere to NASA PR rules) and relatively minor in relation to all that they must do. Contrary to the fantasy of some, astronauts did not become hams first, THEN astronauts. :-) [we now return you to James Burke's "Connections" show already in progress...] bit bit |
#139
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len:
Yes. But do they use pencils like the russians, or pens like our girly-men astronauts. That is the important question now, isn't it? grin John wrote in message oups.com... From: Leo on Jul 23, 11:23 am On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:11:21 -0400, "Dee Flint" wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message Funny, but that question has stuck in my mind for years. I had made a mental note to ask, if ever given the chance... sometimes doesn't take much to entertain me... frown I actually doubt it... I mean, the cleaner would freeze in the tank in space, immediately freeze and/or crystallize to ice when discharged, etc... or, perhaps they meant the pumps used by nasa were actually for another purpose and just adapted to windshields here on terafirma... Don't know about the pumps unfortunately. However it is amazing some of the things that came out of the space program. The original ball point pen was one. Not true. The ball-point pen was invented in 1935 - a long time before space travel became a reality. NASA did spawn the invention of a pressurized ball-point pen that would write in zero-gravity conditions (where the regular pen was quite useless) - I assume that you were referring to this more modern adaptation of a much older design. From a quick trip to the living room bookshelves - "...the fountain pen was invented in 1884. Then in the 1930s Ladislau Biro, a Hungarian artist and journalist, invented the ball-point pen in Budapest. He fled when the Second World War broke out, eventually reaching Argentina." " With the help of his brother Georg, a chemist, he perfected the pen and manufactured it in Buenos Aires during the war. In 1944 he sold his interests in the invention to one of his backers, who produced the Biro pen for the Allied air forces because it was not affected by changes in air pressure." From Reader's Digest "How In The World?" 1990, published in Pleasantville, NY, and Montreal, Canada, page 14. In fiction, novelist Len Deighton's excellent 5th book in his 'WWOCP' espionage series, "Horse Under Water," 1963, is the discovery of a ball-point pen in the submerged wreckage of a German submarine, said submarine supposedly sunk prior to 1944 (it wasn't and was used in post-WW2 times to smuggle contraband and heroin - the "horse" of the title). A ball-point pen requires SOME air pressure INSIDE the ink reservoir in order for it to feed ink. Without that, there would be a partial pressure loss inside the ink tube that would inhibit ink flow. Yes, it works by capilliary action at the TIP, but that requires feeding from the ink reservoir INSIDE the pen. The ink is oil-based, of more viscosity than the ink in fountain pens (which are entirely operating on gravity and capilliary action). While a ball-point pen can operate at high altitudes much better than a fountain pen, both are inhibited in writing action in microgravity. The "Biro Pen" use by the RAF in 1944 may lead, erroneously, to its alleged ability to be used in microgravity. Similarly, the Phase-Locked Loop or PLL was invented in France in 1932! The basic PLL principle was not adaptable to any consumer electronics frequency control applications until the 1960s and the availability of digital circuit packages. That principle led to the Fractional-N frequency synthesis and, quickly, to the Direct Digital Synthesis (DDS) now found in single chip products of Advanced Micro Devices. An offshoot of the original PLL was the "locked oscillator" operating at a multiple of a reference frequency. The locked oscillator principle was used in early TV receivers for sweep circuits but its fussiness in operation confined it to limited commercial applications. While the ubiquitous ball-point pen is used for making notes in ham "logs," the precise frequencies noted down are kept accurate by the PLL or DDS in modern amateur transceivers. NASA has a rather large PR department, adjacent to a large "technology licensing" department, all of which is intended to help support NASA operations' budgets. Their PR is on a higher level than the ARRL's PR, but both tend to generate a considerable number of MYTHS in their respective areas. :-) For an example of cross-pollination of myths, the "space amateur radio" carried on by space station and (previous) shuttle astronauts is done almost entirely by no-code-test Technician class licensed astronauts. It is part of their overall task assignment (every astronaut must adhere to NASA PR rules) and relatively minor in relation to all that they must do. Contrary to the fantasy of some, astronauts did not become hams first, THEN astronauts. :-) [we now return you to James Burke's "Connections" show already in progress...] bit bit |
#140
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|